nach oben

Quality of Life Research

Erschienen in:

01.04.2014 | Review

A review of patient-reported outcomes for children and adolescents with obesity

verfasst von: Bani Ahuja, Anne F. Klassen, Randi Satz, Nikita Malhotra, Elena Tsangaris, Matthew Ventresca, Nora Fayed

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 3/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Introduction

Obesity is a chronic condition that can impact the physical, emotional, mental and social elements that encompass a child’s life. The objectives of this study were to identify which generic and obesity-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments are used in obesity literature, as well as review their conceptual approach, health and health-related content, ethical content and psychometric properties.

Method

PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsycINFO were searched from the inception of each database to May 2012 to identify all studies using multi-dimensional PRO instruments with children who are overweight or obese. The most common generic and all obesity-specific instruments were analyzed according to the study objectives.

Results

From 4,226 articles identified by our search, 70 articles used 6 generic and 4 obesity-specific PRO instruments. While the most commonly used PRO instrument was the generic PedsQL 4.0 (used in 53 studies), many health domains were found in the obesity-specific instruments that are not measured by the PedsQL 4.0. Summary of the development and psychometric properties of the generic and obesity PROs identified that no one instrument meets all the guideline criteria for instrument development and validation, e.g., only one instrument included qualitative input from children with obesity in the content development phase.

Discussion

This comprehensive review provides information to aid in selecting multi-dimensional PRO instruments in children with obesity according to various aspects of content as well as psychometric properties. The conceptual analysis shows that the reviewed PRO instruments contain inconsistencies in their conceptual approaches. Also, certain relevant health domains to children and youth with obesity were not included in the most commonly used generic instrument. The obesity-specific instruments require further validation before they can be used in intervention studies.

Vorheriger Artikel Patient-important activity and participation outcomes in clinical trials involving children with chronic conditions

Nächster Artikel Considering quality of life for children with cancer: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures and the development of a conceptual model

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

World Health Organization. (2013). Childhood overweight and obesity. Resource Document. Geneva: World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/childhood/en/. Accessed on January 2 2013.

Fayed, N., Schiariti, V., Bostan, C., Cieza, A., & Klassen, A. (2011). Health status and QOL instruments used in childhood cancer research: Deciphering conceptual content using World Health Organization definitions. Quality of Life Research, 20(8), 1247–1258.PubMedCrossRef

Fayed, N., De Camargo, O. K., Kerr, E., Rosenbaum, P., et al. (2012). Generic patient-reported outcomes in child health research: A review of conceptual content using World Health Organization definitions. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 54(12), 1085–1095.PubMedCrossRef

Williams, J., Wake, M., Hesketh, K., Maher, E., & Waters, E. (2005). Health-related quality of life of overweight and obese children. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 293(1), 70–76.CrossRef

World Health Organization. (1998). WHOQOL user manual. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Fayed, N., & Kerr, E. N. (2009). Comparing quality of life scales in childhood epilepsy: What’s in the measures? International Journal of Disability, Community & Rehabilitation, 8(3), 1–13.

Schiariti, V., Fayed, N., Cieza, A., Klassen, A., et al. (2011). Content comparison of health-related quality of life measures for cerebral palsy based on the international classification of functioning. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33(15–16), 1330–1339.PubMedCrossRef

U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2009). Patient reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Resource Document. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidancecomplianceRegulatoryinformation/guidelines/UCM193282.pdf www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidancecomplianceRegulatoryinformation/guidelines/UCM193282.pdf. Accessed on January 2, 2013.

Heritage, J. (2002). The limits of questioning: Negative interrogatives and hostile question content. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(10–11), 1427–1446.CrossRef

10.

Schwarz, N. (1999). Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist, 54(2), 93–105.CrossRef

11.

Ronen, G. M., Fayed, N., & Rosenbaum, P. L. (2011). Outcomes in pediatric neurology: A review of conceptual issues and recommendations The 2010 Ronnie Mac Keith lecture. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 53(4), 305–312.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Davis, E. (2006). Paediatric quality of life instruments: A review of the impact of the conceptual framework on outcomes. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 48(04), 311–318.PubMedCrossRef

13.

