nach oben

Journal of Computing in Higher Education

Erschienen in:

01.04.2019

To flip or not to flip: social science faculty members’ concerns about flipping the classroom

verfasst von: Morris Siu-Yung Jong

Erschienen in: Journal of Computing in Higher Education | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Flipped Classroom (FC) is a blended learning approach being promoted in higher education in recent years. It flips the conventional pedagogic arrangement so that students use the out-of-class time to conduct lower-order learning and the in-class time to conduct higher-order learning. Nevertheless, unlike the adoption phenomena in other academic disciplines such as Science, Engineering, Medicine and Education in university teaching, the adoption of FC in Social Science has been rare. This paper reports on a quantitative study (n = 152) in which the Stages of Concern model was employed to probe into the concerns of Social Science faculty members (SSFMs) about introducing FC into their teaching practice. The study reveals that the participants were having strong categorical concerns of “Information” and “Management.” The findings shed light on designing more precise interventions for addressing SSFMs’ actual needs when flipping their classrooms, providing a useful reference for researchers and practitioners who are pursuing work on promoting FC in higher education.

Vorheriger Artikel The use of an extended flipped classroom model in improving students’ learning in an undergraduate course

Nächster Artikel Learning engagement via promoting situational interest in a blended learning environment

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Alammary, A., Sheard, J., & Carbone, A. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Three different design approaches. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4), 440–454.CrossRef

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., et al. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Essex: Pearson.

Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It’s not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers and Education, 78, 227–236.CrossRef

Barkley, E. (2010). Student engagement techniques: A handbook for college faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2009). Remixing chemistry class: Two Colorado teachers make vodcasts of their lectures to free up class time for hands-on activities. Learning and Leading with Technology, 36(4), 22–27.

Bernard, J. S. (2015). The flipped classroom: Fertile ground for nursing education research. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 12(1), 99–109.

Biggs, J., & Moore, P. (1993). Process of learning (3rd ed.). London: Prentice Hall.

Borgerding, L. A., Sadler, T. D., & Koroly, M. J. (2013). Teachers’ concerns about biotechnology education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(2), 133–147.CrossRef

Çakıroğlu, Ü., & Öztürk, M. (2017). Flipped classroom with problem based activities: Exploring self-regulated learning in a programming language course. Educational Technology and Society, 20(1), 337–349.

Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Kinshuk, & Chen, N. S. (2014). Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead? Computers and Education, 79, 16–27.CrossRef

Cheung, D. (2005). Science teachers’ concerns about school-based curriculum development. Hong Kong Science Teachers’ Journal, 22(2), 1–7.

Cheung, D., & Yip, D. Y. (2004). How science teachers’ concerns about school-based assessment of practical work vary with time: The Hong Kong experience. Research in Science and Technological Education, 22(2), 153–169.CrossRef

Chuang, H. H., Weng, C. Y., & Chen, C. H. (2018). Which students benefit most from a flipped classroom approach to language learning? British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 56–68.CrossRef

Creswell, J. W. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

De Freitas, S., & Oliver, M. (2005). Does e-learning policy drive change in higher education? A case study relating models of organisational change to e-learning implementation. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(1), 81–96.CrossRef

Dong, A. M. (2016). A literature review on flipped classroom from 2010 to 2015. In Paper presented at the 24th Chinese America educational research and development association annual conference, Washington, DC.

Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first-and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61.CrossRef

Flipped Learning Network. (2013). What is flipped learning? Retrieved September 1, 2018, from http://flippedlearning.org/cms/lib07/VA01923112/Centricity/Domain/46/FLIP_handout_FNL_Web.pdf.

Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & Adam, E. (2016). The taking action guide to building coherence in schools, districts, and systems. New York: SAGE.

Fuller, F. F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 207–226.CrossRef

Gee, J. P. (2013). Creating smarter students through digital learning. New York: Palgrave.

Gough, E., DeJong, D., Grundmeyer, T., & Baron, M. (2017). K-12 teacher perceptions regarding the flipped classroom model for teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 45(3), 390–423.CrossRef

Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (1987). Change in schools: Facilitating the process. New York: NY State University of New York Press.

Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2001). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes. New Jersey: Pearson.

Hau, K. T. (2015). Flipped classroom. Hong Kong Institute of Educational Research Newsletters, 36, 1–2.

Hockings, C., Cooke, S., Yamashita, H., McGinty, S., & Bowl, M. (2008). Switched off? A study of disengagement among computing students at two universities. Research Papers in Education, 23(2), 191–201.CrossRef

Hung, H. (2014). Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 81–96.CrossRef

Hwang, G. J. (Ed.). (2016). Flipped classroom: Theories, strategies and applications. Taipei: Higher Education Press.

Hwang, G. J., Lai, C. L., & Wang, S. Y. (2015). Seamless flipped learning: A mobile technology-enhanced flipped classroom with effective learning strategies. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(4), 449–473.CrossRef

Jansen, B. A. (2011). Inquiry unpacked: An introduction to inquiry-based learning. Library Media Connection, 29(5), 10–12.

Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2015). NMC horizon report: 2015 higher (education ed.). Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.

Jong, M. S. Y. (2014). Elementary students’ view of collaborative knowledge building in LearningVillages. Interaction Design and Architecture(s), 21, 37–56.

Jong, M. S. Y. (2016). Teachers’ concerns about adopting constructivist online game-based learning in formal curriculum teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(4), 601–617.CrossRef

Jong, M. S. Y. (2017). Empowering students in the process of social inquiry learning through flipping the classroom. Educational Technology and Society, 20(1), 306–322.

Jong, M. S. Y. (2018). A pilot study on social science faculty members’ adoption of flipped learning. Paper presented at the IEEE Education Society Technical Committee on Learning Sciences Annual Meeting 2018, Hong Kong, China.

Jong, M. S. Y., Chan, T., Hue, M. T., & Tam, V. (2018). Gamifying and mobilising social enquiry-based learning in authentic outdoor environments. Educational Technology & Society, 21(4), 277–292.

Jong, M. S. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2016). Understanding the concerns of teachers about leveraging mobile technology to facilitate outdoor social inquiry learning: The EduVenture experience. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(2), 328–344.CrossRef

Kurt, G. (2017). Implementing the flipped classroom in teacher education: Evidence from Turkey. Educational Technology and Society, 20(1), 211–221.

Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30–43.CrossRef

Lin, J. L., Liang, J. C., Su, Y. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Exploring the relationships between self-efficacy and preference for teacher authority among computer science majors. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 49(2), 189–207.CrossRef

Lo, C. K., Lie, C. W., & Hew, K. F. (2018). Applying “First Principles of Instruction” as a design theory of the flipped classroom: Findings from a collective study of four secondary school subjects. Computers and Education, 118, 150–165.CrossRef

Marcu, A. D. (2013). Relationship of self-efficacy to stages of concern in the adoption of innovation in higher education. Retrieved from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Accession No. 13625).

Martin, S., Farnan, J., & Arora, V. (2013). FUTURE: New strategies for hospitalists to overcome challenges in teaching and today’s wards. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 8(7), 409–413.CrossRef

Mason, G., Shuman, T., & Cook, K. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56(4), 430–435.CrossRef

Matar, N. (2015). Evaluating e-learning system use by “CBAM—stages of concern” methodology in Jordanian Universities. World of Computer Science and Information Technology Journal, 5(5), 78–81.

Maxwell, J. A. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95.CrossRef

Prensky, M. (2016). Education to better their world: Unleashing the power of 21st-century kids. New York: Teachers College Press.

Prober, C., & Khan, S. (2013). Medical education reimagined: A call to action. Academic Medicine, 88, 1407–1410.CrossRef

Randall, J. H. (2016). Stages of faculty concern about teaching online: Relationships between faculty teaching methods and technology use in teaching. Retrieved from ERIC. (ERIC No. ED571076).

Sahin, A., Cavlazoglu, B., & Zeytuncu, Y. E. (2015). Flipping a college calculus course: A case study. Educational Technology and Society, 18(3), 142–152.

Seery, M. K. (2015). Flipped learning in higher education chemistry: Emerging trends and potential directions. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 16(4), 758–768.

Small, R. V., Arone, M. P., Stripling, B., & Berger, P. (2012). Teaching for inquiry: Engaging the learner within. New York: Neal-Schuman Publishers.

Song, Y., & Kapur, M. (2017). How to flip the classroom—“Productive failure” or “traditional flipped classroom” pedagogical design? Educational Technology and Society, 20(1), 292–305.

Sun, J. C. Y., Wu, Y. T., & Lee, W. I. (2017). The effect of the flipped classroom approach to OpenCourseWare instruction on students’ self-regulation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(3), 713–729.CrossRef

Wallace, V. L., & Husid, W. N. (2011). Collaborating for inquiry-based learning (2nd ed.). Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.

Yeung, K., & O’Malley, P. (2014). Making “The Flip” work: Barriers to and implementation strategies for introducing flipped teaching methods into traditional higher education courses. New Directions for Institutional Research, 10(1), 59–63.CrossRef

Ziegenfuss, D. H. (2016). Closing the loop: Building synergy for learning through a professional development MOOC about flipped teaching. Current Issues in Emerging eLearning, 3(1), 103–124.

Titel: To flip or not to flip: social science faculty members’ concerns about flipping the classroom
verfasst von: Morris Siu-Yung Jong
Publikationsdatum: 01.04.2019
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Computing in Higher Education / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 1042-1726
Elektronische ISSN: 1867-1233
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09217-y

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

Learning engagement via promoting situational interest in a blended learning environment

Student-to-student connectedness in higher education: a systematic literature review

Applying ‘Sketch Engine for Language Learning’ in the Japanese English classroom

Blended learning in practice: guest editorial

The use of an extended flipped classroom model in improving students’ learning in an undergraduate course

Evaluation of mobile learning for the clinical practicum in nursing education: application of the FRAME model

Premium Partner