nach oben

Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics

Erschienen in:

01.02.2023 | INFORMATION ANALYSIS

Analysis of Developments in Arctic Studies Using Bibliographic and Grant Databases

verfasst von: A. I. Terekhov

Erschienen in: Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics | Ausgabe 1/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The development of Arctic science in 1980–2020 is analyzed. The sources of raw information are the bibliographic databases of the Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and the grant databases of the National Science Foundation of the United States and the Russian Science Foundation. The subject domains in the spotlight are worldwide scientific output indicators, indicators of countries and groups of countries, and of leading organizations; theme-based structures of the studies; scientific cooperation and citation rate indicators; and the number of Arctic projects launched annually by the science foundations of Russia and the United States. The Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus are compared according to the main parameters of Arctic science. The main topics of the Arctic projects launched in the United States and Russia in 2022 are identified with the help of grant abstracts.

Vorheriger Artikel Process Models in the Management of the Decision Support System Efficiency in Production Systems

Nächster Artikel About Representation and Evaluation of the Scientific Data, Numerical and Non-Numerical Nature in the Properties of Materials Research

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Legal successor to the United Scientific Council of the Russian Academy of Sciences for the Study of the Arctic and Antarctic (1992–1999).

Two works by Russian authors relied on domestic databases, including Russian Scientific Citation Index [13] and Scientific Siberica of the State Public Scientific-Technological Library of the Siberian Branch of the RAS [17].

For example, in winter, the Arctic can be proxy to the glacial satellites of Jupiter and Saturn [1].

Denmark is considered together with Greenland, and pre-1992 Russia is considered as the Soviet Union.

The specialization index (SI) compares the share of some country in a specific domain of science with its share in science in general. SI >1 (1 is the average global value) means that the country specializes in this domain.

The highly cited papers indicator [26] for the segment of top‑1% is determined as HCPItop_-1% ≡ PPtop_-1% /1%, where PP_top-1% is the share of highly cited papers in the aggregate output of special issue materials of a specific country (observed value); 1% is the share of these papers in the global output (expected value). As defined, if this proportion exceeds 1, a specific country is a better producer of highly cited (in the segment of top-1%) publications than the rest of the world and vice versa.

The search was done on the websites of the foundations (https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/ and https://www.rscf.ru/ project/); in the first case, the keyword for the search was “arctic”, in the second case, two words were used, including “арктик*” and “арктич*”.

State of Arctic Science Report 2020. The International Arctic Science Committee. https://iasc.info/images/ media/print/SAS2020_web.pdf.

Heininen, L., Everett, K., Padrtova, B., and Reissell, A., Arctic policies and strategies—Analysis, synthesis, and trends, Laxenburg, Austria, 2020. https://doi.org/10.22022/AFI/11-2019.16175

NSF’s 10 Big Ideas, National Science Foundation, 2022. https://www.nsf.gov/news/special_reports/big_ ideas/index.jsp.

Ivanov, G.V., Kostyukov, A.D., and Tashlykov, S.L., Military history aspects of Russia’s arctic space development, Voenno-Istoricheskii Zh., 2020, no. 6, pp. 4–12.

Suleimanov, A.A., Studies of the Academy of Sciences of USSR in Russian Arctic in 1930–1941, Probl. Istorii, Filologii, Kul’tury, 2016, no. 1, pp. 392–407.

Gvishiani, A., On prospects in the area of arctic studies, Vol’naya Ekon., 2022. http://freeconomy.ru/mneniya/ aleksej-gvishiani-o-perspektivah-v-oblasti-arkticheskih-issledovanij.html.

Kryukov, V.A., Russian Arctic: Science is more important than resources, Ross. Global’noi Politike, 2020. https:// globalaffairs.ru/articles/arktika-nauka-vazhnee/8.

Aksnes, D.W. and Hessen, D.O., The structure and development of polar research (1981–2007): A publication-based approach, Arctic, Antarctic, Alpine Res., 2009, no. 2, pp. 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1657/1938-4246-41.2.155

Côté, G. and Picard-Aitken, M., Arctic Research in Canada. A Bibliometric Study, Montreal: Science-Metrix, 2009. http://www.science-metrix.com/pdf/SM_INAC_ Bibliometrics_Arctic_Research.pdf.

10.

Augustsson, A., Aldberg, H., and Friberg, M., Bibliometric survey of polar research in Sweden, Report no. 354-2014-7378, Stockholm: Swedish Research Council. https://paperzz.com/doc/7862964/bibliometric-survey-of-polar-research-in-sweden.

11.

Aksnes, D.W., Osipov, I.A., Moskaleva, O.V., and Kullerud, L., Arctic research publication trends: A pilot study. University of the Arctic, 2016. https://www.elsevier.com/_data/assets/pdf_file/0017/204353/Arctic-Research-Publication-Trends-August-2016.pdf.

12.

Biresselioglu, M.E., Demir, M.H., Solak, B., Kayacan, A., and Altinci, S., Investigating the trends in arctic research: the increasing role of social sciences and humanities, Sci. Total Environ., 2020, vol. 729, p. 139027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139027CrossRef

13.

Moskaleva, O. and Osipov, I., Publications of arctic studies: Analysis of the trend of research development on the basis of Russian Science Citation Index, Working Report, 2016. https://research.uarctic.org/media/ 1598055/rincpublications_rus.pdf.

14.

Terekhov, A.I., Geography of scientific knowledge about the Arctic: Bibliometric analysis, Vestn. Mosk. Univ. Ser. 5: Geogr., 2021, no.3, pp. 86–96.

15.

Bancheva, A.I., A bibliometric analysis of global research on the arctic (with special interest in environmental issues), Polar Sci., 2019, vol. 21, pp. 233–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2019.04.002CrossRef

16.

Baztan, J., Cordier, M., Huctin, J.-M., Zhu, Z., and Vanderlinden, J.-P., Life on thin ice: Insights from Uummannaq, Greenland for connecting climate science with Arctic communities, Polar Sci., 2017, vol. 13, pp. 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2017.05.002CrossRef

17.

Rykova, V.V., Safety of the Arctic: Comparative analysis of database information arrays Web of Science and Scientific Sibirika, Gumanitarnye Probl. Voennogo Dela, 2020, no. 2, pp. 61–67.

18.

Fu, Sh., Goerlandt, F., and Xi, Yo., Arctic shipping risk management: A bibliometric analysis and a systematic review of risk influencing factors of navigational accidents, Saf. Sci., 2021, vol. 139, p. 105254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105254CrossRef

19.

Hua, W., Yuan, S., Yan, M., and Li, Yu, A quantitative analysis of Arctic related articles in the humanities and social sciences appearing in the world core journals, Scientometrics, 2012, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 703–718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0690-0CrossRef

20.

Stegmann, J., Research at UNIS—The University Centre in Svalbard. A bibliometric study, 2014. arXiv:1405.6399 [cs.DL]

21.

Zhuravel, V.P., Russia in the Arctic: Will the state commission be its helmsman, Arktika Sever, 2016, no. 23, pp. 5–16. https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2221-2698.2016.23.5

22.

Singh, V.K., Singh, P., Karmakar, M., Leta, J., and Mayr, P., The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis, Scientometrics, 2021, vol. 126, pp. 5113–5142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5CrossRef

23.

Gusenbauer, M., Search where you will find most: Comparing the disciplinary coverage of 56 bibliographic databases, Scientometrics, 2022, vol. 127, pp. 2683–2745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04289-7CrossRef

24.

Gilyarevskii, R.S., On the incorrect use of citation indices for assessment by comparison of divisions of science, Autom. Doc. Math. Linguist., 2022, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 26–29. https://doi.org/10.3103/S000510552201006XCrossRef

25.

Terekhov, A.I., Bibliometric analysis of research in the field of lasers, Fotonika, 2017, no. 2, pp. 8–19. https://doi.org/10.22184/1993-7296.2017.62.2.8.19

26.

Tijssen, R.J.W., Visser, M.S., and Vanleeuwen, T.N., Benchmarking international scientific excellence: Are highly cited research papers an appropriate frame of reference?, Scientometrics, 2002, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 381–397. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016082432660CrossRef

27.

De Moya-Anegon, Guerrero-Bote, V.P., Lopez-Illescas, C., and Moed, H.F., Statistical relationships between corresponding authorship, international co-authorship and citation impact of national research systems, J. Informetrics, 2018, vol. 12, pp. 1251–1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.10.004CrossRef

28.

Libkind, I.A., Markusova, V.A., Terekhov, A.I., Rubval’ter, D.A., and Libkind, A.N., Bibliometric analysis of competitive research project results, Sci. Tech. Inf. Process., 2014, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 254–264. https://doi.org/10.3103/S014768821404011XCrossRef

29.

Terekhov, A.I., Bibliometric trends in quantum information processing, Sci. Tech. Inf. Process., 2020, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 94–103. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688220020021CrossRef

30.

Álvarez-Bornstein, B., Bordons, M., Costas, R., and Calero-Medina, C., Studying the research funding structure of countries through the analysis of funding acknowledgments, Proc. 23rd Int. Conf. on Science and Technology Indicators, 2018, pp. 1141–1153.

31.

Russian and Western scientists no longer collaborate in the Arctic, The Economist. Science & Technology, 2022. https://www.economist.com/science-and-technology/ russian-and-western-scientists-no-longer-collaborate-in-the-arctic/21809236.

Titel: Analysis of Developments in Arctic Studies Using Bibliographic and Grant Databases
verfasst von: A. I. Terekhov
Publikationsdatum: 01.02.2023
Verlag: Pleiades Publishing
Erschienen in: Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics / Ausgabe 1/2023
Print ISSN: 0005-1055
Elektronische ISSN: 1934-8371
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S000510552301003X

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2023

Algorithm for Setting Fuzzy Logical Inclusion Systems Based on Statistical Data

Scientometric Analysis of the Use of the Term “Economic Landscape”

Process Models in the Management of the Decision Support System Efficiency in Production Systems

Markov Chains, Law of Total Probability, and Recurrence Relations

About Representation and Evaluation of the Scientific Data, Numerical and Non-Numerical Nature in the Properties of Materials Research

Architecture of an Information System for Metallographic Quality Control