nach oben

Journal of Happiness Studies

Erschienen in:

25.06.2023 | Research Paper

Within-Person Associations Between Subjective Well-Being and Big Five Personality Traits

verfasst von: Mohsen Joshanloo

Erschienen in: Journal of Happiness Studies | Ausgabe 6/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This study examined the temporal within-person associations between subjective well-being (life satisfaction, positive affect, low negative affect) and the Big Five personality traits (openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism). A representative American sample was used, collected over a period of approximately two decades and at 3 time points. To separate between-person and within-person levels, the random-intercept cross-lagged panel model was used. Results at the within-person level showed that higher-than-usual levels of subjective well-being were associated with higher-than-usual levels of extraversion, conscientiousness, and openness after about a decade. Higher-than-usual levels of openness were associated with higher-than-usual future levels of subjective well-being. Whereas neuroticism was the strongest correlate of subjective well-being at the between-person level, it had no association with subjective well-being at the within-person level. The results illustrate the importance of distinguishing within and between levels when examining associations between personality traits and well-being.

Vorheriger Artikel Who Benefits from Domestic Market Integration?

Nächster Artikel The Relationship Between Personality Traits and Well-Being via Brain Functional Connectivity

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Anglim, J., Horwood, S., Smillie, L. D., Marrero, R. J., & Wood, J. K. (2020). Predicting psychological and subjective well-being from personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(4), 279–323. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000226CrossRef

Anusic, I., & Schimmack, U. (2016). Stability and change of personality traits, self-esteem, and well-being: Introducing the meta-analytic stability and change model of retest correlations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(5), 766–781. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000066CrossRef

Asparouhov, T. & Muthén, B. (2008). Auxiliary variables predicting missing data. Retrieved from https://www.statmodel.com/download/AuxM2.pdf

Bleidorn, W., Schwaba, T., Zheng, A., Hopwood, C. J., Sosa, S. S., Roberts, B. W., & Briley, D. A. (2022). Personality stability and change: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 148(7–8), 588–619. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000365CrossRef

Brim, O. G., Ryff, C. D., & Kessler, R. C. (2004). The MIDUS National survey: An overview. In O. G. Brim, C. D. Ryff, & R. C. Kessler (Eds.), How healthy are we?: A national study of well-being at midlife (pp. 1–34). The University of Chicago Press.

DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 197–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.197CrossRef

DeYoung, C. G. (2015). Cybernetic big five theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.004CrossRef

Diener, E. & Lucas, R. E. (2023). Personality traits. In R. Biswas-Diener & E. Diener (Eds), Noba textbook series: Psychology. Champaign, IL: DEF publishers. Retrieved from http://noba.to/96u8ecgw

Diener, E. (1998). Subjective well-being and personality. In D. F. Barone, M. Hersen, & V. B. Van Hasselt (Eds.), Advanced personality (pp. 311–334). Springer.CrossRef

Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Tay, L. (2018). Advances in subjective well-being research. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(4), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0307-6CrossRef

Dormann, C., & Griffin, M. A. (2015). Optimal time lags in panel studies. Psychological Methods, 20(4), 489–505. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000041CrossRef

Fetvadjiev, V. H., & He, J. (2019). The longitudinal links of personality traits, values, and well-being and self-esteem: A five-wave study of a nationally representative sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(2), 448–464. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000212CrossRef

Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2013). Nonnormal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 439–492). IAP Information Age Publishing.

Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). The broaden–and–build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the royal society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1367–1377. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1512CrossRef

Fredrickson, B. L. (2008). Promoting positive affect. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 449–468). Guilford Press.

Gallagher, M. W., Lopez, S. J., & Preacher, K. J. (2009). The hierarchical structure of well-being. Journal of Personality, 77(4), 1025–1050. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00573.xCrossRef

Geiser, C. (2020). Longitudinal structural equation modeling with Mplus: A latent state-trait perspective. Guilford publications.

Hamaker, E. L., Kuiper, R. M., & Grasman, R. P. P. G. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038889CrossRef

Hudson, N. W., Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2017). Day-to-day affect is surprisingly stable: A 2-year longitudinal study of well-being. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616662129CrossRef

Joshanloo, M. (2017). Factor structure and criterion validity of original and short versions of the negative and positive affect scale (NAPAS). Personality and Individual Differences, 105, 233–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.09.060CrossRef

Joshanloo, M. (2019). Investigating the relationships between subjective well-being and psychological well-being over two decades. Emotion, 19(1), 183–187. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000414CrossRef

Joshanloo, M. (2021). There is no temporal relationship between hedonic values and life satisfaction: A longitudinal study spanning 13 years. Journal of Research in Personality, 93, 104125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2021.104125CrossRef

Joshanloo, M. (2022a). Longitudinal relationships between personality traits and social well-being: A two-decade study. Journal of Happiness Studies, 23(6), 2969–2983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-022-00534-1CrossRef

Joshanloo, M. (2022b). Reciprocal relationships between personality traits and psychological well-being. British Journal of Psychology, 114(1), 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12596CrossRef

Joshanloo, M. (2023). How stable are life domain evaluations over time? A 20-year study. Journal of Happiness Studies, 24(2), 791–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-023-00618-6CrossRef

Kandler, C., Kornadt, A. E., Hagemeyer, B., & Neyer, F. J. (2015). Patterns and sources of personality development in old age. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(1), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000028CrossRef

Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford.

Lachman, M. E. (2005). Addendum for MIDI Personality Scales: MIDUS II version. Retrieved from https://www.brandeis.edu/departments/psych/lachman/pdfs/revised-midi-scales.pdf

Lucas, R. E. (2018). Exploring the associations between personality and subjective well-being. In E. Diener, S. Oishi, & L. Tay (Eds.), Handbook of well-being. Salt Lake City, UT: DEF Publishers. DOI:nobascholar.com

Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803–855. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803CrossRef

Magee, C. A., Miller, L. M., & Heaven, P. C. L. (2013). Personality trait change and life satisfaction in adults: The roles of age and hedonic balance. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(6), 694–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.05.022CrossRef

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81CrossRef

Metler, S. J., & Busseri, M. A. (2015). Further evaluation of the tripartite structure of subjective well-being: Evidence from longitudinal and experimental studies. Journal of Personality, 85(2), 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12233CrossRef

Mroczek, D. K., & Kolarz, C. M. (1998). The effect of age on positive and negative affect: A developmental perspective on happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1333–1349.CrossRef

Newsom, J. T. (2015). Longitudinal structural equation modeling: A comprehensive introduction. Routledge.CrossRef

Okbay, A., Baselmans, B. M. L., De Neve, J.-E., Turley, P., Nivard, M. G., Fontana, M. A., Meddens, S. F. W., Linnér, R. K., Rietveld, C. A., Derringer, J., Gratten, J., Lee, J. J., Liu, J. Z., de Vlaming, R., Ahluwalia, T. S., Buchwald, J., Cavadino, A., Frazier-Wood, A. C., Furlotte, N. A., & Garfield, V. (2016). Genetic variants associated with subjective well-being, depressive symptoms, and neuroticism identified through genome-wide analyses. Nature Genetics, 48(6), 624–633. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3552CrossRef

Orth, U., Meier, L. L., Bühler, J. L., Dapp, L. C., Krauss, S., Messerli, D., & Robins, R. W. (2022). Effect size guidelines for cross-lagged effects. Psychological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000499CrossRef

Pelt, D. H. M., de Vries, L. P., & Bartels, M. (2022). Unraveling the relation between personality and well-being in a genetically informative design. European Journal of Personality. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070221134878CrossRef

Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1CrossRef

Røysamb, E., & Nes, R. B. (2018). The genetics of wellbeing. In E. Diener, S. Oishi, & L. Tay (Eds.), Handbook of well-being. Salt Lake City, UT: DEF Publishers. DOI:nobascholar.com

Ryff, C. D., & Krueger, R. F. (2018). Approaching human health as an integrative challenge: Introduction and overview. In C. D. Ryff & R. F. Krueger (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of integrative health science. Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Schunk, F., & Trommsdorff, G. (2022). Longitudinal associations of neuroticism with life satisfaction and social adaptation in a nationally representative adult sample. Journal of Personality. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12783CrossRef

Soto, C. J. (2015). Is happiness good for your personality? Concurrent and prospective relations of the big five with subjective well-being. Journal of Personality, 83(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12081CrossRef

Specht, J., Egloff, B., & Schmukle, S. C. (2012). Examining mechanisms of personality maturation. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(2), 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612448197CrossRef

Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134(1), 138–161. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.138CrossRef

Steyer, R., Schmitt, M., & Eid, M. (1999). Latent state–trait theory and research in personality and individual differences. European Journal of Personality, 13(5), 389–408. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199909/10)13:5%3c389::AID-PER361%3e3.0.CO;2-ACrossRef

Sullivan, G. M., & Feinn, R. (2012). Using effect size—or why the p value is not enough. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 4(3), 279–282. https://doi.org/10.4300/jgme-d-12-00156.1CrossRef

Sun, J., Kaufman, S. B., & Smillie, L. D. (2018). Unique associations between big five personality aspects and multiple dimensions of well-being. Journal of Personality, 86(2), 158–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12301CrossRef

Womick, J., & King, L. A. (2020). Personality and well-being. In B. J. Carducci & C. Nave (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell encyclopedia of personality and individual differences: Clinical, applied, and cross-cultural research (pp. 371–376). Wiley.

Titel: Within-Person Associations Between Subjective Well-Being and Big Five Personality Traits
verfasst von: Mohsen Joshanloo
Publikationsdatum: 25.06.2023
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Journal of Happiness Studies / Ausgabe 6/2023
Print ISSN: 1389-4978
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7780
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-023-00673-z

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2023

Mindfulness and Subjective Well-being Among Chinese Adolescents: A Longitudinal Study and a Weekly Diary Investigation

Pleasure or Meaning: Subjective Well-Being Orientations and the Willingness to Help Close Versus Distant Others

Social Connection Constellations and Individual Well-Being Typologies: Using the Loglinear Modeling Approach with Latent Variables

State Contexts, Job Insecurity, and Subjective Well-being in the Time of COVID-19

Exploring the Effects of Consumption Expenditures on Life Satisfaction in China

Art-of-Living Intervention Imparted Through a Blended Learning Approach to Nurture Positivity Among Pakistan’s University Students During COVID-19: A Growth Curve Analysis