nach oben

TechTrends

Erschienen in:

15.07.2023 | Original Paper

A Case-Study Approach to Understanding Non-directive, Virtual Technology Coaching

verfasst von: Julie A. Moore, Jo Williamson

Erschienen in: TechTrends | Ausgabe 4/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Several, large-scale quantitative studies suggest virtual coaching is an effective professional development strategy capable of producing similar results as face-to-face (F2F) programs. Virtual coaching can also be cost-effective, convenient, and even essential when in-person learning is disrupted. However, existing research offers few descriptions of how virtual coaching practices differ from F2F or what modifications coaches must make. To date, no studies have explored virtual coaching for technology integration, which likely has different purposes and more non-directive approaches than existing studies. To address this gap, this case study documents an organization’s first-time transition from F2F to online instructional technology coaching, with an in-depth focus on one coach’s experiences. Findings offer proof-of-concept that virtual technology coaching can be successful, but coaches must overcome challenges associated with enrollment, sustaining relationships, and adapting technologies to coaching purposes. Additionally, a strong grounding in the coaching literature is a necessary precursor for success.

Vorheriger Artikel A Historical Review of Collaborative Learning and Cooperative Learning

Nächster Artikel Exploring an Innovative Approach to Enhance Discussion Board Engagement

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Aguilar, E. (2013). The art of coaching. Jossey Bass.

Amendum, S. J., Vernon-Feagans, L., & Ginsberg, M. C. (2011). The effectiveness of a technologically facilitated classroom-based early reading intervention. The Elementary School Journal, 112(1), 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1086/660684CrossRef

Artman-Meeker, K., Hemmeter, M. L., & Snyder, P. (2014). Effects of distance coaching on teachersʼ use of pyramid model practices. Infants and Young Children, 27(4), 325–344. https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0000000000000016CrossRef

Bahktin, M. (1981). The dialogical imagination. University of Texas.

Beglau, M., Craig-Hare, J., Foltos, L., Gann, K., James, J., Jobe, H., Knight, J., & Smith, B. (2011). Technology, coaching, and community: Power partners for improved professional development in primary and secondary education, an ISTE Whitepaper. International Society for Technology in Education.

Carmouche, M., Thompson, J., & Carter, L. (2018). Effects of professional development and videoconferencing on the increase of opportunities to respond and the on-task behavior of students with emotional behavior disorders. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 17, 127–157. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/183953/.CrossRef

Costa, A. L., & Garmston, R. J. (2016). Cognitive coaching: Developing self-directed leaders and learners (3rd ed.). Roman Littlefield.

Crawford, A., Zucker, T., Van Horne, B., & Landry, S. (2017). Integrating professional development content and formative assessment with the coaching process: The Texas school readiness model. Theory into Practice, 56(1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1241945CrossRef

Creswell, J., & Poth, C. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. McMillan.

Downer, J. T., Williford, A. P., Bulotsky-Shearer, R. J., Vitiello, V. E., Bouza, J., Reilly, S., & Lhospital, A. (2018). Using data-driven, video-based early childhood consultation with teachers to reduce children’s challenging behaviors and improve engagement in preschool classrooms. School Mental Health, 10(3), 226–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-017-9237-0CrossRef

Ermeling, B. A., Tatsui, T., & Young, K. (2015). Virtual coaching for instructional leaders: A multi-method investigation of technology-enabled external assistance. Teachers College Record, 117(110303), 1–48. https://www.tcrecord.org/content.asp?contentid=18112.CrossRef

Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42, 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551CrossRef

Foltos, L. (2013). Peer coaching: Unlocking the power of collaboration. Corwin.CrossRef

Friere, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.

Glover, T. A. (2017). A data-driven coaching model used to promote students’ response to early reading intervention. Theory into Practice, 56(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1260401CrossRef

Gregory, A., Ruzek, E., Hafen, C. A., Mikami, A. Y., Allen, J. P., & Pianta, R. C. (2017). My tteaching partner-secondary: A video-based coaching model. Theory into Practice, 56(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1260402CrossRef

International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2011). National educational technology standards for technology coaches. International Society for Technology in Education.

International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2019). ISTE coaching standards. International Society for Technology in Education. https://www.iste.org/standards/for-coaches

Israel, M., Carnahan, C. R., Snyder, K. K., & Williamson, P. (2013). Supporting new teachers of students with significant disabilities through virtual coaching: A proposed model. Remedial and Special Education, 34(4), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932512450517CrossRef

Knight, J. (2007). Instructional coaching: A partnership approach to improving instruction. Corwin.

Knowles, M. (1984). Andragogy in Action. Jossey-Bass.

Kraft, M. A., & Hill, H. C. (2020). Developing ambitious mathematics instruction through web-based coaching: A randomized trial. American Educational Research Journal, 57(6), 2378–2414. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831220916840CrossRef

Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268CrossRef

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Lee, S. C., Nugent, G., Kunz, G. M., Houston, J., & DeChenne-Peters, S. (2018). Case study: Value-added benefit of distance-based instructional coaching on science teachers’ inquiry instruction in rural schools. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(3), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1432226CrossRef

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.CrossRef

MacKinnon, G., Hamilton Dopwell, A., Jones, Y., Marsh Roberts, T. A., & Williams, D. (2019). Virtual coaching of literacy teachers: An action research study. International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society, 15(4), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.18848/1832-3669/CGP/v15i04/1-22CrossRef

McDaniel, S. C., & Bloomfield, B. S. (2020). School-wide positive behavior support telecoaching in a rural district. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 48(3), 335–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239519886283CrossRef

Mezirow, J. (1995). Transformation theory of adult learning. In M. Welton (Ed.), In defense of the lifeworld: Critical perspectives in adult education (pp. 11–38). State University of New York.

Nugent, G., Kunz, G., Houston, J., Katlutsky, I., Wu, C., Pedersen, J….& Berry, B. (2016). The effectiveness of technology-delivered science instructional coaching in middle and high school. National Center for Research on Rural Education, Institute of Educational Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED571809

Pianta, R. C., Lipscomb, D., & Ruzek, E. (2021). Coaching teachers to improve students’ school readiness skills: Indirect effects of teacher–student interaction. Child Development, 92(6), 2509–2528. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13600CrossRef

Powell, D. R., Diamond, K. E., Burchinal, M. R., & Koehler, M. J. (2010). Effects of an early literacy professional development intervention on head start teachers and children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017763CrossRef

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Titel: A Case-Study Approach to Understanding Non-directive, Virtual Technology Coaching
verfasst von: Julie A. Moore
Jo Williamson
Publikationsdatum: 15.07.2023
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: TechTrends / Ausgabe 4/2023
Print ISSN: 8756-3894
Elektronische ISSN: 1559-7075
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00879-1

Springer Professional

A Case-Study Approach to Understanding Non-directive, Virtual Technology Coaching

Abstract

Premium Partner

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2023

Introduction to the July 2023 Issue

Dr. Charles M. Reigeluth: a True Scholar

The Impact of Gamification on Doctoral Students’ Perceptions, Emotions, and Learning in an Online Environment

Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education, Part One: the Dynamic Frontier

Creative Uses of ChatGPT for Education: a Conversation with Ethan Mollick

An Analysis of Online and Hybrid EdD Programs in Educational Technology

Premium Partner