Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Group Decision and Negotiation 5/2014

01.09.2014

Agent-Based Reallocation Problem on Social Networks

verfasst von: Antoine Nongaillard, Philippe Mathieu

Erschienen in: Group Decision and Negotiation | Ausgabe 5/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Resource reallocation problems aim to determine an allocation maximizing a given objective function. Numerous applications are based on the assumption of restricted contacts between entities but, up to now, studies have been based on unrealistic contexts. Indeed, most of the time, agents are omniscient and/or have complete communication abilities, which are not plausible assumptions in many applications. A solution does not only consist in an optimal allocation, but in a sequence of transactions changing an initial allocation into an optimal solution. We show that the individual rationality does not allow the achievement of socially optimal allocations, and we propose a more suitable criterion: the sociability. Our method provides a sequence of transactions leading to an optimal allocation, with any restriction on agents’ communication abilities. Provided solutions can be viewed as emergent phenomena.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Albert R, Barabási A (2002) Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev Mod Phys 74(1):47–97CrossRef Albert R, Barabási A (2002) Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev Mod Phys 74(1):47–97CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Biggs N, Lloyd E, Wilson R (1986) Graph theory. Oxford University Press, USA Biggs N, Lloyd E, Wilson R (1986) Graph theory. Oxford University Press, USA
Zurück zum Zitat Bollobás B (2001) Random graphs. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef Bollobás B (2001) Random graphs. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chevaleyre Y, Endriss U, Lang J, Maudet N (2005) Negotiating over small bundles of resources. In: AAMAS’05, pp 296–302 Chevaleyre Y, Endriss U, Lang J, Maudet N (2005) Negotiating over small bundles of resources. In: AAMAS’05, pp 296–302
Zurück zum Zitat Chevaleyre Y, Dunne P, Endriss U, Lang J, Lemaitre M, Maudet N, Padget J, Phelps S, Rodriguez-Aguilar J, Sousa P (2006) Issues in multiagent resource allocation. Informatica 30(1):3 Chevaleyre Y, Dunne P, Endriss U, Lang J, Lemaitre M, Maudet N, Padget J, Phelps S, Rodriguez-Aguilar J, Sousa P (2006) Issues in multiagent resource allocation. Informatica 30(1):3
Zurück zum Zitat Chevaleyre Y, Endriss U, Maudet N (2010) Simple negotiation schemes for agents with simple preferences: sufficiency, necessity and maximality. Auton Agents Multi-Agent Syst 20(2):234–259 Chevaleyre Y, Endriss U, Maudet N (2010) Simple negotiation schemes for agents with simple preferences: sufficiency, necessity and maximality. Auton Agents Multi-Agent Syst 20(2):234–259
Zurück zum Zitat Doyle J (2004) Prospects for preferences. Comput Intell 20(2):111–136CrossRef Doyle J (2004) Prospects for preferences. Comput Intell 20(2):111–136CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dunne P, Wooldridge M, Laurence M (2005) The complexity of contract negotiation. Artif Intell 164 (1–2):23–46CrossRef Dunne P, Wooldridge M, Laurence M (2005) The complexity of contract negotiation. Artif Intell 164 (1–2):23–46CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Endriss U, Maudet N, Sadri F, Toni F (2006) Negotiating socially optimal allocations of resources. J Artif Intell Res 25:315–348 Endriss U, Maudet N, Sadri F, Toni F (2006) Negotiating socially optimal allocations of resources. J Artif Intell Res 25:315–348
Zurück zum Zitat Erdős P, Rényi A (1959) On random graphs. Publicationes Mathematicae 6:290–297 Erdős P, Rényi A (1959) On random graphs. Publicationes Mathematicae 6:290–297
Zurück zum Zitat Nongaillard A, Mathieu P (2009a) A multi-agent resource negotiation for social welfare. In: IAT’09—proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM international conference on intelligent agent technology, pp 58–62 Nongaillard A, Mathieu P (2009a) A multi-agent resource negotiation for social welfare. In: IAT’09—proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM international conference on intelligent agent technology, pp 58–62
Zurück zum Zitat Nongaillard A, Mathieu P (2009b) Allocation de ressources et maximisation de bien-être social. In: Actes des Cinquièmes Journées Francophones sur les Modèles Formels de l’Interaction (MFI’09), pp 243–254 Nongaillard A, Mathieu P (2009b) Allocation de ressources et maximisation de bien-être social. In: Actes des Cinquièmes Journées Francophones sur les Modèles Formels de l’Interaction (MFI’09), pp 243–254
Zurück zum Zitat Nongaillard A, Mathieu P, Jaumard B (2009) A realistic approach to solve the nash welfare. In: Practical applications of agents and multi-agents systems (PAAMS’2009), vol 55, pp 374–382 Nongaillard A, Mathieu P, Jaumard B (2009) A realistic approach to solve the nash welfare. In: Practical applications of agents and multi-agents systems (PAAMS’2009), vol 55, pp 374–382
Zurück zum Zitat Sandholm T (1998) Contract types for satisficing task allocation: I theoretical results. In: AAAI spring symposium: satisficing models, vol 99. AAAI Press, USA, California, Stanford University, pp 68–75 Sandholm T (1998) Contract types for satisficing task allocation: I theoretical results. In: AAAI spring symposium: satisficing models, vol 99. AAAI Press, USA, California, Stanford University, pp 68–75
Zurück zum Zitat Sandholm T (2002) Algorithm for optimal winner determination in combinatorial auctions. Artif Intell 135(1–2):1–54CrossRef Sandholm T (2002) Algorithm for optimal winner determination in combinatorial auctions. Artif Intell 135(1–2):1–54CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Agent-Based Reallocation Problem on Social Networks
verfasst von
Antoine Nongaillard
Philippe Mathieu
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2014
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Group Decision and Negotiation / Ausgabe 5/2014
Print ISSN: 0926-2644
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9907
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-012-9336-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2014

Group Decision and Negotiation 5/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner