Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering
Erschienen in: Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 4/2021

03.01.2021 | Research Article-Computer Engineering and Computer Science

Two-Archive Fuzzy-Pareto-Dominance Swarm Optimization for Many-Objective Software Architecture Reconstruction

verfasst von: Amarjeet Prajapati

Erschienen in: Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering | Ausgabe 4/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

To design an efficient and effective search-based optimization methods for the computationally hard many-objective optimization problems is a promising ongoing research area. Since last one decade, there has been tremendous growth in the development of many-objective optimizer for solving complex science and engineering optimization problems. In the software engineering field, the task of software architecture reconstruction is a complex form of optimization problem where many multiple objectives need to be optimized simultaneously. To address the many-objective software architecture reconstruction problem, we exploit the potential of two-archive storage strategy, quality indicator and fuzzy-Pareto-dominance selection method in designing a many-objective particle swarm-based optimizer. Apart from that, several other customizations in particle swarm optimization regarding the software architecture reconstruction problem have also been performed. To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, an empirical study is conducted over five software projects with a varying set of objectives. The results demonstrate that the proposed approach can address the many-objective software architecture reconstruction problem effectively and has significant advantages over state-of-art metaheuristic optimization algorithms.
Vorheriger Artikel Numerical Study of the 3D Variable Coefficient Heat Transfer Problem by Using the Finite Pointset Method
Nächster Artikel An Ensemble Multi-label Themes-Based Classification for Holy Qur’an Verses Using Word2Vec Embedding

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Kasprzyk, J.R.; Reed, P.M.; Characklis, W.; Kirsch, B.R.: Many-objective de Novo water supply portfolio planning under deep uncertainty. Environ. Model Softw. 34, 87–104 (2012)CrossRef
2.
Mkaouer, M.; Kessentini, M.; Shaout, A.; Koligheu, P.; Bechikh, S.; Deb, K.; Ouni, A.: Many objective software remodularization using NSGA-III. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 24(3), 1–17 (2015)CrossRef
3.
Raja, B.D.; Jhala, R.L.; Patel, V.: Many-objective optimization of shell and tube heat exchanger. Thermal Sci. Eng. Prog. 2, 87–101 (2017)CrossRef
4.
Prajapati, A.; Chhabra, J.K.: MaDHS: many-objective discrete harmony search to improve existing package design. Comput. Intell. 35, 98–123 (2019)MathSciNetCrossRef
5.
Ishibuchi,H., Tsukamoto, N., Nojima, Y.: Evolutionary many-objective optimization: A short review. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence), Hong Kong, pp. 2419–2426 (2008)
6.
Harman, M.; Mansouri, S.A.; Zhang, Y.: Search-based software engineering: trends, techniques and applications. ACM Comput. Surv. 45(1), 1–61 (2012)CrossRef
7.
Schmidt, F.; MacDonell, S.; Connor, A.M.: Multi-objective reconstruction of software architecture. Int. J. Software Eng. Knowl. Eng. 28(6), 869–892 (2018)CrossRef
8.
Mancoridis, S., Mitchell, B.S., Rorres, C., Chen, Y.F., Gansner, E.R.: Using automatic clustering to produce high-level system organizations of source code. In: Proceedings of 6th International Workshop on Program Comprehension, pp 45–53 (1998)
9.
Maqbool, O.; Babri, H.: Hierarchical clustering for software architecture recovery. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 33(1), 759–780 (2007)CrossRef
10.
Kumari, A.C., Srinivas, K., Gupta, M.P.: Software module clustering using a hyper-heuristic based multi-objective genetic algorithm. In: 2013 IEEE 3rd International Advance Computing Conference (IACC), Ghaziabad, pp 813–818 (2013)
11.
Corazza, A.; Martino, S.D.; Maggio, V.; Scanniello, G.: Weighing lexical information for software clustering in the context of architecture recovery. Empir. Softw. Eng. 21(1), 72–103 (2016)CrossRef
12.
de Jong, T., van der Werf, J.M.E.M.: Process-mining based dynamic software architecture reconstruction. In: Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Software Architecture—Volume 2 (ECSA ‘19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp 217–224
13.
Florian, R.; Sabine, Z.; Albert, Z.: A modeling method for systematic architecture reconstruction of microservice-based software systems. Enterp. Bus. Process Inf. Syst. Model. 387, 311–326 (2020)
14.
Wilhelm, A.J.: Interactive software parallelization based on hybrid analysis and software architecture reconstruction. Universitätsbibliothek der TU München (2019)
15.
Praditwong, K.; Harman, M.; Yao, X.: Software module clustering as a multi-objective search problem. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 37(2), 264–282 (2011)CrossRef
16.
Mohammadi, S.; Izadkhah, H.: A new algorithm for software clustering considering the knowledge of dependency between artifacts in the source code. Inf. Softw. Technol. 105, 252–256 (2019)CrossRef
17.
18.
Amarjeet, P.; Chhabra, J.K.: Many-objective artificial bee colony algorithm for large-scale software module clustering problem. Soft. Comput. 22(19), 6341–6361 (2018)CrossRef
19.
Goldberg, D.E.: Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison-Wesley, New York (1989)MATH
20.
Karaboga D (2005) An idea based on honey bee swarm for numerical optimization. Technical Report TR06, Erciyes University, Engineering Faculty, Computer Engineering Department
21.
Geem, Z.W.; Kim, J.H.; Loganathan, G.V.: A new heuristic optimization algorithm: harmony search. Simulation 76(2), 60–68 (2001)CrossRef
22.
Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R.: Particle swarms optimization. In: Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, vol. 4, pp. 1942–1948 (1995)
23.
Maltese, J.; Ombuki-Berman, B.M.; Engelbrecht, A.P.: A scalability study of many-objective optimization algorithms. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 22(1), 79–96 (2018)CrossRef
24.
Sheikholeslami, F.; Navimipour, N.J.: Service allocation in the cloud environments using multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm based on crowding distance. Swarm Evolut. Comput. 35, 53–64 (2017)CrossRef
25.
Fazli, W.; Rozaida, G.; Muhammad, A.: An efficient artificial intelligence hybrid approach for energy management in intelligent buildings. KSII Trans. Internet Inf. Syst. 13(10), 5904–5927 (2019)
26.
Wahid, F.; Fayaz, M.; Aljarbouh, A.; Mir, M.; Aamir, M.; Imran, X.: Energy consumption optimization and user comfort maximization in smart buildings using a hybrid of the firefly and genetic algorithms. Energies 13, 4363 (2020)CrossRef
27.
Wahid, F.; et al.: An enhanced firefly algorithm using pattern search for solving optimization problems. IEEE Access 8, 148264–148288 (2020)CrossRef
28.
Marichelvam, M.K.; Geetha, M.; Tosun, O.: An improved particle swarm optimization algorithm to solve hybrid flowshop scheduling problems with the effect of human factors—a case study. Comput. Oper. Res. 114, 104812 (2020)MathSciNetCrossRef
29.
Afshin, N.; Nima, N.: A new agent-based method for QoS-aware cloud service composition using particle swarm optimization algorithm. J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 10, 1851–1864 (2019)CrossRef
30.
31.
Milan, S.T.; Rajabion, L.; Darwesh, A.; et al.: Priority-based task scheduling method over cloudlet using a swarm intelligence algorithm. Clust. Comput. 23, 663–671 (2020)CrossRef
32.
Li, M.; Yang, S.; Liu, X.: Shift-based density estimation for Pareto-based algorithms in many-objective optimization. IEEE Trans. Evolut. Comput. 18(3), 348–365 (2014)CrossRef
33.
Yang, S.; Li, M.; Liu, X.; Zheng, J.: A grid-based evolutionary algorithm for many-objective optimization. IEEE Trans. Evolut. Comput. 17(5), 721–736 (2013)CrossRef
34.
Wang, R.; Purshouse, R.C.; Fleming, P.J.: Preference-inspired coevolutionary algorithms for many-objective optimization. IEEE Trans. Evolut. Comput. 17(4), 474–494 (2013)CrossRef
35.
Deb, K.: Jain, H,: An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm using reference-point-based nondominated sorting approach—part I: solving problems with box constraints. IEEE Trans. Evolut. Comput. 18(4), 577–601 (2014)CrossRef
36.
Ramírez, A.; Romero, J.R.; Ventura, S.: A survey of many-objective optimisation in search-based software engineering. J. Syst. Softw. 149, 382–395 (2019)CrossRef
37.
Mancoridis, S., Mitchell, B.S., Chen, Y.F., Gansner, E.R.: Bunch: a clustering tool for the recovery and maintenance of software system structures. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Software Maintenance, pp. 50–59 (1999)
38.
Mitchell, B.S., Mancoridis, S.: Using heuristic search techniques to extract design abstractions from source code. In: Proceedings of Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pp. 1375–1382 (2002)
39.
Mahdavi, K., Harman, M., Hierons, R.M.: A multiple hill climbing approach to software module clustering. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Maintenance, pp. 315–324 (2003)
40.
Praditwong, K.: Solving software module clustering problem by evolutionary algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Joint Conference Computer Science and Software Engineering, pp. 154–159 (2011).
41.
Amarjeet, P.; Chhabra, J.K.: Harmony search based remodularization for object-oriented software systems. Comput. Lang. Syst. Struct. 47, 153–169 (2016)
42.
Barros, M.: An analysis of the effects of composite objectives in multi-objective software module clustering. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation, pp. 1205–1212 (2012)
43.
Kumari, A.C.; Srinivas, K.: Hyper-heuristic approach for multi-objective software module clustering. J. Syst. Softw. 117, 384–401 (2016)CrossRef
44.
Amarjeet, P., Chhabra, J.K.: An empirical study of the sensitivity of quality indicator for software module clustering. In: 2014 Seventh International Conference on Contemporary Computing (IC3), Noida, pp. 206–211 (2014)
45.
Amarjeet, P.; Chhabra, J.K.: Improving package structure of object-oriented software using multi-objective optimization and weighted class connections. J King Saud Univ Comput Inf Sci 29, 349–364 (2017)
46.
Praditwong, K., Yao, Y.: A new multi-objective evolutionary optimization algorithm: the two-archive algorithm. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security, vol. 1. Guangzhou, China, pp. 286–291 (2006)
47.
Pierro, F.D.; Khu, S.-T.; Savic, D.A.: An investigation on preference order ranking scheme for multiobjective evolutionary optimization. IEEE Trans. Evolut. Comput. 11(1), 17–45 (2007)CrossRef
48.
Yuan, Y.; Xu, H.; Wang, B.; Yao, X.: A new dominance relationbased evolutionary algorithm for many-objective optimization. IEEE Trans. Evolut. Comput. 20(1), 16–37 (2016)CrossRef
49.
Köppen, M., Vicente-Garcia, R.: A fuzzy scheme for the ranking of multivariate data and its application. In: Proceedings of the 2004 Annual Meeting of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society, vol. 1, IEEE Press, pp. 140–145 (2004)
50.
Zitzler, E., Künzli, S.: Indicator-based selection in multi-objective search. In: Parallel Problem Solving from Nature—PPSN VIII. Springer, Berlin, Germany, pp. 832–842 (2004)
51.
Deb, K., Thiele, L., Laumanns, M., Zitzler, E.: Scalable test problems for evolutionary multiobjective optimization. In: Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization: Theoretical Advances and Applications. Springer, London, UK, pp. 105–145 (2005)
52.
Zitzler, E.; Thiele, L.: Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach. IEEE Trans. Evolut. Comput. 3(4), 257–271 (1999)CrossRef
53.
Goh, C.K.; Tan, K.C.: An investigation on noisy environments in evolutionary multiobjective optimization. IEEE Trans. Evolut. Comput. 11(3), 354–381 (2007)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Two-Archive Fuzzy-Pareto-Dominance Swarm Optimization for Many-Objective Software Architecture Reconstruction
verfasst von
Amarjeet Prajapati
Publikationsdatum
03.01.2021
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering / Ausgabe 4/2021
Print ISSN: 2193-567X
Elektronische ISSN: 2191-4281
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-05147-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2021

Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 4/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Review-Computer Engineering and Computer Science

Applications of Blockchain Technology in Clinical Trials: Review and Open Challenges

Research Article-Computer Engineering and Computer Science

Adaptive Technique for Brightness Enhancement of Automated Knife Detection in Surveillance Video with Deep Learning

Research Article-Computer Engineering and Computer Science

Numerical Study of the 3D Variable Coefficient Heat Transfer Problem by Using the Finite Pointset Method

Research Article-Computer Engineering and Computer Science

An IoT-Based School Bus and Vehicle Tracking System Using RFID Technology and Mobile Data Networks

Research Article-Computer Engineering and Computer Science

Design and Analysis of Pattern Matching Algorithms Based on QuRAM Processing

Research Article-Computer Engineering and Computer Science

An Evolutionary-based Random Weight Networks with Taguchi Method for Arabic Web Pages Classification

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise