nach oben

Shape Memory and Superelasticity

Erschienen in:

24.03.2023 | TECHNICAL ARTICLE

Viewpoint: Tuning the Martensitic Transformation Mode in Shape Memory Ceramics via Mesostructure and Microstructure Design

verfasst von: Donald J. Erb, Hunter A. Rauch, Kendall P. Knight, Hang Z. Yu

Erschienen in: Shape Memory and Superelasticity | Ausgabe 1/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The shape memory and superelastic effects are based on mechanically or thermally induced martensitic transformation. In bulk monolithic shape memory materials, these effects are characterized by a driving force threshold, such as a critical stress or a critical temperature, above which the transformation is completed within a relatively narrow window of stress or temperature. In this viewpoint article, we discuss the tuning of macroscopic martensitic transformation characteristics via mesostructure and microstructure design: with heterogeneous driving force and low nucleation barrier in meso-/micro-structured shape memory materials, especially shape memory ceramics, local transformation events can occur sequentially rather than simultaneously. This can lead to a globally continuous transformation mode without well-defined critical stress or temperature. Based on the insights from mechanics modeling and experimental evidence, we illustrate this effect in granular packings, metal matrix composites, and cellular architectures, and discuss how it may unlock new possibilities for applications involving actuation and energy dissipation.

Vorheriger Artikel Considerations on Tension–Tension Fatigue Predictions for Nitinol

Nächster Artikel Advancing Nitinol Implant Design and Simulation Through Data-Driven Methodologies

Yu HZ, Hassani-Gangaraj M, Du ZH, Gan CL, Schuh CA (2017) Granular shape memory ceramic packings. Acta Mater 132:455–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.04.057CrossRef

Chowdhury P, Patriarca L, Ren G, Sehitoglu H (2016) Molecular dynamics modeling of NiTi superelasticity in presence of nanoprecipitates. Int J Plast 81:152–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2016.01.011CrossRef

Ogawa Y, Ando D, Sutou Y, Koike J (2016) A lightweight shape-memory magnesium alloy. Science 353(6297):368–370. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf6524CrossRef

Tanaka Y, Himuro Y, Kainuma R, Sutou Y, Omori T, Ishida K (2010) Ferrous polycrystalline shape-memory alloy showing huge superelasticity. Science 327(5972):1488–1490. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183169CrossRef

Hofmann DC (2010) Shape memory bulk metallic glass composites. Science 329(5997):1294–1295. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1193522CrossRef

Xie T (2010) Tunable polymer multi-shape memory effect. Nature 464(7286):267–270. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08863CrossRef

Xie T (2011) Recent advances in polymer shape memory. Polymer 52(22):4985–5000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2011.08.003CrossRef

Reyes-Morel PE, Cherng J-S, Chen IW (1988) Transformation plasticity of CeO₂-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystals: II, pseudoelasticity and shape memory effect. J Am Ceram Soc 71(8):648–657. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1988.tb06383.xCrossRef

Wang Y, Ren X, Otsuka K (2006) Shape memory effect and superelasticity in a strain glass alloy. Phys Rev Lett 97(22):225703. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.225703CrossRef

10.

Casalena L, Bucsek AN, Pagan DC, Hommer GM, Bigelow GS, Obstalecki M, Noebe RD, Mills MJ, Stebner AP (2018) Structure-property relationships of a high strength superelastic NiTi–1Hf alloy. Adv Eng Mater 20(9):1800046. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201800046CrossRef

11.

Bucsek AN, Hudish GA, Bigelow GS, Noebe RD, Stebner AP (2016) Composition, compatibility, and the functional performances of ternary NiTiX high-temperature shape memory alloys. Shape Mem Superelasticity 2(1):62–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40830-016-0052-5CrossRef

12.

Schaedler TA, Carter WB (2016) Architected cellular materials. Annu Rev Mater Res 46(1):187–210. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-031624CrossRef

13.

Restrepo D, Mankame ND, Zavattieri PD (2015) Phase transforming cellular materials. Extreme Mech Lett 4:52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2015.08.001CrossRef

14.

Naebe M, Shirvanimoghaddam K (2016) Functionally graded materials: a review of fabrication and properties. Appl Mater Today 5:223–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2016.10.001CrossRef

15.

