Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.
Wählen Sie Textabschnitte aus um mit Künstlicher Intelligenz passenden Patente zu finden.
powered by
Markieren Sie Textabschnitte, um KI-gestützt weitere passende Inhalte zu finden.
powered by
Abstract
This chapter focuses on Tehran's shifting proliferation aspirations and highlights Iran's transformation from a low-to-moderate proliferation aspirant to a moderate-to-high proliferation aspirant following the fracture of the nuclear deal by the United States. The chapter outlines that Iran has already breached its uranium limit, as agreed upon in the 2015 nuclear deal, thus partially stepping out of the agreement. Despite remaining compliant with the JCPOA for a year after the U.S. withdrawal, Iran has now accumulated sufficient uranium for the production of multiple nuclear weapons and has resumed enrichment activities at the underground site in Fordow. There is a concern that if the US imposes further sanctions despite its own non-compliance with the deal, and Iran may withdraw from both the JCPOA and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). The “maximum pressure” policy pursued by the Trump administration is highlighted as a significant trigger, leading to Iran producing at least eight times more enriched uranium than permitted under the agreement. Furthermore, Iran's refusal to cooperate fully with international inspectors is noted, and the chapter presents evidence of Iran progressively deviating from its commitments under the deal.
The Biden administration's decision to maintain sanctions on Iran, mirroring the approach of the Trump era, has significantly impacted Iran's nuclear proliferation activities. These sanctions have subjected Iran to economic pressure, severely restricting its international trade, access to financial markets, and oil exports, thereby impeding its ability to invest in its nuclear program. In response, Iran has escalated its nuclear activities, including higher uranium enrichment levels and the development of advanced centrifuges, signaling a resolve to withstand economic coercion. While the Biden administration seeks to engage in negotiations to revive the JCPOA or establish a new agreement, the continued sanctions have created a complex dynamic, whereby Iran responds to economic constraints by asserting its nuclear capabilities, underscoring the ongoing challenges in US-Iran relations and the intricacies of nuclear diplomacy in the region.
The chapter underscores Iran's strong inclination toward proliferation decisions, attributing this shift to the US defection from the deal and the subsequent lack of trust in any security arrangement. The motivations behind Iran's current uranium enrichment activities are explored in detail. A comparison is drawn between Iran's current proliferation activities and its past actions, indicating that the current intensity of Iran's proliferation efforts is the most rapid to date. This highlights the heightened determination of states to achieve their security goals under any circumstance when faced with the failure of such agreements. Additionally, it provides a causal explanation for Iran's accelerated proliferation activities, considering facilitating factors such as the presence of long-running rivalries, the existence of nuclear latency, the desire to regain lost prestige and identity, and the expectation of trade and aid benefits. It also analyzes the role played by the precipitating factor, namely the differences between major powers involved in the deal, in driving Iran's renewed interest in proliferation.
Anzeige
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.
Interview with Trita Parsi, Executive Vice President, Quincy Institute, Washington, D.C., August 7, 2019. Parsi is an expert on US-Iranian relations, Iranian foreign policy, and the geopolitics of the Middle East.
Testimony of Barbara Slavin to the Subcommittee on National Security, the Border and Foreign Affairs, Sept 15, 2023, in Joe Cirincione, “Barbara Slavin on Why We Must Free American Prisoners Held by Iran,” Strategy and History, September 15, 2023.
Interview with Seyed Hossein Mousavian, September 10, 2023. Mousavian is a former chief of Iran’s National Security and Foreign Relations Committee and scholar who served on Iran's nuclear diplomacy team in negotiations with the EU and International Atomic Energy Agency. He is a Middle East security and nuclear policy specialist at Princeton University.
Adam Kredo, “Iran Can Produce 10 Nuclear Bombs in 4 Months, Watchdog Says, as Biden Releases $6 Billion to Tehran, Its Weapon Capacity Expands,” The Washington Free Beacon, September 11, 2023.
Adam Kredo, “Iran Can Produce 10 Nuclear Bombs in 4 Months, Watchdog Says, as Biden Releases $6 Billion to Tehran, Its Weapon Capacity Expands,” The Washington Free Beacon, September 11, 2023.
“The US and the Iran Nuclear Deal: Rejoining Is Wiser than Destroying: A European Joint Call on the US to Reconsider Its Approach to the JCPOA,” European Leadership Network, May 8, 2019.
The US and the Iran Nuclear Deal: Rejoining Is Wiser than Destroying: A European Joint Call on the US to Reconsider Its Approach to the JCPOA,” European Leadership Network, May 8, 2019.
The US and the Iran Nuclear Deal: Rejoining Is Wiser than Destroying: A European Joint Call on the US to Reconsider Its Approach to the JCPOA,” European Leadership Network, May 8, 2019.
Joseph Grieco, “Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism,” in David A. Baldwin, ed., Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993), pp. 116–140.
Saira Khan, “China-US Relations: Competition and Cooperation Under Enduring Rivalry,” International Studies Association (ISA) Annual Convention, Toronto, March 2014.
See Frederic Wehrey et al., Dangerous But Not Omnipotent: Exploring the Reach and Limitations of Iranian Power in the Middle East (Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation, 2009), p. 166.
See Frederic Wehrey et al., Dangerous But Not Omnipotent: Exploring the Reach and Limitations of Iranian Power in the Middle East (Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation, 2009), p. 166.
See Frederic Wehrey et al., Dangerous But Not Omnipotent: Exploring the Reach and Limitations of Iranian Power in the Middle East (Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation, 2009), p. 167.
Nicholas J. Wheeler, “US-Iranian Relations and the Crisis of Trust,” The Birmingham Brief, University of Birmingham, August 1, 2019. Also, see Nicholas J. Wheeler, Trusting Enemies: Interpersonal Relationships in International Conflict (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).
Interview with Steven Saidman, Ottawa, February 24, 2020. Saidman holds the Paterson Chair in International Affairs at Norman Paterson School of International Affairs at Carleton University, Ottawa. Formerly, he was the Canada Research Chair in International Security and Ethnic Conflict at McGill University. Montreal. His research focuses on the international relations of ethnic conflict and comparative civil-military relations.
Interview with El Sayed Ghannam, Security and Military Affairs Deputy Head of Egyptian Mission in Iran, 2010–2011, Washington, August 10, 2019. Ghannam also served in Tehran from 2009–2010 to 2011–2013.
For more information on ‘Protracting the Protracted Conflict,’ See Saira Khan, “Nuclear Weapons and the Prolongation of the India-Pakistan Conflict,” in T. V. Paul, ed., India-Pakistan Conflict: An Enduring Rivalry, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), pp. 156–177.
Adam Krefeld, “Iran Claims to Have Formula for Nuclear Bomb: Tehran Threatens Nuclear Force Against U.S., Israel, Allies,” The Washington Free Beacon, February 19, 2019.
Adam Krefeld, “Iran Claims to Have Formula for Nuclear Bomb: Tehran Threatens Nuclear Force Against U.S., Israel, Allies,” The Washington Free Beacon, February 19, 2019.
Adam Krefeld, “Iran Claims to Have Formula for Nuclear Bomb: Tehran Threatens Nuclear Force Against U.S., Israel, Allies,” The Washington Free Beacon, February 19, 2019.
See Saira Khan, Nuclear Proliferation Dynamics in Protracted Conflict Regions: A Comparative Study of South Asia and the Middle East (Aldershot, Vermont and Sydney: Ashgate Publishing Ltd., 2002).
Interview with the Ambassador of Brazil to Bangladesh, João Tabajara de Oliveira Júnior, April 22, 2019.
The interview's primary objective was to gain insight into Brazil's perspective on Iran's potential actions in the realm of nuclear proliferation, particularly in light of Brazil and Argentina's past proximity to developing nuclear weapons in the 1980s, a development that was ultimately reversed. During the interview, the role of the United States in influencing this decision was explored, along with a discussion on Brazil's 2010 initiative to facilitate a diplomatic agreement between Iran and the US, shedding light on the reasons behind its ultimate failure. He argued that Brazil's amicable relations with its neighbors, combined with its commitment to denuclearization, played a crucial role in these decisions. Moreover, the potential for economic agreements and joint inspections to influence the policies of rivals like Brazil and Argentina was discussed. It was emphasized that Brazil's consistent adherence to its commitments served as a significant confidence-building measure for Argentina. The interview also touched upon the establishment of a peace and cooperation zone in South America during the 1990s, highlighting Brazil's efforts to ensure the security of its smaller neighbors. Initially, there was suspicion regarding Brazil's intentions, but the nation's focus on transparency created an ideal environment for collaborative efforts to thrive. The interview further focused on the nuances of asymmetric conflicts, where the responsibility lies with the stronger party to initiate changes from hostility to friendship while upholding commitments to foster trust. Additionally, it was suggested that a change in the US administration could be a catalyst for new diplomatic initiatives. The Ambassador underscored the importance of “strategic patience” for Iran in response to the developments in the nuclear realm, which were seen as predictable given the actions of the current American administration.
Aron David Miller, “There Are No Good Deals with Iran: But the Biden Administration’s Latest Negotiations with Tehran Are Still the Best Option Available,” Foreign Policy, August 14, 2023.
An interview conducted on April 17, 2019, with Tariq Karim, who held the position of Bangladesh's Ambassador to Iran from 1991 to 1995, offers valuable insights into his deep understanding of Iran's Persian identity and its impact on the country's approach to foreign relations. During his diplomatic tenure in Tehran, Ambassador Karim gained a nuanced perspective on Iran's cultural and historical heritage, which profoundly influences its foreign policy decisions. This interview serves as a window into how Iran perceives and engages with the world through the prism of its distinctive Persian identity, shedding light on the intricacies of its international relations.
Interview with Munshi Faiz Ahmed, Ambassador and Chairman of Bangladesh Institute of International and Strategic Studies (BIISS), Dhaka, April 20, 2019. He served as Bangladesh’s Ambassador to China.
Interview with Ambassador Farooq Sobhan, President, Bangladesh Enterprise Institute, Dhaka, April 18, 2019. He was the Bangladeshi Ambassador to the Peoples Republic of China from 1987 to 1990.
Interview with Munshi Faiz Ahmed, former Chairman of Bangladesh Institute of International and Strategic Studies (BIISS), a former Ambassador to China, April 20, 2019.
Interview with Munshi Faiz Ahmed, Ambassador and former Chairman of Bangladesh Institute of International and Strategic Studies (BIISS), April 20, 2019. He was Bangladesh's Ambassador to China from 2007 to 2012. During his time in Beijing, he gathered extensive knowledge on China’s BRI and its implications for world politics.
An interview conducted on April 20, 2019 with Munshi Faiz Ahmed, former Chairman at the Bangladesh Institute of International and Strategic Studies (BIISS). His notable diplomatic assignments include a significant tenure as Bangladesh's Ambassador to China from 2007 to 2012, along with earlier responsibilities as the Second Secretary from 1984 to 1989. Over the span of a decade, Ambassador Munshi Faiz Ahmed gained a profound understanding of China's internal political dynamics, its global diplomatic engagements, and its worldview. This interview provides valuable insights into his extensive experience and expertise in deciphering China's intricate domestic politics and its role on the world stage.
Ellie Geranmayeh and Nicole Grajewski, “Alone Together: How the War in Ukraine Shapes the Russian-Iranian Relationship,” European Council on Foreign Relations, September 6, 2023.
Ellie Geranmayeh and Nicole Grajewski, “Alone Together: How the War in Ukraine Shapes the Russian-Iranian Relationship,” European Council on Foreign Relations, September 6, 2023.
Adam Gallagher, Sarhang Hamasaeed, and Garrett Nada, “What You Need to Know About China’s Saudi-Iran Deal,” The United States Institute of Peace, March 16, 2023.
An interview conducted on January 17, 2019, featured Dr. Mohammad Yunus, a distinguished Nobel Peace Prize laureate and accomplished economist. Dr. Yunus is renowned for his groundbreaking work in microfinance and poverty alleviation. This interview provided a unique opportunity to comprehend the wisdom and insights of a global icon who has dedicated his career to finding innovative solutions for addressing poverty and fostering economic empowerment, particularly in developing nations. Dr. Yunus’s perspectives and experiences offer valuable lessons in the fields of economics, social entrepreneurship, and peace-building, making this interview a significant source of inspiration and knowledge.
Interview with Dr. Mohammad Yunus, Nobel Peace Prize Winner and Economist, Dhaka, January 17, 2019. Dr. Mohammad Yunus, a Nobel Peace Prize-winning economist, is a forward-thinking and insightful individual who has a keen understanding of global dynamics and the potential for unexpected shifts in the world order. His reference to the fall of the Berlin Wall as an example of transformative change occurring unpredictably underscores his perspective that traditional structures and frameworks, including governments, may undergo significant changes as people find innovative solutions to their problems. Dr. Yunus also recognizes the growing influence of non-state actors, like WikiLeaks, and the impact of advancing technology on the relevance of governments and nuclear weapons in the future. His visionary outlook and ability to anticipate evolving global trends make him a compelling and knowledgeable interviewer, well-equipped to engage in discussions on a wide range of topics, including economics, geopolitics, and social change.
“Iran has No Nuclear Weapons: IAEA Chief,” Tehran Times, August 29, 2023. The statement by the UN nuclear chief emphasizes that Iran possesses the nuclear materials required for producing several nuclear weapons, but it underscores that Iran does not currently possess any operational nuclear weapons. This distinction is crucial in the context of international efforts to monitor and regulate Iran's nuclear activities. It acknowledges Iran's capability in terms of nuclear materials while confirming that there is no evidence of Iran having developed nuclear weapons at the present time. This distinction reflects the ongoing efforts to ensure compliance with international agreements and to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons.
Metadaten
Titel
US Exit from the Deal and Tehran’s Intense Proliferation Interest