De Civita, M. (2005). Evaluating health-related quality-of-life studies in paediatric populations: Some conceptual, methodological and developmental considerations and recent applications. PharmacoEconomics, 23(7), 659–685.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Ravens-Sieberer, U., Erhart, M., Wille, N., Wetzel, R., Nickel, J., & Bullinger, M. (2006). Generic health-related quality-of-life assessment in children and adolescents: Methodological considerations. PharmacoEconomics, 24(12), 1199–1220.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Clarke, S., & Eiser, C. (2004). The measurement of health-related quality of life (QOL) in paediatric clinical trials: A systematic review. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2, 66.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

16.

Eiser, C., & Morse, R. (2001). A review of measures of quality of life for children with chronic illness. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 84(3), 205–211.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

17.

Harding, L. (2001). Children’s quality of life assessments: A review of generic and health related quality of life measures completed by children and adolescents. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 8(2), 79–96.CrossRef

18.

Matza, L. S., Swenson, A. R., Flood, E. M., Secnik, K., & Leidy, N. K. (2004). Assessment of health-related quality of life in children: A review of conceptual, methodological, and regulatory issues. Value in health, 7(1), 79–92.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Solans, M., Pane, S., Estrada, M. D., Serra-Sutton, V., Berra, S., Herdman, M., et al. (2008). Health-related quality of life measurement in children and adolescents: A systematic review of generic and disease-specific instruments. Value in health, 11(4), 742–764.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Rajmil, L., Herdman, M., Fernandez de Sanmamed, M. J., Detmar, S., Bruil, J., Ravens-Sieberer, U., et al. (2004). Generic health-related quality of life instruments in children and adolescents: A qualitative analysis of content. Journal of Adolescent Health, 34(1), 37–45.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

22.

Giraudeau, B., & Mary, J. Y. (2001). Planning a reproducibility study: How many subjects and how many replicates per subject for an expected width of the 95 per cent confidence interval of the intraclass correlation coefficient. Statistics in Medicine, 20(21), 3205–3214.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Varni, J. W., Katz, E. R., Seid, M., Quiggins, D. J. L., & Friedman-Bender, A. (1998). The pediatric cancer quality of life inventory-32 (PCQL-32): I. Reliability and validity. Cancer, 82(6), 1184–1196.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Varni, J. W., Katz, E. R., Seid, M., Quiggins, D. J. L., Friedman-Bender, A., et al. (1998). The pediatric cancer quality of life inventory (PCQL): I. Instrument development, descriptive statistics, and cross-informant variance. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 21(2), 179–204.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Varni, J. W., Rode, C. A., Seid, M., Katz, E. R., Friedman-Bender, A., & Quiggins, D. J. L. (1999). The pediatric cancer quality of life inventory-32 (PCQL-32): II. Feasibility and range of measurement. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 22, 397–406.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Varni, J. W. (2013). The PedsQL measurement model for the pediatric quality of life inventory. http://www.PedsQL.org/. Accessed on May 3, 2013.

27.

Varni, J. W., Seid, M., & Kurtin, P. S. (2001). PedsQL 4.0: Reliability and validity of the pediatric quality of life inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Medical Care, 39(8), 800–812.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Varni, J. W., Burwinkle, T. M., Seid, M., & Skarr, D. (2003). The PedsQL 4.0 as a pediatric population health measure: Feasibility, reliability, and validity. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 3(6), 329–341.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Kolotkin, R. L., Head, S., & Brookhart, A. (1997). Construct validity of the impact of weight on quality of life questionnaire. Obesity Research, 5(5), 434–441.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Kolotkin, R. L., Head, S., Hamilton, M., & Tse, C. K. (1995). Assessing impact of weight on quality of life. Obesity Research, 3(1), 49–56.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Kolotkin, R. L., & Crosby, R. D. (2002). Psychometric evaluation of the impact of weight on quality of life-lite questionnaire (IWQOL-lite) in a community sample. Quality of Life Research, 11(2), 157–171.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Kolotkin, R. L., Crosby, R. D., Kosloski, K. D., & Williams, G. R. (2001). Development of a brief measure to assess quality of life in obesity. Obesity Research, 9(20), 102–111.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Modi, A. C., & Zeller, M. H. (2011). The IWQOL-Kids(©): establishing minimal clinically important difference scores and test-retest reliability. International Journal of Paediatric Obesity, 6(2–2), 94–96.CrossRef

34.

Nadeau, K., Kolotkin, R. L., Boex, R., Witten, T., McFann, K. K., Zeitler, P., et al. (2011). Health-related quality of life in adolescents with comorbidities related to obesity. Journal of Adolescent Health, 49(1), 90–92.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Zeller, M. H., & Modi, A. C. (2009). Development and initial validation of an obesity-specific quality-of-life measure for children: Sizing me up. Obesity, 17(6), 1171–1177.PubMedCentralPubMed

36.

Modi, A. C., & Zeller, M. H. (2008). Validation of a parent-proxy, obesity-specific quality-of-life measure: Sizing them up. Obesity, 16(12), 2624–2633.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

37.

Ravens-Sieberer, U., Bullinger M. (2000). KINDLE^R questionnaire for measuring health-related quality of life in children and adolescents revised version manual.

38.

Ravens-Sieberer, U., & Bullinger, M. (1998). Assessing health-related quality of life in chronically ill children with the German KINDL: First psychometric and content analytical results. Quality of Life Research, 7(5), 399–407.PubMedCrossRef

39.

Wille, N., Bullinger, M., Holl, R., Hoffmeister, U., Mann, R., Goldapp, C., et al. (2010). Health-related quality of life in overweight and obese youths: Results of a multicenter study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8, 36.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

40.

Morales, L. S., Edwards, T. C., Flores, Y., Barr, L., & Patrick, D. L. (2011). Measurement properties of a multicultural weight-specific quality-of-life instrument for children and adolescents. Quality of Life Research, 20(2), 215–224.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

41.

Patrick, D.L., Edwards, T.C., Skalicky, A. (2010). Youth quality of life instrument-weight module (YQOL-W). User manual and interpretation guide & scoring programs. (1^st Ed.). Seattle, Washington.

42.

WHOQOL Group. (1994). The development of the world health organization quality of life assessment instrument (WHOQOL). In W. Kuyken & J. Orley (Eds.), Quality of life assessment: International perspectives (pp. 41–57). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef

43.

Fayed, N. (2011). Content issues in child health status and quality of life instruments: Addressing the challenges with new methods (Doctor of Philosophy, McMaster University). Open Access Dissertations and Theses Paper, 6066.

44.

Colver, A. (2012). Quality of life. In A. Majnemer (Ed.), Measures for children with developmental disability framed by the ICF-CY (1st ed.). Cambridge: Mac Keith Press.

45.

Wright, V. et al. (under-review). Parent’s thoughts on the PEDI, Developmental Medicine Child Neurology.

Titel: A review of patient-reported outcomes for children and adolescents with obesity
verfasst von: Bani Ahuja
Anne F. Klassen
Randi Satz
Nikita Malhotra
Elena Tsangaris
Matthew Ventresca
Nora Fayed
Publikationsdatum: 01.04.2014
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0459-9

Springer Professional

Abstract

Introduction

Method

Results

Discussion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2014

Development and validation of the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy treatment satisfaction (FACIT TS) measures

Development of a measure of asthma-specific quality of life among adults

Quality of life for parents of children with influenza-like illness: development and validation of Care-ILI-QoL

International development of an EORTC questionnaire for assessing health-related quality of life in chronic myeloid leukemia patients: the EORTC QLQ-CML24

Assessing the performance of the EQ-VAS in the NHS PROMs programme

Demographic and clinical characteristics associated with quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Premium Partner