Ashby MF, Chapter 11—Designing Hybrid Materials, Materials Selection in Mechanical Design (4th Edition), M.F. Ashby, (Ed.), Butterworth-Heinemann, 2011, p 299–340

16.

Kazemi H, Vaziri A, Norato JA (2018) Topology optimization of structures made of discrete geometric components with different materials. J Mech Des. https://doi.org/10.1115/14040624CrossRef

17.

Yan X, Huang X, Zha Y, Xie YM (2014) Concurrent topology optimization of structures and their composite microstructures. Comput Struct 133:103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2013.12.001CrossRef

18.

Asadpoure A, Tootkaboni M, Guest JK (2011) Robust topology optimization of structures with uncertainties in stiffness—Application to truss structures. Comput Struct 89(11):1131–1141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2010.11.004CrossRef

19.

Zhao M, Qing H, Wang Y, Liang J, Zhao M, Geng Y, Liang J, Lu B (2021) Superelastic behaviors of additively manufactured porous NiTi shape memory alloys designed with Menger sponge-like fractal structures. Mater Des 200:109448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109448CrossRef

20.

Wang Z (2019) Recent advances in novel metallic honeycomb structure. Compos Part B 166:731–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.02.011CrossRef

21.

Meza LR, Das S, Greer JR (2014) Strong, lightweight, and recoverable three-dimensional ceramic nanolattices. Science 345(6202):1322–1326. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255908CrossRef

22.

Cui H, Hensleigh R, Yao D, Maurya D, Kumar P, Kang MG, Priya S, Zheng XR (2019) Three-dimensional printing of piezoelectric materials with designed anisotropy and directional response. Nat Mater 18(3):234–241. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-018-0268-1CrossRef

23.

Portela CM, Edwards BW, Veysset D, Sun Y, Nelson KA, Kochmann DM, Greer JR (2021) Supersonic impact resilience of nanoarchitected carbon. Nat Mater 20(11):1491–1497. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-021-01033-zCrossRef

24.

Bauer J, Meza LR, Schaedler TA, Schwaiger R, Zheng X, Valdevit L (2017) Nanolattices: an emerging class of mechanical metamaterials. Adv Mater 29(40):1701850. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201701850CrossRef

25.

Rauch HA, Cui H, Knight KP, Griffiths RJ, Yoder JK, Zheng X, Yu HZ (2022) Additive manufacturing of yttrium-stabilized tetragonal zirconia: progressive wall collapse, martensitic transformation, and energy dissipation in micro-honeycombs. Addit Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.102692CrossRef

26.

Machado G, Louche H, Alonso T, Favier D (2015) Superelastic cellular NiTi tube-based materials: Fabrication, experiments and modeling. Mater Des (1980–2015) 65:212–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.007CrossRef

27.

Du Z, Zeng XM, Liu Q, Schuh CA, Gan CL (2016) Superelasticity in micro-scale shape memory ceramic particles. Acta Mater 123:255–263CrossRef

28.

Lai A, Du Z, Gan CL, Schuh CA (2013) Shape memory and superelastic ceramics at small scales. Science 341(6153):1505–1508. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239745CrossRef

29.

Chen Y, Schuh CA (2011) Size effects in shape memory alloy microwires. Acta Mater 59(2):537–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2010.09.057CrossRef

30.

Dunand DC, Müllner P (2011) Size effects on magnetic actuation in Ni-Mn-Ga shape-memory alloys. Adv Mater 23(2):216–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201002753CrossRef

31.

Zhu J, Gao Y, Wang D, Zhang T-Y, Wang Y (2017) Taming martensitic transformation via concentration modulation at nanoscale. Acta Mater 130:196–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.03.042CrossRef

32.

Wang D, Hou S, Wang Y, Ding X, Ren S, Ren X, Wang Y (2014) Superelasticity of slim hysteresis over a wide temperature range by nanodomains of martensite. Acta Mater 66:349–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2013.11.022CrossRef

33.

Rauch HA, Yu HZ (2020) Effects of mechanical constraint on thermally induced reverse martensitic transformation in granular shape memory ceramic packings. J Appl Phys 128(24):245102. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0035041CrossRef

34.

Rauch HA, Chen Y, An K, Yu HZ (2019) In situ investigation of stress-induced martensitic transformation in granular shape memory ceramic packings. Acta Mater 168:362–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2019.02.028CrossRef

35.

Majmudar TS, Behringer RP (2005) Contact force measurements and stress-induced anisotropy in granular materials. Nature 435(7045):1079–1082. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03805CrossRef

36.

Tordesillas A, Tobin ST, Cil M, Alshibli K, Behringer RP (2015) Network flow model of force transmission in unbonded and bonded granular media. Phys Rev E 91(6):062204. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.91.062204CrossRef

37.

Boyd JG, Lagoudas DC (1996) A thermodynamical constitutive model for shape memory materials. Part I. The monolithic shape memory alloy. Int J Plast 12(6):805–842. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-6419(96)00030-7CrossRef

38.

COMSOL Structural Mechanics Module User’s Guide, 2020

39.

Shape Memory Alloys: Modeling and Engineering Applications, D.C. Lagoudas, (Ed.), Springer, 2008

40.

Lagoudas DC, Entchev PB (2004) Modeling of transformation-induced plasticity and its effect on the behavior of porous shape memory alloys. Part I: constitutive model for fully dense SMAs. Mech Mater 36(9):865–892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2003.08.006CrossRef

41.

Lagoudas DC, Entchev PB, Popov P, Patoor E, Brinson LC, Gao XJ (2006) Shape memory alloys, Part II: Modeling of polycrystals. Mech Mater 38(5–6):430–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2005.08.003CrossRef

42.

Reyes-Morel PE, Chen I-W (1988) Transformation plasticity of CeO₂-Stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystals: I, stress assistance and autocatalysis. J Am Ceram Soc 71(5):343–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1988.tb05052.xCrossRef

43.

Du Z, Zeng XM, Liu Q, Lai A, Amini S, Miserez A, Schuh CA, Gan CL (2015) Size effects and shape memory properties in ZrO₂ ceramic micro- and nano-pillars. Scripta Mater 101:40–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.01.013CrossRef

44.

Maran S, Masters IG, Gibbons GJ (2020) Additive manufacture of 3D auxetic structures by laser powder bed fusion—Design influence on manufacturing accuracy and mechanical properties. Appl Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10217738CrossRef

45.

Arghavani J, Auricchio F, Naghdabadi R, Reali A, Sohrabpour S (2010) A 3-D phenomenological constitutive model for shape memory alloys under multiaxial loadings. Int J Plast 26(7):976–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2009.12.003CrossRef

46.

Auricchio F (2001) A robust integration-algorithm for a finite-strain shape-memory-alloy superelastic model. Int J Plast 17(7):971–990. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-6419(00)00050-4CrossRef

47.

Auricchio F, Petrini L (2004) A three-dimensional model describing stress-temperature induced solid phase transformations: solution algorithm and boundary value problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng 61(6):807–836. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1086CrossRef

48.

Ahadi A, Sun Q (2014) Effects of grain size on the rate-dependent thermomechanical responses of nanostructured superelastic NiTi. Acta Mater 76(2014):186–197CrossRef

Titel: Viewpoint: Tuning the Martensitic Transformation Mode in Shape Memory Ceramics via Mesostructure and Microstructure Design
verfasst von: Donald J. Erb
Hunter A. Rauch
Kendall P. Knight
Hang Z. Yu
Publikationsdatum: 24.03.2023
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Shape Memory and Superelasticity / Ausgabe 1/2023
Print ISSN: 2199-384X
Elektronische ISSN: 2199-3858
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40830-023-00430-4

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2023

Shape Memory and Superelasticity Announces a New Addition to the Editorial Advisory Board

Heat Source Reconstruction and Its Relationship with Functional Fatigue of Pseudoelastic NiTi Ribbons

Numerical Investigation on the Effect of Inclusions on the Local Fatigue Strain in Superelastic NiTi Alloy

Enhancing Shape Memory Response of Additively Manufactured Niti Shape Memory Alloys by Texturing and Post-Processing Heat Treatment

Tensile Deformation of B19′ Martensite in Nanocrystalline NiTi Wires

Advancing Nitinol Implant Design and Simulation Through Data-Driven Methodologies

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten