nach oben

Erschienen in:

16.02.2021 | Review Paper

A review of culture media for bacterial cellulose production: complex, chemically defined and minimal media modulations

verfasst von: Gabriela Sperotto, Larissa Gabrieli Stasiak, João Pedro Maximino Gongora Godoi, Naiana Cristine Gabiatti, Samara Silva De Souza

Erschienen in: Cellulose | Ausgabe 5/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Culture media is classified into several categories depending on their composition or application. Bacterial cellulose (BC) is a promising biomaterial with desirable properties for industrial and commercial applications. Based on that, its production was explored in several works on the modulation of the culture media. This review provides an overview of the advantages and limitations of undefined and defined media for BC production. The majority of these reported researches are based in complex media through modification of carbon and nitrogen sources. Some of them focused on the addition of non-conventional components to improve BC yield and reduce the production cost. However, the exact composition of these media cannot be determined, hindering the process reproducibility. Alternatively, chemically and minimal defined media, that are required in biochemical, physiological and genetic studies, due its exact amount of nutrients, are potential alternatives as BC culture media. The modulation of different types of culture media will determine the costs, yield and properties of BC.

Graphic abstract

Vorheriger Artikel Study of azomethine functionalized cellulose with salicylaldehyde as novel demetallization agent for metalloporphyrins in crude oil

Nächster Artikel Dynamic mechanical behaviour of kenaf cellulosic fibre biocomposites: a comprehensive review on chemical treatments

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Abdelraof M, Hasanin MS, El-Saied H (2019) Ecofriendly green conversion of potato peel wastes to high productivity bacterial cellulose. Carbohydr Polym 211:75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.01.095CrossRefPubMed

Abelovska L, Bujdos M, Kubova J et al (2007) Comparison of element levels in minimal and complex yeast media. Can J Microbiol 53:533–535. https://doi.org/10.1139/W07-012CrossRefPubMed

Abol-Fotouh D, Hassan MA, Shokry H et al (2020) Bacterial nanocellulose from agro-industrial wastes: low-cost and enhanced production by Komagataeibacter saccharivorans MD1. Sci Rep 10:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60315-9CrossRef

Abouelkheir SS, Kamara MS, Atia SM et al (2020) Novel research on nanocellulose production by a marine Bacillus velezensis strain SMR: a comparative study. Sci Rep 10:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70857-7CrossRef

Akinsemolu AA (2018) The role of microorganisms in achieving the sustainable development goals. J Clean Prod 182:139–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.081CrossRef

Al-Abdallah W, Dahman Y (2013) Production of green biocellulose nanofibers by Gluconacetobacter xylinus through utilizing the renewable resources of agriculture residues. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 36:1735–1743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-013-0948-9CrossRefPubMed

Alves AA, Silva WE, Belian MF et al (2020) Bacterial cellulose membranes for environmental water remediation and industrial wastewater treatment. Int J Environ Sci Technol 17:3997–4008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-02746-5CrossRef

Andriani D, Apriyana AY, Karina M (2020) The optimization of bacterial cellulose production and its applications: a review. Cellulose 27:6747–6766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03273-9CrossRef

Arora M (2013) Cell culture media: a review. Mater Methods 3:1–29. https://doi.org/10.13070/mm.en.3.175CrossRef

Augimeri RV, Varley AJ, Strap JL (2015) Establishing a role for bacterial cellulose in environmental interactions: lessons learned from diverse biofilm-producing proteobacteria. Front Microbiol 6:1282. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01282CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Azeredo HMC, Barud H, Farinas CS et al (2019) Bacterial cellulose as a raw material for food and food packaging applications. Front Sustain Food Syst 3:1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2019.00007CrossRef

Bäckdahl H, Helenius G, Bodin A et al (2006) Mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose and interactions with smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials 27:2141–2149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.026CrossRefPubMed

Barshan S, Rezazadeh-Bari M, Almasi H, Amiri S (2019) Optimization and characterization of bacterial cellulose produced by Komagatacibacter xylinus PTCC 1734 using vinasse as a cheap cultivation medium. Int J Biol Macromol 136:1188–1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.192CrossRefPubMed

Berríos-Rivera SJ, Sánchez AM, Bennett GN, San KY (2004) Effect of different levels of NADH availability on metabolite distribution in Escherichia coli fermentation in minimal and complex media. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 65:426–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-004-1609-3CrossRefPubMed

Berti FV, Rambo CR, Dias PF, Porto LM (2013) Nanofiber density determines endothelial cell behavior on hydrogel matrix. Mater Sci Eng C 33:4684–4691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2013.07.029CrossRef

Bilgi E, Bayir E, Sendemir-Urkmez A, Hames EE (2016) Optimization of bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus using carob and haricot bean. Int J Biol Macromol 90:2–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.02.052CrossRefPubMed

Black JG, Black LJ (2008) Growth and culture of bacteria. In: Microbiology: principles and explorations, 7th edn. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 161–168

Brown AJ (1886) XIX.—The chemical action of pure cultivations of bacterium aceti. J Chem Soc Trans 49:172–187. https://doi.org/10.1039/CT8864900172CrossRef

Çakar F, Özer I, Aytekin AÖ, Şahin F (2014) Improvement production of bacterial cellulose by semi-continuous process in molasses medium. Carbohydr Polym 106:7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.01.103CrossRefPubMed

Campano C, Balea A, Blanco A, Negro C (2016) Enhancement of the fermentation process and properties of bacterial cellulose: a review. Cellulose 23:57–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0802-0CrossRef

Canale-Parola E, Wolfe RS (1964) Synthesis of cellulose by Sarcina ventriculi. BBA Gen Subj 82:403–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4165(64)90314-9CrossRef

Cao Y, Lu S, Yang Y (2018) Production of bacterial cellulose from byproduct of citrus juice processing (citrus pulp) by Gluconacetobacter hansenii. Cellulose 25:6977–6988. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-2056-0CrossRef

Castro C, Cleenwerck I, Trček J et al (2013) Gluconacetobacter medellinensis sp. nov., cellulose- and non-cellulose-producing acetic acid bacteria isolated from vinegar. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 63:1119–1125. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.043414-0CrossRefPubMed

Castro C, Zuluaga R, Putaux JL et al (2011) Structural characterization of bacterial cellulose produced by Gluconacetobacter swingsii sp. from Colombian agroindustrial wastes. Carbohydr Polym 84:96–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.10.072CrossRef

Cavka A, Guo X, Tang SJ et al (2013) Production of bacterial cellulose and enzyme from waste fiber sludge. Biotechnol Biofuels 6:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-6-25CrossRef

Chao Y, Ishida T, Sugano Y, Shoda M (2000) Bacterial cellulose production by Acetobacter xylinum in a 50-L internal-loop airlift reactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 68:345–352. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(20000505)68:3%3c345::AID-BIT13%3e3.0.CO;2-MCrossRefPubMed

Chawla PR, Bajaj IB, Survase SA, Singhal RS (2009) Microbial cellulose: fermentative production and applications. Food Technol Biotechnol 47:107–124

Chen L, Hong F, Yang X-X, Han S-F (2013) Biotransformation of wheat straw to bacterial cellulose and its mechanism. Bioresour Technol 135:464–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.029CrossRefPubMed

Chen P, Cho SY, Jin HJ (2010) Modification and applications of bacterial celluloses in polymer science. Macromol Res 18:309–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13233-010-0404-5CrossRef

Cheng KC, Catchmark JM, Demirci A (2009a) Enhanced production of bacterial cellulose by using a biofilm reactor and its material property analysis. J Biol Eng 3:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-1611-3-12CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Cheng KC, Catchmark JM, Demirci A (2009b) Enhanced production of bacterial cellulose by using a biofilm reactor and its material property analysis. J Biol Eng 3:486–497. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-1611-3-12CrossRef

Cortés-Zavaleta O, López-Malo A, Hernández-Mendoza A, García HS (2014) Antifungal activity of lactobacilli and its relationship with 3-phenyllactic acid production. Int J Food Microbiol 173:30–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.12.016CrossRefPubMed

Corujo VF, Cerrutti P, Foresti ML, Vázquez A (2016) Production of bacterial nanocellulose from non-conventional fermentation media. In: Multifunctional polymeric nanocomposites based on cellulosic reinforcements. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 39–59

Costa AFS, Almeida FCG, Vinhas GM, Sarubbo LA (2017) Production of bacterial cellulose by Gluconacetobacter hansenii using corn steep liquor as nutrient sources. Front Microbiol 8:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02027CrossRef

Czaja W, Romanovicz D, Brown RM (2004) Structural investigations of microbial cellulose produced in stationary and agitated culture. Cellulose 11:403–411. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:cell.0000046412.11983.61CrossRef

Dahman Y, Jayasuriya KE, Kalis M (2010) Potential of biocellulose nanofibers production from agricultural renewable resources: preliminary study. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 162:1647–1659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-010-8946-8CrossRefPubMed

De Souza SS, Berti FV, De Oliveira KPV et al (2019) Nanocellulose biosynthesis by Komagataeibacter hansenii in a defined minimal culture medium. Cellulose 26:1641–1655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-2178-4CrossRef

Dórame-Miranda RF, Gámez-Meza N, Medina-Juárez L et al (2019) Bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter entanii using pecan nutshell as carbon source and its chemical functionalization. Carbohydr Polym 207:91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.11.067CrossRefPubMed

Dos Santos PS, Solidade LS, Souza JGB et al (2018) Fermentação em estado sólido em resíduos agroindustriais para a produção de enzimas: uma revisão sistemática. J Eng Exact Sci 4:181–188. https://doi.org/10.18540/jcecvl4iss2pp0181-0188CrossRef

Duarte EB, Andrade FK, Lima HLS et al (2019) Celulose bacteriana: propriedades, meios fermentativos e aplicações. Embrapa Agroindústria Trop 186:1–37

Dudman WF (1959) Cellulose production by Acetobacter actigenum in defined medium. J Gen Microbiol 21:327–337. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-21-2-327CrossRefPubMed

Dutta D, Gachhui R (2007) Nitrogen-fixing and cellulose-producing Gluconacetobacter kombuchae sp. nov., isolated from Kombucha tea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:353–357. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.64638-0CrossRefPubMed

Esa F, Tasirin SM, Rahman NA (2014) Overview of bacterial cellulose production and application. Agric Agric Sci Procedia 2:113–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2014.11.017CrossRef

Fan S, Zhang Z, Zou W et al (2014) Development of a minimal chemically defined medium for Ketogulonicigenium vulgare WSH001 based on its genome-scale metabolic model. J Biotechnol 169:15–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2013.10.027CrossRefPubMed

Fan X, Gao Y, He W et al (2016) Production of nano bacterial cellulose from beverage industrial waste of citrus peel and pomace using Komagataeibacter xylinus. Carbohydr Polym 151:1068–1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.06.062CrossRefPubMed

Fernandes M, Gama M, Dourado F, Souto AP (2019) Development of novel bacterial cellulose composites for the textile and shoe industry. Microb Biotechnol 12:650–661. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13387CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Figueiredo ARP, Silvestre AJD, Neto CP, Freire CSR (2015) In situ synthesis of bacterial cellulose/polycaprolactone blends for hot pressing nanocomposite films production. Carbohydr Polym 132:400–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.06.001CrossRefPubMed

Forng ER, Anderson SM, Cannon RE (1989) Synthetic medium for Acetobacter xylinum that can be used for isolation of auxotrophic mutants and study of cellulose biosynthesis. Appl Environ Microbiol 55:1317–1319. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.55.5.1317-1319.1989CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Gao G, Ji K, Zhang Y et al (2020) Microbial enhanced oil recovery through deep profile control using a conditional bacterial cellulose-producing strain derived from Enterobacter sp. FY-07. Microb Cell Fact 19:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-020-01314-3CrossRef

Gao M, Li J, Bao Z et al (2019) A natural in situ fabrication method of functional bacterial cellulose using a microorganism. Nat Commun 10:437. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07879-3CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

García-Sánchez ME, Robledo-Ortíz JR, Jiménez-Palomar I et al (2020) Production of bacterial cellulose by Komagataeibacter xylinus using mango waste as alternative culture medium. Rev Mex Ing Quim 19:851–865. https://doi.org/10.24275/rmiq/Bio743CrossRef

García B, Latasa C, Solano C et al (2004) Role of the GGDEF protein family in Salmonella cellulose biosynthesis and biofilm formation. Mol Microbiol 54:264–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04269.xCrossRefPubMed

Godinho JF, Berti FV, Müller D et al (2016) Incorporation of Aloe vera extracts into nanocellulose during biosynthesis. Cellulose 23:545–555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0844-3CrossRef

Gomes FP, Silva NHCS, Trovatti E et al (2013) Production of bacterial cellulose by Gluconacetobacter sacchari using dry olive mill residue. Biomass Bioenerg 55:205–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.02.004CrossRef

Gündüz G, Aşık N (2018) Production and characterization of bacterial cellulose with different nutrient source and surface–Volume ratios. Drv Ind 69:141–147. https://doi.org/10.5552/drind.2018.1744CrossRef

Guo X, Cavka A, Jönsson LJ, Hong F (2013) Comparison of methods for detoxification of spruce hydrolysate for bacterial cellulose production. Microb Cell Fact 12:93. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-12-93CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Guo X, Chen L, Tang J et al (2016) Production of bacterial nanocellulose and enzyme from [AMIM]Cl-pretreated waste cotton fabrics: effects of dyes on enzymatic saccharification and nanocellulose production. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 91:1413–1421. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.4738CrossRef

Ham RG, McKeehan WL (1979) Media and growth requirements. In: Methods in enzymology. Academic Press, New York, pp 44–93

Han YH, Mao HL, Wang SS et al (2020) Ecofriendly green biosynthesis of bacterial cellulose by Komagataeibacter xylinus B2–1 using the shell extract of Sapindus mukorossi Gaertn. as culture medium. Cellulose 27:1255–1272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02868-1CrossRef

He F, Yang H, Zeng L et al (2020) Production and characterization of bacterial cellulose obtained by Gluconacetobacter xylinus utilizing the by-products from Baijiu production. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 43:927–936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-020-02289-6CrossRefPubMed

He J, Zhao H, Li X et al (2018) Superelastic and superhydrophobic bacterial cellulose/silica aerogels with hierarchical cellular structure for oil absorption and recovery. J Hazard Mater 346:199–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.12.045CrossRefPubMed

Heo M-S, Son H-J (2002) Development of an optimized, simple chemically defined medium for bacterial cellulose production by Acetobacter sp. A9 in shaking cultures. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 36:41–45. https://doi.org/10.1042/ba20020018CrossRefPubMed

Heßler N, Klemm D (2009) Alteration of bacterial nanocellulose structure by in situ modification using polyethylene glycol and carbohydrate additives. Cellulose 16:899–910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-009-9301-5CrossRef

Hestrin S, Schramm M (1954) Synthesis of cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum. II. Preparation of freeze-dried cells capable of polymerizing glucose to cellulose. Biochem J 58:345–352. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj0580345CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ho Jin Y, Lee T, Kim JR et al (2019) Improved production of bacterial cellulose from waste glycerol through investigation of inhibitory effects of crude glycerol-derived compounds by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. J Ind Eng Chem 75:158–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2019.03.017CrossRef

Hong F, Guo X, Zhang S et al (2012) Bacterial cellulose production from cotton-based waste textiles: enzymatic saccharification enhanced by ionic liquid pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 104:503–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.028CrossRefPubMed

Hong F, Qiu K (2008) An alternative carbon source from konjac powder for enhancing production of bacterial cellulose in static cultures by a model strain Acetobacter aceti subsp. xylinus ATCC 23770. Carbohydr Polym 72:545–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.09.015CrossRef

Hornung M, Ludwig M, Gerrard AM, Schmauder HP (2006) Optimizing the production of bacterial cellulose in surface culture: evaluation of substrate mass transfer influences on the bioreaction (part 1). Eng Life Sci 6:537–545. https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.200620162CrossRef

Hu W, Chen S, Yang J et al (2014) Functionalized bacterial cellulose derivatives and nanocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 101:1043–1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.09.102CrossRefPubMed

Huang C, Guo HJ, Xiong L et al (2016) Using wastewater after lipid fermentation as substrate for bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Carbohydr Polym 136:198–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.09.043CrossRefPubMed

Huang C, Yang XY, Xiong L et al (2015) Evaluating the possibility of using acetone-butanol-ethanol (ABE) fermentation wastewater for bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Lett Appl Microbiol 60:491–496. https://doi.org/10.1111/lam.12396CrossRefPubMed

Huang D, Wen J, Wang G et al (2012) In silico aided metabolic engineering of Streptomyces roseosporus for daptomycin yield improvement. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 94:637–649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3773-6CrossRefPubMed

Hungund BS, Gupta SG (2010) Production of bacterial cellulose from Enterobacter amnigenus GH-1 isolated from rotten apple. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 26:1823–1828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-010-0363-1CrossRef

Hussain Z, Sajjad W, Khan T, Wahid F (2019) Production of bacterial cellulose from industrial wastes: a review. Cellulose 26:2895–2911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02307-1CrossRef

Iguchi M, Yamanaka S, Budhiono A (2000) Bacterial cellulose—a masterpiece of nature’s arts. J Mater Sci 35:261–270. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004775229149CrossRef

Jae YJ, Joong KP, Ho NC (2005) Bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter hansenii in an agitated culture without living non-cellulose producing cells. Enzyme Microb Technol 37:347–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.02.019CrossRef

Jang WD, Hwang JH, Kim HU et al (2017) Bacterial cellulose as an example product for sustainable production and consumption. Microb Biotechnol 10:1181–1185. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12744CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Janzen RA, Rood SB, Dormaar JF, McGill WB (1992) Azospirillum brasilense produces gibberellin in pure culture on chemically-defined medium and in co-culture on straw. Soil Biol Biochem 24:1061–1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(92)90036-WCrossRef

Jayme DW, Blackman KE (1985) Culture media for propagation of mammalian cells, viruses and other biologicals. In: Phillpotts RJ (ed) Advances in biotechnological processes. Alan Liss, New York, pp 1–30

Jorfi M, Foster EJ (2015) Recent advances in nanocellulose for biomedical applications. J Appl Polym Sci 132:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.41719CrossRef

Jozala AF, De Lencastre-Novaes LC, Lopes AM et al (2016) Bacterial nanocellulose production and application: a 10-year overview. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:2063–2072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-7243-4CrossRefPubMed

Jozala AF, Pértile RAN, Dos Santos CA et al (2015) Bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus by employing alternative culture media. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:1181–1190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-6232-3CrossRefPubMed

Jung H II, Jeong JH, Lee OM et al (2010) Influence of glycerol on production and structural-physical properties of cellulose from Acetobacter sp. V6 cultured in shake flasks. Bioresour Technol 101:3602–3608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.12.111CrossRefPubMed

Kamiński K, Jarosz M, Grudzień J et al (2020) Hydrogel bacterial cellulose: a path to improved materials for new eco-friendly textiles. Cellulose 27:5353–5365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03128-3CrossRef

Keshk SMAS, Sameshima K (2005) Evaluation of different carbon sources for bacterial cellulose production. Afr J Biotechnol 4:478–482

Kim J, Kim KH (2017) Effects of minimal media vs. complex media on the metabolite profiles of Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Process Biochem 57:64–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2017.04.003CrossRef

Kiziltas EE, Kiziltas A, Gardner DJ (2015) Synthesis of bacterial cellulose using hot water extracted wood sugars. Carbohydr Polym 124:131–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.01.036CrossRefPubMed

Klemm D, Schumann D, Udhardt U, Marsch S (2001) Bacterial synthesized cellulose—artificial blood vessels for microsurgery. Prog Polym Sci 26:1561–1603. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6700(01)00021-1CrossRef

Kongruang S (2008) Bacterial cellulose production by Acetobacter xylinum strains from agricultural waste products. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 148:245–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-007-8119-6CrossRefPubMed

Krystynowicz A, Czaja W, Wiktorowska-Jezierska A et al (2002) Factors affecting the yield and properties of bacterial cellulose. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 29:189–195. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jim.7000303CrossRefPubMed

Kuo CH, Huang CY, Shieh CJ et al (2019) Hydrolysis of orange peel with cellulase and pectinase to produce bacterial cellulose using Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Waste Biomass Valoriz 10:85–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-017-0034-7CrossRef

Kurosumi A, Sasaki C, Yamashita Y, Nakamura Y (2009) Utilization of various fruit juices as carbon source for production of bacterial cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum NBRC 13693. Carbohydr Polym 76:333–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.11.009CrossRef

Lestari P, Elfrida N, Suryani A, Suryadi Y (2014) Study on the production of bacterial cellulose from Acetobacter xylinum using Agro-waste. Jordan J Biol Sci 7:75–80. https://doi.org/10.12816/0008218CrossRef

Li Y, Tian C, Tian H et al (2012) Improvement of bacterial cellulose production by manipulating the metabolic pathways in which ethanol and sodium citrate involved. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 96:1479–1487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-012-4242-6CrossRefPubMed

Li Z, Wang L, Hua J et al (2015) Production of nano bacterial cellulose from waste water of candied jujube-processing industry using Acetobacter xylinum. Carbohydr Polym 120:115–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.11.061CrossRefPubMed

Lima HLS, Nascimento ES, Andrade FK et al (2017) Bacterial cellulose production by Komagataeibacter hansenii ATCC 23769 using sisal juice—an agroindustry waste. Braz J Chem Eng 34:671–680. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-6632.20170343s20150514CrossRef

Lin D, Lopez-Sanchez P, Li R, Li Z (2014) Production of bacterial cellulose by Gluconacetobacter hansenii CGMCC 3917 using only waste beer yeast as nutrient source. Bioresour Technol 151:113–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.10.052CrossRefPubMed

Lisdiyanti P, Navarro RR, Uchimura T, Komagata K (2006) Reclassification of Gluconacetobacter hansenii strains and proposals of Gluconacetobacter saccharivorans sp. nov. and Gluconacetobacter nataicola sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56:2101–2111. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.63252-0CrossRefPubMed

Liu W, Yu YH, Cao SY et al (2013) Transcriptome profiling of Xanthomonas campestris pv campestris grown in minimal medium MMX and rich medium NYG. Res Microbiol 164:466–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2013.02.005CrossRefPubMed

Lu H, Jiang X (2014) Structure and properties of bacterial cellulose produced using a trickling bed reactor. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 172:3844–3861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-014-0795-4CrossRefPubMed

Ludwicka K, Jedrzejczak-Krzepkowska M, Kubiak K et al (2016) Medical and cosmetic applications of bacterial nanoCellulose. In: Gama M (ed) Bacterial nanocellulose: from biotechnology to bio-economy. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 145–165CrossRef

Ma T, Ji K, Wang W et al (2012) Cellulose synthesized by Enterobacter sp. FY-07 under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Bioresour Technol 126:18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.09.040CrossRefPubMed

Madigan MT, Martinko MJ, Bender KS et al (2016) Metabolismo microbiano. In: Microbiologia de Brock, 14th edn. Artmed, Porto Alegre, pp 73–95

Masaoka S, Ohe T, Sakota N (1993) Production of cellulose from glucose by Acetobacter xylinum. J Ferment Bioeng 75:18–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0922-338X(93)90171-4CrossRef

Matsuoka M, Tsuchida T, Matsushita K et al (1996) A synthetic medium for bacterial cellulose production by Acetobacter xylinum subsp. sucrofermentans. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 60:575–579. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.60.575CrossRef

Matthysse AG, White S, Lightfoot R (1995) Genes required for cellulose synthesis in Agrobacterium tumefaciens. J Bacteriol 177:1069–1075. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.177.4.1069-1075.1995CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Mikkelsen D, Flanagan BM, Dykes GA, Gidley MJ (2009) Influence of different carbon sources on bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus strain ATCC 53524. J Appl Microbiol 107:576–583. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04226.xCrossRefPubMed

Mohammadkazemi F, Azin M, Ashori A (2015) Production of bacterial cellulose using different carbon sources and culture media. Carbohydr Polym 117:518–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.10.008CrossRefPubMed

Mohite BV, Patil SV (2014) A novel biomaterial: bacterial cellulose and its new era applications. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 61:101–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/bab.1148CrossRefPubMed

Moniri M, Moghaddam AB, Azizi S et al (2017) Production and status of bacterial cellulose in biomedical engineering. Nanomaterials 7:1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7090257CrossRef

Moosavi-nasab M, Yousefi AR (2010) Investigation of physicochemical properties of the bacterial cellulose produced by Gluconacetobacter xylinus from date syrup. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 4:613–618. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1071644CrossRef

Morgan JLW, Strumillo J, Zimmer J (2013) Crystallographic snapshot of cellulose synthesis and membrane translocation. Nature 493:181–186. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11744CrossRefPubMed

Oikawa T, Ohtori T, Ameyama M (1995) Production of cellulose from D-mannitol by Acetobacter xylinum KU-1. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 59:331–332. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.59.331CrossRef

Pacheco G, Nogueira CR, Meneguin AB et al (2017) Development and characterization of bacterial cellulose produced by cashew tree residues as alternative carbon source. Ind Crops Prod 107:13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.05.026CrossRef

Pfeffer S, Mehta K, Brown RM (2016) Complete genome sequence of a Gluconacetobacter hansenii ATCC 23769 isolate, AY201, producer of bacterial cellulose and important model organism for the study of cellulose biosynthesis. Genome Announc 4:e00808-e816. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00808-16CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Phulara SC, Chaturvedi P, Chaurasia D et al (2019) Modulation of culture medium confers high-specificity production of isopentenol in Bacillus subtilis. J Biosci Bioeng 127:458–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2018.10.002CrossRefPubMed

Raiszadeh-Jahromi Y, Rezazadeh-Bari M, Almasi H, Amiri S (2020) Optimization of bacterial cellulose production by Komagataeibacter xylinus PTCC 1734 in a low-cost medium using optimal combined design. J Food Sci Technol 57:2524–2533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-020-04289-6CrossRefPubMed

Ramana KV, Tomar A, Singh L (2000) Effect of various carbon and nitrogen sources on cellulose synthesis by Acetobacter xylinum. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 16:245–248. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008958014270CrossRef

Rani MU, Rastogi NK, Appaiah KAA (2011) Statistical optimization of medium composition for bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter hansenii UAC09 using coffee cherry husk extract—an agro-industry waste. J Microbiol Biotechnol 21:739–745. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1012.12026CrossRefPubMed

Recouvreux DOS, Rambo CR, Berti FV et al (2011) Novel three-dimensional cocoon-like hydrogels for soft tissue regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C 31:151–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2010.08.004CrossRef

Reiling HE, Laurila H, Fiechter A (1985) Mass culture of Escherichia coli: medium development for low and high density cultivation of Escherichia coli B/r in minimal and complex media. J Biotechnol 2:191–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1656(85)90038-0CrossRef

Revin V, Liyaskina E, Nazarkina M et al (2018) Cost-effective production of bacterial cellulose using acidic food industry by-products. Braz J Microbiol 49:151–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2017.12.012CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Römling U, Lünsdorf H (2004) Characterization of cellulose produced by Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Cellulose 11:413–418. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:cell.0000046411.74345.8fCrossRef

Ross P, Mayer R, Benziman M (1991) Cellulose biosynthesis and function in bacteria. Microbiol Rev 55:35–38. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.55.1.35-58.1991CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ruka DR, Simon GP, Dean KM (2012) Altering the growth conditions of Gluconacetobacter xylinus to maximize the yield of bacterial cellulose. Carbohydr Polym 89:613–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.03.059CrossRefPubMed

Saibuatong O-A, Phisalaphong M (2010) Novo aloe vera-bacterial cellulose composite film from biosynthesis. Carbohydr Polym 79:455–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.08.039CrossRef

Salari M, Sowti Khiabani M, Rezaei Mokarram R et al (2019) Preparation and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from bacterial cellulose produced in sugar beet molasses and cheese whey media. Int J Biol Macromol 122:280–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.136CrossRefPubMed

Saxena IM, Kudlicka K, Okuda K, Brown RM (1994) Characterization of genes in the cellulose-synthesizing operon (acs operon) of Acetobacter xylinum: implications for cellulose crystallization. J Bacteriol 176:5735–5752. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.176.18.5735-5752.1994CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Schaub J, Mauch K, Reuss M (2008) Metabolic flux analysis in Escherichia coli by integrating isotopic dynamic and isotopic stationary 13C labeling data. Biotechnol Bioeng 99:1170–1185. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.21675CrossRefPubMed

Shah N, Ul-Islam M, Khattak WA, Park JK (2013) Overview of bacterial cellulose composites: a multipurpose advanced material. Carbohydr Polym 98:1585–1598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.08.018CrossRefPubMed

Shoda M, Sugano Y (2005) Recent advances in bacterial cellulose production. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 10:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02931175CrossRef

Singhsa P, Narain R, Manuspiya H (2018) Physical structure variations of bacterial cellulose produced by different Komagataeibacter xylinus strains and carbon sources in static and agitated conditions. Cellulose 25:1571–1581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1699-1CrossRef

Singleton C, Gilman J, Rollit J et al (2019) A design of experiments approach for the rapid formulation of a chemically defined medium for metabolic profiling of industrially important microbes. PLoS ONE 14:7–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218208CrossRef

Son HJ, Kim HG, Kim KK et al (2003) Increased production of bacterial cellulose by Acetobacter sp. V6 in synthetic media under shaking culture conditions. Bioresour Technol 86:215–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00176-1CrossRefPubMed

Souza EF, Furtado MR, Carvalho CWP et al (2020) Production and characterization of Gluconacetobacter xylinus bacterial cellulose using cashew apple juice and soybean molasses. Int J Biol Macromol 146:285–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.180CrossRefPubMed

Spiers AJ, Bohannon J, Gehrig SM, Rainey PB (2003) Biofilm formation at the air-liquid interface by the Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 wrinkly spreader requires an acetylated form of cellulose. Mol Microbiol 50:15–27. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03670.xCrossRefPubMed

Stumpf TR, Pértile RAN, Rambo CR, Porto LM (2013) Enriched glucose and dextrin mannitol-based media modulates fibroblast behavior on bacterial cellulose membranes. Mater Sci Eng C 33:4739–4745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2013.07.035CrossRef

Suwanposri A, Yukphan P, Yamada Y, Ochaikul D (2013) Identification and biocellulose production of Gluconacetobacter strains isolated from tropical fruits in Thailand. Maejo Int J Sci Technol 7:70–82. https://doi.org/10.14456/mijst.2013.6CrossRef

Tortora GJ, Funke BR, Case Cl (2012) Crescimento microbiano. In: Microbiologia, 10th edn. Artmed, Porto Alegre, pp 156–183

Toyosaki H, Naritomi T, Seto A et al (1995) Screening of bacterial cellulose-producing Acetobacter strains suitable for agitated culture. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 59:1498–1502. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.59.1498CrossRef

Trovatti E, Serafim LS, Freire CSR et al (2011) Gluconacetobacter sacchari: an efficient bacterial cellulose cell-factory. Carbohydr Polym 86:1417–1420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.046CrossRef

Tsouko E, Kourmentza C, Ladakis D et al (2015) Bacterial cellulose production from industrial waste and by-product streams. Int J Mol Sci 16:14832–14849. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms160714832CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ude S, Arnold DL, Moon CD et al (2006) Biofilm formation and cellulose expression among diverse environmental Pseudomonas isolates. Environ Microbiol 8:1997–2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01080.xCrossRefPubMed

Ul-Islam M, Khan S, Ullah MW, Park JK (2015) Bacterial cellulose composites: synthetic strategies and multiple applications in bio-medical and electro-conductive fields. Biotechnol J 10:1847–1861. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201500106CrossRefPubMed

Ullah H, Santos HA, Khan T (2016) Applications of bacterial cellulose in food, cosmetics and drug delivery. Cellulose 23:2291–2314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-0986-yCrossRef

Valepyn E, Berezina N, Paquot M (2012) Optimization of production and preliminary characterization of new exopolysaccharides from Gluconacetobacter hansenii LMG1524. Adv Microbiol 02:488–496. https://doi.org/10.4236/aim.2012.24062CrossRef

Vazquez A, Foresti ML, Cerrutti P, Galvagno M (2013) Bacterial cellulose from simple and low cost production media by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. J Polym Environ 21:545–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-012-0541-3CrossRef

Velmourougane K, Prasanna R, Saxena AK et al (2017) Modulation of growth media influences aggregation and biofilm formation between Azotobacter chroococcum and Trichoderma viride. Appl Biochem Microbiol 53:546–556. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0003683817050179CrossRef

Wada K, Toya Y, Banno S et al (2017) 13C-metabolic flux analysis for mevalonate-producing strain of Escherichia coli. J Biosci Bioeng 123:177–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2016.08.001CrossRefPubMed

Wang J, Tavakoli J, Tang Y (2019) Bacterial cellulose production, properties and applications with different culture methods—a review. Carbohydr Polym 219:63–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.05.008CrossRefPubMed

Wu M, Chen W, Hu J et al (2019) Valorizing kitchen waste through bacterial cellulose production towards a more sustainable biorefinery. Sci Total Environ 695:133898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133898CrossRefPubMed

Yamada Y, Yukphan P, Vu HTL et al (2012) Description of Komagataeibacter gen. nov., with proposals of new combinations (Acetobacteraceae). J Gen Appl Microbiol 58:397–404. https://doi.org/10.2323/jgam.58.397CrossRefPubMed

Yamanaka S, Watanabe K, Kitamura N et al (1989) The structure and mechanical properties of sheets prepared from bacterial cellulose. J Mater Sci 24:3141–3145. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01139032CrossRef

Yan H, Chen X, Song H et al (2017) Synthesis of bacterial cellulose and bacterial cellulose nanocrystals for their applications in the stabilization of olive oil pickering emulsion. Food Hydrocoll 72:127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2017.05.044CrossRef

Yang XY, Huang C, Guo HJ et al (2013) Bioconversion of elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum) acid hydrolysate to bacterial cellulose by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. J Appl Microbiol 115:995–1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12255CrossRefPubMed

Yang XY, Huang C, Guo HJ et al (2014) Beneficial effect of acetic acid on the xylose utilization and bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Indian J Microbiol 54:268–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-014-0450-3CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Yanti NA, Ahmad SW, Ambardini S et al (2017) Screening of acetic acid bacteria from pineapple waste for bacterial cellulose production using sago liquid waste. Biosaintifika J Biol Biol Educ 9:387. https://doi.org/10.15294/biosaintifika.v9i3.10241CrossRef

Ye J, Zheng S, Zhang Z et al (2019) Bacterial cellulose production by Acetobacter xylinum ATCC 23767 using tobacco waste extract as culture medium. Bioresour Technol 274:518–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.028CrossRefPubMed

Yeannes MI, Ameztoy IM, Ramirez EE, Felix MM (2011) Culture alternative medium for the growth of extreme halophilic bacteria in fish products. Food Sci Technol 31:561–566. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0101-20612011000300002CrossRef

Yim SM, Song JE, Kim HR (2017) Production and characterization of bacterial cellulose fabrics by nitrogen sources of tea and carbon sources of sugar. Process Biochem 59:26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2016.07.001CrossRef

Yun EJ, Lee J, Kim DH et al (2018) Metabolomic elucidation of the effects of media and carbon sources on fatty acid production by Yarrowia lipolytica. J Biotechnol 272–273:7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2018.02.011CrossRefPubMed

Yunoki S, Osada Y, Kono H, Takai M (2004) Role of ethanol in improvement of bacterial cellulose production: analysis using13C-labeled carbon sources. Food Sci Technol Res 10:307–313. https://doi.org/10.3136/fstr.10.307CrossRef

Zeng X, Small DP, Wan W (2011) Statistical optimization of culture conditions for bacterial cellulose production by Acetobacter xylinum BPR 2001 from maple syrup. Carbohydr Polym 85:506–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.02.034CrossRef

Zhang H, Xu X, Chen X et al (2017) Complete genome sequence of the cellulose-producing strain Komagataeibacter nataicola RZS01. Sci Rep 7:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04589-6CrossRef

Zhang J, Greasham R (1999) Chemically defined media for commercial fermentations. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 51:407–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530051411CrossRef

Zhang J, Reddy J, Buckland B, Greasham R (2003) Toward consistent and productive complex media for industrial fermentations: studies on yeast extract for a recombinant yeast fermentation process. Biotechnol Bioeng 82:640–652. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.10608CrossRefPubMed

Zhong C, Zhang GC, Liu M et al (2013) Metabolic flux analysis of Gluconacetobacter xylinus for bacterial cellulose production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:6189–6199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-4908-8CrossRefPubMed

Zhou LL, Sun DP, Hu LY et al (2007) Effect of addition of sodium alginate on bacterial cellulose production by Acetobacter xylinum. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 34:483–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-007-0218-4CrossRefPubMed

Zogaj X, Nimtz M, Rohde M et al (2001) The multicellular morphotypes of Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli produce cellulose as the second component of the extracellular matrix. Mol Microbiol 39:1453–1463. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02337.xCrossRef

Titel: A review of culture media for bacterial cellulose production: complex, chemically defined and minimal media modulations
verfasst von: Gabriela Sperotto
Larissa Gabrieli Stasiak
João Pedro Maximino Gongora Godoi
Naiana Cristine Gabiatti
Samara Silva De Souza
Publikationsdatum: 16.02.2021
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Cellulose / Ausgabe 5/2021
Print ISSN: 0969-0239
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-882X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-03754-5

Springer Professional

Abstract

Graphic abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2021

Study of azomethine functionalized cellulose with salicylaldehyde as novel demetallization agent for metalloporphyrins in crude oil

Flexible textile ion sensors based on reduced graphene oxide/fullerene and their potential applications of sweat characterization

Finite element analysis of glucose diffusivity in cellulose nanofibril peripheral nerve conduits

Enhancing antibacterial and flame-retardant performance of cotton fabric with an iminodiacetic acid-containing N-halamine

Construction of interconnected and oriented graphene nanosheets networks in cellulose aerogel film for high-efficiency electromagnetic interference shielding

Synthesis of cellulose aerogels as promising carriers for drug delivery: a review