Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Science Teacher Education 6/2013

01.10.2013

Writing Like a Scientist: Exploring Elementary Teachers’ Understandings and Practices of Writing in Science

verfasst von: Nicole J. Glen, Sharon Dotger

Erschienen in: Journal of Science Teacher Education | Ausgabe 6/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This qualitative study examined the connections between elementary teachers’ conceptions of how scientists use writing and how the teachers used writing during science lessons. Data collected included lesson observations, interviews, handouts to students, and curriculum resources. The findings revealed that teachers in this study thought scientists write for several purposes: the presentation of data, observations, experiences, procedures, and facts. The teachers used writing tasks that mirrored this with their students. The teachers also had a limited definition of creativity in writing, and when they had students write creatively in science it was to add in fictional elements. Implications of this study include providing teachers with better models for how and why scientists write, including these models in more inquiry-based science lessons, and directly relating concepts of nature of science to elementary science writing.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665–701.CrossRef Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665–701.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Akerson, V. L., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2003). Teaching elements of nature of science: A yearlong case study of a fourth-grade teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(10), 1025–1049.CrossRef Akerson, V. L., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2003). Teaching elements of nature of science: A yearlong case study of a fourth-grade teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(10), 1025–1049.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F. S., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 295–317.CrossRef Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F. S., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 295–317.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Akerson, V. L., Hanson, D. L., & Cullen, T. A. (2007). The influence of guided inquiry and explicit instruction on K-6 teachers’ views of nature of science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 751–772.CrossRef Akerson, V. L., Hanson, D. L., & Cullen, T. A. (2007). The influence of guided inquiry and explicit instruction on K-6 teachers’ views of nature of science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 751–772.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Akerson, V. L., & Hanuscin, D. L. (2007). Teaching nature of science through inquiry: Results of a 3-year professional development program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(5), 653–680.CrossRef Akerson, V. L., & Hanuscin, D. L. (2007). Teaching nature of science through inquiry: Results of a 3-year professional development program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(5), 653–680.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Allchin, D. (2011). Evaluating knowledge of the nature of (whole) science. Science Education, 95, 518–542.CrossRef Allchin, D. (2011). Evaluating knowledge of the nature of (whole) science. Science Education, 95, 518–542.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Alonzo, A. C. (2001). Using student notebooks to assess the quality of inquiry science instruction. In P. R. Aschbacher (Chair), Challenges in assessing evidence of learning and teaching in elementary science. Symposium conducted at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA, April 10–14. Alonzo, A. C. (2001). Using student notebooks to assess the quality of inquiry science instruction. In P. R. Aschbacher (Chair), Challenges in assessing evidence of learning and teaching in elementary science. Symposium conducted at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA, April 10–14.
Zurück zum Zitat Alonzo, A. C. (2008). Using science notebooks as an informal assessment tool. In J. Coffey, R. Douglas, & C. Stearns (Eds.), Assessing science learning: Perspectives from research and practice (pp. 83–99). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press. Alonzo, A. C. (2008). Using science notebooks as an informal assessment tool. In J. Coffey, R. Douglas, & C. Stearns (Eds.), Assessing science learning: Perspectives from research and practice (pp. 83–99). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
Zurück zum Zitat American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1990). Science for all Americans. [Electronic version]. New York: Oxford University Press. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1990). Science for all Americans. [Electronic version]. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Applebee, A. N. (1982). Writing and learning in school settings. In M. Nystrand (Ed.), What writers know: The language, process, and structure of written discourse (pp. 365–381). New York: Academic Press. Applebee, A. N. (1982). Writing and learning in school settings. In M. Nystrand (Ed.), What writers know: The language, process, and structure of written discourse (pp. 365–381). New York: Academic Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Applebee, A. N., & Langer, J. A. (2011). A snapshot of writing instruction in middle schools and high schools. English Journal, 100(6), 14–27. Applebee, A. N., & Langer, J. A. (2011). A snapshot of writing instruction in middle schools and high schools. English Journal, 100(6), 14–27.
Zurück zum Zitat Baker, L., & Saul, W. (1994). Considering science and language arts connections: A study of teacher cognition. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 1023–1037.CrossRef Baker, L., & Saul, W. (1994). Considering science and language arts connections: A study of teacher cognition. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 1023–1037.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zurück zum Zitat Caswell, L. J., & Duke, N. K. (1998). Non-narrative as a catalyst for narrative development. Language Arts, 75(2), 108–117. Caswell, L. J., & Duke, N. K. (1998). Non-narrative as a catalyst for narrative development. Language Arts, 75(2), 108–117.
Zurück zum Zitat Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21.CrossRef Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Coyne, I. T. (1997). Sampling in qualitative research: Purposeful and theoretical sampling, merging or clear boundaries? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26, 623–630.CrossRef Coyne, I. T. (1997). Sampling in qualitative research: Purposeful and theoretical sampling, merging or clear boundaries? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26, 623–630.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Donovan, C. A., & Smolkin, L. B. (2011). Supporting informational writing in the elementary grades. The Reading Teacher, 64(6), 406–416.CrossRef Donovan, C. A., & Smolkin, L. B. (2011). Supporting informational writing in the elementary grades. The Reading Teacher, 64(6), 406–416.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dorfman, L. R., & Cappelli, R. (2009). Nonfiction mentor texts. Portland, ME: Stenhouse. Dorfman, L. R., & Cappelli, R. (2009). Nonfiction mentor texts. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.
Zurück zum Zitat Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287–312.CrossRef Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287–312.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ford, D. J. (2006). Representations of science within children’s trade books. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(2), 214–235.CrossRef Ford, D. J. (2006). Representations of science within children’s trade books. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(2), 214–235.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fulwiler, T. (1987). The journal book. Portsmouth, NH: Boyton/Cook. Fulwiler, T. (1987). The journal book. Portsmouth, NH: Boyton/Cook.
Zurück zum Zitat Gee, J. P. (2001). Reading as situated language: A sociocognitive perspective. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 44(8), 714–725.CrossRef Gee, J. P. (2001). Reading as situated language: A sociocognitive perspective. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 44(8), 714–725.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gere, A. R. (1985). Roots in the sawdust: Writing-to-learn across the disciplines. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English. Gere, A. R. (1985). Roots in the sawdust: Writing-to-learn across the disciplines. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Zurück zum Zitat Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
Zurück zum Zitat Glen, N. J. (2008). Writing in elementary school science: Factors that influence teacher beliefs and practices. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY. Glen, N. J. (2008). Writing in elementary school science: Factors that influence teacher beliefs and practices. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.
Zurück zum Zitat Glynn, S. M., & Muth, K. D. (1994). Reading and writing to learn science: Achieving scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 1057–1073.CrossRef Glynn, S. M., & Muth, K. D. (1994). Reading and writing to learn science: Achieving scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 1057–1073.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gunel, M., Hand, B., & Prain, V. (2007). Writing for learning in science: A secondary analysis of six studies. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(4), 615–637.CrossRef Gunel, M., Hand, B., & Prain, V. (2007). Writing for learning in science: A secondary analysis of six studies. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(4), 615–637.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hand, B. M., Alvermann, D. E., Gee, J., Guzzetti, B. J., Norris, S. P., Phillips, L. M., et al. (2003). Message from the “island group”: What is literacy in science literacy? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 607–615.CrossRef Hand, B. M., Alvermann, D. E., Gee, J., Guzzetti, B. J., Norris, S. P., Phillips, L. M., et al. (2003). Message from the “island group”: What is literacy in science literacy? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 607–615.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Henriques, L. (1998). Maximizing the impact of your in-service: Designing the inservice and selecting the participants. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers of Science, Minneapolis, MN. Henriques, L. (1998). Maximizing the impact of your in-service: Designing the inservice and selecting the participants. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers of Science, Minneapolis, MN.
Zurück zum Zitat Hildebrand, G. M. (1998). Disrupting hegemonic writing practices in school science: Contesting the right way to write. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(4), 345–362.CrossRef Hildebrand, G. M. (1998). Disrupting hegemonic writing practices in school science: Contesting the right way to write. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(4), 345–362.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Holliday, W. G., Yore, L. D., & Alvermann, D. E. (1994). The reading-science learning-writing connection: Breakthroughs, barriers, and promises. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 877–893.CrossRef Holliday, W. G., Yore, L. D., & Alvermann, D. E. (1994). The reading-science learning-writing connection: Breakthroughs, barriers, and promises. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 877–893.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Honig, S. L. (2010). A framework for supporting scientific language in primary grades. The Reading Teacher, 64(1), 23–32.CrossRef Honig, S. L. (2010). A framework for supporting scientific language in primary grades. The Reading Teacher, 64(1), 23–32.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Keys, C. W. (1999a). Language as an indicator of meaning generation: An analysis of middle school students’ written discourse about scientific investigations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(9), 1044–1061.CrossRef Keys, C. W. (1999a). Language as an indicator of meaning generation: An analysis of middle school students’ written discourse about scientific investigations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(9), 1044–1061.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Keys, C. W. (1999b). Revitalizing instruction in scientific genres: Connecting knowledge production with writing to learn in science. Science Education, 83, 115–130.CrossRef Keys, C. W. (1999b). Revitalizing instruction in scientific genres: Connecting knowledge production with writing to learn in science. Science Education, 83, 115–130.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat King, K., Shumow, L., & Lietz, S. (2001). Science education in an urban elementary school: Case studies of teacher beliefs and classroom practices. Science Education, 85, 89–110.CrossRef King, K., Shumow, L., & Lietz, S. (2001). Science education in an urban elementary school: Case studies of teacher beliefs and classroom practices. Science Education, 85, 89–110.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kucer, S. L. (1985). The making of meaning: Reading and writing as parallel processes. Written Communication, 2(3), 317–336.CrossRef Kucer, S. L. (1985). The making of meaning: Reading and writing as parallel processes. Written Communication, 2(3), 317–336.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Langer, J. A., & Applebee, A. N. (1987). How writing shapes thinking: A study of teaching and learning. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English. Langer, J. A., & Applebee, A. N. (1987). How writing shapes thinking: A study of teaching and learning. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Zurück zum Zitat Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. A. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–879). New York: Routledge. Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. A. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–879). New York: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Levitt, K. E. (2001). An analysis of elementary teachers’ beliefs regarding the teaching and learning of science. Science Education, 86, 1–22.CrossRef Levitt, K. E. (2001). An analysis of elementary teachers’ beliefs regarding the teaching and learning of science. Science Education, 86, 1–22.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Luft, J. A., & Pizzini, E. L. (1998). The demonstration classroom in-service: Changes in the classroom. Science Education, 82, 147–162.CrossRef Luft, J. A., & Pizzini, E. L. (1998). The demonstration classroom in-service: Changes in the classroom. Science Education, 82, 147–162.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McNeill, K. L. (2011). Elementary students’ views of explanation, argumentation, and evidence, and their abilities to construct arguments over the school year. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(7), 793–823.CrossRef McNeill, K. L. (2011). Elementary students’ views of explanation, argumentation, and evidence, and their abilities to construct arguments over the school year. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(7), 793–823.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McQuitty, V., Dotger, S., & Khan, U. (2010). One without the other isn’t as good as both together: A theoretical framework of integrated writing/science instruction in the primary grades. National Reading Conference Yearbook, 59, 315–328. McQuitty, V., Dotger, S., & Khan, U. (2010). One without the other isn’t as good as both together: A theoretical framework of integrated writing/science instruction in the primary grades. National Reading Conference Yearbook, 59, 315–328.
Zurück zum Zitat Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Zurück zum Zitat Moje, E. B. (1996). “I teach students, not subject”: Teacher-student relationships as contexts for secondary literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 31(2), 172–195.CrossRef Moje, E. B. (1996). “I teach students, not subject”: Teacher-student relationships as contexts for secondary literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 31(2), 172–195.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Berkshire, England: Open University Press. Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat National Research Council (NRC). (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. [Electronic version]. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council (NRC). (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. [Electronic version]. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Zurück zum Zitat National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. [Electronic version]. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. [Electronic version]. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Newell, G. E., Beach, R., Smith, J., & VanDerHeide, J. (2011). Teaching and learning argumentative reading and writing: A review of research. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(3), 273–304. Newell, G. E., Beach, R., Smith, J., & VanDerHeide, J. (2011). Teaching and learning argumentative reading and writing: A review of research. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(3), 273–304.
Zurück zum Zitat Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87, 224–240.CrossRef Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87, 224–240.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Norton-Meier, L., Hand, B., Hockenberry, L., & Wise, K. (2008). Questions, claims & evidence: The important place of argument in children’s science writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. Norton-Meier, L., Hand, B., Hockenberry, L., & Wise, K. (2008). Questions, claims & evidence: The important place of argument in children’s science writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Zurück zum Zitat Olson, D. R. (1977). Oral and written language and the cognitive processes of children. Journal of Communication, 27(3), 10–26.CrossRef Olson, D. R. (1977). Oral and written language and the cognitive processes of children. Journal of Communication, 27(3), 10–26.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Osborne, J. F., & Patterson, A. (2011). Scientific argument and explanation: A necessary distinction? Science Education, 95, 627–638.CrossRef Osborne, J. F., & Patterson, A. (2011). Scientific argument and explanation: A necessary distinction? Science Education, 95, 627–638.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Penney, K., Norris, S. P., Phillips, L. M., & Clark, G. (2003). The anatomy of junior high school science textbooks: An analysis of textual characteristics and a comparison to media reports of science. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 3(4), 415–436.CrossRef Penney, K., Norris, S. P., Phillips, L. M., & Clark, G. (2003). The anatomy of junior high school science textbooks: An analysis of textual characteristics and a comparison to media reports of science. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 3(4), 415–436.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Prain, V., & Hand, B. (1996). Writing for learning in secondary science: Rethinking practices. Teaching & Teacher Education, 12(6), 609–626.CrossRef Prain, V., & Hand, B. (1996). Writing for learning in secondary science: Rethinking practices. Teaching & Teacher Education, 12(6), 609–626.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Purcell-Gates, V., Duke, N. K., & Martineau, J. A. (2007). Learning to read and write genre-specific text: Roles of authentic experience and explicit teaching. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(1), 8–45.CrossRef Purcell-Gates, V., Duke, N. K., & Martineau, J. A. (2007). Learning to read and write genre-specific text: Roles of authentic experience and explicit teaching. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(1), 8–45.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Resnick, L. B. (1983). Mathematics and science learning: A new conception. Science, 220(4596), 477–478.CrossRef Resnick, L. B. (1983). Mathematics and science learning: A new conception. Science, 220(4596), 477–478.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Richardon, B. (2005). What writing represents what scientists actually do? Science and Children, 43(3), 50–51. Richardon, B. (2005). What writing represents what scientists actually do? Science and Children, 43(3), 50–51.
Zurück zum Zitat Rivard, L. P. (1994). A review of writing to learn in science: Implications for practice and research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 969–983.CrossRef Rivard, L. P. (1994). A review of writing to learn in science: Implications for practice and research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 969–983.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rowell, P. M. (1991). A teacher’s pedagogical frame for writing in the elementary science classroom. Paper presented at the National Science Teachers Association Area Convention, Vancouver, British Columbia, November. Rowell, P. M. (1991). A teacher’s pedagogical frame for writing in the elementary science classroom. Paper presented at the National Science Teachers Association Area Convention, Vancouver, British Columbia, November.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Li, M., Tsai, S. P., & Schneider, J. (2010). Testing one premise of scientific inquiry in science classrooms: Examining students’ scientific explanations and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 583–608. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Li, M., Tsai, S. P., & Schneider, J. (2010). Testing one premise of scientific inquiry in science classrooms: Examining students’ scientific explanations and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 583–608.
Zurück zum Zitat Saul, E. W. (Ed.). (2004). Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press. Saul, E. W. (Ed.). (2004). Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Shymansky, J. A., Yore, L. D., & Good, R. (1991). Elementary school teachers’ beliefs about and perceptions of elementary school science, science reading, science textbooks, and supportive instructional factors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(5), 437–454.CrossRef Shymansky, J. A., Yore, L. D., & Good, R. (1991). Elementary school teachers’ beliefs about and perceptions of elementary school science, science reading, science textbooks, and supportive instructional factors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(5), 437–454.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Suppe, F. (1998). The structure of a scientific paper. Philosophy of Science, 65(3), 381–405.CrossRef Suppe, F. (1998). The structure of a scientific paper. Philosophy of Science, 65(3), 381–405.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sutton, C. (1993). Figuring out a scientific understanding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1215–1227.CrossRef Sutton, C. (1993). Figuring out a scientific understanding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1215–1227.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tilgner, P. J. (1990). Avoiding science in the elementary school. Science Education, 74(4), 421–431.CrossRef Tilgner, P. J. (1990). Avoiding science in the elementary school. Science Education, 74(4), 421–431.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tolchinsky, L. (2006). The emergence of writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 83–95). New York: The Guilford Press. Tolchinsky, L. (2006). The emergence of writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 83–95). New York: The Guilford Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Nostrand, A. D. (1979). Writing and the generation of knowledge. Social Education, 43, 178–180. Van Nostrand, A. D. (1979). Writing and the generation of knowledge. Social Education, 43, 178–180.
Zurück zum Zitat Water-Adams, S. (2006). The relationship between understanding of the nature of science and practice: The influence of teacher’s beliefs about education, teaching, and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 28(8), 919–944.CrossRef Water-Adams, S. (2006). The relationship between understanding of the nature of science and practice: The influence of teacher’s beliefs about education, teaching, and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 28(8), 919–944.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yager, R. E. (2004). Science is not written, but it can be written about. In E. W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice (pp. 95–107). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press. Yager, R. E. (2004). Science is not written, but it can be written about. In E. W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice (pp. 95–107). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Yopp, R. H., & Yopp, H. K. (2006). Informational texts as read-alouds at school and home. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(1), 37–51.CrossRef Yopp, R. H., & Yopp, H. K. (2006). Informational texts as read-alouds at school and home. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(1), 37–51.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yore, L. D. (2004). Why do future scientists need to study the language arts? In E. W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice (pp. 71–94). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press. Yore, L. D. (2004). Why do future scientists need to study the language arts? In E. W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice (pp. 71–94). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Yore, L. D., Bisanz, G. L., & Hand, B. M. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 689–725.CrossRef Yore, L. D., Bisanz, G. L., & Hand, B. M. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 689–725.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yore, L. D., Hand, B. M., & Florence, M. K. (2004). Scientists’ views of science, models of writing, and science writing practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 338–369.CrossRef Yore, L. D., Hand, B. M., & Florence, M. K. (2004). Scientists’ views of science, models of writing, and science writing practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 338–369.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zeidler, D. L. (1997). The central role of fallacious thinking in science education. Science Education, 81, 483–496.CrossRef Zeidler, D. L. (1997). The central role of fallacious thinking in science education. Science Education, 81, 483–496.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zembal-Saul, C. (2009). Learning to teach elementary school science as argument. Science Education, 93, 687–719.CrossRef Zembal-Saul, C. (2009). Learning to teach elementary school science as argument. Science Education, 93, 687–719.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zembal-Saul, C., McNeill, K. L., & Hershberger, K. (2013). What’s your evidence? Engaging K-5 students in constructing explanations in science. New York: Pearson. Zembal-Saul, C., McNeill, K. L., & Hershberger, K. (2013). What’s your evidence? Engaging K-5 students in constructing explanations in science. New York: Pearson.
Zurück zum Zitat Zembal-Saul, C., Munford, D., Crawford, B., Friedrichsen, P., & Land, S. (2002). Scaffolding preservice science teachers’ evidence-based arguments during an investigation of natural selection. Research in Science Education, 32(4), 437–463.CrossRef Zembal-Saul, C., Munford, D., Crawford, B., Friedrichsen, P., & Land, S. (2002). Scaffolding preservice science teachers’ evidence-based arguments during an investigation of natural selection. Research in Science Education, 32(4), 437–463.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zinsser, W. (1988). Writing to learn. New York: Harper & Row. Zinsser, W. (1988). Writing to learn. New York: Harper & Row.
Zurück zum Zitat Zohar, A. (2004). Elements of teachers’ pedagogical knowledge regarding instruction of higher order thinking. Journal of Research in Science Education, 15(4), 293–312. Zohar, A. (2004). Elements of teachers’ pedagogical knowledge regarding instruction of higher order thinking. Journal of Research in Science Education, 15(4), 293–312.
Metadaten
Titel
Writing Like a Scientist: Exploring Elementary Teachers’ Understandings and Practices of Writing in Science
verfasst von
Nicole J. Glen
Sharon Dotger
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2013
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Science Teacher Education / Ausgabe 6/2013
Print ISSN: 1046-560X
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1847
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-013-9348-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2013

Journal of Science Teacher Education 6/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner