nach oben

Erschienen in:

2022 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

‘Try this Because’: The Effect of Positive Framing in Robo-Advisors

verfasst von : Eunseong Kim, Jeongyun Heo, Jieun Lee

Erschienen in: [ ] With Design: Reinventing Design Modes

Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

We compared the effectiveness of quantitatively providing the result (profit or loss) that users can achieve through investment advice provided by robo-advisor based on attribute framing theory. The main factors considered while evaluating them were the transparency of the system and the understandability and acceptance of investment advisory information. Researchers in related fields emphasise the importance of improving transparency in artificial intelligence decision-making algorithms and information asymmetry in financial advice to increase customers’ acceptance of robo-advisor. The financial information provided by robo-advisor can be difficult for customers to understand, which negatively impacts their willingness to use the system. Positive framing, which takes into account the user experience by providing clear meanings and concise sentence composition, contributes to effective message design. The results suggest that providing a positive expectation for advice acceptance (i.e. quantitative representation) has a positive impact on improving transparency and mitigating information asymmetry in decision-making systems.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Developing Responsible Algorithmic Curation Features in Social Media Through Participatory Design

Nächstes Kapitel Understanding User Experience with Recommendations in Social Network Service Feed

Ananny, M., Crawford, K.: Seeing without knowing: limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability. New Media Soc. 20(3), 973–989 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816676645CrossRef

Rühr, A.: Robo-advisor configuration: an investigation of user preferences and the performance-control dilemma. In: ECIS (2020)

Sironi, P.: FinTech Innovation: from Robo-Advisors to Goal Based Investing and Gamification. The Wiley Finance Series. Wiley, New York (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119227205.ch1

Nussbaumer, P., Matter, I., Schwabe, G.: “Enforced” vs. “Casual” transparency-findings from IT-supported financial advisory encounters. ACM Trans. Manage. Inf. Syst. (TMIS) 3(2), 1–19 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2229156.2229161CrossRef

Ruf, C., Back, A., Burkhardt, M.: Mobile first auch in Beratungsprozessen des private banking? Entwicklung und Validierung einer iPad-Applikation, Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik, pp. 955–966 (2016)

Jung, D., Dorner, V., Weinhardt, C., Pusmaz, H.: Designing a robo-advisor for risk-averse, low-budget consumers. Electron. Mark. 28(3), 367–380 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-017-0279-9CrossRef

Lies, E.: Strategic writing for UX: drive engagement, conversion, and retention with every word: Torrey Podmajersky (Book Review). IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun. 63(4), 404–405 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/tpc.2020.3024409CrossRef

Krishnamurthy, P., Carter, P., Blair, E.: Attribute framing and goal framing effects in health decisions. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 85(2), 382–399 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2962CrossRef

Levin, I.P., Schneider, S.L., Gaeth, G.J.: All frames are not created equal: a typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 76(2), 149–188 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2804CrossRef

Park, J.Y., Ryu, J.P., Shin, H.J.: Robo advisors for portfolio management. Adv. Sci. Technol. Lett. 141, 104–108 (2016). https://doi.org/10.14257/astl.2016.141.21

Rubel, A.: The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms that Control Money and Information. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2016). Bus. Ethics Q. 26(4), 568–571

Shin, D.: The effects of explainability and causability on perception, trust, and acceptance: implications for explainable AI. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 146, 102551 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102551CrossRef

Wang, W., Benbasat, I.: Interactive decision aids for consumer decision making in e-commerce: the influence of perceived strategy restrictiveness. MIS Q. 33, 293–320 (2009). https://doi.org/10.2307/20650293

Chen, J.Y., Procci, K., Boyce, M., Wright, J., Garcia, A., Barnes, M.: Situation awareness-based agent transparency. In: Army Research Lab Aberdeen Proving Ground MD Human Research and Engineering Directorate (2014). https://doi.org/10.21236/ada600351

Hesslow, G.: The problem of causal selection. In: Contemporary Science and Natural Explanation: Commonsense Conceptions of Causality, pp. 11–32 (1988)

Mercado, J.E., Rupp, M.A., Chen, J.Y., Barnes, M.J., Barber, D., Procci, K.: Intelligent agent transparency in human–agent teaming for Multi-UxV management. Hum. Factors 58(3), 401–415 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720815621206CrossRef

Dawes, R.M.: The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. Am. Psychol. 34(7), 571 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511809477.029CrossRef

Highhouse, S.: Stubborn reliance on intuition and subjectivity in employee selection. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 1(3), 333–342 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2008.00058.xCrossRef

Mason, M.: Transparency for whom? Information disclosure and power in global environmental governance. Global Environ. Polit. 8(2), 8–13 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2008.8.2.8CrossRef

Pieters, W.: Explanation and trust: what to tell the user in security and AI? Ethics Inf. Technol. 13(1), 53–64 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9253-3CrossRef

Nussbaumer, P., Matter, I.: What you see is what you (Can) get? Designing for process transparency in financial advisory encounters. In: Campos, P., Graham, N., Jorge, J., Nunes, N., Palanque, P., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2011. LNCS, vol. 6946, pp. 277–294. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23774-4_24CrossRef

Oehler, A., Kohlert, D.: Financial advice giving and taking—where are the market’s self-healing powers and a functioning legal framework when we need them? J. Consum. Policy 32(2), 91–116 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-009-9099-4CrossRef

Tsvetkov, V.Y.: Information interaction as a mechanism of semantic gap elimination. Eur. Researcher 782–786 (2013)

Tsvetkov, V.Y.: Information asymmetry as a risk factor. Eur. Researcher 86, 1937–1943 (2014). https://doi.org/10.13187/er.2014.86.1937

Dunk, A.S.: The effect of budget emphasis and information asymmetry on the relation between budgetary participation and slack. Account. Rev. 68, 400–410 (1993)

Aboody, D., Lev, B.: Information asymmetry, R&D, and insider gains. J. Financ. 55(6), 2747–2766 (2000)CrossRef

Kilic, M., Heinrich, P., Schwabe, G.: Coercing into completeness in financial advisory service encounters. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, pp. 1324–1335 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675289

Marsh, J.: The Composite Persuasion (2012)

Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185, 1124–1131 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511809477.002

Cheng, F.F., Wu, C.S.: Debiasing the framing effect: the effect of warning and involvement. Decis. Support Syst. 49(3), 328–334 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.04.002CrossRef

Levin, I.P., Gaeth, G.J.: How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. J. Consum. Res. 15(3), 374–378 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1086/209174CrossRef

Gonzalez, C., Dana, J., Koshino, H., Just, M.: The framing effect and risky decisions: examining cognitive functions with fMRI. J. Econ. Psychol. 26(1), 1–20 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2004.08.004CrossRef

Levin, I.P., Schnittjer, S.K., Thee, S.L.: Information framing effects in social and personal decisions. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 24(6), 520–529 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(88)90050-9CrossRef

Salo, M., Haapio, H.: Robo-advisors and investors: enhancing human-robot interaction through information design. In: Trends and Communities of Legal Informatics, Proceedings of the 20th International Legal Informatics Symposium IRIS, pp. 441–448 (2017). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2937821

Hohenberger, C., Lee, C., Coughlin, J.F.: Acceptance of robo-advisors: effects of financial experience, affective reactions, and self-enhancement motives. Financ. Plann. Rev. 2(2), e1047 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/cfp2.1047CrossRef

Ben David, D., Resheff, Y.S., Tron, T.: Explainable AI and adoption of financial algorithmic advisors: an experimental study. In: Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, pp. 390–400 (2021)

Gamliel, E., Peer, E.: Positive versus negative framing affects justice judgments. Soc. Justice Res. 19(3), 307–322 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1145/3461702.3462565CrossRef

Marsh, B.A.: Examining the personal finance attitudes, behaviors, and knowledge levels of first-year and senior students at Baptist universities in the state of Texas, Ph.D. dissertation, Bowling Green State University (2006)

Titel: ‘Try this Because’: The Effect of Positive Framing in Robo-Advisors
verfasst von: Eunseong Kim
Jeongyun Heo
Jieun Lee
Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore
Buch: [ ] With Design: Reinventing Design Modes
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-4471-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-19-4472-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4472-7_189

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"