nach oben

Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting

Erschienen in:

01.08.2013 | Original Research

Value at risk estimation by quantile regression and kernel estimator

verfasst von: Alex YiHou Huang

Erschienen in: Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting | Ausgabe 2/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Risk management has attracted a great deal of attention, and Value at Risk (VaR) has emerged as a particularly popular and important measure for detecting the market risk of financial assets. The quantile regression method can generate VaR estimates without distributional assumptions; however, empirical evidence has shown the approach to be ineffective at evaluating the real level of downside risk in out-of-sample examination. This paper proposes a process in VaR estimation with methods of quantile regression and kernel estimator which applies the nonparametric technique with extreme quantile forecasts to realize a tail distribution and locate the VaR estimates. Empirical application of worldwide stock indices with 29 years of data is conducted and confirms the proposed approach outperforms others and provides highly reliable estimates.

Vorheriger Artikel Controlling shareholders’ opportunistic use of share repurchases

Nächster Artikel Oil and stock market activity when prices go up and down: the case of the oil and gas industry

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

In 1994, JP Morgan published its risk-measured program RiskMetrics which, for the first time, systematically developed detailed methodologies for VaR. In 1996, the Basel committee on banking supervision amended the Basel Capital Accord and obliged their member banks to reserve capital requirements calculated based on VaR.

Baixauli and Alvarez (2006) showed that accurate VaR estimates can be produced with correct characterization of a left-tail distribution.

For examples, see Gourieroux et al. (2000), Costello et al. (2008), Chen (2008), Chen and Liao (2009), and Lu et al. (2012).

See Table 1 in page 372 of Engle and Manganelli (2004).

See Table 5 in page 81 of Kuester et al. (2006).

In empirical applications of this study, the process is applied rolling through the entire out-of-sample, so the tail distributions are generated for each day and are different from each other. The demonstration in the figure is done as an illustration from two selected dates: August 31, 2009 (the last sampling day) and September 1, 2007 (2 years prior to the last date).

Both settings are empirically rational choices rather than selections according to statistical inferences. Thousandth quantile forecasts in empirical applications are considered very frequent and the threshold of 0.02 is reasonably extreme for determining the 1 % unconditional quantile.

The two indices are extracted with different sample periods due to data availability and stability.

Samples of emerging markets also end at August 31, 2009.

Both VaR estimate series are transformed into percentage format to coincide with return series in same scale.

The only exception is that the QR-symmetric model also has a favorable unconditional likelihood ratio test at a 10 % significance level for the FTSE100.

With only one exception where both QR-asymmetric and KQ-asymmetric models have the same back-testing outcome of 38 for the Russian stock index with out-of-samples of 2,858.

Angelidis T, Benos A, Degiannakis S (2007) A robust VaR model under different time periods and weighting schemes. Rev Quant Finan Acc 28:187–201CrossRef

Baillie RT, Bollerslev T, Mikkelsen MO (1996) Fractionally integrated generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. J Econom 74:3–30CrossRef

Baixauli JS, Alvarez S (2006) Evaluating effects if excess kurtosis on VaR estimates: evidence for international stock indices. Rev Quant Finan Acc 27:27–46CrossRef

Bali TG, Mo H, Tang Y (2008) The role of autoregressive conditional skewness and kurtosis in the estimation of conditional VaR. J Bank Finance 32:269–282CrossRef

Bollerslev T (1986) Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity. J Econom 31:307–327CrossRef

Brooks C, Burke SP, Persand G (2005) Autoregressive conditional kurtosis. J Financ Econ 3:399–421

Butler JS, Schachter B (1997) Estimating value-at-risk with a precision measure by combining kernel estimation with historical simulation. Rev Deriv Res 1:371–390

Cai Z, Wang X (2008) Nonparametric estimation of conditional VaR and expected shortfall. J Econom 147:120–130CrossRef

Chen H (2008) Value-at-Risk efficient portfolio selection using goal programming. Rev Pacific Basin Financ Markets Policies 11(2):187–200CrossRef

Chen FY, Liao SL (2009) Modelling VaR for foreign-asset portfolios in continuous time. Econ Model 26:234–240CrossRef

Chou RY, Wu CC, Liu N (2009) Forecasting time-varying covariance with a range-based dynamic conditional correlation model. Rev Quant Finan Acc 33:327–345CrossRef

Christoffersen PF (1998) Evaluating interval forecast. Int Econ Rev 39:841–862CrossRef

Connor G, Linton O (2007) Semiparametric estimation of a characteristic-based factor model of common stock returns. J Empir Finance 14:694–717CrossRef

Costello A, Asem E, Gardner E (2008) Comparison of historically simulated VaR: evidence from oil prices. Energy Econ 30:2154–2166CrossRef

Danielsson J, de Vries CG (2000) Value at risk and extreme return. Ann Econ Stat 60:239–270

Engle RF, Manganelli S (2004) CAViaR: conditional autoregressive value at risk by regression quantiles. J Bus Econ Stat 22:367–381CrossRef

Epanechnikov VA (1969) Nonparametric estimation of a multivariate probability density. Theo Prob Its App 14:153–158CrossRef

Gijbels I, Pope A, Wand MP (1999) Understanding exponential smoothing via kernel regression. J R Stat Soc Series B 61:39–50CrossRef

Giot P, Laurent S (2004) Modelling daily Value-at-Risk using realized volatility and ARCH type models. J Empir Finance 11:379–398CrossRef

Glosten LR, Jagannathan R, Runkle DE (1993) On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of the normal excess return on stocks. J Financ 48:1779–1801CrossRef

Gourieroux C, Laurent JP, Scaillet O (2000) Sensitivity analysis of Value at Risk. J Empir Finance 7:225–245CrossRef

Gray SF (1996) Modeling the conditional distribution of interest rates as a regime-switching process. J Financ Econ 42:27–62CrossRef

Harvey CR, Siddique A (1999) Autoregressive conditional skewness. J Financ Quant Anal 34:465–487CrossRef

Hendricks D (1996) Evaluating value-at-risk models using historical data. Federal Reserve Bank New York Econ Policy Rev, pp 39–69

Hsu CP, Huang CW, Chiou WJ (2011) Effectiveness of copula-extreme value theory in estimating value-at-risk: empirical evidence from Asian emerging markets. Rev Quant Finan Acc. doi:10.1007/s11156-011-0261-0

Huang AY (2009) A value-at-risk approach with kernel estimator. Appl Financ Econ 19:379–395CrossRef

Huang AY (2011) Volatility modeling by asymmetrical quadratic effect with diminishing marginal impact. Comp Econ 37:301–330CrossRef

Jondeau E, Rockinger M (2003) Conditional volatility, skewness, and kurtosis: existence, persistence, and comovements. J Econ Dyn Control 27:1699–1737CrossRef

Jones MC, Marron JS, Sheather SJ (1996) A brief survey of bandwidth selection for density estimation. J Am Stat Assoc 91:401–407CrossRef

Jorion P (2006) Value at risk: the new benchmark for managing financial risk, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill

Kahneman I, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47:263–290CrossRef

Koenker R, Basset G (1978) Regression quantiles. Econometrica 46:33–50CrossRef

Kuan CM, Yeh JH, Hsu YC (2009) Assessing value at risk with CARE, the conditional autoregressive expectile models. J Econom 150:261–270CrossRef

Kuester K, Mittnik S, Paolella MS (2006) Value-at-Risk prediction: a comparison of alternative strategies. J Financ Econom 4:53–89

Ledoit O, Wolf M (2008) Robust performance hypothesis testing with the Sharpe ratio. J Empir Finance 15:850–859CrossRef

Lee CF, Su JB (2011) Alternative statistical distributions for estimating value-at-risk: theory and evidence. Rev Quant Finan Acc. doi:10.1007/s11156-011-0256-x

Lu C, Tse Y, Williams M (2012) Returns transmission, value at risk, and diversification benefits in international REITs: evidence from the financial crisis. Rev Quant Finan Acc. doi:10.1007/s11156-012-0274-3

Markowitz H (1952) Portfolio selection. J Financ 7:77–91

McNeil AJ, Frey R (2000) Estimation of tail-related risk measures for heteroscedastic financial time series: an extreme value approach. J Empir Finance 7:71–300CrossRef

Mittnik S, Paolella MS, Rachev S (2002) Stationarity of stable power-GARCH processes. J Econom 106:97–107CrossRef

Neftci SN (2000) Value at Risk calculations, extreme events, and tail estimation. J Deriv 7:23–37CrossRef

Nelson DB (1991) Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: a new approach. Econometrica 59:347–370CrossRef

Poon S, Granger CW (2003) Forecasting volatility in financial markets: a review. J Econ Lit 41:478–539

Sentana E (1995) Quadratic ARCH models. Rev Econ Stud 62:639–661CrossRef

Sheather SJ, Marron JS (1990) Kernel quantile estimators. J Am Stat Assoc 85:410–416CrossRef

Silverman BW (1986) Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman and Hall, London

Taylor JW (2008) Using exponentially weighted quantile regression to estimate value at risk and expected shortfall. J Financ Econom 6:382–406

Venkataraman S (1997) Value at risk for a mixture of normal distributions: the use of quasi-Bayesian estimation techniques. Econ Perspect 21:2–13

Titel: Value at risk estimation by quantile regression and kernel estimator
verfasst von: Alex YiHou Huang
Publikationsdatum: 01.08.2013
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting / Ausgabe 2/2013
Print ISSN: 0924-865X
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7179
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-012-0308-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2013

Controlling shareholders’ opportunistic use of share repurchases

Copula-GARCH versus dynamic conditional correlation: an empirical study on VaR and ES forecasting accuracy

Corporate governance and market segmentation: evidence from the price difference between Chinese A and H shares

Market implied future earnings and analysts’ forecasts

Non-audit fees, institutional monitoring, and audit quality

Managerial flexibility and the wealth effect of new product introductions