nach oben

Quality & Quantity

01.09.2015

War on terror: Do military measures matter? Empirical analysis of post 9/11 period in Pakistan

Erschienen in: Quality & Quantity | Ausgabe 5/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This paper is the first attempt to investigate the causal relationship between military spending, terrorist attacks and intensity of terrorism in case of Pakistan, by applying the ARDL approach to cointegration and innovation accounting approach for causality analysis. The results indicate that war on terror is the major determinant of military spending followed by terrorism intensity and the number of terrorist attacks respectively. The study further finds that terrorism intensity and terrorist attacks Granger-cause military spending but the reverse is not present. The failure of military measures to curtail terrorism and its intensity induces one to suggest greater involvement of civil intelligence agencies by raising their budgets instead of pure military budget.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

See Shahbaz (2010) for justification of log-linear specification.

It is argued in economics literature that the Granger causality approaches such VECM Granger causality test has some limitations. The causality test cannot capture the relative strength of causal relation between the variable beyond the selected time period. This weakens the reliability of causality results by VECM Granger approach (Wolde-Rufael 2009).

The OLS regression results are available from authors upon request. We have used dummy i.e. 1 after 2001 and 0 for the rest of the years.

In Swat, the terrorism intensity was extremely high not only because of high fatalities but also due to the type of terrorist attacks, including suicide bombings and beheading the people. Its intensity was felt even in Islamabad and therefore, when the operation was conducted in Swat, it was welcomed by the people.

Abadie, A., Gardeazabal, J.: The economic costs of conflict: a case study of the Basque Country. Am. Econ. Rev. 93(1), 113–132 (2003)CrossRef

Akhmet, G., Zaman, K., Shukui, T., Sajjad, F.: Exploring The root causes Of Terrorism In South Asia: everybody should be concerned. Qual Quant, 1–15 (2013). doi:10.1007/s11135-013-9941-2

Alesina, A., Perotti, R.: Income distribution, political instability, and investment. NBER Working Paper No. 4486 National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA (1993)

Alesina, A., Perotti, R.: Income distribution, political instability, and investment. Eur. Econ. Rev. 40(6), 1203–1228 (1996)CrossRef

Alesina, A., Ozler, S., Roubini, N., Swagel, P.: Political instability and economic growth. J. Econ. Growth 1(2), 189–212 (1996)CrossRef

Arora, V., Bayoumi, T.: Economic Benefits of Reducing Military Expenditure, Annex II in World Economic Outlook. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC (1993)

Arunatilake, N., Jayasuriya, S., Kelegama, S.: The economic cost of the war in Sri Lanka. Research studies:macroeconomic policy and planning series 13 Colombo: Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka (2001)

Barro, R.J.: Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Q. J. Econ. 106(6), 407–443 (1991)CrossRef

Baum, C.F.: A review of Stata 8.1 and its time series capabilities. Int. J. Forecast. 20(1), 151–161 (2004)CrossRef

Benoit, E.: Growth and defense in developing countries. Econ. Dev. Cult. Chang. 26(2), 271–280 (1978)CrossRef

Blomberg, S.B., Hess, G., Orphanides, A.: The macroeconomic consequences of terrorism. J. Monet. Econ. 51(5), 1007–1032 (2004)CrossRef

Brophy-Baermann, B., Conybeare, J.A.C.: Retaliating against terrorism: rational expectations and the optimality of rules versus discretion. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 38(1), 196–210 (1994)CrossRef

Carroll, D.: A guns vs. taxes? A look at how defense spending affects U.S. federal tax policy. Public Budg. Financ. 26(2), 59–78 (2006)CrossRef

Cauley, J., Im, E.I.: Intervention policy analysis of skyjackings and other terrorist incidents. Am. Econ. Rev. Pap. Proc. 78(2), 27–31 (1988)

Dickey, D.A., Fuller, W.A.: Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 74(336), 427–431 (1979)

Elliot, G., Rothenberg, T.J., Stock, J.H.: Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica 64(4), 813–836 (1996)CrossRef

Enders, W., Sandler, T.: The effectiveness of anti-terrorism policies: a vector-autoregression-intervention analysis. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 87(4), 829–844 (1993)CrossRef

Engle, R.F., Granger, C.W.J.: Cointegration and error correction representation: estimation and testing. Econometrica 55(2), 251–276 (1987)CrossRef

Feridun, M., Shahbaz, M.: Fighting terrorism: are military measures effective? Empirical evidence from Turkey. Def. Peace Econ. 21(2), 193–205 (2010)CrossRef

Gregory, A.W., Hansen, B.E.: Residual-based tests for cointegration in models with regime shifts. J. Econom. 70(1), 99–126 (1996)CrossRef

Gupta, S., Clements, B., Bhattacharya, R., Chakravarti, S.: Fiscal consequences of armed conflict and terrorism in low- and middle-income countries. Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 20(2), 403–421 (2004)CrossRef

Johansen, S.: Cointegration in partial systems and the efficiency of single-equation analysis. J. Econom. 52(3), 389–402 (1992)CrossRef

Knight, M., Loayza, N., Villanueva, D.: The peace dividend: military spending cuts and economic growth. IMF Staff Pap. 43(1), 1–37 (1996)CrossRef

Kronstadt, K.A.: Pakistan and terrorism: A summary, Specialist in Asian Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division (2007)

Landes, W.M.: An economic study of U.S. aircraft hijacking, 1961–1976. J. Law Econ. 21(1), 1–31 (1978)CrossRef

Lis, P.: Government’s role in fighting terrorism. Financ. Econ. 3(2), 1–38 (2007)

Lum, C., Kennedy, L.W., Sherley, A.J.: The effectiveness of counter-terrorism strategies. A Campbell Syst. Rev. 2(4), 1–49 (2006)

Malik, Z., Zaman, K.: Macroeconomic consequences of terrorism in Pakistan. J. Policy Model. 35, 1103–1123 (2013)CrossRef

Morley, B.: Causality between economic growth and immigration: an ARDL bounds testing approach. Econ. Lett. 90(1), 72–76 (2006)CrossRef

Narayan, P.N.: The saving and investment nexus for China: evidence from cointegration tests. Appl. Econ. 37(17), 1979–1990 (2005)CrossRef

Nasir, M., Amanat, A., Rehman, F.Ur: Determinants of terrorism: a panel data analysis of selected South Asian countries. Singap. Econ. Rev. 26(2), 175–187 (2011)CrossRef

Omand, D.: Countering international terrorism: the use of strategy. Survival 47(4), 107–116 (2005)CrossRef

Ouattara, B.: Foreign Aid and Fiscal Policy in Senegal. University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (2004)

Pakistan Economic Survey: Ministry of Pakistan, Islamabad, Pakistan (2010)

Pakistan Economic Survey: Ministry of Pakistan, Islamabad, Pakistan (2011)

Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y.: An autoregressive distributed lag modeling approach to cointegration analysis. Chapter 11 In: Strom S. (ed.) Econometrics and economic theory in the 20th century: the ragnar frisch centennial symposium. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)

Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y., Smith, R.: Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J. Appl. Econom. 16(3), 289–326 (2001)CrossRef

Richardson Jr, J.M., de Samarasinghe, A.S.W.R.: Measuring the economic dimensions of Sri Lanka’s ethnic conflict. In: de Samarasinghe, A., Coughlan, R. (eds.) Economic Dimensions of Ethnic Conflict. St. Martin’s Press, New York (1991)

Rodrik, D.: Where did all the growth go? External shocks, social conflict, and growth collapses. J. Econ. Growth 4(4), 385–412 (1999)CrossRef

Sandler, T.: Collective versus unilateral responses to terrorism. Public Choice 124(1–2), 75–93 (2005)CrossRef

Seddighi, H.R., Lawler, A., Katos, A.V.: Applied Econometrics: A Practical Approach. Routledge, London (2006)

Sezgin, S.: Country survey x: defence spending in Turkey. Def. Peace Econ. 8(4), 381–409 (1997)CrossRef

Sezgin, S.: The defense-growth relation: evidence from Greece. In: Brauer, J., Hartley, K. (eds.) The Economics of Regional Security: NATO, the Mediterranean and South Africa, pp. 113–137. Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam (2000)

Sezgin, S.: An empirical analysis of Turkey’s defence-growth relationship with a multi equation model (1956–1994). Def. Peace Econ. 12(1), 69–86 (2001)CrossRef

Shahbaz, M.: Income inequality-economic growth and non-linearity: a case of Pakistan. Int. J. Soc. Econ. 37, 613–736 (2010)CrossRef

Silke, A. (2005) Fire of lolaus: the role of state countermeasures in causing terrorism and what needs to be done. In: Bjorgo, T., (ed.) Root Causes Of Terrorism? Myths, Reality and Ways Forward. Routledge, Oxford, UK Terör Faturasi: 100 milyar dolar (2006) Radikal Gazetesi. http://www.radikal.com.tr/haber.php?haberno=203451&tarih=04/11/2006 (2006). Retrieved 3 Jan 2008

Turner, P.: Response surfaces for an F-test for cointegration. Appl. Econ. Lett. 13(8), 479–482 (2006)CrossRef

Venieris, Y.P., Gupta, D.K.: Income distribution and socio political instability as determinants of savings: a cross-sectional model. J. Polit. Econ. 94(4), 873–883 (1986)CrossRef

Wolde-Rufael, Y.: The defence spending-external debt nexus in Ethiopia. Def. Peace Econ. 20(5), 423–436 (2009)CrossRef

Zivot, E., Andrews, D.: Further evidence of great crash, the oil price shock and unit root hypothesis. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 10(3), 251–270 (1992)

Titel: War on terror: Do military measures matter? Empirical analysis of post 9/11 period in Pakistan
Publikationsdatum: 01.09.2015
Erschienen in: Quality & Quantity / Ausgabe 5/2015
Print ISSN: 0033-5177
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7845
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0084-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner