nach oben

The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology

Erschienen in:

10.01.2023 | Critical Review

A systematic review on digital human models in assembly process planning

verfasst von: Ming-Yue Yin, Jian-Guang Li

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology | Ausgabe 3-4/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Simulating the behavior of operators through a digital human model (DHM) is an intuitive way to reflect the human factors in the assembly process, which is important for ergonomics research in Industry 4.0. The efficiency of digital human assembly simulation has become the main bottleneck restricting the application of DHMs in assembly planning for a long time. With the development of artificial intelligence algorithms, it has become more realistic and efficient to build a human-cyber-physical system (HCPS) and achieve efficient digital human assembly planning. This paper has considered the leading technologies, advanced methods, and challenges related to digital human assembly. In terms of digital human modeling, we summarized the limitations of existing construction methods and discussed the potential of innovative methods in the field of robotics and computers for digital human motion modeling to improve the efficiency of digital human posture planning. In terms of assembly ergonomics evaluation with DHMs, we reviewed the classical assembly ergonomics evaluation methods and pointed out the parts to be improved in the existing evaluation systems. In terms of digital human assembly operation planning with DHMs, we discussed and identify the limitations of existing planning methods. And in terms of human–robot collaborative assembly with DHMs, we proposed the difficulties and the future development trends at the practical application. It is foreseeable that by improving the efficiency of the digital human posture planning and the comprehensiveness of ergonomics evaluation with DHMs, DHMs will have the potential to be more in-depth to help the operators and designers in whole process of product manufacturing industry.

Vorheriger Artikel 3D printing of polylactic acid: recent advances and opportunities

Nächster Artikel An overview of surface roughness enhancement of additively manufactured metal parts: a path towards removing the post-print bottleneck for complex geometries

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Zhu WM, Fan XM, Zhang YX (2019) Applications and research trends of digital human models in the manufacturing industry. Virtual Real Intell Hardw 6:558–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vrih.2019.09.005CrossRef

Jafari Roodbandi AS, Choobineh A, Barahmand N, Sadeghi M (2021) Research outputs in ergonomics and human factors engineering: a bibliometric and co-word analysis of content and contributions. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2021.1955495

Spasojević BVK, Klarinb MM, Brkićc AD (2014) Ergonomic design of crane cabin interior: the path to improved safety. Saf Sci 73:43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.11.010CrossRef

Nguyen Ngoc H, Lasa G, Iriarte I (2021) Human-centred design in industry 4.0: case study review and opportunities for future research. J Intell Manuf 33(1):35–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-021-01796-xCrossRef

Broday EE (2020) Participatory Ergonomics in the context of Industry 4.0: a literature review. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 22(2):237–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922x.2020.1801886CrossRef

Paul G, Abele ND, Kluth K (2021) A review and qualitative meta-analysis of digital human modeling and cyber-physical-systems in ergonomics 4.0. IISE Trans Occup Ergon Human Factors 9(3–4):111–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2021.1966130CrossRef

Kadir BA, Broberg O, Conceição CS (2019) Current research and future perspectives on human factors and ergonomics in Industry 4.0. Comput Ind Eng 137:106004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106004CrossRef

Babamiri M, Heidarimoghadam R, Ghasemi F, Tapak L, Mortezapour A (2021) Ergonomics 4.0: a bibliometric review of human factors research in Industrial Revolution 4.0 (IR 4.0). Work 70(1):321–334. https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-213576CrossRef

Ma J, Jaradat R, Ashour O, Hamilton M, Jones P, Dayarathna VL (2019) Efficacy investigation of virtual reality teaching module in manufacturing system design course. ASME J Mech Des 141(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4041428CrossRef

10.

Patrik P, Marek B, Michal Š (2015) Comparison of digital tools for ergonomics in practice. Procedia Eng Procedia Eng 100:1277–1285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.01.494CrossRef

11.

Sanjog J, Karmakar S, Patel T, Chowdhury A (2015) Towards virtual ergonomics: aviation and aerospace. Aircr Eng Aerosp Technol 87(3):266–273. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-05-2013-0094CrossRef

12.

Zhu W, Fan X, Zhang Y (2019) Applications and research trends of digital human models in the manufacturing industry. Virtual Real Intell Hardw 1(6):558–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vrih.2019.09.005CrossRef

13.

Yang J, Son YH, Lee D, Noh SD (2022) Digital twin-based integrated assessment of flexible and reconfigurable automotive part production lines. Machines 10(2):75. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines10020075CrossRef

14.

Edward YLG (2016) A journey from robot to digital human: mathematical principles and applications with MATLAB programming. Springer, Germany

15.

Busemann S, Steffen J, Herrmann E (2016) Interactive planning of manual assembly operations: from language to motion. Procedia CIRP 41:224–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.12.106CrossRef

16.

Wang J, Qin W, Sun L (2019) Terrain adaptive walking of biped neuromuscular virtual human using deep reinforcement learning. IEEE Access 7:92465–92475. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2927606CrossRef

17.

Tigrini A, Mengarelli A, Fioretti S, Verdini F (2021) Anterior-posterior center of pressure analysis for the DIP/VIP balance maintenance model: formalization and preliminary results. 2021 10th Int IEEE/EMBS Conf Neural Eng 832–835. https://doi.org/10.1109/NER49283.2021.9441159

18.

Wang Y (2017) Simulation of body extension motion based on dynamics virtualization. Clust Comput 22(S4):10175–10184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-1208-6CrossRef

19.

Gragg J, Yang J (2013) Digital human forward kinematic and dynamic reliabilities. J Mech Des 135(7). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4024234

20.

Maric F, Giamou M, Hall AW, Khoubyarian S, Petrovic I, Kelly J (2022) Riemannian optimization for distance-geometric inverse kinematics. IEEE Trans Rob 38(3):1703–1722. https://doi.org/10.1109/tro.2021.3123841CrossRef

21.

Caputo F, Greco A, D’Amato E, Notaro I, Spada S (2018) On the use of virtual reality for a human-centered workplace design. Procedia Struct Integrity 8:297–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2017.12.031CrossRef

22.

Susperregi L, Arruti A, Jauregi E, Sierra B, Martínez-Otzeta JM, Lazkano E, Ansuategui A (2013) Fusing multiple image transformations and a thermal sensor with kinect to improve person detection ability. Eng Appl Artif Intell 26(8):1980–1991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2013.04.013CrossRef

23.

He H, Tan Y, Zhang W (2018) A wavelet tensor fuzzy clustering scheme for multi-sensor human activity recognition. Eng Appl Artif Intell 70:109–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2018.01.004CrossRef

24.

Yi X, Zhou Y, Habermann M, Shimada S, Golyanik V, Theobalt C, Xu F (2022) Physical inertial poser (PIP): physics-aware real-time human motion tracking from sparse inertial sensors. 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01282

25.

San-Segundo R, Blunck H, Moreno-Pimentel J, Stisen A, Gil-Martín M (2018) Robust human activity recognition using smartwatches and smartphones. Eng Appl Artif Intell 72:190–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2018.04.002CrossRef

26.

Jeffrey O, Brad L (2011) Virtual reality: avatars in human spaceflight training. Acta Astronaut 71:139–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2011.08.011CrossRef

27.

Puthenveetil SC, Daphalapurkar CP, Zhu W, Leu MC, Liu XF, Gilpin-Mcminn JK, Snodgrass SD (2015) Computer-automated ergonomic analysis based on motion capture and assembly simulation. Virtual Real 19(2):119–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-015-0261-9CrossRef

28.

Alipoor P, Daneshmandi H, Fararuei M, Zamanian Z (2021) Ergonomic design of manual assembly workstation using digital human modeling. Annals Glob Health 87(1):55. https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.3256CrossRef

29.

Geiger A, Brandenburg E, Stark R (2020) Natural virtual reality user interface to define assembly sequences for digital human models. Appl Syst Innov 3(1):15. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi3010015CrossRef

30.

Ottogalli K, Rosquete D, Rojo J, Amundarain A, María Rodríguez J, Borro D (2021) Virtual reality simulation of human-robot coexistence for an aircraft final assembly line: process evaluation and ergonomics assessment. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 34(9):975–995. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192x.2021.1946855CrossRef

31.

Costanzo M, De Maria G, Lettera G, Natale C (2022) A multimodal approach to human safety in collaborative robotic workcells. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 19(2):1202–1216. https://doi.org/10.1109/tase.2020.3043286CrossRef

32.

Wang Y, Chang F, Wu Y, Hu Z, Li L, Li P, Lang P, Yao S (2022) Multi-kinects fusion for full-body tracking in virtual reality-aided assembly simulation. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 18(5):155013292210975. https://doi.org/10.1177/15501329221097591CrossRef

33.

Theodoridou E, Cinque L, Mignosi F, Placidi G, Polsinelli M, Tavares JMRS, Spezialetti M (2022) Hand tracking and gesture recognition by multiple contactless sensors: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/thms.2022.3188840

34.

Peternel L, Tsagarakis N, Caldwell D, Ajoudani A (2016) Adaptation of robot physical behaviour to human fatigue in human-robot co-manipulation. 2016 IEEE-RAS 16th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids). https://doi.org/10.1109/humanoids.2016.7803320.

35.

Mazaheri A, Forsman M, Haettel R, Rose LM (2022) Reaction force exposure for tightening tool users: a psychophysical based experimental study of electric right-angle nutrunners. Appl Ergon 103:103776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103776CrossRef

36.

Peruzzini M, Grandi F, Pellicciari M, Campanella C (2017) Virtual maintenance simulation for socially sustainable serviceability. Procedia Manuf 11:1413–1420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.271CrossRef

37.

Hariri M, Ajisafe T, Park J (2017) Optimization-based simulation of the motion of a human performing a horizontal drop jump. Advances Human Factors Simul Model 413–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60591-3_37

38.

Fang C, Ajoudani A, Bicchi A, Tsagarakis NG (2018) A real-time identification and tracking method for the musculoskeletal model of human arm. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC). https://doi.org/10.1109/smc.2018.00588

39.

Seydel A, Farrell K, Johnson R, Marler T, Rahmatalla S, Bhatt R, Abdel-Malek K (2017) Improved motion capture processing for high-fidelity human models using optimization-based prediction of posture and anthropometry. Adv Human Factors Simul Model 549–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60591-3_50

40.

Van Crombrugge I, Penne R, Vanlanduit S (2019) People tracking with range cameras using density maps and 2D blob splitting. Integr Comput-Aided Eng 26(3):285–295. https://doi.org/10.3233/ica-190600CrossRef

41.

Mihajlovic M, Saito S, Bansal A, Zollhoefer M, Tang S (2022) COAP: compositional articulated occupancy of people. 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01285

42.

Geng J, Peng X, Qiu B (2018) Simulation data integration-based approach for motion synthesis in virtual maintenance. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 99:1481–1501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2560-2CrossRef

43.

Guo Z, Lv C, Zhou D, Peng X, Wang Z (2016) Mixing control of animating virtual human for maintenance simulation. 2016 12th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation (WCICA). https://doi.org/10.1109/wcica.2016.7578807

44.

Leu MC, ElMaraghy HA, Nee AYC, Ong SK, Lanzetta M, Putz M, Zhu WJ, Bernard A (2013) CAD model based virtual assembly simulation, planning and training. CIRP Ann 62:799–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2013.05.005CrossRef

45.

Dianatfar M, Latokartano J, Lanz M (2021) Review on existing VR/AR solutions in human–robot collaboration. Procedia CIRP 97:407–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.05.259CrossRef

46.

Iacob R, Popescu D, Noel F, Masclet C (2015) Implementation and evaluation of a model processing pipeline for assembly simulation. Assem Autom 37(4):400–410. https://doi.org/10.1108/AA-11-2015-104CrossRef

47.

Scheffer S, Martinetti A, Damgrave R, Thiede S, Dongen L (2021) How to make augmented reality a tool for railway maintenance operations: operator 4.0 perspective. Appl Sci 11(6):2656. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11062656CrossRef

48.

Ribeiro R, Ramos J, Safadinho D, Reis A, Rabadão C, Barroso J, Pereira A (2021) Web AR solution for UAV pilot training and usability testing. Sensors 21(4):1456. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21041456CrossRef

49.

Wang X, Liang CJ, Menassa CC, Kamat VR (2021) Interactive and immersive process-level digital twin for collaborative human–robot construction work. J Comput Civil Eng 35(6). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000988

50.

Bernard F, Zare M, Sagot JC, Paquin R (2020) Using digital and physical simulation to focus on human factors and ergonomics in aviation maintainability. Hum Factors 62(1):37–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819861496CrossRef

51.

Michalos G, Karvouniari A, Dimitropoulos N, Togias T, Makris S (2018) Workplace analysis and design using virtual reality techniques. CIRP Ann 67(1):141–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2018.04.120CrossRef

52.

Da Silva AG, Mendes Gomes MV, Winkler I (2022) Virtual reality and digital human modeling for ergonomic assessment in industrial product development: a patent and literature review. Appl Sci 12:1084. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031084CrossRef

53.

Luxenburger A, Mohr J, Spieldenner T, Merkel D, Espinosa F, Schwartz T, Reinicke F, Ahlers J, Stoyke M (2019) Augmented reality for human-robot cooperation in aircraft assembly. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality (AIVR). https://doi.org/10.1109/aivr46125.2019.00061

54.

Faccio M, Ferrari E, Galizia FG, Gamberi M, Pilati F (2019) Real-time assistance to manual assembly through depth camera and visual feedback. Procedia CIRP 81:1254–1259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.303CrossRef

55.

Pizzagalli SL, Kuts V, Otto T (2021) User-centred design in industrial collaborative automated systems. Proc Est Acad Sci 70(4):436. https://doi.org/10.3176/proc.2021.4.10CrossRef

56.

Malik AA, Bilberg A (2018) Digital twins of human robot collaboration in a production setting. Procedia Manuf 17:278–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.10.047CrossRef

57.

Baskaran Niaki FA, Tomaszewski M, Gill JS, Chen Y, Jia YY, Mears L, Krovi V (2019) Digital human and robot simulation in automotive assembly using siemens process simulate: a feasibility study. Procedia Manuf 34:986–994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.097CrossRef

58.

Tan C, JackHu S, Freiheit T, Barton K, Banu M (2021) Robustness optimization of product assembly architecture for personalization. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.0004155v

59.

Van Der Meulen PA, Diclemente P (2001) Ergonomic evaluation of an aircraft cockpit with RAMSIS 3D human modeling software. SAE Tech Paper Series. https://doi.org/10.4271/2001-01-2115CrossRef

60.

Kingsley EC (1982) SAMMIE - 3-D Modelling For Human Factors Evaluation. CAD 82:689–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-86103-058-3.50079-8CrossRef

61.

Ghinea RA, Popescu D, Neamțu C, Hurgoiu D, Popister F (2014) Using Delmia V5 for human activity improvement in an assembly line production. Appl Mech Mater 657:353–358. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.657.353CrossRef

62.

Diana C, Angela R, Mihaela B, Anca S (2015) Modeling and simulation of gait by anybody software before and after hip arthroplasty. 2015 E-Health and Bioengineering Conference (EHB). https://doi.org/10.1109/ehb.2015.7391372

63.

Proeschel RA (2002) Proe 90™ recuperator for microturbine applications. vol. 1: Turbo Expo 2002. https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2002-30406

64.

Pinchefsky D (2019) NexGen Ergonomics Inc. HumanCAD. DHM and posturography 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-816713-7.00007-6

65.

Senteler M, Weisse B, Rothenfluh DA, Snedeker JG (2015) Intervertebral reaction force prediction using an enhanced assembly of OpenSim models. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 19(5):538–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2015.1043906CrossRef

66.

Beuß F, Sender J, Flügge W (2019) Ergonomics simulation in aircraft manufacturing – methods and potentials. Procedia CIRP 81:742–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.187CrossRef

67.

Sánchez A, Garcia M, Domingo R, Camacho AM, Sebastián M (2015) Application of a virtual and ergonomic framework for an industrial light vehicle concept assembly process: a case report. Procedia Eng 132:1077–1080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.598CrossRef

68.

Guo Z, Zhou D, Liu P, He Z, Lv C (2018) A quantitative assessment method for the space design of products based on ergonomics and virtual simulation. PLoS ONE 13(7):e0200880. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200880CrossRef

69.

Chen JY, Zhou D, Kang L, Ma L, Ge HJ (2020) A maintenance time estimation method based on virtual simulation and improved modular arrangement of predetermined time standards. Int J Ind Ergon 80:103042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2020.103042CrossRef

70.

Zhu W, Fan X, He Q (2020) An integrated operation feasibility analysis method for manual assembly and disassembly in restricted space. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106:3721–3740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04740-9CrossRef

71.

Wu WW, Shao XD, Liu HL (2019) Automatic visibility evaluation method for application in virtual prototyping environment. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 32(10):960–978. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2019.1667027CrossRef

72.

Pandya AK, Hasson SM (1992) Correlation and prediction of dynamic human isolated joint strength from lean body mass. Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing

73.

Mortensen J, Trkov M, Merryweather A (2018) Improved ergonomic risk factor assessment using opensim and inertial measurement units. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Connected Health: Applications, Systems and Engineering Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1145/3278576.3278589

74.

Shukriah A, Baba MD, Jaharah AG (2017) J Fundam Appl Sci 9:1080–1086. https://doi.org/10.4314/jfas.v9i5s.74CrossRef

75.

Karhu O, Kansi P, Kuorinka I (1977) Correcting working postures in industry: a practical method for analysis. Appl Ergon 8(4):199–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(77)90164-8CrossRef

76.

McAtamney L, Corlett EN (1993) Rula: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Appl Ergon 24:91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(93)90080-sCrossRef

77.

Graves RJ, Way K, Riley D, Lawton C, Morris L (2004) Development of risk filter and risk assessment worksheets for HSE guidance—‘upper limb disorders in the workplace’ 2002. Appl Ergon 35(5):475–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2004.03.011CrossRef

78.

Moussavi SE, Zare M, Mahdjoub M, Grunder O (2019) Balancing high operator’s workload through a new job rotation approach: application to an automotive assembly line. Int J Ind Ergon 71:136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2019.03.003CrossRef

79.

Marzano A, Kodua AA, Ratchev S (2012) Virtual ergonomics and time optimization of a railway coach assembly line. Procedia CIRP 3:555–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2012.07.095CrossRef

80.

Haugen S, Barros ACVG, Kongsvik T, Vinnem JE (2018) Safety and reliability – safe societies in a changing world. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351174664CrossRef

81.

Laring J, Christmansson M, Kadefors R, Örtengren R (2005) ErgoSAM: a preproduction risk identification tool. Human Factors Ergonom Manuf 15(3):309–325. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20028CrossRef

82.

Botti L, Calzavara M, Mora C (2020) Modelling job rotation in manufacturing systems with aged workers. Int J Prod Res 59(8):2522–2536. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1735659CrossRef

83.

Lin JH, McGorry RW, Maikala RV (2012) The effects of joint torque, pace and work:rest ratio on powered hand tool operations. Ergonomics 55(3):361–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2011.639905CrossRef

84.

Gallagher S, Heberger JR (2012) Examining the interaction of force and repetition on musculoskeletal disorder risk. Human Factors: J Human Factors Ergonom Soc 55(1):108–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720812449648CrossRef

85.

Koç Ö, Top N, Eldem C, Gökçe H, Şahin İ (2021) Ergonomics assessment and redesign of helicopter transmission assembly fixture using digital human models. Politeknik Dergisi 24(3):1197–1203. https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.886411CrossRef

86.

Wang R, Zhang Y, Zhang L (2015) An adaptive neural network approach for operator functional state prediction using psychophysiological data. Integr Computer-Aided Eng 23(1):81–97. https://doi.org/10.3233/ica-150502MathSciNetCrossRef

87.

Wang CG, Mitrouchev P, Li GQ, Lu LX (2015) Disassembly operations’ efficiency evaluation in a virtual environment. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 29(3):309–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2015.1033752CrossRef

88.

Qiu S, Yang Y, Fan X, He Q (2014) Human factors automatic evaluation for entire maintenance processes in virtual environment. Assem Autom 34(4):357–369. https://doi.org/10.1108/AA-04-2014-028CrossRef

89.

Slavila CA, Decreuse C, Ferney M (2005) Fuzzy approach for maintainability evaluation in the design process. Concurr Eng Res Appl 13(4):291–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063293X05059807CrossRef

90.

Lu Z, Sun YC (2009) Maintainability virtual evaluation method based on fuzzy multiple attribute decision making theory for civil aircraft system. 2009 8th International Conference on Reliability, Maintainability and Safety, pp 684–689. https://doi.org/10.1109/icrms.2009.5270100

91.

Fabio G, Margherita P, Sara C, Elisa P, Marcello P (2021) Creation of a UX index to design human tasks and workstations. Int J Comput Integr Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2021.1972470CrossRef

92.

Turk M, Šimic M, Pipan M, Herakovič N (2022) Multi-criterial algorithm for the efficient and ergonomic manual assembly process. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(6):3496. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063496CrossRef

93.

He Q, Qiu S, Fan X, Liu K (2015) An interactive virtual lighting maintenance environment for human factors evaluation. Assem Autom 36(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1108/AA-04-2015-029CrossRef

94.

Pelliccia L, Klimant F, Santis AD, Gironimo GD, Lanzotti A, Tarallo A, Putz M, Klimant P (2016) Task-based motion control of digital humans for industrial applications. Procedia CIRP 62:535–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.06.057CrossRef

95.

Gaisbauer F, Agethen P, Otto M, Bär T, Sues J, Rukzio E (2018) Presenting a modular framework for a holistic simulation of manual assembly tasks. Procedia CIRP 72:768–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.281CrossRef

96.

Geng J, Peng X, Li Y, Lv C, Wang Z, Zhou D (2017) A semi-automatic approach to implement rapid non-immersive virtual maintenance simulation". Assem Autom 38(3):291–302. https://doi.org/10.1108/AA-07-2017-079CrossRef

97.

Busemann S, Steffen J, Herrmann E (2016) Interactive planning of manual assembly operations: from language to motion. Procedia CIRP 41:224–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.12.106CrossRef

98.

Yu F, Xue Q, Liu M (2017) Virtual human motion design and ergonomics analysis in maintenance simulation. Advances in applied digital human modeling and simulation. Adv Intell Syst Comput 481:65–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41627-4_7CrossRef

99.

100.

Song Q, Zhang J, Li C, Wang Z (2017) Application of virtual simulation technology in maintenance training. E-learning and games. Lect Notes Comput Sci 10345:101–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65849-0_12CrossRef

101.

Mårdberg P, Yan Y, Bohlin R, Delfs N, Gustafsson S, Carlson JS (2016) Controller hierarchies for efficient virtual ergonomic assessments of manual assembly sequences. Procedia CIRP 44:435–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.084CrossRef

102.

Gragg J, Yang J, Howard B (2012) Hybrid method for driver accommodation using optimization-based digital human models. Comput Aided Des 44(1):29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2010.11.009CrossRef

103.

Howard B, Cloutier A, Yang J (2012) Physics-based seated posture prediction for pregnant women and validation considering ground and seat pan contacts. J Biomech Eng 134(7):071004. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4007006CrossRef

104.

Howard B, Yang J (2011) Optimization-based seated posture prediction considering contact with environment. In vol. 2: 31st Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Parts a and B:557–566. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2011-48685

105.

Kim JH, Abdel-Malek K, Xiang Y, Yang JJ, Arora JS (2011) Concurrent motion planning and reaction load distribution for redundant dynamic systems under external holonomic constraints. Int J Numer Methods Eng 88(1):47–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.3162MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

106.

Du G, Long S, Li F, Huang X (2018) Active collision avoidance for human-robot interaction with UKF, expert system, and artificial potential field method. Front Robot AI 5:1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00125CrossRef

107.

Jin Y, Geng J, He Z, Lv C, Zhao T (2021) A capsule-based collision detection approach of irregular objects in virtual maintenance". Assem Autom 41(1):89–105. https://doi.org/10.1108/AA-12-2019-0224CrossRef

108.

Trommershauser J (2005) Optimal compensation for changes in task-relevant movement variability. J Neurosci 25(31):7169–7178. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1906-05.2005CrossRef

109.

Yang J, Howard B, Baus J (2021) A collision avoidance algorithm for human motion prediction based on perceived risk of collision: part 1-model development. IISE Trans Occup Ergonom Human Factors 9(3–4):199–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2021.1973613CrossRef

110.

Yang J, Howard B, Baus J (2021) A collision avoidance algorithm for human motion prediction based on perceived risk of collision: part 2-application. IISE Trans Occup Ergonom Human Factors 9(3–4):211–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2021.2004265CrossRef

111.

Li Y, Delfs N, Mårdberg P, Bohlin R, Carlson JS (2018) On motion planning for narrow-clearance assemblies using virtual manikins. Procedia CIRP 72:790–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.181CrossRef

112.

Xiang Y, Cruz J, Zaman R, Yang J (2020) Multi-objective optimization for two-dimensional maximum weight lifting prediction considering dynamic strength. Eng Optim 53(2):206–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215x.2019.1702979MathSciNetCrossRef

113.

Yang J, Marler T, Rahmatalla S (2011) Multi-objective optimization-based method for kinematic posture prediction: development and validation. Robotica 29(2):245–253. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026357471000010XCrossRef

114.

Almosnino S, Cappelletto J (2021) Minimizing low back cumulative loading during design of manual material handling tasks: an optimization approach. IISE Trans Occup Ergonom Human Factors 9(3–4):124–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2021.2021458CrossRef

115.

Gaisbauer F, Lehwald J, Agethen P, Otto M, Rukzio E (2018) A motion reuse framework for accelerated simulation of manual assembly processes. Procedia CIRP 72:398–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.282CrossRef

116.

Pan W, Wang Y, Du P (2014) Automatic disassembly navigation for accurate virtual assembly path planning. Assem Autom 34(3):244–254. https://doi.org/10.1108/AA-01-2014-008CrossRef

117.

Torres Y, Nadeau S, Landau K (2021) Evaluation of fatigue and workload among workers conducting complex manual assembly in manufacturing. IISE Trans Occup Ergonom Human Factors 9(1):49–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2021.1997835CrossRef

118.

Aicha M, Belhadj I, Hammadi M, Aifaoui N (2022) A mathematical formulation for processing time computing in disassembly lines and its optimization. Comput Ind Eng 165:107933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.107933CrossRef

119.

Harari Y, Bechar A, Riemer R (2019) Simulation-based optimization methodology for a manual material handling task design that maximizes productivity while considering ergonomic constraints. IEEE Trans Human-Machine Syst 49(5):440–448. https://doi.org/10.1109/thms.2019.2900294CrossRef

120.

Pascual AI, Högberg D, Syberfeldt A, Brolin E, Hanson L (2019) Application of multi-objective optimization on ergonomics in production – a case study. Advances in Additive Manufacturing, Modeling Systems and 3D Prototyping 584–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20216-3_54

121.

Mencía R, Sierra MR, Mencía C, Varela R (2016) Genetic algorithms for the scheduling problem with arbitrary precedence relations and skilled operators. Integr Comput-Aided Eng 23(3):269–285. https://doi.org/10.3233/ica-160519CrossRef

122.

Brolin E, Hogberg D, Hanson L, Ortengren R (2016) Generation and evaluation of distributed cases by clustering of diverse anthropometric data. Int J Human Factors Model Simul 5(3):210–229. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHFMS.2016.079706CrossRef

123.

Pascual AI, Högberg D, Lämkull D, Luque EP, Syberfeldt A, Hanson L (2021) Optimization of productivity and worker well-being by using a multi-objective optimization framework. IISE Trans Occup Ergonom Human Factors 9(3–4):143–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2021.1997834CrossRef

124.

Arents J, Abolins V, Judvaitis J, Vismanis O, Oraby A, Ozols K (2021) Human–robot collaboration trends and safety aspects: a systematic review. J Sens Actuator Netw 10(3):48. https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan10030048CrossRef

125.

Wang B, Zhou H, Yang G, Li X, Yang H (2022) Human digital twin (HDT) driven human-cyber-physical systems: key technologies and applications. Chin J Mech Eng 35(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s10033-022-00680-w

126.

Lv Q, Zhang R, Sun X, Lu Y, Bao J (2021) A digital twin-driven human-robot collaborative assembly approach in the wake of COVID-19. J Manuf Syst 60:837–851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.02.011CrossRef

127.

Ye Z, Jingyu L, Hongwei Y (2022) A digital twin-based human-robot collaborative system for the assembly of complex-shaped architectures. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part B: J Eng Manuf 095440542211109. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544054221110960

128.

Kramberger A, Kunic A, Iturrate I, Sloth C, Naboni R, Schlette C (2022) Robotic assembly of timber structures in a human-robot collaboration setup. Front Robot AI 8:768038. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.768038CrossRef

129.

Wang Y, Feng J, Liu J, Liu X, Wang J (2022) Digital twin-based design and operation of human-robot collaborative assembly. IFAC-PapersOnLine 55(2):295–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.04.209CrossRef

130.

Mhenni F, Vitolo F, Rega A, Plateaux R, Hehenberger P, Patalano S, Choley JY (2022) Heterogeneous models integration for safety critical mechatronic systems and related digital twin definition: application to a collaborative workplace for aircraft assembly. Appl Sci 12(6):2787. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12062787CrossRef

131.

Zhang R, Lv Q, Li J, Bao J, Liu T, Liu S (2022) A reinforcement learning method for human-robot collaboration in assembly tasks. Robot Comput-Integrated Manuf 73:102227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2021.102227CrossRef

132.

Roegiers S, Allebosch G, Veelaert P, Philips W (2019) Human action recognition using hierarchic body related occupancy maps. Integr Computer-Aided Eng 26(3):223–241. https://doi.org/10.3233/ica-190599CrossRef

133.

González L, Álvarez JC, López AM, Álvarez D (2021) Metrological evaluation of human–robot collaborative environments based on optical motion capture systems. Sensors 21(11):3748. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21113748CrossRef

134.

Bonci A, Cen Cheng PD, Indri M, Nabissi G, Sibona F (2021) Human-robot perception in industrial environments: a survey. Sensors 21(5):1571. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21051571CrossRef

135.

136.

Ding H, Reissig G, Wijaya K, Bortot D, Bengler K, Stursberg O (2011) Human arm motion modeling and long-term prediction for safe and efficient human-robot-interaction. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. https://doi.org/10.1109/icra.2011.5980248.

137.

Bordel B, Alcarria R, Robles T (2021) Recognizing human activities in Industry 4.0 scenarios through an analysis-modeling- recognition algorithm and context labels. Integr Comput-Aided Eng 29(1):83–103. https://doi.org/10.3233/ica-210667CrossRef

138.

Akkaladevi SC, Heindl C (2015) Action recognition for human robot interaction in industrial applications. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Graphics, Vision and Information Security (CGVIS). https://doi.org/10.1109/cgvis.2015.7449900

139.

Shu B, Solvang B (2021) Architecture for task-dependent human-robot collaboration. 2021 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII). https://doi.org/10.1109/ieeeconf49454.2021.9382703

140.

Yan JH, Wang ZP (2022) YOLO V3 + VGG16-based automatic operations monitoring and analysis in a manufacturing workshop under Industry 4.0. J Manuf Syst 63:134–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.02.009CrossRef

141.

Chen C, Guo W, Ma C, Yang Y, Wang Z, Lin C (2021) sEMG-based continuous estimation of finger kinematics via large-scale temporal convolutional network. Appl Sci 11(10):4678. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11104678CrossRef

142.

Xu Y, Ding C, Shu X, Gui K, Bezsudnova Y, Sheng X, Zhang D (2019) Shared control of a robotic arm using non-invasive brain–computer interface and computer vision guidance. Robot Auton Syst 115:121–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2019.02.014CrossRef

143.

Chen X, Jiang Y, Yang C (2020) Stiffness estimation and intention detection for human-robot collaboration. 2020 15th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA). https://doi.org/10.1109/iciea48937.2020.9248186

144.

Huang Y, Chen K, Zhang X, Wang K, Ota J (2020) Joint torque estimation for the human arm from sEMG using backpropagation neural networks and autoencoders. Biomed Signal Process Control 62:102051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2020.102051CrossRef

145.

Buerkle A, Eaton W, Lohse N, Bamber T, Ferreira P (2021) EEG based arm movement intention recognition towards enhanced safety in symbiotic human-robot collaboration. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 70:102137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2021.102137CrossRef

146.

Wang L, Liu S, Cooper C, Wang XV, Gao RX (2021) Function block-based human-robot collaborative assembly driven by brainwaves. CIRP Ann 70(1):5–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2021.04.091CrossRef

147.

Urgo M, Tarabini M, Tolio T (2019) A human modelling and monitoring approach to support the execution of manufacturing operations. CIRP Ann 68(1):5–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2019.04.052CrossRef

148.

DelPreto J, Salazar-Gomez AF, Gil S, Hasani R, Guenther FH, Rus D (2020) Plug-and-play supervisory control using muscle and brain signals for real-time gesture and error detection. Auton Robot 44(7):1303–1322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-020-09916-xCrossRef

149.

Kirchner EA, Kyoung Kim S (2019) Transfer approach for the detection of missed task-relevant events in P300-based brain-computer interfaces. 2019 9th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER). https://doi.org/10.1109/ner.2019.8717041

150.

Buerkle A, Bamber T, Lohse N, Ferreira P (2021) Feasibility of detecting potential emergencies in symbiotic human-robot collaboration with a mobile EEG. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 72:102179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2021.102179CrossRef

151.

Buerkle A, Matharu H, Al-Yacoub A, Lohse N, Bamber T, Ferreira P (2021) An adaptive human sensor framework for human–robot collaboration. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 119(1–2):1233–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08299-2CrossRef

152.

Fournier É, Kilgus D, Landry A, Hmedan B, Pellier D, Fiorino H, Jeoffrion C (2022) The impacts of human-cobot collaboration on perceived cognitive load and usability during an industrial task: an exploratory experiment. IISE Trans Occup Ergonom Human Factors 10(2):83–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2022.2072021CrossRef

153.

Liu Y, Habibnezhad M, Jebelli H (2021) Brainwave-driven human-robot collaboration in construction. Autom Constr 124:103556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103556CrossRef

154.

Toichoa Eyam A, Mohammed WM, Martinez Lastra JL (2021) Emotion-driven analysis and control of human-robot interactions in collaborative applications. Sensors 21(14):4626. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21144626CrossRef

155.

Pacaux-Lemoine MP, Berdal Q, Guérin C, Rauffet P, Chauvin C, Trentesaux D (2021) Designing human–system cooperation in industry 4.0 with cognitive work analysis: a first evaluation. Cognit, Technol; Work 24(1):93–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-021-00667-yCrossRef

156.

Chacón A, Ponsa P, Angulo C (2021) Cognitive interaction analysis in human–robot collaboration using an assembly task. Electronics 10(11):1317. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10111317CrossRef

157.

Rahman SMM, Wang Y (2018) Mutual trust-based subtask allocation for human–robot collaboration in flexible lightweight assembly in manufacturing. Mechatronics 54:94–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2018.07.007CrossRef

158.

Wang XV, Kemény Z, Váncza J, Wang L (2017) Human–robot collaborative assembly in cyber-physical production: classification framework and implementation. CIRP Ann 66(1):5–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.101CrossRef

159.

Belhadj I, Aicha M, Aifaoui N (2022) Product disassembly planning and task allocation based on human and robot collaboration. Int J Interact Des Manuf (IJIDeM) 16(2):803–819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-022-00908-yCrossRef

160.

Çil ZA, Li Z, Mete S, Özceylan E (2020) Mathematical model and bee algorithms for mixed-model assembly line balancing problem with physical human–robot collaboration. Appl Soft Comput 93:106394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106394CrossRef

161.

Li Z, Janardhanan MN, Tang Q (2021) Multi-objective migrating bird optimization algorithm for cost-oriented assembly line balancing problem with collaborative robots. Neural Comput Appl 33(14):8575–8596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05610-2CrossRef

Titel: A systematic review on digital human models in assembly process planning
verfasst von: Ming-Yue Yin
Jian-Guang Li
Publikationsdatum: 10.01.2023
Verlag: Springer London
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology / Ausgabe 3-4/2023
Print ISSN: 0268-3768
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-10804-8

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3-4/2023

Analysis of strength properties of concrete containing sea sand and micro silica as partial replacement of fine aggregate

Cutting performance and lubrication mechanism of microtexture tool with continuous lubrication on tool-chip interface

A multi-objective robust grey wolf optimization model for the study of concrete mix using copper slag and glass powder

Effect of discharge accumulation on wire breakage in WEDM process

Effects of double pulse welding on microstructure, texture, and fatigue behavior of DP590 steel resistance spot weld

The investigation of fracture characteristics and process optimization of low-cycle fatigue cropping by using an AET-based multi-sensor system

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten