Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Quality of Life Research
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research 9/2016

26.03.2016

Trajectories of quality of life in patients with traumatic limb injury: a 2-year follow-up study

verfasst von: Gong-Hong Lin, Yi-Jing Huang, Chien-Yu Huang, Wen-Shian Lu, Sheng-Shiung Chen, Wen-Hsuan Hou, Ching-Lin Hsieh

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 9/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Purpose

Traumatic limb injury (TLI) can have a negative impact on a patient’s quality of life (QOL), and the patient’s QOL may fluctuate over time. However, the longitudinal change patterns of QOL in patients with TLI are largely unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the QOL trajectories in patients with TLI in 4 QOL domains: physical capacity, psychological well-being, social relationships, and environment.

Methods

The patients’ QOL was assessed within 14 days and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after injury. In each QOL domain, 4 latent growth curve models (LGMs, including non-growth, linear growth, quadratic growth, and cubic LGM) were adopted to examine the QOL trajectories across the 6 time points.

Results

A total of 499 patients completed the 6 assessments. For all 4 QOL domains, the cubic LGM had the best model fitting (root-mean-square error of approximation < 0.01) revealing that the patients’ 4 QOL domains changed with cubic trajectories: QOL improved in the first 6 months, deteriorated in the second 6 months, and improved smoothly at 12–24 months after injury.

Conclusions

This study found that the trajectories in the 4 QOL domains were cubic trajectories in patients with TLI. These findings indicate that clinicians should pay additional attention to improve the patients’ QOL in the first 6 months after injury and to prevent or reduce QOL deterioration at 6–12 months.
Vorheriger Artikel Quality of life in older individuals with joint contractures in geriatric care settings
Nächster Artikel Change in quality of life and one-year mortality risk in maintenance dialysis patients

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Holtslag, H., Buskens, E., Rommers, C., Prevo, A., & van der Werken, C. (2006). Long-term outcome after lower extremity injuries in severely injured patients. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 32(4), 365–373.CrossRef
2.
Marinković, M., Janjić, Z., & Nikolić, J. (2015). Estimating disability and quality of life after different degrees of hand and forearm trauma. Vojnosanitetski Pregled., 72(2), 155–159.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Bailey, R., Kaskutas, V., Fox, I., Baum, C. M., & Mackinnon, S. E. (2009). Effect of upper extremity nerve damage on activity participation, pain, depression, and quality of life. Journal of Hand Surgery, 34(9), 1682–1688.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Bryant, R. A., O’Donnell, M. L., Creamer, M., McFarlane, A. C., Clark, C. R., & Silove, D. (2010). The psychiatric sequelae of traumatic injury. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167(3), 312–320.CrossRefPubMed
5.
WHOQOL group. (1995). The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization. Social Science and Medicine, 41(10), 1403–1409.CrossRef
6.
Johnson, J. R., & Temple, R. (1985). Food and drug administration requirements for approval of new anticancer drugs. Cancer Treatment Reports, 69(10), 1155–1159.PubMed
7.
Grady, K. L., Meyer, P. M., Dressler, D., Mattea, A., Chillcott, S., Loo, A., et al. (2004). Longitudinal change in quality of life and impact on survival after left ventricular assist device implantation. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 77(4), 1321–1327.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Steer, J., Gibson, G. J., & Bourke, S. C. (2015). Longitudinal change in quality of life following hospitalisation for acute exacerbations of COPD. BMJ Open Respiratory Research, 2(1), e000069.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Schwartz, C. E., & Sprangers, M. A. G. (1999). Methodological approaches for assessing response shift in longitudinal health-related quality-of-life research. Social Science and Medicine, 48(11), 1531–1548.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Bush, N. E., Donaldson, G. W., Haberman, M. H., Dacanay, R., & Sullivan, K. M. (2000). Conditional and unconditional estimation of multidimensional quality of life after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A longitudinal follow-up of 415 patients. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 6(5), 576–591.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Herndon, J. E., Fleishman, S., Kosty, M. P., & Green, M. R. (1997). A longitudinal study of quality of life in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 8931. Controlled Clinical Trials, 18(4), 286–300.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zidarov, D., Swaine, B., & Gauthier-Gagnon, C. (2009). Quality of life of persons with lower-limb amputation during rehabilitation and at 3-month follow-up. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 90(4), 634–645.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Stensman, R. (1994). Adjustment to traumatic spinal cord injury. A longitudinal study of self-reported quality of life. Paraplegia, 32(6), 416–422.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Hou, W.-H., Sheu, C.-F., Liang, H.-W., Hsieh, C.-L., Lee, Y., Chuang, H.-Y., et al. (2012). Trajectories and predictors of return to work after traumatic limb injury—A 2-year follow-up study. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 38(5), 456–466.CrossRef
15.
Hou, W.-H., Liang, H.-W., Sheu, C.-F., Hsieh, C.-L., & Chuang, H.-Y. (2013). Return to work and quality of life in workers with traumatic limb injuries: A 2-year repeated-measurements study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94(4), 703–710.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Hou, W.-H., Liang, H.-W., Hsieh, C.-L., Sheu, C.-F., Hwang, J.-S., & Chuang, H.-Y. (2013). Integrating health-related quality of life with sickness leave days for return-to-work assessment in traumatic limb injuries. Quality of Life Research, 22(9), 2307–2314.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Leung, K. F., Wong, W. W., Tay, M. S., Chu, M. M., & Ng, S. S. (2005). Development and validation of the interview version of the Hong Kong Chinese WHOQOL-BREF. Quality of Life Research, 14(5), 1413–1419.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Yao, G., Chung, C.-W., Yu, C.-F., & Wang, J.-D. (2002). Development and verification of validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, 101(5), 342–351.PubMed
19.
Skevington, S. M., Lotfy, M., & O’Connell, K. A. (2004). The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Quality of Life Research, 13(2), 299–310.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Bonnetain, F., Bouche, O., Michel, P., Mariette, C., Conroy, T., Pezet, D., et al. (2006). A comparative longitudinal quality of life study using the Spitzer quality of life index in a randomized multicenter phase III trial (FFCD 9102): Chemoradiation followed by surgery compared with chemoradiation alone in locally advanced squamous resectable thoracic esophageal cancer. Annals of Oncology, 17(5), 827–834.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Lix, L. M., Graff, L. A., Walker, J. R., Clara, I., Rawsthorne, P., Rogala, L., et al. (2008). Longitudinal study of quality of life and psychological functioning for active, fluctuating, and inactive disease patterns in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, 14(11), 1575–1584.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
23.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRef
24.
Hardt, J., Herke, M., & Leonhart, R. (2012). Auxiliary variables in multiple imputation in regression with missing X: A warning against including too many in small sample research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12(1), 1–13.CrossRef
25.
Holbrook, T. L., Anderson, J. P., Sieber, W. J., Browner, D., & Hoyt, D. B. (1998). Outcome after major trauma: Discharge and 6-month follow-up results from the Trauma Recovery Project. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 45(2), 315–324.CrossRef
26.
Carod-Artal, J., Egido, J. A., González, J. L., & De Seijas, E. V. (2000). Quality of life among stroke survivors evaluated 1 year after stroke: Experience of a stroke unit. Stroke, 31(12), 2995–3000.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Sprangers, M. A., & Schwartz, C. E. (1999). Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: A theoretical model. Social Science and Medicine, 48(11), 1507–1515.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Anderson, P. A., Carreon, L. Y., & Glassman, S. D. (2009). Response shift phenomenon. Does this apply to spine outcomes research? The Spine Journal, 9(12), 1037–1038.CrossRefPubMed
29.
World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization.
30.
Boik, R. J. (1988). The mixed model for multivariate repeated measures: Validity conditions and an approximate test. Psychometrika, 53(4), 469–486.CrossRef
31.
Levasseur, M., Desrosiers, J., & Whiteneck, G. (2010). Accomplishment level and satisfaction with social participation of older adults: Association with quality of life and best correlates. Quality of Life Research, 19(5), 665–675.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Levasseur, M., Desrosiers, J., & Noreau, L. (2004). Is social participation associated with quality of life of older adults with physical disabilities? Disability and Rehabilitation, 26(20), 1206–1213.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Metadaten
Titel
Trajectories of quality of life in patients with traumatic limb injury: a 2-year follow-up study
verfasst von
Gong-Hong Lin
Yi-Jing Huang
Chien-Yu Huang
Wen-Shian Lu
Sheng-Shiung Chen
Wen-Hsuan Hou
Ching-Lin Hsieh
Publikationsdatum
26.03.2016
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 9/2016
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1274-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2016

Quality of Life Research 9/2016 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Anxiety and depression analyses of patients undergoing diagnostic cystoscopy

OriginalPaper

Considerations for conducting qualitative research with pediatric patients for the purpose of PRO development

Brief Communication

A single question about a respondent’s perceived financial ability to pay monthly bills explains more variance in health utility scores than absolute income and assets questions

OriginalPaper

The use and impact of quality of life assessment tools in clinical care settings for cancer patients, with a particular emphasis on brain cancer: insights from a systematic review and stakeholder consultations

Erratum

Erratum to: The internal and external responsiveness of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) and Short Form-12 Health Survey version 2 (SF-12 v2) in patients with prostate cancer

OriginalPaper

Assessment of the psychometrics of a PROMIS item bank: self-efficacy for managing daily activities

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise