Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Human Studies 1/2018

31.08.2017 | Theoretical/Philosophical Paper

Viewing Spontaneity Ethnomethodologically

verfasst von: Nicolas J. Zaunbrecher

Erschienen in: Human Studies | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this article, I identify “spontaneity” as a significant but poorly-analyzed term in social theory and description through an overview of tensions between varying technical accounts of spontaneity in research literature. In contrast to conceptually-slippery “realist” accounts of spontaneity, I argue for viewing spontaneity ethnomethodologically, i.e., as a contextually-emergent social practice. I suggest two directions for future applications of this approach: first, an ethnomethodological approach to rhetorical analysis of unanalyzed use of the term “spontaneity” in research literature, and second, observational studies of improvisational theatre, a social practice in which orientation toward the production of spontaneity by participants is criterial to the identity of the practice.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Berger, H. (1995). The routinization of spontaneity. Sociology of Religion, 56(1), 49–61.CrossRef Berger, H. (1995). The routinization of spontaneity. Sociology of Religion, 56(1), 49–61.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bland, D. (1990). Patterns of spontaneous rhetoric: Ways of praying among the charismatic Bible Temple community. Journal of Communication and Religion, 13(1), 1–11. Bland, D. (1990). Patterns of spontaneous rhetoric: Ways of praying among the charismatic Bible Temple community. Journal of Communication and Religion, 13(1), 1–11.
Zurück zum Zitat Buckareff, A. A. (2005). How (not) to think about mental action. Philosophical Explorations, 8(1), 83–89.CrossRef Buckareff, A. A. (2005). How (not) to think about mental action. Philosophical Explorations, 8(1), 83–89.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Carter, M. (2003). Communicative spontaneity of children with high support needs who use augmentative and alternative communication systems I: Classroom spontaneity, mode and function. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19(3), 141–154.CrossRef Carter, M. (2003). Communicative spontaneity of children with high support needs who use augmentative and alternative communication systems I: Classroom spontaneity, mode and function. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19(3), 141–154.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Carter, M., & Hotchkis, G. D. (2002). A conceptual analysis of communicative spontaneity. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 27(3), 168–190.CrossRef Carter, M., & Hotchkis, G. D. (2002). A conceptual analysis of communicative spontaneity. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 27(3), 168–190.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Christoforou, A., & Kipper, D. A. (2006). The Spontaneity Assessment Inventory (SAI), anxiety, obsessive-compulsive tendency, and temporal orientation. Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama, and Sociometry, 59(1), 23–34.CrossRef Christoforou, A., & Kipper, D. A. (2006). The Spontaneity Assessment Inventory (SAI), anxiety, obsessive-compulsive tendency, and temporal orientation. Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama, and Sociometry, 59(1), 23–34.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Davelaar, P. M., Araujo, F. S., & Kipper, D. A. (2008). The Revised Spontaneity Assessment Inventory (SAI-R): Relationship to goal orientation, motivation, perceived self-efficacy, and self esteem. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 35, 117–128.CrossRef Davelaar, P. M., Araujo, F. S., & Kipper, D. A. (2008). The Revised Spontaneity Assessment Inventory (SAI-R): Relationship to goal orientation, motivation, perceived self-efficacy, and self esteem. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 35, 117–128.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eberle, T. S. (2012). Phenomenological life-world analysis and ethnomethodology’s program. Human Studies, 35, 279–304.CrossRef Eberle, T. S. (2012). Phenomenological life-world analysis and ethnomethodology’s program. Human Studies, 35, 279–304.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Garfinkel, H. (1996). Ethnomethodology’s program. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59(1), 5–21.CrossRef Garfinkel, H. (1996). Ethnomethodology’s program. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59(1), 5–21.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Genev, D. (2013). Ethnomethodological and hermeneutic-phenomenological perspectives on scientific practices. Human Studies, 36, 277–305.CrossRef Genev, D. (2013). Ethnomethodological and hermeneutic-phenomenological perspectives on scientific practices. Human Studies, 36, 277–305.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat George, J. M., & Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling good-doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work—organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 112(2), 310–329.CrossRef George, J. M., & Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling good-doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work—organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 112(2), 310–329.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. (1997). Organizational spontaneity in context. Human Performance, 10(2), 153–170.CrossRef George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. (1997). Organizational spontaneity in context. Human Performance, 10(2), 153–170.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
Zurück zum Zitat Heap, J. L. (1980). Description in ethnomethodology. Human Studies, 3, 87–106.CrossRef Heap, J. L. (1980). Description in ethnomethodology. Human Studies, 3, 87–106.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ivanhoe, P. J. (2005). The values of spontaneity. In Building bridges: East and west—Eighth annual graduate student philosophy conference. Southern Illinois University—Carbondale, Carbondale, IL, 4 November 2005. Ivanhoe, P. J. (2005). The values of spontaneity. In Building bridges: East and westEighth annual graduate student philosophy conference. Southern Illinois University—Carbondale, Carbondale, IL, 4 November 2005.
Zurück zum Zitat Kellar, H., Treadwell, T. W., Kumar, V. K., & Leach, E. S. (2002). The Personal Attitude Scale-II: A revised measure of spontaneity. Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama, and Sociometry, 55(1), 35–46.CrossRef Kellar, H., Treadwell, T. W., Kumar, V. K., & Leach, E. S. (2002). The Personal Attitude Scale-II: A revised measure of spontaneity. Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama, and Sociometry, 55(1), 35–46.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kindler, A. (2010). Spontaneity and improvisation in psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 30, 222–234.CrossRef Kindler, A. (2010). Spontaneity and improvisation in psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 30, 222–234.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kipper, D. A. (1998). Psychodrama and trauma: Implications for future interventions of psychodramatic role-playing modalities. International Journal of Action Methods, 51(3), 13–21. Kipper, D. A. (1998). Psychodrama and trauma: Implications for future interventions of psychodramatic role-playing modalities. International Journal of Action Methods, 51(3), 13–21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kipper, D. A. (2005). Introduction to the special issue on the treatment of couples and families with psychodrama and action methods: The case of generic psychodrama. Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama, and Sociometry, 58(2), 51–54.CrossRef Kipper, D. A. (2005). Introduction to the special issue on the treatment of couples and families with psychodrama and action methods: The case of generic psychodrama. Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama, and Sociometry, 58(2), 51–54.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kipper, D. A., Davelaar, P. S., & Herst, S. (2009). The relationship between spontaneity and inhibition. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 36, 329–334.CrossRef Kipper, D. A., Davelaar, P. S., & Herst, S. (2009). The relationship between spontaneity and inhibition. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 36, 329–334.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kipper, D. A., & Hundal, J. (2005). The spontaneity assessment inventory: The relationship between spontaneity and nonspontaneity. Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama, and Sociometry, 58(3), 119–129.CrossRef Kipper, D. A., & Hundal, J. (2005). The spontaneity assessment inventory: The relationship between spontaneity and nonspontaneity. Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama, and Sociometry, 58(3), 119–129.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kipper, D. A., & Ritchie, T. D. (2003). The effectiveness of psychodramatic techniques: A meta-analysis. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7(1), 13–25.CrossRef Kipper, D. A., & Ritchie, T. D. (2003). The effectiveness of psychodramatic techniques: A meta-analysis. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7(1), 13–25.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kozlowski, R. (2002). The art of Chicago improv: Shortcuts to long-form improvisation. Portsmouth: Heinemann. Kozlowski, R. (2002). The art of Chicago improv: Shortcuts to long-form improvisation. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Zurück zum Zitat Kubovy, M. (1977). Response availability and the apparent spontaneity of numerical choices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3(2), 359–364. Kubovy, M. (1977). Response availability and the apparent spontaneity of numerical choices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3(2), 359–364.
Zurück zum Zitat Kubovy, M., & Psotka, J. (1976). The predominance of seven and the apparent spontaneity of numerical choices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2(2), 291–294. Kubovy, M., & Psotka, J. (1976). The predominance of seven and the apparent spontaneity of numerical choices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2(2), 291–294.
Zurück zum Zitat Mahmood, S. (2001). Rehearsed spontaneity and the conventionality of ritual: Disciples of salat. American Ethnologist, 28, 827–854.CrossRef Mahmood, S. (2001). Rehearsed spontaneity and the conventionality of ritual: Disciples of salat. American Ethnologist, 28, 827–854.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Maynard, D. W., & Clayman, S. E. (1991). The diversity of ethnomethodology. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 385–418.CrossRef Maynard, D. W., & Clayman, S. E. (1991). The diversity of ethnomethodology. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 385–418.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McVea, C., & Reekie, D. (2007). Freedom to act in new ways: The application of Moreno’s spontaneity theory and role playing to psychological coaching. Australian Psychologist, 42(4), 295–299.CrossRef McVea, C., & Reekie, D. (2007). Freedom to act in new ways: The application of Moreno’s spontaneity theory and role playing to psychological coaching. Australian Psychologist, 42(4), 295–299.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Meares, R. (2001). What happens next? A developmental model of therapeutic spontaneity. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 11(5), 755–769.CrossRef Meares, R. (2001). What happens next? A developmental model of therapeutic spontaneity. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 11(5), 755–769.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Peyrot, M. (1982). Understanding ethnomethodology: A remedy for some common misconceptions. Human Studies, 5, 261–283.CrossRef Peyrot, M. (1982). Understanding ethnomethodology: A remedy for some common misconceptions. Human Studies, 5, 261–283.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pina e Cunha, M., Kamoche, K., & Campos e Cunha, R. (2003). Organization improvisation and leadership: A field study in two computer-mediated settings. International Studies of Management and Organization, 33(1), 34–57. Pina e Cunha, M., Kamoche, K., & Campos e Cunha, R. (2003). Organization improvisation and leadership: A field study in two computer-mediated settings. International Studies of Management and Organization, 33(1), 34–57.
Zurück zum Zitat Pinnington, A., Morris, T., & Pinnington, C. (2003). The relational structure of improvisation: A case illustration from corporate video production. International Studies of Management and Organization, 33(1), 10–33. Pinnington, A., Morris, T., & Pinnington, C. (2003). The relational structure of improvisation: A case illustration from corporate video production. International Studies of Management and Organization, 33(1), 10–33.
Zurück zum Zitat Rawls, A. W. (2011). Garfinkel, ethnomethodology, and the defining questions of pragmatism. Qualitative Sociology, 34, 277–282.CrossRef Rawls, A. W. (2011). Garfinkel, ethnomethodology, and the defining questions of pragmatism. Qualitative Sociology, 34, 277–282.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ringstrom, P. A. (2001). Cultivating the improvisational in psychoanalytic treatment. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 11(5), 727–754.CrossRef Ringstrom, P. A. (2001). Cultivating the improvisational in psychoanalytic treatment. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 11(5), 727–754.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ringstrom, P. A. (2010). Yes/and, Alan! A few additional thoughts. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 30, 235–242.CrossRef Ringstrom, P. A. (2010). Yes/and, Alan! A few additional thoughts. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 30, 235–242.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Salinsky, T., & Frances-White, D. (2008). The improv handbook. New York: Continuum. Salinsky, T., & Frances-White, D. (2008). The improv handbook. New York: Continuum.
Zurück zum Zitat Scholl, E. (2004). Spontaneity. Cistercian Studies Quarterly, 39(1), 41–47. Scholl, E. (2004). Spontaneity. Cistercian Studies Quarterly, 39(1), 41–47.
Zurück zum Zitat Spolin, V. (1999). Improvisation for the theatre (3rd ed.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press. Spolin, V. (1999). Improvisation for the theatre (3rd ed.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Starr, A., & Weisz, H. S. (1989). Psychodramatic techniques in the brief treatment of inpatient groups. Individual Psychology: The Journal of Adlerian Theory, Research and Practice, 45(1/2), 143–147. Starr, A., & Weisz, H. S. (1989). Psychodramatic techniques in the brief treatment of inpatient groups. Individual Psychology: The Journal of Adlerian Theory, Research and Practice, 45(1/2), 143–147.
Zurück zum Zitat Strawson, G. (2003). Mental ballistics or the involuntariness of spontaneity. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 103(3), 227–256.CrossRef Strawson, G. (2003). Mental ballistics or the involuntariness of spontaneity. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 103(3), 227–256.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tauven, L. (2001). A comparison of psychoanalytic and psychdramatic theory from a psychodramatist’s perspective. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 14(4), 331–355.CrossRef Tauven, L. (2001). A comparison of psychoanalytic and psychdramatic theory from a psychodramatist’s perspective. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 14(4), 331–355.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Treadwell, T. W., & Kumar, V. K. (2002). Introduction to the special issue on cognitive behavioral therapy and psychodrama. Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama, and Sociometry, 54(2/3), 51–53.CrossRef Treadwell, T. W., & Kumar, V. K. (2002). Introduction to the special issue on cognitive behavioral therapy and psychodrama. Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama, and Sociometry, 54(2/3), 51–53.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Viera da Cunha, J., Kamoche, K., & Pina e Cunha, M. (2003). Organizational improvisation: A contextual approach. International Review of Sociology, 13(3), 567–589.CrossRef Viera da Cunha, J., Kamoche, K., & Pina e Cunha, M. (2003). Organizational improvisation: A contextual approach. International Review of Sociology, 13(3), 567–589.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Viewing Spontaneity Ethnomethodologically
verfasst von
Nicolas J. Zaunbrecher
Publikationsdatum
31.08.2017
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Human Studies / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0163-8548
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-851X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-017-9442-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Human Studies 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner