Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards MyNewsletter Firmensuche
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
Sustainability in Automotive

Gesamtlebenszyklus wird immer wichtiger

In der Digitalkonferenz am 5. Dezember 2024 geht es um die wachsende Bedeutung der Kreislaufwirtschaft in der Automobilindustrie und wie nachhaltige Werkstoffe sowie wiederverwendbare Komponenten dazu beitragen können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces
Erschienen in:

06.03.2021 | Original Paper

Training public speaking with virtual social interactions: effectiveness of real-time feedback and delayed feedback

verfasst von: Mathieu Chollet, Stacy Marsella, Stefan Scherer

Erschienen in: Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces | Ausgabe 1/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Social signal processing and virtual social interaction technologies have allowed the creation of social skills training applications, and initial studies have shown that such solutions can lead to positive training outcomes and could complement traditional teaching methods by providing cheap, accessible, safe tools for training social skills. However, these studies evaluated social skills training systems as a whole and it is unclear to what extent which components contributed to positive outcomes. In this paper, we describe an experimental study where we compared the relative efficacy of real-time interactive feedback and after-action feedback in the context of a public speaking training application. We observed that both components provide benefits to the overall training: the real-time interactive feedback made the experience more immersive and improved participants’ motivation in using the system, while the after-action feedback led to positive training outcomes when it contained personalized feedback elements. Taken in combination, these results confirm that both social signal processing technologies and virtual social interactions are both contributing to social skills training systems’ efficiency. Additionally, we observed that several individual factors, here the subjects’ initial level of public speaking anxiety, personality and tendency to immersion significantly influenced the training experience. This finding suggests that social skills training systems could benefit from being tailored to participants’ particular individual circumstances.
Vorheriger Artikel Predicting multimodal presentation skills based on instance weighting domain adaptation
Nächster Artikel RFID-based tangible and touch tabletop for dual reality in crisis management context

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
Literatur
1.
Ali MR, Crasta D, Jin L, Baretto A, Pachter J, Rogge RD, Hoque ME (2015) LISSA—live interactive social skill assistance. In: 2015 international conference on affective computing and intelligent interaction (ACII). IEEE, pp 173–179
2.
Anderson K, André E, Baur T, Bernardini S, Chollet M, Chryssafidou E, Damian I, Ennis C, Egges A, Gebhard P, et al (2013) The tardis framework: intelligent virtual agents for social coaching in job interviews. In: International conference on advances in computer entertainment technology. Springer, pp 476–491
3.
Baltrusaitis T, Zadeh A, Lim YC, Morency LP (2018) Openface 2.0: facial behavior analysis toolkit. In: 2018 13th IEEE international conference on automatic face & gesture recognition (FG 2018), pp 59–66. IEEE
4.
Bandura A (1997) Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Macmillan
5.
Barmaki R, Hughes CE (2018) Embodiment analytics of practicing teachers in a virtual immersive environment. J Comput Assist Learn
6.
Batrinca L, Stratou G, Shapiro A, Morency LP, Scherer S (2013) Cicero—towards a multimodal virtual audience platform for public speaking training. In: Intelligent virtual agents, pp 116–128
7.
8.
Blascovich J, Mendes W (2000) Challenge and threat appraisals: the role of affective cues. In: Forgas J (ed) Feeling and thinking: the role of affect in social cognition, pp 59–82
9.
Bower M, Cavanagh M, Moloney R, Dao M (2011) Developing communication competence using an online video reflection system: pre-service teachers’ experiences. Asia-Pac J Teach Educ 39(4):311–326CrossRef
10.
Brown T, Morrissey L (2004) The effectiveness of verbal self-guidance as a transfer of training intervention: its impact on presentation performance, self efficacy and anxiety. Innov Educ Teach Int 41(3):255–271CrossRef
11.
Casler K, Bickel L, Hackett E (2013) Separate but equal? a comparison of participants and data gathered via amazons mturk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Comput Hum Behav 29(6):2156–2160CrossRef
12.
Chan V (2011) Teaching oral communication in undergraduate science: are we doing enough and doing it right? J Learn Des 4(3):71–79
13.
Chollet M, Chandrashekhar N, Shapiro A, Morency LP, Scherer S (2016) Manipulating the perception of virtual audiences using crowdsourced behaviors. In: International conference on intelligent virtual agents. Springer, pp 164–174
14.
Chollet M, Prendinger H, Scherer S (2016) Native vs. non-native language fluency implications on multimodal interaction for interpersonal skills training. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM international conference on multimodal interaction. ACM, pp 386–393
15.
Chollet M, Scherer S (2017) Assessing public speaking ability from thin slices of behavior. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on face and gesture recognition (to appear)
16.
Chollet M, Scherer S (2017) Perception of virtual audiences. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 37(4):50–59CrossRef
17.
Chollet M, Wörtwein T, Morency LP, Shapiro A, Scherer S (2015) Exploring feedback strategies to improve public speaking: an interactive virtual audience framework. In: Proceedings of UbiComp 2015. ACM, Osaka, Japan
18.
Cicchetti DV (1994) Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess 6(4):284CrossRef
19.
Damian I, Baur T, Lugrin B, Gebhard P, Mehlmann G, André E (2015) Games are better than books: in-situ comparison of an interactive job interview game with conventional training. In: International conference on artificial intelligence in education. Springer, pp 84–94
20.
Damian I, Tan CSS, Baur T, Schöning J, Luyten K, André E (2015) Augmenting social interactions: realtime behavioural feedback using social signal processing techniques. In: Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI ’15. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 565–574. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1145/​2702123.​2702314
21.
De Grez L, Valcke M, Roozen I (2009) The impact of goal orientation, self-reflection and personal characteristics on the acquisition of oral presentation skills. Eur J Psychol Educ 24(3):293CrossRef
22.
Feher A, Vernon PA (2020) Looking beyond the big five: a selective review of alternatives to the big five model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences p 110002
23.
Flanagan JR, Johansson RS (2003) Action plans used in action observation. Nature 424(6950):769–771CrossRef
24.
Fung M, Jin Y, Zhao R, Hoque ME (2015) Roc speak: semi-automated personalized feedback on nonverbal behavior from recorded videos. In: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing. ACM, pp 1167–1178
25.
Furmark T, Tillfors M, Everz PO, Marteinsdottir I, Gefvert O, Fredrikson M (1999) Social phobia in the general population: prevalence and sociodemographic profile. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 34(8):416–424CrossRef
26.
van Ginkel S, Gulikers J, Biemans H, Mulder M (2015) Towards a set of design principles for developing oral presentation competence: a synthesis of research in higher education. Educ Res Rev 14:62–80CrossRef
27.
van Ginkel S, Gulikers J, Biemans H, Noroozi O, Roozen M, Bos T, van Tilborg R, van Halteren M, Mulder M (2019) Fostering oral presentation competence through a virtual reality-based task for delivering feedback. Comput Educ 134:78–97CrossRef
28.
Hallgren KA (2012) Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: an overview and tutorial. Tutorials Quant Methods Psychol 8(1):23CrossRef
29.
Harris SR, Kemmerling RL, North MM (2002) Brief virtual reality therapy for public speaking anxiety. Cyberpsychol Behav 5:543–550CrossRef
30.
Hassenzahl M, Burmester M, Koller F (2003) Attrakdiff: a questionnaire to measure perceived hedonic and pragmatic quality. In: Mensch & computer, pp 187–196
31.
Hofmann SG, DiBartolo PM (2000) An instrument to assess self-statements during public speaking: scale development and preliminary psychometric properties. Behav Therapy 31(3):499–515CrossRef
32.
Hoque ME, Courgeon M, Martin JC, Mutlu B, Picard RW (2013) Mach: My automated conversation coach. In: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international joint conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing. ACM, pp 697–706
33.
Hoque ME, Picard RW (2014) Rich nonverbal sensing technology for automated social skills training. Computer 47(4):28–35CrossRef
34.
Jennett C, Cox AL, Cairns P, Dhoparee S, Epps A, Tijs T, Walton A (2008) Measuring and defining the experience of immersion in games. Int J Hum Comput Stud 66(9):641–661CrossRef
35.
Kerby D, Romine J (2009) Develop oral presentation skills through accounting curriculum design and course-embedded assessment. J Educ Bus 85(3):172–179CrossRef
36.
Liebowitz M (1987) Liebowitz social anxiety scale. Mod Probl Pharmacopsychiatry 22:141–173CrossRef
37.
38.
Lombard M, Ditton TB, Weinstein L (2009) Measuring presence: the temple presence inventory. In: Proceedings of the 12th annual international workshop on presence, pp. 1–15
39.
McCroskey JC (1978) Validity of the prca as an index of oral communication apprehension. Commun Monogr 45(3):192–203CrossRef
40.
Mihoub A, Lefebvre G (2019) Wearables and social signal processing for smarter public presentations. ACM Trans Interact Intell Syst (TiiS) 9(2–3):9
41.
Paul G (1966) Insight vs. desensitization in psychotherapy: an experiment in anxiety reduction. Stanford University Press
42.
43.
Petukhova V, Mayer T, Malchanau A, Bunt H (2017) Virtual debate coach design: assessing multimodal argumentation performance. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on multimodal interaction, ICMI 2017. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 41–50. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1145/​3136755.​3136775
44.
45.
Price M, Anderson PL (2012) Outcome expectancy as a predictor of treatment response in cognitive behavioral therapy for public speaking fears within social anxiety disorder. Psychotherapy 49(2):173CrossRef
46.
Ramanarayanan V, Leong CW, Chen L, Feng G, Suendermann-Oeft D (2015)Evaluating speech, face, emotion and body movement time-series features for automated multimodal presentation scoring. In: Proceedings of the ACM international conference on multimodal interaction, ICMI ’15. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 23–30. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1145/​2818346.​2820765
47.
Rammstedt B, John O (2007) Measuring personality in one minute or less: a 10-item short version of the big five inventory in English and German. J Res Person 41(1):203–212CrossRef
48.
Safir MP, Wallach HS, Bar-Zvi M (2012) Virtual reality cognitive-behavior therapy for public speaking anxiety: one-year follow-up. Behav Modif 36(2):235–246CrossRef
49.
Scherer S, Marsella S, Stratou G, Xu Y, Morbini F, Egan A, Morency LP et al (2012)Perception markup language: Towards a standardized representation of perceived nonverbal behaviors. In: International conference on intelligent virtual agents. Springer, pp 455–463
50.
Schneider J, Börner D, van Rosmalen P, Specht M (2015) Presentation trainer, your public speaking multimodal coach. In: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM on international conference on multimodal interaction, ICMI ’15. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 539–546. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1145/​2818346.​2830603
51.
Slater M (1999) Measuring presence: a response to the Witmer and singer presence questionnaire. Presence 8(5):560–565CrossRef
52.
Tanveer MI, Lin E, Hoque ME (2015) Rhema: a real-time in-situ intelligent interface to help people with public speaking. In: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on intelligent user interfaces. ACM, pp 286–295
53.
Tanveer MI, Zhao R, Chen K, Tiet Z, Hoque ME (2016) Automanner: An automated interface for making public speakers aware of their mannerisms. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 385–396. ACM
54.
Vinciarelli A, Pantic M, Bourlard H (2009) Social signal processing: survey of an emerging domain. Image Vis Comput 27(12):1743–1759CrossRef
55.
Wagner J, Lingenfelser F, Baur T, Damian I, Kistler F, André E (2013) The social signal interpretation (ssi) framework: multimodal signal processing and recognition in real-time. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Multimedia. ACM, pp 831–834
56.
Witmer BG, Singer MJ (1998) Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire. Presence 7(3):225–240CrossRef
57.
Wörtwein T, Chollet M, Schauerte B, Morency LP, Stiefelhagen R, Scherer S (2015) Multimodal public speaking performance assessment. In: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM on international conference on multimodal interaction. ACM, pp 43–50
58.
Zhao R, Li V, Barbosa H, Ghoshal G, Hoque ME (2017) Semi-automated 8 collaborative online training module for improving communication skills. In: Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies, vol 1(2), p 32
Metadaten
Titel
Training public speaking with virtual social interactions: effectiveness of real-time feedback and delayed feedback
verfasst von
Mathieu Chollet
Stacy Marsella
Stefan Scherer
Publikationsdatum
06.03.2021
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces / Ausgabe 1/2022
Print ISSN: 1783-7677
Elektronische ISSN: 1783-8738
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12193-021-00371-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2022

Combining audio and visual displays to highlight temporal and spatial seismic patterns

  • Original Paper

A wearable virtual touch system for IVIS in cars

  • Original Paper

A gaze-based interactive system to explore artwork imagery

  • Open Access
  • Original Paper

RFID-based tangible and touch tabletop for dual reality in crisis management context

  • Original Paper

Interactive exploration of a hierarchical spider web structure with sound

  • Original Paper

Correction to: A gaze-based interactive system to explore artwork imagery

  • Correction

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise