nach oben

International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal

Erschienen in:

31.03.2023

Unpacking the effect of institutional support on international corporate entrepreneurship in entrepreneurial support systems

verfasst von: Fei Zhou, Xue Li, Chunjia Han, Lan Zhang, Brij B. Gupta

Erschienen in: International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal | Ausgabe 3/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Extent research is unclear about the relationship between entrepreneurship support systems and international corporate entrepreneurship (ICE) in emerging economies. This research considered entrepreneurial support systems essentially act as institutional intermediaries and consider resource slack as a mediating variable and dual network embeddedness as a moderating variable to explore the effects of formal institutional support and informal institutional support on ICE. Based on an empirical analysis of data from 480 valid questionnaires from small multinational corporations (MNCs) in Asia-Pacific region, this research found that (1) institutional support has a positive effect on ICE; (2) resource slack mediates institutional support and ICE; and (3) local network embeddedness has a negative moderating effect on the relationship between institutional support and resource slack, and ultra-local network embeddedness has a positive moderating effect on the relationship between institutional support and resource slack. The findings of the study echo the call of scholars to pay attention to the influence of institutional factors on ICE, and clarify the process of institutional support in the entrepreneurial support system on ICE.

Vorheriger Artikel Work engagement and employee satisfaction in the practice of sustainable human resource management – based on the study of Polish employees

Nächster Artikel Entrepreneurial intention and creative performance – the role of distress tolerance

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Acs, Z. J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014). National systems of entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43(3), 476–494.CrossRef

Ahmed, F. U., & Brennan, L. (2021). A review of methodological diversity within the domain of international entrepreneurship. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 19(2), 256–299.CrossRef

Ahsan, M., & Fernhaber, S. A. (2019). Multinational enterprises: Leveraging a corporate international entrepreneurship lens for new insights into subsidiary initiatives. Journal of International Management, 25(1), 51–65.CrossRef

Andersen, K. V. (2013). The problem of embeddedness revisited: Collaboration and market types. Research Policy, 42(1), 139–148.CrossRef

Audretsch, D. B. (2003). SMEs in the age of globalisation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2016). Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: Establishing the framework conditions. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 1030–1051.CrossRef

Autio, E., Nambisan, S., Thomas, L. D. W., & Wright, M. (2018). Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 72–95.CrossRef

Bansal, P., & Song, H. C. (2017). Similar but not the same: Differentiating corporate sustainability from corporate responsibility. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 105–149.CrossRef

Baier-Fuentes, H., Merigó, J. M., Amorós, J. E., & Gaviria-Marín, M. (2019). International entrepreneurship: A bibliometric overview. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15(2), 385–429.CrossRef

Bao, G., Zhang, W., Xiao, Z., & Hine, D. (2019). Slack resources and growth performance: The mediating roles of product and process innovation capabilities. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 28(1), 60–76.CrossRef

Barney, J. B., Ketchen, D. J. Jr., & Wright, M. (2011). The future of resource-based theory: Revitalization or decline? Journal of Management, 37(5), 1299–1315.CrossRef

Baumgartner, R. J. (2014). Managing corporate sustainability and CSR: A conceptual framework combining values, strategies and instruments contributing to sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(5), 258–271.CrossRef

Bojica, A. M., del Mar Fuentes-Fuentes, M., & Fernández Pérez, V. (2017). Corporate entrepreneurship and codification of the knowledge acquired from strategic partners in SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 55, 205–230.CrossRef

Boudreaux, C. J., Nikolaev, B. N., & Klein, P. (2019). Socio-cognitive traits and entrepreneurship: The moderating role of economic institutions. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(1), 178–196.CrossRef

Bourgeois, I. I. I., L. J (1981). On the measurement of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review, 6(1), 29–39.CrossRef

Chen, H. (2022). The impact of intellectual property protection on the development of digital economy and regional entrepreneurial activity: Evidence from small and medium enterprises. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 18.

Clough, D. R., Fang, T. P., Vissa, B., & Wu, A. (2019). Turning lead into gold: How do entrepreneurs mobilize resources to exploit opportunities? Academy of Management Annals, 13(1), 240–271.CrossRef

Curran, D. (2020). Connecting risk: Systemic risk from finance to the digital. Economy and Society, 49(2), 239–264.CrossRef

de Jong, A., Zacharias, N. A., & Nijssen, E. J. (2021). How young companies can effectively manage their slack resources over time to ensure sales growth: The contingent role of value-based selling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49(2), 304–326.CrossRef

Dutt, N., Hawn, O., Vidal, E., Chatterji, A., McGahan, A., & Mitchell, W. (2016). How open system intermediaries address institutional failures: The case of Business Incubators in Emerging-Market Countries. Academy of Management Journal, 59(3), 818–840.CrossRef

Elert, N., & Henrekson, M. (2017). Entrepreneurship and institutions: A bidirectional relationship. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 13(3), 191–263.CrossRef

Franco-Leal, N., & Diaz-Carrion, R. (2022). How financing and information drive international corporate entrepreneurs’ innovations. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 20(2), 316–343.CrossRef

Forcadell, F. J., & Úbeda, F. (2022). Individual entrepreneurial orientation and performance: The mediating role of international entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 18(2), 875–900.CrossRef

Garcia-Sanchez, E., Garcia-Morales, V., & Martin-Rojas, R. (2018). Analysis of the influence of the environment, stakeholder integration capability, absorptive capacity, and technological skills on organizational performance through corporate entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(2), 345–377.CrossRef

Glinyanova, M., Bouncken, R. B., Tiberius, V., & Cuenca Ballester, A. C. (2021). Five decades of corporate entrepreneurship research: Measuring and mapping the field. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 17, 1731–1751.CrossRef

Godoy-Bejarano, J. M., Ruiz-Pava, G. A., & Tellez-Falla, D. F. (2020). Environmental complexity, slack, and firm performance. Journal of Economics and Business, 112, 105933.CrossRef

Gorecki, S., Possik, J., Zacharewicz, G., Ducq, Y., & Perry, N. (2021). Business models for distributed-simulation orchestration and risk management. Information, 12(2), 71.CrossRef

Gruber, M., Heinemann, F., Brettel, M., & Hungeling, S. (2010). Configurations of resources and capabilities and their performance implications: An exploratory study on technology ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 31(12), 1337–1356.CrossRef

Gulati, R., & Sytch, M. (2007). Dependence asymmetry and joint dependence in interorganizational relationships: Effects of embeddedness on a manufacturer’s performance in procurement relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 32–69.CrossRef

Hayes, A. F., & Scharkow, M. (2013). The relative trustworthiness of Inferential tests of the Indirect Effect in Statistical Mediation Analysis: Does Method really Matter? Psychological Science, 24(10), 1918–1927.CrossRef

Horak, S., & Suseno, Y. (2022). Informal networks, informal Institutions, and social exclusion in the workplace: Insights from subsidiaries of multinational corporations in Korea.Journal of Business Ethics,1–23.

Hu, B., Gaurav, A., Choi, C., & Almomani, A. (2022). Evaluation and comparative analysis of semantic web-based strategies for enhancing educational system development. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), 18(1), 1–14.CrossRef

Huang, X., Li, X. L., Yu, Y., Zheng, X. R., & Xu, X. B. (2019). Integration of Bricolage and Institutional Entrepreneurship for Internet Finance: Alibaba’s Yu’e Bao. Journal of Global Information Management, 27(2), 1–23.CrossRef

Hughes, M., & Mustafa, M. (2017). Antecedents of corporate entrepreneurship in SMEs: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Small Business Management, 55, 115–140.CrossRef

Kafouros, M., Chandrashekar, S. P., Aliyev, M., & Au, A. K. M. (2022). How do formal and informal institutions influence firm profitability in emerging countries?Journal of International Management, 28(1).

Karmaker, C. L., Aziz, A., Palit, R., T., & Bari, A. M. (2023). Analyzing supply chain risk factors in the small and medium enterprises under fuzzy environment: Implications towards sustainability for emerging economies. Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship, 2(1), 100032.CrossRef

Ketteni, E., & Kottaridi, C. (2019). The impact of regulations on the FDI-growth nexus within the institution-based view: A nonlinear specification with varying coefficients. International Business Review, 28(3), 415–427.CrossRef

Kouatli, I., ElKhalil, R., & Karam, K. (2020, November). Agility decision-making model in digital enterprise markets driven by turbulence of cultural cognition and technological Innovation. In 2020 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Application (DASA) (pp. 756–760). IEEE.

Kraus, S., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Schussler, M. (2018). Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research - the rise of a method. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(1), 15–33.CrossRef

Kubera, P. (2017). Evaluating the impact of regulation and regulatory policy - towards better entrepreneurial ecosystem. The case of Poland. Problemy Zarzadzania-Management Issues, 15(1), 237–253.CrossRef

Kyvik, O. (2018). The global mindset: A must for international innovation and entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(2), 309–327.CrossRef

Lee, C. K., & Hung, S. C. (2014). Institutional entrepreneurship in the informal economy: China’s shan-zhai mobile phones. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 8(1), 16–36.CrossRef

Li, H., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2001). Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in China. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1123–1134.CrossRef

Li, L., Chen, J., Gao, H., & Xie, L. (2019). The certification effect of government R&D subsidies on innovative entrepreneurial firms’ access to bank finance: Evidence from China. Small Business Economics, 52, 241–259.CrossRef

Liu, P., & Shao, Y. Y. (2022). Innovation and new business formation: The role of innovative large firms. Small Business Economics, 59(2), 691–720.CrossRef

Liu, X. H., Xia, T. J., Lu, J. Y., & Lin, D. M. (2019). Under what institutional conditions does overseas business knowledge contribute to firm performance? International Business Review, 28(3), 588–602.CrossRef

Lu, D., Yao, S., Li, G., Liu, H., & Gao, X. (2007). Comprehensive analysis of the urbanization process based on China’s conditions. Economic Geography, 27(6), 883–887.

Luo, L. L., Ma, X. F., Makino, S., & Shinkle, G. A. (2020). Cluster status and new venture creation. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(5), 105985.CrossRef

Mair, J., Martí, I., & Ventresca, M. J. (2012). Building Inclusive Markets in Rural Bangladesh: How Intermediaries Work Institutional Voids. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 819–850.CrossRef

McKeever, E., Jack, S., & Anderson, A. (2015). Embedded entrepreneurship in the creative re-construction of place. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(1), 50–65.CrossRef

Muller, J., & Kunisch, S. (2018). Central Perspectives and Debates in Strategic Change Research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(2), 457–482.CrossRef

Nhi, N. T. U., & Le, T. M. (2022). A model of semantic-based image retrieval using C-Tree and neighbor graph. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), 18(1), 1–23.CrossRef

Nohria, N., & Gulati, R. (1996). Is slack good or bad for innovation? Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1245–1264.CrossRef

Nyagadza, B. (2022). Sustainable digital transformation for ambidextrous digital firms: a systematic literature review and future research directions.Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship, 100020.

Oparaocha, G. O. (2015). SMEs and international entrepreneurship: An institutional network perspective. International Business Review, 24(5), 861–873.CrossRef

Pan, X. F., Ming, Y., Li, M. N., Guo, S. C., & Han, C. C. (2020). Inter-regional innovation correlation effects and influencing factors in China. Business Process Management Journal, 26(4), 925–941.CrossRef

Park, S. H., & Luo, Y. J. (2001). Guanxi and organizational dynamics: Organizational networking in chinese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(5), 455–477.CrossRef

Peng, M. W. (2002). Towards an institution-based view of business strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2), 251–267.CrossRef

Peng, M. W., & Luo, Y. (2000). Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: The nature of a micro-macro link. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 486–501.CrossRef

Peters, N. J., Hofstetter, J. S., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2011). Institutional entrepreneurship capabilities for interorganizational sustainable supply chain strategies. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 22(1), 52–86.CrossRef

Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227.CrossRef

Qu, Y., Qu, T., & Wu, Y. A. (2017). The role of regional formal institutions and foreign direct investment in innovation in chinese enterprises. Asia Pacific Business Review, 23(1), 27–43.CrossRef

Sadeghi, V. J., Nkongolo-Bakenda, J. M., Anderson, R. B., & Dana, L. P. (2019). An institution-based view of international entrepreneurship: A comparison of context-based and universal determinants in developing and economically advanced countries.International Business Review, 28(6).

Saka-Helmhout, A., Chappin, M. M., & Rodrigues, S. B. (2022). Corporate social innovation in developing countries. Journal of Business Ethics, 181, 589–605.CrossRef

Saxton, T., Wesley, C. L., & Saxton, M. K. (2016). Venture advocate behaviors and the emerging enterprise. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 10(1), 107–125.CrossRef

Shahzad, A. M., Mousa, F. T., & Sharfman, M. P. (2016). The implications of slack heterogeneity for the slack-resources and corporate social performance relationship. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5964–5971.CrossRef

Shepherd, D. A., Wennberg, K., Suddaby, R., & Wiklund, J. (2019). What are we explaining? A review and agenda on initiating, engaging, performing, and contextualizing entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 45(1), 159–196.CrossRef

Shir, N., Nikolaev, B. N., & Wincent, J. (2019). Entrepreneurship and well-being: The role of psychological autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(5), 105875.CrossRef

Shu, C., De Clercq, D., Zhou, Y., & Liu, C. (2019). Government institutional support, entrepreneurial orientation, strategic renewal, and firm performance in transitional China. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 25(3), 433–456.CrossRef

Skafi, M., Yunis, M. M., & Zekri, A. (2020). Factors influencing SMEs’ adoption of cloud computing services in Lebanon: An empirical analysis using TOE and contextual theory. Ieee Access: Practical Innovations, Open Solutions, 8, 79169–79181.CrossRef

Smith, W. K., Gonin, M., & Besharov, M. L. (2013). Managing social-business tensions: A review and research agenda for social enterprise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(3), 407–442.CrossRef

Snow, C. C., Fjeldstad, Ø. D., Lettl, C., & Miles, R. E. J. (2011). Organizing continuous product development and commercialization: The collaborative community of firms model. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(1), 3–16.CrossRef

Spigel, B., & Harrison, R. (2018). Toward a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 151–168.CrossRef

Stergiou, C. L., Psannis, K. E., & Gupta, B. B. (2021). InFeMo: Flexible big data management through a federated cloud system. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, 22(2), 1–22.CrossRef

Stephan, U., Uhlaner, L. M., & Stride, C. (2015). Institutions and social entrepreneurship: The role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(3), 308–331.CrossRef

Tan, J., & Peng, M. W. (2003). Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: Two studies from an emerging economy. Strategic Management journal, 24(13), 1249–1263.CrossRef

Tang, Y. L., Motohashi, K., Hu, X. Y., & Montoro-Sanchez, A. (2020). University-industry interaction and product innovation performance of Guangdong manufacturing firms: The roles of regional proximity and research quality of universities. Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(2), 578–618.CrossRef

Tay, B., & Mourad, A. (2020). Intelligent performance-aware adaptation of control policies for optimizing banking teller process using machine learning. Ieee Access: Practical Innovations, Open Solutions, 8, 153403–153412.CrossRef

Taylor, K. (2021). An analysis of the entrepreneurial institutional ecosystems supporting the development of hybrid organizations: The development of cooperatives in the US. Journal of Environmental Management, 286, 112244.CrossRef

Theodoraki, C., & Messeghem, K. (2017). Exploring the entrepreneurial ecosystem in the field of entrepreneurial support: A multi-level approach. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 31(1), 47–66.CrossRef

Theodoraki, C., & Catanzaro, A. (2022). Widening the borders of entrepreneurial ecosystem through the international lens. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 47(2), 383–406.CrossRef

Thanos, I. C., Pavlos, D., & Sapouna, P. (2017). The implications of international entrepreneurial orientation, politicization, and hostility upon SME international performance. International Small Business Journal-Researching Entrepreneurship, 35(4), 495–514.CrossRef

Tiemann, I., Fichter, K., & Geier, J. (2018). University support systems for sustainable entrepreneurship: Insights from explorative case studies. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 10(1), 83–110.CrossRef

Vanhaverbeke, W., Gilsing, V., & Duysters, G. (2007). Exploration and exploitation in technology-based alliance networks. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2007(1), 1–6.

Vlasov, M., Bonnedahl, K. J., & Vincze, Z. (2018). Entrepreneurship for resilience: Embeddedness in place and in trans-local grassroots networks. Journal of Enterprising Communities-People and Places in the Global Economy, 12(3), 374–394.CrossRef

Wang, C. Q., Kafouros, M., Yi, J. T., Hong, J. J., & Ganotakis, P. (2020). The role of government affiliation in explaining firm innovativeness and profitability in emerging countries: Evidence from China.Journal of World Business, 55(3).

Wang, H. F., Zhao, Y. P., Dang, B. L., Han, P. F., & Shi, X. (2019). Network centrality and innovation performance: The role of formal and informal institutions in emerging economies. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 34(6), 1388–1400.CrossRef

Wang, Y. K., Chung, C. C., & Lim, D. S. K. (2015). The drivers of international corporate entrepreneurship: CEO incentive and CEO monitoring mechanisms. Journal of World Business, 50(4), 742–753.CrossRef

Wigren-Kristofersen, C., Korsgaard, S., Brundin, E., Hellerstedt, K., Alsos, G. A., & Grande, J. (2019). Entrepreneurship and embeddedness: Dynamic, processual and multi-layered perspectives. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 31(9–10), 1011–1015.CrossRef

Xie, Y., Gao, S. X., Jiang, X., & Fey, C. F. (2015). Social Ties and Indigenous Innovation in China’s Transition Economy: The moderating Effects of learning intent. Industry and Innovation, 22(2), 79–101.CrossRef

Xin, K. K., & Pearce, J. L. J. (1996). Guanxi: Connections as substitutes for formal institutional support. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1641–1658.CrossRef

Yi, G. F. (2021). From green entrepreneurial intentions to green entrepreneurial behaviors: The role of university entrepreneurial support and external institutional support. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 17(2), 963–979.CrossRef

Yiu, D. W., Hoskisson, R. E., Bruton, G. D., & Lu, Y. (2014). Dueling institutional logics and the effect on strategic entrepreneurship in chinese business groups. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 8(3), 195–213.CrossRef

Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E., & Sapienza, H. J. (2001). Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology‐based firms. Strategic Management journal, 22(6‐7), 587–613.CrossRef

Yoon, H., Kim, N., Buisson, B., & Phillips, F. (2018). A cross-national study of knowledge, government intervention, and innovative nascent entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research, 84, 243–252.CrossRef

Zahoor, N., & Al-Tabbaa, O. (2021). Post-entry internationalization speed of SMEs: The role of relational mechanisms and foreign market knowledge. International Business Review, 30(1), 101761.CrossRef

Zahra, S. A., & Garvis, D. M. (2000). International corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: The moderating effect of international environmental hostility. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5), 469–492.CrossRef

Zhang, C. J. (2022). Formal and informal institutional legacies and inward foreign direct investment into firms: Evidence from China. Journal of International Business Studies, 53(6), 1228–1256.CrossRef

Zhang, J. A., Bai, T., & O’Kane, C. (2022). How political connections affect entrepreneurial risk-taking in SMEs: A symmetric assessment and a configurational approach. International Small Business Journal-Researching Entrepreneurship, forthcoming.

Zhao, M. L., Liu, J. X., & Shu, C. L. (2021). Pursuing sustainable development through green entrepreneurship: An institutional perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 4281–4296.CrossRef

Zhou, W. B. (2013). Political connections and entrepreneurial investment: Evidence from China’s transition economy. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(2), 299–315.CrossRef

Titel: Unpacking the effect of institutional support on international corporate entrepreneurship in entrepreneurial support systems
verfasst von: Fei Zhou
Xue Li
Chunjia Han
Lan Zhang
Brij B. Gupta
Publikationsdatum: 31.03.2023
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal / Ausgabe 3/2023
Print ISSN: 1554-7191
Elektronische ISSN: 1555-1938
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-023-00861-6

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2023

Turbulence and adaptations to the coronavirus crisis: resources, coping and effects on stress and wellbeing of entrepreneurs

Entrepreneurial intention and creative performance – the role of distress tolerance

Entrepreneurial efforts and opportunity costs: evidence from twitch streamers

New paradigms of sustainable entrepreneurship in metaverse: a micro-level perspective

Measuring performance differentials across entrepreneurship types

Sociocultural factors and social entrepreneurial intention during the COVID-19 pandemic: Preliminary evidence from developing countries

Premium Partner