nach oben

Journal of Business and Psychology

Erschienen in:

01.12.2010

A General Structure of Job Performance: Evidence from Two Studies

verfasst von: Otmar E. Varela, Ronald S. Landis

Erschienen in: Journal of Business and Psychology | Ausgabe 4/2010

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to test alternative models of job performance based on competing categorization criteria.

Design/methodological/approach

Survey-based data were collected from individuals in two separate studies. In Study 1, proficiency ratings of job performance were collected from individuals (N = 553) across multiple jobs in four organizations in three Latin America countries. Similar data (N = 489) were collected as part of a second study in order to provide additional support for the results observed in the first study.

Findings

Modest support was obtained for performance models based on prior literature and a modified ten-factor solution. Follow-up analyses, on the basis of multidimensional scaling, suggested an alternative categorization that unveiled three underlying proficiency-dimensions. Emerging dimensions suggest that proficiency can be classified according to (a) the target of work behaviors (i.e., data, persons, and things), (b) the degree of influence behaviors convey (controlling others versus do-it-yourself), and (c) the degree of interaction involved (integration vs. working in isolation).

Implications

The modest fit of the data with performance models derived from the extant literature calls for further investigations of the structure emerging from the current studies.

Originality

These studies contrasted existing methods to categorize employee proficiency and provided empirical evidence of the shortcomings of these methods. Results also provided alternative criteria to discriminate performance behaviors.

Vorheriger Artikel Emotional Exhaustion Among Employees Without Social or Client Contact: The Key Role of Nonstandard Work Schedules

Nächster Artikel The Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment on the Relationships between P–O Fit, Job Satisfaction, and In-role Performance

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

We thank an anonymous reviewer for this suggestion.

Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American Economic Review, 91, 1369–1401.CrossRef

Anderson, L. (2001). Social mobility in Latin America: Link with adolescent schooling. Washington, DC: Inter-America Development Bank.

Atwater, L. E., Ostroff, C., Yammarino, F. J., & Fleenor, J. W. (1998). Self-other agreement: Does it really matter? Personnel Psychology, 51, 577–598.CrossRef

Austin, J. T., & Villanova, P. (1992). The criterion problem: 1917–1992. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 836–874.CrossRef

Benson, P. L., Dehority, J., Garman, L., Hanson, E., Hochschwender, M., Lebold, C., et al. (1980). Intrapersonal correlates of nonspontaneous helping behaviors. Journal of Social Psychology, 110, 87–95.CrossRef

Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Inc.

Binning, J. F., & Barrett, G. V. (1989). Validity of personnel decisions: A conceptual analysis of the inferential and evidential bases. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 478–494.CrossRef

Borg, I., & Groenen, P. J. F. (2005). Modern multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

Borman, W. C., & Brush, D. H. (1993). More progress toward a taxonomy of managerial performance requirements. Human Performance, 6, 1–21.CrossRef

Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71–98). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Burke, M. J., Sarpy, S. A., Tesluk, P. E., & Smith-Crowe, K. (2002). General safety performance: A test of a grounded theoretical model. Personnel Psychology, 55, 429–458.CrossRef

Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 687–731). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.

Campbell, J. P. (1999). The definition and measurement of performance in the new age. In D. E. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance (pp. 399–429). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Campbell, J. P., McHenry, J. J., & Wise, L. L. (1990). Modeling job performance in a population of jobs. Personnel Psychology, 43, 313–333.CrossRef

Carretta, T. R., & Ree, M. J. (2000). General and specific cognitive and psychomotor abilities in personnel selection: The prediction of training and job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 227–236.CrossRef

Cascio, W. F. (1998). Applied psychology in human resource management (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Conway, J. M. (1999). Distinguishing contextual performance from task performance for managerial job. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 3–13.CrossRef

Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.

Dye, D., & Silver, M. (1999). The origins of O*NET. In N. G. Peterson, M. D. Mumford, W. C. Borman, P. R. Jeanneret, & E. A. Fleishman (Eds.), An occupational information system for the 21st century (pp. 9–20). Washington, DC: APA.CrossRef

Fine, S. A., & Wiley, W. W. (1971). An introduction to functional job analysis: Methods for manpower analysis. Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute. Rand McNally.

Gael, S. (1983). Job Analysis: A guide to assessing work activities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Goldstein, I. L. (1991). Training in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial & organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 507–620). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Harris, M. M., & Schaubroeck, J. (1988). A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer, and peer-supervisor ratings. Personnel Psychology, 41, 43–62.CrossRef

Harvey, R. J. (1991). Job analysis. In M. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial & organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 71–164). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Heidemeier, H., & Moser, K. (2009). Self-other agreement in job performance ratings: A Meta-analytic test of a process model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2, 353–370.CrossRef

Hoffman, B. J., Blair, C. A., Mariac, J. P., & Woehr, D. J. (2007). Expanding the criterion domain? A quantitative review of the OCB literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 555–566.CrossRefPubMed

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing valuesm, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Hunt, S. (1996). Generic work behaviors: An investigation into the dimensions of entry-level, hourly job performance. Personnel Psychology, 49, 51–83.CrossRef

Hwang, Ch., Yan, W., & Scherer, R. F. (1996). Understanding managerial behavior in different cultures: A review of instrument translation methodology. International Journal of Management, 13, 332–339.

Ilgen, D. R., & Pulakos, E. D. (1999). Employee performance in today’s organizations. In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance (pp. 1–20). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Jeanneret, P. R., Borman, W. C., Kubisiak, U. C., & Hanson, M. A. (1999). Generalized work activities. In N. G. Peterson, M. D. Mumford, W. C. Borman, P. R. Jeanneret, & E. A. Fleishman (Eds.), An occupational information system for the 21st century: The development of O*NET (pp. 105–126). Washington, DC: APA.CrossRef

Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1966). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.

Knapp, D. J. (2006). The U.S. joint-service job performance measurement project: An enduring legacy in performance measurement. In W. Bennett, E. Ch. Lance, & D. J. Woehr (Eds.), Performance measurement: Current perspective and future challenges (pp. 113–140). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Konovsky, M. A., & Organ, D. W. (1996). Dispositional and contextual determinants of organizationalcitizenshipbehaviors. Journal of OrganizationalBehavior, 17, 253–266.

LePine, J. A., Erez, A., & Johnson, D. E. (2002). The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 52–65.CrossRefPubMed

Lizcano, F. F. (2005). Composicion etnica de las tres areas culturales del continente Americano al comienzo del siglo XXI. Revista Convergencia Universidad Autonoma del Estado de México, 38, 185–232.

London, M. (2004). Job feedback: Giving, seeking, and using feedback for performance improvement (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Milkovich, G. T., & Newman, J. M. (2005). Compensation (8th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Morrison, E. W. (1994). Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: The importance of the employees’ perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1543–1567.CrossRef

Motowidlo, S. J. (2003). Job performance. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimonski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (industrial/organizational psychology (12th ed., pp. 39–53). New York: Wiley.

Motowidlo, S. J., & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 475–480.CrossRef

Mumford, M. D., & Peterson, N. G. (1999). The O*NET content model: Structural considerations in describing jobs. In N. G. Peterson, M. D. Mumford, W. C. Borman, P. R. Jeanneret, & E. A. Fleishman (Eds.), An occupational information systems for the 21st century: The development of O*NET (pp. 21–30). Washington, DC: APA.CrossRef

Mumford, M. D., Peterson, N. G., & Childs, R. A. (1999). Basic and cross-functional skills. In N. G. Peterson, M. D. Mumford, W. C. Borman, P. R. Jeanneret, & E. A. Fleishman (Eds.), An occupational information systems for the 21st century: The development of O*NET (pp. 49–69). Washington, DC: APA.CrossRef

Murphy, K. R. (2008). Explaining the weak relationship between job performance and ratings of job performance. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 148–166.CrossRef

Olson, H. C., Fine, S. A., Myers, D. C., & Jennings, M. C. (1981). The use of functional job analysis in establishing performance standards for heavy equipment operators. Personnel Psychology, 34, 351–365.CrossRef

Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior. The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: It’s construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10, 85–97.CrossRef

Organ, D. W., & Ryan, K. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48, 775–802.CrossRef

Paine, J. B., & Organ, D. W. (2000). The cultural matrix of organizational citizenship behavior: Some preliminary conceptual and empirical observations. Human Resource Management Review, 10, 45–59.CrossRef

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26, 513–563.CrossRef

Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M., & Plamandon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 612–624.CrossRefPubMed

Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2000). A first course in structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Schiffman, S. S., Reynolds, M. L., & Young, F. W. (1981). Introduction to multidimensional scaling. New York: Academic Press.

Schmidt, S., & Kaplan, R. (1971). Composite vs multiple criteria: A review and resolution of the controversy. Personnel Psychology, 24, 419–434.CrossRef

Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 653–663.CrossRef

Stalans, L. J. (1995). Multidimensional scaling. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 137–168). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Tett, R. P., Guterman, H. A., Bleier, A., & Murphy, P. J. (2000). Development and content validation of a “hyperdimensional” taxonomy of managerial competence. Human Performance, 13, 205–251.CrossRef

Thorndike, R. L. (1949). Personnel selection. New York: Wiley.

Varela, O. E., & Premeaux, S. (2008). Do cross cultural values affect multisource feedback dynamics? The case of collectivism and high-power distance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16, 134–142.CrossRef

Viswesvaran, C. (2001). Assessment of individual job performance: A review of the past century and a look ahead. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinangil, & Ch. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work, and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 110–125). London: SAGE.

Viswesvaran, C., Schmidt, F. L., & Ones, D. S. (2005). Is there a general factor in ratings of job performance? A meta-analytic framework for disentangling substantive and error influences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 108–131.CrossRefPubMed

Volti, R. (1995). Society and technological change (3rd ed.). New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Wexley, K. N., & Klimoski, R. (1984). Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 2, pp. 35–79). London: JAI Press.

Wise, L. L., McHenry, J. J., & Campbell, J. P. (1990). Identifying optimal predictor composites and testing for generalizability across jobs and performance factors. Personnel Psychology, 43, 355–366.CrossRef

Zammuto, R. F. (1984). A comparison of multiple constituency models of organizational effectiveness. Academy of Management Review, 9, 606–616.CrossRef

Titel: A General Structure of Job Performance: Evidence from Two Studies
verfasst von: Otmar E. Varela
Ronald S. Landis
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2010
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Business and Psychology / Ausgabe 4/2010
Print ISSN: 0889-3268
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-353X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9155-8

Springer Professional

Abstract

Purpose

Design/methodological/approach

Findings

Implications

Originality

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2010

The Impact of Organizational Culture on Attraction and Recruitment of Job Applicants

Perspective Taking and Communication Satisfaction in Coworker Dyads

The Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment on the Relationships between P–O Fit, Job Satisfaction, and In-role Performance

Work Status Congruence’s Relation to Employee Attitudes and Behaviors: The Moderating Role of Procedural Justice

Psychological Contracts and Counterproductive Work Behaviors: Employee Responses to Transactional and Relational Breach

BARS and Those Mysterious, Missing Middle Anchors

Premium Partner