Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Philosophy of Management
Erschienen in: Philosophy of Management 1/2019

02.06.2018

When Relationships are Broken: Restorative Justice under a Levinasian Approach

verfasst von: Guglielmo Faldetta

Erschienen in: Philosophy of Management | Ausgabe 1/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The issue of damaged relationships and of repairing them is very important, especially in recent years with reports of organizations which damage relationships with various stakeholders. Many studies have investigated how individuals react to damaged relationships after perceiving injustice or receiving offense in organizations. A part of this research has been focused on revenge or other types of negative responses. However, individuals can choose to react in other ways than revenge, willing to repair relationships through reconciliation. Recently, the effectiveness of reconciliation to repair damaged relationship in organizations has been linked to restorative justice. For the purpose of this article we are interested in understanding how restorative justice can be effective in repairing damaged or broken relationships in organizations, as inspired by principles of compassion or mercy. In this sense, we look for a convincing philosophical foundation for restorative justice, proposing Levinas’ ethics as a way to justify it.
Vorheriger Artikel Corporate Social Responsibility and Dehumanization
Nächster Artikel Levinas, Weber, and a Hybrid Framework for Business Ethics

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
Aasland, D.G. 2007. The exteriority of ethics in management and its transition into justice: A Levinasian approach to ethics in business. Business Ethics: A European Review 16 (3): 220–226.CrossRef
Adams, J.S. 1963. Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67 (5): 422–436.CrossRef
Allers, C.R. 2011. Undoing what has been done: Hannah Arendt and Emmanuel Levinas on forgiveness. In Forgiveness. promise, possibility & failure, ed. G. Karabin and K. Wigura, 171–181. Freeland: Inter-Disciplinary Press.
Ambrose, M.L., M.A. Seabright, and M. Schminke. 2002. Sabotage in the workplace: The role of organizational injustice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 89 (1): 947–965.CrossRef
Aquino, K., S.L. Grover, B. Goldman, and R. Folger. 2003. When push doesn’t come to shove: Interpersonal forgiveness in workplace relationships. Journal of Management Inquiry 12 (3): 209–216.CrossRef
Aquino, K., and A. Reed II. 2002. The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83 (6): 1423–1440.CrossRef
Aquino, K., T.M. Tripp, and R.J. Bies. 2001. How employees respond to interpersonal offense: The effects of blame attribution, offender status, and victim status on revenge and reconciliation in the workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology 86 (1): 52–59.CrossRef
Aquino, K., T.M. Tripp, and R.J. Bies. 2006. Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology 91 (3): 653–668.CrossRef
Baker, M., and J. Roberts. 2011. All in the mind? Ethical identity and the allure of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 101 (1): 5–15.CrossRef
Bertels, S., M. Cody, and S. Pek. 2014. A responsive approach to organizational misconduct: rehabilitation, reintegration, and the reduction of reoffense. Business Ethics Quarterly 24 (3): 343–370.CrossRef
Bevan, D., and H. Corvellec. 2007. The impossibility of corporate ethics: For a levinasian approach to managerial ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review 16 (3): 208–219.CrossRef
Bies, R.J., and J.S. Moag. 1986. Interactional justice: Communication criteria for fairness. In Research on negotiation in organizations Vol. 1, ed. R.J. Lewicki, B.H. Sheppard, and M.H. Bazerman, 43–55. Greenwich: JAI Press.
Blok, V. 2017a. Levinasian ethics in business. In Encyclopedia of business and professional ethics, ed. D. Poff and A. Michalos, 1–5. Cham, Switzerland: Spinger.
Blok, V. 2017b. Bridging the gap between individual and corporate responsible behaviour: Toward a performative concept of corporate codes. Philosophy of Management 16 (2): 117–136.CrossRef
Bordia, P., S.L.D. Restubog, and R.L. Tang. 2008. When employees strike back: Investigating mediating mechanisms between psychological contract breach and workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology 93 (5): 1104–1117.CrossRef
Bradfield, M., and K. Aquino. 1999. The effects of blame attributions and offender likableness on forgiveness and revenge in the workplace. Journal of Management 2 (5): 697–631.
Braithwaite, J. 1999. Restorative justice: Assessing optimistic and pessimistic accounts. Crime and Justice 25: 1–127.CrossRef
Burggraeve, R. 2003. The Wisdom of love in the service of love: Emmanuel Levinas on justice, peace and human rights. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.
Byers, D., and C. Rhodes. 2007. Ethics, alterity, and organizational justice. Business Ethics: A European Review 16 (3): 239–250.CrossRef
Colquitt, J.A. 2001. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology 86 (3): 386–400.CrossRef
Cropanzano, R., Z. Byrne, D. Bobocel, and D. Rupp. 2001. Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior 58 (2): 164–209.CrossRef
Cropanzano, R., B. Goldman, and R. Folger. 2003. Deontic justice: The role of moral principles in workplace fairness. Journal of Organizational Behavior 24 (8): 1919–1024.CrossRef
Cropanzano, R., and J.H. Stein. 2009. Organizational justice and behavioral ethics: Promises and prospects. Business Ethics Quarterly 19 (2): 193–233.CrossRef
De Cremer, D., and A. Van Hiél. 2006. Effects of another person’s fair treatment on one’s own emotions and behaviors: The moderating role of how much other cares for you. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 100 (2): 231–249.CrossRef
Dirks, K.T., R.J. Lewicki, and A. Zaheer. 2009. Repairing relationships within and between organizations: Building a conceptual foundation. Academy of Management Review 34 (1): 68–84.CrossRef
Dulac, T., J.A.M. Coyle-Shapiro, D.J. Henderson, and S.J. Wayne. 2008. Not all responses to breach are the same: The interconnection of social exchange and psychological contract processes in organizations. Academy of Management Journal 51 (6): 1079–1098.CrossRef
Elangovan, A.R., and D.L. Shapiro. 1998. Betrayal of trust in organizations. Academy of Management Review 23 (3): 547–566.CrossRef
Faldetta, G. 2016. Organizational caring and organizational justice: Some implications for the employment relationship. International Journal of Organizational Analysis 24 (1): 64–80.CrossRef
Faldetta, G. 2018. A relational approach to responsibility in organizations: The logic of gift and Levinasian ethics for a ‘corporeal’ responsibility. Culture and Organization 24 (3): 196–220.CrossRef
Ferrin, D.L., P.H. Kim, C.D. Cooper, and K.T. Dirks. 2007. Silence speaks volumes: The effectiveness of reticence in comparison to apology and denial for responding to integrity-and competence-based trust violations. Journal of Applied Psychology 92 (4): 893–908.CrossRef
Folger, R. 2001. Fairness as deonance. In Research in social issues in management, ed. S.W. Gilliland, D.D. Steiner, and D.P. Skarlicki, 3–31. Greenwich: Information Age.
Fortin, M., and M.R. Fellenz. 2008. Hypocrisies of fairness: Towards a more reflexive ethical base in organizational justice research and practice. Journal of Business Ethics 78 (3): 415–433.CrossRef
Friedland, J. 2016. Retrieving philosophy in management and organization science. Philosophy of Management 15 (2): 161–169.CrossRef
Gillespie, N., and G. Dietz. 2009. Trust repair after an organization-level failure. Academy of Management Review 34 (1): 127–145.CrossRef
Goodstein, J., and K. Aquino. 2010. And restorative justice for all: Redemption, forgiveness, and reintegration in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior 31 (4): 624–628.CrossRef
Goodstein, J., and K.D. Butterfield. 2010. Extending the horizon of business ethics: Restorative justice and the aftermath of unethical behavior. Business Ethics Quarterly 20 (3): 453–480.CrossRef
Goodstein, J., K.D. Butterfield, M.D. Pfarrer, and A.C. Wicks. 2014. Individual and organizational reintegration after ethical or legal transgressions: Challenges and opportunities. Business Ethics Quarterly 24 (3): 315–342.CrossRef
Gromet, D.M., and T.G. Okimoto. 2014. Back into the fold: The influence of offender amends and victim forgiveness on peer reintegration. Business Ethics Quarterly 24 (3): 411–441.CrossRef
Jones, C. 2003. As if business ethics were possible, ‘within such limits’. Organization 10 (2): 223–248.CrossRef
Karamali, E. 2007. Has the guest arrived yet? Emmanuel Levinas, a stranger in business ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review 16 (3): 313–331.CrossRef
Kelloway, E.K., L. Francis, M. Prosser, and J.E. Cameron. 2010. Counterproductive work behavior as protest. Human Resource Management Review 20 (1): 18–25.CrossRef
Kidder, D.L. 2007. Restorative justice: Not “rights”, but the right way to heal relationships at work. International Journal of Conflict Management 18 (1): 4–22.CrossRef
Kim, P.H., K.T. Dirks, and C.D. Cooper. 2009. The repair of trust: A dynamic bilateral perspective and multilevel conceptualization. Academy of Management Review 34 (3): 401–422.CrossRef
Kim, P.H., D.L. Ferrin, C.D. Cooper, and K.T. Dirks. 2004. Removing the shadow of suspicion: The effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence-versus integrity-based trust violations. Journal of Applied Psychology 89 (1): 104–118.CrossRef
Kramer, R.M. 1999. Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology 50 (1): 569–598.CrossRef
Kramer, R.M., and R.J. Lewicki. 2010. Repairing and enhancing trust: Approaches to reducing organizational trust deficits. The Academy of Management Annals 4 (1): 245–277.CrossRef
Labianca, G., and D.J. Brass. 2006. Exploring the social ledger: Negative relationships and negative asymmetry in social networks in organizations. Academy of Management Review 31 (3): 596–614.CrossRef
Labianca, G., D.J. Brass, and B. Gray. 1998. Social networks and perceptions of intergroup conflict: The role of negative relationships and third parties. Academy of Management Journal 41 (1): 55–67.
Lawrence, T.B., and S.L. Robinson. 2007. Ain’t misbehavin: Workplace deviance as organizational resistance. Journal of Management 33 (3): 378–394.CrossRef
Ledoux, L. 2012. Philosophy: Today’s manager’s best Ffiend? Philosophy of Management 11 (3): 11–26.CrossRef
Levinas, E. 1969. Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
Levinas, E. 1972. Humanisme de l’autre homme. Saint-Clement-la-Riviere, France: Fata Morgana.
Levinas, E. 1981. Otherwise than being or beyond essence. New York. In NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
Levinas, E. 1998. Entre nous. Thinking-of-the-other. New York: Continuum.
Lewicki, R.J., D.J. McAllister, and R.J. Bies. 1998. Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review 23 (3): 438–458.CrossRef
Madsen, S.R., J. Gygi, S. Plowman, and S.C. Hammond. 2009. Forgiveness as a workplace intervention: The literature and a proposed framework. Journal of Applied and Behavioral Management 10 (2): 246–262.
Mansell, S. 2008. Proximity and rationalisation: The limits of a Levinasian ethics in the context of corporate governance and regulation. Journal of Business Ethics 83 (3): 565–577.CrossRef
Mitchell, M.S., and M.L. Ambrose. 2007. Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology 92 (4): 1159–1168.CrossRef
Morrison, E.W., and S.L. Robinson. 1997. When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. Academy of Management Review 22 (1): 226–256.CrossRef
Okimoto, T.G., and M. Wenzel. 2014. Bridging diverging perspectives and repairing damaged relationships in the aftermath of workplace transgressions. Business Ethics Quarterly 24 (3): 443–473.CrossRef
O’Leary-Kelly, A.M., R.W. Griffin, and D.J. Glew. 1996. Organization-motivated aggression: A research framework. Academy of Management Review 21 (1): 225–253.CrossRef
O’Reilly, J., and K. Aquino. 2011. A model of third parties’ morally motivated responses to mistreatment in organizations. Academy of Management Review 36 (3): 526–543.
Painter-Morland, M. 2010. Questioning corporate codes of ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review 19 (3): 265–279.CrossRef
Palanski, M.E. 2012. Forgiveness and reconciliation in the workplace: A multi-level perspective and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics 109 (3): 275–287.CrossRef
Presser, L., and E. Gaarder. 2000. Can restorative justice reduce battering? Some preliminary considerations. Social Justice 27 (1): 175–195.
Pullen, A., and C. Rhodes. 2015. Ethics, embodiment and organizations. Organization 22 (2): 159–165.CrossRef
Ren, H., and B. Gray. 2009. Repairing relationship conflict: How violation types and culture influence the effectiveness of restoration rituals. Academy of Management Review 34 (1): 105–126.CrossRef
Roberts, J. 2001. Corporate governance and the ethics of narcissus. Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (1): 109–127.CrossRef
Roberts, J. 2003. The manufacture of corporate social responsibility: Constructing corporate sensibility. Organization 10 (2): 249–265.CrossRef
Robinson, S.L. 1996. Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly 41 (4): 574–599.CrossRef
Robinson, S.L., and D.M. Rousseau. 1994. Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm. Journal of Organizational Behavior 15 (3): 245–259.CrossRef
Rupp, D.E., and C.M. Bell. 2010. Extending the deontic model of justice: Moral self-regulation in third-party responses to injustice. Business Ethics Quarterly 20 (1): 89–106.CrossRef
Saarinen, E. 2008. Philosophy for managers: Reflections of a practioner. Philosophy of Management 7(Supplement 1): 3-24.
Stone, M. 2002. Forgiveness in the workplace. Industrial and Commercial Training 34 (7): 278–286.CrossRef
Tatransky, T. 2008. A reciprocal asymmetry? Levinas’s ethics reconsidered. Ethical Perspectives 15 (3): 293–307.CrossRef
Thibaut, J., and L. Walker. 1975. Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Tomlinson, E.C., B.R. Dineen, and R.J. Lewicki. 2004. The road to reconciliation: Antecedents of victim willingness to reconcile following a broken promise. Journal of Management 30 (2): 165–187.CrossRef
Treviño, L.K. 1992. The social effects of punishment in organizations: A justice perspective. Academy of Management Review 17 (4): 647–676.CrossRef
Van Buren, H.J., III. 2008. Fairness and the main management theories of the twentieth century: A historical review, 1900-1965. Journal of Business Ethics 82 (3): 633–644.CrossRef
Walker, M.U. 2006. Moral repair. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Wenzel, M., T.G. Okimoto, N.T. Feather, and M.J. Platow. 2008. Retributive and restorative justice. Law and Human Behavior 32 (5): 375–389.CrossRef
Zoghbi-Manriqe-de-Lara, P. 2010. Do unfair procedures predict employees’ ethical behavior by deactivating formal regulations? Journal of Business Ethics 94 (3): 411–425.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
When Relationships are Broken: Restorative Justice under a Levinasian Approach
verfasst von
Guglielmo Faldetta
Publikationsdatum
02.06.2018
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Philosophy of Management / Ausgabe 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1740-3812
Elektronische ISSN: 2052-9597
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-018-0094-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

Philosophy of Management 1/2019 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Levinas, Weber, and a Hybrid Framework for Business Ethics

OriginalPaper

The Philosophy of Theory U: A Critical Examination

OriginalPaper

Horizontal Unfairness and Retrospective Sensemaking

OriginalPaper

Corporate Social Responsibility and Dehumanization

EditorialNotes

Editorial

OriginalPaper

The “Freely Adaptive System”. Application of this Cybernetic Model to an Organization Formed by Two Dynamic Human Systems

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise