nach oben

Journal of Business Ethics

Erschienen in:

01.12.2011

A Model for Ethical Decision Making in Business: Reasoning, Intuition, and Rational Moral Principles

verfasst von: Jaana Woiceshyn

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 3/2011

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

How do business leaders make ethical decisions? Given the significant and wide-spread impact of business people’s decisions on multiple constituents (e.g., customers, employees, shareholders, competitors, and suppliers), how they make decisions matters. Unethical decisions harm the decision makers themselves as well as others, whereas ethical decisions have the opposite effect. Based on data from a study on strategic decision making by 16 effective chief executive officers (and three not-so-effective ones as contrast), I propose a model for ethical decision making in business in which reasoning (conscious processing) and intuition (subconscious processing) interact through forming, recalling, and applying moral principles necessary for long-term success in business. Following the CEOs in the study, I employ a relatively new theory, rational egoism, as the substantive content of the model and argue it to be consistent with the requirements of long-term business success. Besides explaining the processes of forming and applying principles (integration by essentials and spiraling), I briefly describe rational egoism and illustrate the model with a contemporary moral dilemma of downsizing. I conclude with implications for further research and ethical decision making in business.

Vorheriger Artikel Art and Artifice in Public Apologies

Nächster Artikel Beyond the Bounded Instrumentality in Current Corporate Sustainability Research: Toward an Inclusive Notion of Profitability

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

This section closely follows the presentation of integration by essentials in Woiceshyn (2009).

This point is controversial as ethicists have not been able agree that there is a factual basis of moral principles. In contrast to most philosophers, there are some who start from the naturalistic premise that facts about human nature give rise to the need of ethics; that humans need to act according to the requirements of their nature in order to survive and flourish (Foot 2001; Gaut 1997; Hursthouse 1999). Continuing on that premise, others have argued that ethics is like any other science, and that facts can validate moral principles in the same way as they validate or invalidate any other kind of principles (Simpson 2009; Smith 2006).

This happens automatically once a principle has been identified.

Binswanger, H. (1995). Psycho-epistemology. Lectures delivered at the Lyceum International summer conference, San Francisco, CA, USA. Available on cd from www.aynrandbookstore2.com.

Bowie, N. E. (2009). How empirical research in human cognition does and does not affect philosophical ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 635–643.CrossRef

Cushman, F., Young, L., & Hauser, M. (2006). The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: Testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1082–1089.CrossRef

Dane, E., & Pratt, M. G. (2007). Exploring the role of intuition in managerial decision making. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 33–54.CrossRef

DesJardins, J. (2006). An introduction to business ethics. New York: McGraw Hill.

Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1994). Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 252–284.

Ferrell, O., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L. (2005). Business ethics: Ethical decision making and cases. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Foot, P. (2001). Natural goodness. Oxford: Clarendon Press (quoted in Smith, 2006, p. 2).

Frederiksen, C. S. (2010). The relation between policies concerning corporate social responsibility (CSR) and philosophical moral theories—an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 357–371.CrossRef

Gaut, B. (1997). The structure of practical reason. In G. Cullity & B. Gaut (Eds.), Ethics and practical reason (pp. 161–188). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834.CrossRef

Haidt, J., & Bjorklund, F. (2008). Social intuitionists reason, as normal part of conversation. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology, volume 2: The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Harung, H. (1993). More effective decisions through synergy of objective and subjective approaches. Management Decision, 31(7), 38–45.CrossRef

Hills, A. (2010). The beloved self. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Hunt, S., & Vitell, S. (1984). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6, 5–16.CrossRef

Hursthouse, R. (1999). On virtue ethics. New York: Oxford University Press (quoted in Smith 2006, p. 2).

Jensen, M. C. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2(2), 235–256.CrossRef

Jones, T. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16, 366–395.

Khatri, N., & Ng, H. A. (2000). The role of intuition in strategic decision making. Human Relations, 53(1), 57–86.CrossRef

Klein, G. (2001). Sources of power: How people make decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Klein, G. (2003). Power of intuition. New York: Doubleday.

Kohlberg, L. (1973). The claim to moral adequacy of a highest stage of moral judgment. Journal of Philosophy, 70(18), 630–646.CrossRef

Korsgaard, C. (1996). The sources of normativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Lieberman, M., Gaunt, R., Gilbert, D., & Trope, Y. (2002). Reflexion and reflection: A social cognitive neuroscience approach to attributional inference. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 199–249). New York: Academic Press.

Locke, E. A. (2000). The prime movers: Traits of the great wealth creators. New York: AMACOM.

Locke, E. A. (2002). The epistemological side of teaching management: Teaching through principles. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1, 195–205.CrossRef

Locke, E. A. (2006). Business ethics: A way out of the morass. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5, 324–332.CrossRef

Maitland, I. (2002). The human face of self-interest. Journal of Business Ethics, 38, 3–17.CrossRef

Miner, M., & Petocz, A. (2003). Moral theory in ethical decision making: Problems, clarification and recommendations from a psychological perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 42, 11–25.CrossRef

Moore, G. (1903/1951). Principia ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 375–413.CrossRef

Oliver, D., & Roos, J. (2005). Decision-making in high-velocity environments: The importance of guiding principles. Organization Studies, 26(6), 889–913.CrossRef

Peikoff, L. (1989). Why should one act on principle? Intellectual Activist, 4(20), 2–6.

Peikoff, L. (1991). Objectivism: The philosophy of Ayn Rand. New York: Dutton.

Pondy, L. R. (1983). The union of rationality and intuition in management action. In S. Shrivastava & associates (Eds.), The executive mind. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Premeaux, S. (2004). The current link between management behavior and ethical philosophy. Journal of Business Ethics, 52, 269–278.CrossRef

Puris, M. (1999). Comeback: How seven straight-shooting CEOs turned around troubled companies. New York: Random House.

Rand, A. (1964). The objectivist ethics. In A. Rand (Ed.), The virtue of selfishness (pp. 13–35). New York: Signet/Penguin.

Rand, A. (1990). Introduction to objectivist epistemology. Expanded second edition. New York: Meridian.

Rest, J. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.

Reynolds, S. J. (2006). A neurocognitive model of the ethical decision-making process: Implications for study and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 737–748.CrossRef

Salvador, R., & Folger, R. G. (2009). Business ethics and the brain. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(1), 1–31.

Simon, H. A. (1987). Making management decisions: The role of intuition and emotion. Academy of Management Executive, 1(1), 57–64.CrossRef

Simpson, B. P. (2009). Wealth and income inequity: An economic and ethical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 525–538.CrossRef

Singer, A. E. (2010). Integrating ethics and strategy: A pragmatic approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 479–491.CrossRef

Smith, T. (2000). Viable values: The study of life as the root and reward of morality. Lanham, MD: Rowman Littlefield.

Smith, T. (2006). The virtuous egoist: Ayn Rand’s normative ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Sonenshein, S. (2007). The role of construction, intuition and justification in responding to ethical issues at work: The sensemaking-intuition model. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1022–1040.CrossRef

Tichy, N. M., & Bennis, W. G. (2007). Judgment: How winning leaders make great calls. New York: Portfolio/Penguin.

Toffler, B. L. (2003). Final accounting: Ambition, greed and the fall of Arthur Andersen. New York: Broadway Books.

Treviño, L., & Youngblood, S. (1990). Bad apples in bad barrels: A causal analysis of ethical decision-making behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 378–385.CrossRef

Woiceshyn, J. (2009). Lessons from “Good Minds”: How CEOs use intuition, analysis and guiding principles to make strategic decisions. Long Range Planning, 42(3), 277–319.

Titel: A Model for Ethical Decision Making in Business: Reasoning, Intuition, and Rational Moral Principles
verfasst von: Jaana Woiceshyn
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2011
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 3/2011
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0910-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2011

Beyond the Bounded Instrumentality in Current Corporate Sustainability Research: Toward an Inclusive Notion of Profitability

Art and Artifice in Public Apologies

Learning to Be Job Ready: Strategies for Greater Social Inclusion in Public Sector Employment

Business Ethics Perceptions of Public and Private Sector Iranians

Visualizing the Phronetic Organization: The Case of Photographs in CSR Reports

The Origins and Meanings of Names Describing Investment Practices that Integrate a Consideration of ESG Issues in the Academic Literature

Premium Partner