nach oben

Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management

Erschienen in:

13.04.2020 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Anaerobic codigestion of bovine manure and banana tree leaf: the effect of temperature variability on biogas yield in different proportions of waste

verfasst von: Rafaela Franqueto, Joel Dias da Silva, Ester Kelly Starick, Caio Felipe Souza Jacinto

Erschienen in: Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management | Ausgabe 5/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion (AD) is an efficient process for the conversion of predominantly organic waste into biogas. However, when those wastes have a lignocellulosic composition, the process is slower with low rates of biogas production potential. In these cases, the increment with other wastes, known as anaerobic codigestion (AcoD), proves to be effective, especially when animal waste is included. The objective of the study is to obtain the best waste proportion (manure/agricultural waste) according to the volume of biogas produced during the biodegradability test under investigation of the effects of different temperatures (from 36 to 60 °C). The preliminary investigation consisted of sampling and drying the wastes with analytical tests (TS, VS, COD, TOC, N, P, pH, and moisture), what did allow to determine the proportions to be used in the experimental research. The biodegradability test was evaluated in different proportions of substrate (banana leaf) and inoculum (bovine manure) (1:1; 1:2; 1:9; 0:1) under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. During the test, different temperatures were tested, starting from 36 up to 60 °C, gradually increasing from 2 to 2 °C, every 3 or 5 days, to adapt the anaerobic microorganisms. The investigated proportions presented production different from biogas (in volume), which can be explained by the composition of the proportions and variability of proposed temperatures. The 1:9 proportion was that one which obtained the highest cumulative biogas yield among the proportions, with 113.00 mL/g VS. The results show that the tested AcoD has adaptability when undergone to the variation of temperature, with better profit of biogas in thermophilic temperatures, mainly for the proportion 1:9; when the best condition was considered for the profit of biogas for the employed wastes, in the conditions of the research.

Vorheriger Artikel Preparation and properties of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete with alkaline waste water obtained from foundry sand regeneration process

Nächster Artikel Effects of curing time and freeze–thaw cycle on strength of soils with high plasticity stabilized by waste marble powder

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Sindhu R, Binod P, Pandey A (2016) Biological pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass—an overview. Biores Technol 199:76–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.08.030CrossRef

Shen F, Li H, Wu X, Wang Y, Zhang Q (2018) Effect of organic loading rate on anaerobic co-digestion of rice straw and pig manure with or without biological pretreatment. Biores Technol 250:155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.11.037CrossRef

Awe OW, Zhao Y, Nzihou A, Minh DP, Lyczko N (2017) Review of biogas utilisation, purification and upgrading technologies. Waste Biomass Valorization 8:267–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-016-9826-4CrossRef

Chiumenti A, Borso FD, Limina S (2018) Dry anaerobic digestion of cow manure and agricultural products in a full-scale plant: efficiency and comparison with wet fermentation. Waste Manag 71:704–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.03.046CrossRef

Milani M, Montorsi L (2018) Energy recovery of the biomass from livestock farms in Italy: the case of Modena Province. J Sustain Dev Energy Water Environ Syst 6:464–480. https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.d6.0199CrossRef

Xu F, Li Y, Ge X, Yang L, Li Y (2018) Anaerobic digestion of food waste—challenges and opportunities. Biores Technol 247:1047–1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.020CrossRef

Ren Y, Yu M, Wu C, Wang Q, Gao M, Huang Q, Liu Y (2018) A comprehensive review on food waste anaerobic digestion: research updates and tendencies. Biores Technol 247:1069–1076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.109CrossRef

Valli L, Rossi L, Fabbri C, Sibilla F, Gattoni P, Dale BE, Kim S, Ong RG, Bozzetto S (2017) Greenhouse gas emissions of electricity and biomethane produced using the Biogasdoneright™ system: four case studies from Italy. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 11:847–860. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1789CrossRef

Parajuli R, Dalgaard T, Birkved M (2018) Can farmers mitigate environmental impacts through combined production of food, fuel and feed? A consequential life cycle assessment of integrated mixed crop-livestock system with a green biorefinery. Sci Total Environ 619–620:127–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.082CrossRef

10.

Hosseini Koupaie E, Dahadha S, Lakeh Bazyar AA, Azizi A, Elbeshbishy E (2019) Enzymatic pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for enhanced biomethane production—a review. J Environ Manag 233:774–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.106CrossRef

11.

Jang HM, Ha JH, Kim M-S, Kim J-O, Kim YM, Park JM (2016) Effect of increased load of high-strength food wastewater in thermophilic and mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of waste activated sludge on bacterial community structure. Water Res 99:140–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.04.051CrossRef

12.

Nghiem LD, Koch K, Bolzonella D, Drewes JE (2017) Full scale co-digestion of wastewater sludge and food waste: bottlenecks and possibilities. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 72:354–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.062CrossRef

13.

Obulisamy PK, Chakraborty D, Selvam A, Wong JW (2016) Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and chemically enhanced primary-treated sludge under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. Environ Technol 37:3200–3207. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2016.1181112CrossRef

14.

Chakraborty D, Karthikeyan OP, Selvam A, Wong JWC (2018) Co-digestion of food waste and chemically enhanced primary treated sludge in a continuous stirred tank reactor. Biomass Bioenergy 111:232–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.06.002CrossRef

15.

Mehariya S, Patel AK, Obulisamy PK, Punniyakotti E, Wong JWC (2018) Co-digestion of food waste and sewage sludge for methane production: current status and perspective. Bioresour Technol 265:519–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.04.030CrossRef

16.

Da Ros C, Cavinatto C, Pavan P, Bolzonella D (2017) Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of winery wastewater sludge and wine lees: an integrated approach for sustainable wine production. J Environ Manag 203(Part 2, 1):745–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.03.029CrossRef

17.

Esposito G, Frunzo L, Giordano A, Liotta F, Pánico A, Pirozzi F (2012) Anaerobic co-digestion of organic wastes. Rev Environ Sci Bio/Technol 11:325–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-012-9277-8CrossRef

18.

Gou C, Yang Z, Huang J, Wang H, Xu H, Wang L (2014) Effects of temperature and organic loading rate on the performance and microbial community of anaerobic co-digestion of waste activated sludge and food waste. Chemosphere 105:146–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.01.018CrossRef

19.

Serrano A, Siles JA, Martín MA, Chica AF, Estévez-Pastor FS, Toro-Baptista E (2016) Improvement of anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge through microwave pre-treatment. J Environ Manag 177:231–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.03.048CrossRef

20.

Wickham R, Galway B, Bustamante H, Nghiem LD (2016) Biomethane potential evaluation of co-digestion of sewage sludge and organic wastes. Int Biodeterioration Biodegrad 113:3–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.03.018CrossRef

21.

Negi S, Dhar H, Hussain A, Kumar S (2018) Biomethanation potential for co-digestion of municipal solid waste and rice straw: a batch study. Biores Technol 254:139–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.070CrossRef

22.

Dahunsi SO, Oranusi S, Owolabi JB, Efeovbokhan VE (2017) Synergy of Siam weed (Chromolaena odorata) and poultry manure for energy generation: effects of pretreatment methods, modeling and process optimization. Biores Technol 225:409–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.11.123CrossRef

23.

Matheri AN, Ndiweni SN, Belaid M, Muzenda E, Hubert R (2017) Optimising biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of chicken manure and organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 80:756–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.068CrossRef

24.

Bong CPC, Lim LY, Lee CT, Klemeš JJ, Ho CS, Ho WS (2018) The characterization and treatment of food waste for improvement of biogas production during anaerobic digestion—a review. J Clean Prod 172:1545–1558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.199CrossRef

25.

Vasco-Correa J, Khanal S, Manandhar A, Shah A (2018) Anaerobic digestion for bioenergy production: global status, environmental and techno-economic implications, and government policies. Biores Technol 247:1015–1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.004CrossRef

26.

Pecchi M, Baratieri M (2019) Coupling anaerobic digestion with gasification, pyrolysis or hydrothermal carbonization: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 105:462–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.02.003CrossRef

27.

Yang L, Xu F, Ge X, Li Y (2015) Challenges and strategies for solid-state anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 44:824–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.002CrossRef

28.

Mao C, Feng Y, Wang X, Ren G (2015) Review on research achievements of biogas from anaerobic digestion. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 45:540–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.032CrossRef

29.

Vrieze JDE, Smet D, Klok J, Colsen J, Angenent LT, Vlaeminck SE (2016) Thermophilic sludge digestion improves energy balance and nutrient recovery potential in full-scale municipal wastewater treatment plants. Biores Technol 218:1237–1245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.06.119CrossRef

30.

Zhang T, Mao C, Zhai N, Wang X, Yang G (2015) Influence of initial pH on thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of swine manure and maize stalk. Waste Manag 35:119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.09.004CrossRef

31.

Sukhesh M, Rao P (2018) Anaerobic digestion of crop residues: technological developments and environmental impact in the Indian context. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 16:513–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2018.08.007CrossRef

32.

Chaikitkaew S, Kongjan P, O-Thong S (2015) Biogas production from biomass residues of palm oil mill by solid state anaerobic digestion. Energy Procedia 79:838–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.575CrossRef

33.

Abdul Aziz NIH, Hanafiah MM, Mohamed Ali MY (2019) Sustainable biogas production from agrowaste and effluents—a promising step for small-scale industry income. Renew Energy 132:363–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.149CrossRef

34.

Klein M, Griess O, Pulidindi IN, Perkas N, Gedanken A (2016) Bioethanol production from Ficus religiosa leaves using microwave irradiation. J Environ Manag 177:20–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.03.050CrossRef

35.

Billota P, Steinmetz RLR, Kunz A, Mores R (2017) Swine effluent post-treatment by alkaline control and UV radiation combined for water reuse. J Clean Prod 140:1247–1254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.033CrossRef

36.

Dollhofer V, Dandikas V, Dorn-In S, Bauer C, Lebuhn M, Bauer J (2018) Accelerated biogas production from lignocellulosic biomass after pre-treatment with Neocallimastix frontalis. Biores Technol 264:219–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.05.068CrossRef

37.

Hillion M-L, Moscoviz R, Trably E, Leblanc Y, Bernet N, Torrijos M, Escudié R (2017) Co-ensiling as a new technique for long-term storage of agro-industrial waste with low sugar content prior to anaerobic digestion. Waste Manag 71:147–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.10.024CrossRef

38.

Zahan Z, Othman M, Muster T (2016) Characterisation of agro-industrial wastes and their anaerobic digestion/co-digestion kinetic potential: a comparative batch study. In: Sixth international symposium on energy from biomass and waste 2016, Venice, Italy, 14–17 November 2016, pp 1–9

39.

Rojas-Downing MM, Nejadhashemi P, Harrigan T, Woznicki SA (2017) Climate change and livestock: Impacts, adaptation, and mitigation. Clim Risk Manag 16:145–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2017.02.001CrossRef

40.

Schnürer A, Bohn I, Moestedt J (2016) Protocol for start-up and operation of CSTR biogas processes. In: McGenity TJ, Timmis KN, Nogales B (eds) Hydrocarbon and lipid microbiology protocols: bioproducts, biofuels, biocatalysts and facilitating tools. Springer, Berlin, pp 171–200CrossRef

41.

Janke L, Weinrich S, Leite AF, Schüch A, Nikolausz M, Nelles M, Stinner W (2017) Optimization of semi-continuous anaerobic digestion of sugarcane straw codigested with filter cake: effects of macronutrients supplementation on conversion kinetics. Bioresour Technol 245:35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.084CrossRef

42.

Awasthi SK, Joshi R, Dhar H, Verma S, Awasthi MK, Varjani S, Sarsaiya S, Zhang Z, Kumar S (2018) Improving methane yield and quality via co-digestion of cow dung mixed with food waste. Bioresour Technol 251:259–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.12.063CrossRef

43.

Ormaechea P, Castrillón L, Suárez-Peña B, Megido L, Fernández-Nava Y, Negral L, Marañón E, Rodríguez-Iglesias J (2018) Enhancement of biogas production from cattle manure pretreated and/or co-digested at pilot-plant scale. Characterization by SEM. Renew Energy 126:897–904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.04.022CrossRef

44.

Kamdem I, Hiligsmann S, Vanderghem C, Jacquet N, Tiappi FM, Richel A, Jacques P, Thonart P (2018) Enhanced biogas production during anaerobic digestion of steam-pretreated lignocellulosic biomass from Williams Cavendish Banana Plants. Waste Biomass Valor 9:175–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-016-9788-6CrossRef

45.

Ge X, Xu F, Li Y (2016) Solid-state anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass: recent progress and perspectives. Biores Technol 205:239–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.01.050CrossRef

46.

Guerrero AB, Aguado PL, Sánchez J, Curt MD (2016) Gis-based assessment of banana residual biomass potential for ethanol production and power generation: a case study. Waste Biomass Valorization 7:405–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-015-9455-3CrossRef

47.

Fernandes ERK, Marangoni C, Souza O, Sellin N (2013) Thermochemical characterization of banana leaves as a potential energy source. Energy Convers Manage 75:603–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.08.008CrossRef

48.

Awedem WF, Achu MBL, Happi ET (2016) Nutritive value of three varieties of banana and plan-tain blossoms from Cameroon. Greener J Agric Sci 5:52–61. https://doi.org/10.15580/GJAS.2015.2.012115009CrossRef

49.

Wobiwo FA, Alleluya VK, Emaga TH, Boda M, Fokou E, Gillet S, Deleu M, Gerin PA (2017) Recovery of fibers and biomethane from banana penducles biomass through anaerobic digestiON. Energy Sustain Dev 37:60–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2017.01.005CrossRef

50.

Burg V, Bowman G, Haubensak M, Baier U, Thess O (2018) Valorization of an untapped resource: energy and greenhouse gas emissions benefits of converting manure to biogas through anaerobic digestion. Resour Conserv Recycling 136:53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.04.004CrossRef

51.

Tsapekos P, Kougias PG, Egelund H, Larsen U, Pedersen J, Trénel P, Angelidaki I (2017) Mechanical pretreatment at harvesting increases the bioenergy output from marginal land grasses. Renew Energy 111:914–921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.061CrossRef

52.

Krause MJ, Chickering GW, Townsend TG, Pullammanappallil P (2018) Effects of temperature and particle size on the biochemical methane potential of municipal solid waste components. Waste Manag 71:25–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.015CrossRef

53.

Brasileiro Institute of Geography and Statistics-IBGE (2018) Agricultural Census 2017, preliminary results. https://censos.ibge.gov.br/agro/2017/templates/censo_agro/resultadosagro/index.html. Accessed 16 Nov 2018 (in Portuguese)

54.

APHA (2012) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 22nd edn. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environmental Federation, Washington

55.

Koch K, Lippert T, Drewes JE (2017) The role of inoculum’s origin on the methane yield of different substrates in Biochemical Methane Potential (BMP) tests. Bioresour Technol 243:457–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.142CrossRef

56.

Xin L, Guo Z, Xiao X, Xu W, Geng R, Wang W (2018) Feasibility of anaerobic digestion for contaminated rice straw inoculated with waste activated sludge. Biores Technol 266:45–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.048CrossRef

57.

Yan Y, Zhang L, Feng L, Sun D, Dang Y (2018) Comparison of varying operating parameters on heavy metals ecological risk during anaerobic co-digestion of chicken manure and corn stover. Bioresour Technol 247:660–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.146CrossRef

58.

Li D, Liu S, Mi L, Yuan Y, Yan Z, Liu X (2015) Effects of feedstock ratio and organic loading rate on the anaerobic mesophilic co-digestion of rice straw and cow manure. Biores Technol 189:319–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.033CrossRef

59.

Barua VB, Rathore V, Kalamdhad AS (2018) Comparative evaluation of anaerobic co-digestion of water hyacinth and cooked food waste with and without pretreatment. Bioresour Technol Rep 4:202–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2018.11.002CrossRef

60.

Xu L, Peng S, Dong D, Wang C, Fan W, Cao Y, Huang F, Wang J, Yue Z (2019) Performance and microbial community analysis of dry anaerobic codigestion of rice straw and cow manure with added limonite. Biomass Bioenerg 126:41–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.04.026CrossRef

61.

Schnurer A, Jarvis A (2018) Microbiology of the biogas process. In: Handbook. SLU (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences). ISBN: 978-91-576-9546-8

62.

Tapadia-Maheshwari S, Pore S, Engineer A, Shetty D, Dagar SS, Dhakephalkar PK (2019) Illustration of the microbial community selected by optimized process and nutritional parameters resulting in enhanced biomethanation of rice straw without thermo-chemical pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 289:121639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121639CrossRef

63.

Hidalgo D, Martín-Marroquín JM (2015) Biochemical methane potential of livestock and agri-food waste streams in the Castilla y León Region (Spain). Food Res Int 73:226–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.12.044CrossRef

64.

Wang B, Björn A, Strömberg S, Nges IA, Nistor M, Liu J (2017) Evaluating the influences of mixing strategies on the Biochemical Methane Potential test. J Environ Manag 185:54–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.10.044CrossRef

65.

Labatut RA, Angenent LT, Scott NR (2011) Biochemical methane potential and biodegradability of complex organic substrates. Biores Technol 10:2255–2264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.035CrossRef

66.

Holliger C, Alves M, Andrade D, Angel I, Astals S, Baier U, Bougrier C, Buffere P, Carballa M, de Wilde V, Ebertsder F, Fernández B, Ficara E, Fotidis I, Frigon JC, De Laclos HF, Ghasimi DS, Hack G, Hartel M, Heerenklage J, Horvath IS, Jenicek P, Koch K, Krautwald J, Lizasoain J, Liu J, Mosberger L, Nistor M, Oechsner H, Oliveira JV, Paterson M, Pauss A, Pommier S, Porqueddu I, Raposo F, Ribeiro T, Rusch Pfund F, Stromberg S, Torrijos M, Van Eekert M, Van Lier J, Wedwitschka H, Wierinck I (2016) Towards a standardization of biomethane potential tests. Water Sci Technol 74:2515–2522. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2016.336CrossRef

67.

Athanasoulia E, Melidis P, Aivasidis A (2014) Co-digestion of sewage sludge and crude glycerol from biodiesel production. Renew Energy 62:73–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.06.040CrossRef

68.

Li Y, Zhang R, Chen C, Liu G, He Y, Liu X (2013) Biogas production from codigestion of corn stover and chicken manure under anaerobic wet, hemi-solid, and solid state conditions. Biores Technol 149:406–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.09.091CrossRef

69.

Baêta BEL, Lima DRS, Balena JGF, Adarme OFH, Gurgel LVA, Aquino SF (2016) Evaluation of hydrogen and methane production from sugarcane bagasse hemicellulose hydrolysates by two-stage anaerobic digestion process. Bioresour Technol 218:436–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.06.113CrossRef

70.

Baêta BEL, Lima DRS, Balena Filho JG, Adarme OFH, Gurgel LVA, Aquino SF (2016) Optimization of sugarcane bagasse autohydrolysis for methane production from hemicellulose hydrolyzates in a biorefinery concept. Bioresour Technol 200:137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.003CrossRef

71.

Abdelgadir A, Chen X, Liu J, Xie X, Zhang J, Zhang K, Wang H, Liu N (2014) Characteristics, process parameters, and inner components of anaerobic bioreactors. Biomed Res Int 2014:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/841573CrossRef

72.

Vats N, Khan AA, Ahmad K (2019) Observation of biogas production by sugarcane bagasse and food waste in different composition combinations. Energy 185:1100–1105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.07.080CrossRef

73.

Orrico ACA, Sunada NDAS, Lucas Junior JDE, Orrico Junior MAP, Schwingel ALW (2015) Codigestão anaeróbia de dejetos de suínos e níveis de inclusão de óleo de descartes. J Braz Assoc Agric Eng 25:657–664. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v35n4p657-664/2015(in Portuguese)CrossRef

74.

McVoitte WPA, Clark G (2019) The effects of temperature and duration of thermal pretreatment on the solid-state anaerobic digestion of dairy cow manure. Heliyon 5:e02140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02140CrossRef

75.

Wang H, Zhang Y, Angelidaki I (2016) Ammonia inhibition on hydrogen enriched Anaerobic digestion of manure under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. Water Res 105:314–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.09.006CrossRef

76.

Liu CM, Wachemo A, Yuan HR, Zou DX, Liu YP, Zhang L, Pang YZ, Li XJ (2018) Evaluation of methane yield using acidogenic effluent of NaOH pretreated corn stover in anaerobic digestion. Renew Energy 116(PartA):224–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.07.001CrossRef

77.

Schwantes D, Gonçalves JRAC, Richart A, Castro GMDE, Trespach FW, Scwantes N, Manfrin J (2017) Alternative biodigesters for organic waste treatment. Sci Agraria Paranaensis 16:475–484 10.18188/1983-1471/sap.v16n4p475-484

78.

Vivan M, Kunz A, Stolberg J, Perdomo C, Techio VH (2010) Eficiência da interação biodigestor e lagoas de estabilização na remoção de poluentes em dejetos de suínos. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 14:320–325 (in Portuguese)CrossRef

79.

Costa MSSM, Lucas JRJDE, Costa LADEM, Orrico ACA (2016) Highly concentrated diet increases biogas production and the agronomic value of young bull's manure. Waste Manag 48:521–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.09.038CrossRef

80.

Schwingel AW, Orrico ACA, Orrico Junior MAP, Sunada NDAS, Centurion SR (2016) Performance of the anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure with the inclusion of crude glycerine. Revista Ciência Agronômica 47:778–783. https://doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20160093CrossRef

81.

Veroneze ML, Schwantes D, Gonçalves JRAC, Richart A, Manfrin J, Schiller ADAP, Schuba TB (2019) Production of biogas and biofertilizer using anaerobic reactors with swine manure and glycerin doses. J Clean Prod 213:176–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.181CrossRef

82.

Wang K, Yin J, Shen D, Li N (2014) Anaerobic digestion of food waste for volatile fatty acids (VFAs) production with different types of inoculum: effect of pH. Biores Technol 161:395–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.088CrossRef

83.

Jaffar M, Pang Y, Yuan H, Zou D, Liu Y, Zhu B, Korai RM, Li X (2016) Wheat straw pretreatment with KOH for enhancing biomethane production and fertilizer value in anaerobic digestion. Chin J Chem Eng 24:404–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2015.11.005CrossRef

84.

Karlsson T et al (2014) Manual Básico de Biogás, 1st edn. Editora da Univates Rio Grande do Sul, Lajeado (in Portuguese)

85.

Chandra R, Vijay VK, Subbarao PMV, Khura TK (2012) Production of methane from anaerobic digestion of jatropha and pongamia oil cakes. Appl Energy 93:148–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.10.049CrossRef

86.

Patinvoh R, Osadolor OA, Horváth IS, Taherzadeh MJ (2017) Cost effective dry anaerobic digestion in textile bioreactors: experimental and economic evaluation. Bioresour Technol 245(Part A):549–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.081CrossRef

87.

Parralejo AI, Royano L, González J, González JF (2019) Small scale biogas production with animal excrement and agricultural residues. Ind Crops Prod 131:307–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.01.059CrossRef

88.

Song Z, Zhang C (2015) Anaerobic codigestion of pretreated wheat straw with cattle manure and analysis of the microbial community. Biores Technol 186:128–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.03.028CrossRef

89.

Kenasa G, Kena E (2019) Optimization of biogas production from avocado fruit peel wastes codigestion with animal manure collected from juice vending house in Gimbi Town, Ethiopia. J Ferment Technol 8:1–6

90.

Işik EHB, Polat F (2018) Effects of pretreatments on the production of biogas from cow manure. Int Adv Res Eng J 2:48–52

91.

Yao Y, Luo Y, Yang Y, Sheng H, Li X, Li T, Song Y, Zhang H, Chen S, He W, Ren Y, Gao J, Wei Y, An L (2014) Water free anaerobic co-digestion of vegetable processing waste with cattle slurry for methane production at high total solid content. Energy 74:309–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.06.014CrossRef

92.

Tumutegyereize P, Muranga FI, Kawangolo J, Nabugoomu F (2011) Optimization of biogas production from banana peels: effect of particle size on methane yield. Afr J Biotechnol 10:18243–18251. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB11.2442CrossRef

93.

Lima DRS, Adarme OFH, Baêta BEL, Gurgel LVA, Aquino SFDE (2018) Influence of different thermal pretreatments and inoculum selection on the biomethanation of sugarcane bagasse by solid-state anaerobic digestion: a kinetic analysis. Ind Crops Prod 111:684–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.11.048CrossRef

94.

Hansen TL, Schmidt JE, Angelidaki I, Marca E, Jansen JLAC, Mosbaek H, Christensen TH (2004) Method for determination of methane potentials of solid organic waste. Waste Manag 24:393–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2003.09.009CrossRef

95.

Xu F, Wang F, Lin Y, Li Y (2016) Comparison of digestate from solid anaerobic digesters and dewatered effluent from liquid anaerobic digesters as inocula for solid state anaerobic digestion of yard trimmings. Biores Technol 200:753–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.103CrossRef

96.

Shen FLH, Wu X, Wang Y, Zhang Q (2018) Effect of organic loading rate on anaerobic co-digestion of rice straw and pig manure with or without biological pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 250:155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.11.037CrossRef

97.

Cerrillo M, Viñas M, Bonmatí A (2017) Unravelling the active microbial community in a thermophilic anaerobic digester-microbial electrolysis cell coupled system under different conditions. Water Res 110:192–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.12.019CrossRef

98.

Nielfa A, Cano R, Fdz-Polanco M (2015) Theoretical methane production generated by the co-digestion of organic fraction municipal solid waste and biological sludge. Biotechnol Rep 5:14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2014.10.005CrossRef

99.

Achinas S, Li Y, Achinas V, Euverink GJW (2018) Influence of sheep manure addition on biogas potential and methanogenic communities during cow dung digestion under mesophilic conditions. Sustain Environ Res 28:240–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serj.2018.03.003CrossRef

100.

Sa’diah S, Putra MD (2018) Biogas production from wastes of tofu industry with effects of water hyacinth and cow manure additions. IOP Conf Series Mater Sci Eng 543:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/543/1/012097CrossRef

101.

Zhao Y, Sun F, Yu J, Cai Y, Luo X, Cui Z, Hu Y, Wang X (2018) Co-digestion of oat straw and cow manure during anaerobic digestion: stimulative and inhibitory effects on fermentation. Biores Technol 269:143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.08.040CrossRef

102.

Amirta R, Herawati E, Suwinarti W, Watanabe T (2016) Two-steps utilization of shorea wood waste biomass for the production of oyster mushroom and biogas—a zero waste approach. Agric Agric Sci Procedia 9:202–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.127CrossRef

103.

Tietz CM, Soares PRH, dos Santos KG (2013) Produção de energia pela biodigestão anaeróbia de efluentes: o caso da bovinocultura. Acta Iguazu 2:15–29

104.

Cremonez PA, Sampaio SC, Teleken JG, Meier TW, Dieter J, Teleken J (2019) Influence of inoculum to substrate ratio on the anaerobic digestion of a cassava starch polymer. Ind Crops Prod 141:111709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111709CrossRef

105.

Shi J, Xu F, Wang Z, Stiverson JA, Yu Z, Li Y (2014) Effects of microbial and nonmicrobial factors of liquid anaerobic digestion effluent as inoculum on solidstate anaerobic digestion of corn stover. Bioresour Technol 57:188–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.089CrossRef

106.

Kawai M, Nagao N, Tajima N, Niwa C, Matsuyama T, Toda T (2014) The effect of the labile organic fraction in food waste and the substrate/inoculum ratio on anaerobic digestion for a reliable methane yield. Biores Technol 157:174–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.018CrossRef

107.

Zhang W, Li L, Xing W, Chen B, Zhang L, Li A, Li R, Yang R (2019) Dynamic behaviors of batch anaerobic systems of food waste for methane production under different organic loads, substrate to inoculum ratios and initial pH. J Biosci Bioeng 128:733–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2019.05.013CrossRef

108.

Pore SD, Engineer A, Dagar SS, Dhakephalkar PK (2019) Meta-omics based analyses of microbiome involved in biomethanation of rice straw in a thermophilic anaerobic bioreactor under optimized conditions. Biores Technol 279:25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.01.099CrossRef

109.

Náthia-Neves G, Berni M, Dragone G, Mussatto SI, Forster-Carneiro T (2018) Anaerobic digestion process: technological aspects and recent developments. Int J Environ Sci Technol 15:2033–2046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1682-2CrossRef

110.

Riya S, Suzuki K, Terada A, Hosomi M (2016) Influence of C/N ratio on performance and microbial community structure of dry-thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of swine manure and rice straw. J Med Biol Eng 5:11–14. https://doi.org/10.12720/jomb.5.1.11-14CrossRef

111.

Mardia KV, Kent JT, Bibby JM (1978) Multivariate analysis. Academic Press, New YorkMATH

112.

Wei S, Zhang H, Cai X, Xu J, Fang J, Liu H (2014) Psychrophilic anaerobic co-digestion of highland barley straw with two animal manures at high altitude for enhancing biogas production. Energy Convers Manage 88:40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.08.018CrossRef

113.

de Vrieze J, Gildemyn S, Vilchez-Vargas R, Jáuregui R, Pieper DH, Verstraete W, Boon N (2015) Inoculum selection is crucial to ensure operational stability in anaerobic digestion. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:189–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-6046-3CrossRef

114.

Syaichurrozi I, Suhirman S, Hidayat T (2018) Effect of initial pH on anaerobic co-digestion of Salvinia molesta and rice straw for biogas production and kinetics. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 16:594–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2018.10.007CrossRef

115.

Bundhoo MAZ, Mohee R (2016) Inhibition of dark fermentative bio-dydrogen production: a review. Int J Hydrogen Energy 41:6713–6733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.03.057CrossRef

116.

Shitophyta LM, Maryudi M, Budiyono BNR (2017) Comparison of kinetic models for biogas production from rice straw. J Bahan Alam Terbarukan 6:107–111. https://doi.org/10.15294/jbat.v6i2.9325CrossRef

117.

Battista F, Fino D, Mancini G (2016) Optimization of biogas production from coffee production waste. Biores Technol 200:884–890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.11.020CrossRef

118.

Deepanraj B, Sivasubramanian V, Jayaraj S (2015) Experimental and kinetic study on anaerobic digestion of food waste: the effect of total solids and pH. J Renew Sustain Energy 7:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4935559CrossRef

119.

Seswoya RA, Karim ATA, Darnak NA, Rahman MFA (2018) Methane potential from the digestion of food waste in a batch reactor. Int J Eng Technol 7:36–39. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.23.17255CrossRef

120.

Al-Zuhairi F, Micoli L, Florio C, Ausiello A, Turco M, Pirozzi D, Toscano G (2019) Anaerobic co-digestion of municipal solid wastes with giant reed under mesophilic conditions. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 21:1332–1340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-019-00886-6CrossRef

121.

Zhang H, Luo L, Li W, Wang X, Sun Y, Sun Y, Gong W (2018) Optimization of mixing ratio of ammoniated rice straw and food waste co-digestion and impact of trace element supplementation on biogas production. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 20:745–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-017-0634-0CrossRef

122.

Bardi MJ, Rad HA (2019) Simultaneous synergistic effects of addition of agro-based adsorbent on anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and sewage sludge. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 22:65–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-019-00911-8CrossRef

123.

Ohuchi Y, Ying C, Lateef SA, Ihara I, Iwasaki M, Inoue R, Umetsu K (2014) Anaerobic co-digestion of sugar beet tops silage and dairy cow manure under thermophilic condition. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 17:540–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-014-0284-4CrossRef

124.

Chaiyapong P, Chavalparit O (2016) Enhancement of biogas production potential from Acacia leaf waste using alkaline pre-treatment and co-digestion. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 18:427–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-016-0469-0CrossRef

125.

Franqueto F, da Silva JD, Konig M (2019) Effect of temperature variation on codigestion of animal waste and agricultural residue for biogas production. BioEnergy Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-019-10049-yCrossRef

126.

Santos TN, Dutra ED, Prado AG, Leite FCB, Souza RFR, Santos DC, Abreu CAM, Simões DA, Morais JRMA, Menezes RSC (2016) Potencial for biofuels from the biomass of prickly pear cladodes: challenges for bioethanol and biogas production in dry areas. Biomass Bioenergy 85:215–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.12.005CrossRef

127.

CIBIOGÁS (2019) Nota Técnica: No. 03/2019—Produção de biogás a partir de dejetos da bovinocultura de leite e corte. Foz do Iguaçu, março de (in Portuguese)

128.

Orrico ACA, Lopes WRT, Manarelli DM, Orrico Junior MAP, Sunada NDAS (2016) Codigestão anaeróbia dos dejetos de bovinos leiteiros e óleo de descartes. J Braz Assoc Agric Eng 36:537–545. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v36n3p537-545/2016(in Portuguese)CrossRef

129.

Luo H, Liu X, Anderson B, Zhang K, Li X, Huang B, Li M, Mo Y, Fan L, Shen Q, Chen F, Jiang M (2015) Carbon sequestration potential of green roofs using mixed-sewage-sludge substrate in Chengdu World Modern Garden City. Ecol Ind 49:247–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.10.016CrossRef

130.

Pavlík Z, Fǒrt J, Záleská M, Pavlíková M, Tmík A, Medved I, Keppert M, Koutsoukos P, Černý R (2016) Energy-efficient termal treatment of sewage sludge for its application in blended cements. J Clean Prod 112:409–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.072CrossRef

131.

Kothari R, Pandey AK, Kumar S, Tyagi VV, Tyagi SK (2014) Different aspects of dry anaerobic digestion for bio-energy: an overview. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 39:174–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.011CrossRef

132.

Salehiyoun AR, Sharifi M, di Maria F, Zilouei H, Aghbashlo M (2019) Efect of substituting organic fraction of municipal solid waste with fruit and vegetable wastes on anaerobic digestion. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 21:1321–1331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-019-00887-5CrossRef

133.

Company of Agricultural Research and Rural Extension of Santa Catarina*EPAGRI (2017) Annual synthesis of the agriculture of Santa Catarina 2014–2015. https://docweb.epagri.sc.gov.br/website_cepa/. Accessed 16 Mar 2017 (in Portuguese)

134.

Company of Agricultural Research and Rural Extension of Santa Catarina-EPAGRI (2018) Santa Catarina Annual Agricultural Summary 2017–2018. https://docweb.epagri.sc.gov.br/website_cepa/publicacoes/Sintese_2017_18.pdf. Accessed 09 May 2019 (in Portuguese)

135.

Saghouri M, Mansoori Y, Rohani A, Khodaparast MHH, Sheikhdavoodi MJ (2017) Modelling and evaluation of anaerobic digestion process of tomato processing wastes for biogas generation. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 20:561–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-017-0622-4CrossRef

136.

Sawatdeenarunat C, Nguyen D, Surendra KC, Shrestha S, Rajendran K, Oechsner H, Xie L, Khanal SK (2016) Anaerobic biorefinery: current status, challenges, and opportunities. Bioresour Technol 215:304–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.074CrossRef

Titel: Anaerobic codigestion of bovine manure and banana tree leaf: the effect of temperature variability on biogas yield in different proportions of waste
verfasst von: Rafaela Franqueto
Joel Dias da Silva
Ester Kelly Starick
Caio Felipe Souza Jacinto
Publikationsdatum: 13.04.2020
Verlag: Springer Japan
Erschienen in: Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management / Ausgabe 5/2020
Print ISSN: 1438-4957
Elektronische ISSN: 1611-8227
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-020-01033-2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2020

Synthesis and thermal decomposition of alkoxy-, hydroxy-derivatives of Sovol polychlorbiphenyls technical mixture

Performance study of a bio-trickling filter to remove high hydrogen sulfide concentration from biogas: a pilot-scale experiment

The effect of nanomaterials as anti-stripping additives on the moisture sensitivity of glasphalt

Pyrolysis of low-density polyethylene waste plastics using mixtures of catalysts

Recycled waste paper–cement composite panels reinforced with kenaf fibres: durability and mechanical properties

Rethinking sustainability: a review of Liberia’s municipal solid waste management systems, status, and challenges