nach oben

Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics

Erschienen in:

01.02.2023 | INFORMATION ANALYSIS

Process Models in the Management of the Decision Support System Efficiency in Production Systems

verfasst von: L. A. Mylnikov

Erschienen in: Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics | Ausgabe 1/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The paper proposes a process model approach to enhance the economic efficiency of production systems driven by the transformation of their IT infrastructure under the dynamics of the external environments. To achieve the goal, a new notation is suggested that allows to formalize processes in organizational systems, allocate the management subject in an explicit form, simulate the work of the process model for the decision support system in order to study its performance and efficiency. As a result of the study, an algorithm has been developed to estimate how the changes of the IT infrastructure parameters affect the efficiency of the production system performance; in addition, this algorithm can be used to determine the key performance indicators of the organizational system through scheduling development plans.

Vorheriger Artikel Architecture of an Information System for Metallographic Quality Control

Nächster Artikel Analysis of Developments in Arctic Studies Using Bibliographic and Grant Databases

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Voigt, K.-I., Industrielles Management: Industriebetriebslehre aus prozessorientierter Sicht, Springer-Lehrbuch, Berlin: Springer, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69009-2CrossRef

Calmes, A., Der Fabrikbetrieb: Die Organisation, die Buchhaltung und die Selbstkostenberechnung industrieller Betriebe, London: Forgotten Books, 2018.

Gantt, H.L. and Forrer, D., Organizing for Work, Forrer, D.A., Ed., Florida: Donald A. Forrer, 2006.

Thomas, O. and Fellmann, M.A., Semantische Prozessmodellierung—Konzeption und informationstechnische Unterstützung einer ontologiebasierten Reprasentation von Geschäftsprozessen, Wirtschaftsinformatik, 2009, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 506–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11576-009-0201-yCrossRef

Makhabel, B., Learning Data Mining with R, Birmingham: Packt Publishing, 2015.

Myl’nikov, L.A., Statisticheskie metody intellektual’nogo analiza dannykh (Statistical Methods of Intelligent Data Analysis), St. Petersburg: BKhV-Peterburg, 2021.

Amberg, M., Bodendorf, F., and Möslein, K.M., Wertschöpfungsorientierte Wirtschaftsinformatik, Springer-Lehrbuch, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16756-0CrossRef

Bertoni, M., Bordegoni, M., Cugini, U., Regazzoni, D., and Rizzi, C., PLM paradigm: How to lead BPR within the product development field, Comput. Ind., 2009, vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 476–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2009.02.004CrossRef

Scheer, A.-W., ARIS—Modellierungsmethoden, Metamodelle, Anwendungen, Berlin: Springer, 2001, 4th ed.CrossRef

10.

von Rosing, M., White, S., Cummins, F., de Man, H., Business process model and notation—BPMN, The Complete Business Processs Handbook: Body of Knowledge from Process Modeling to BPM, vol. 1, von Rosing, M., Scheer, A.-W., and von Scheel, H., Eds., Morgan Kaufmann, 2015, pp. 433–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-799959-3.00021-5

11.

El-Saber, N. and Boronat, A., BPMN formalization and verification using Maude, Proc. 2014 Workshop On Behaviour Modelling—Foundations and Applications, New York, 2014, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2014, p. 1. https://doi.org/10.1145/2630768.2630769

12.

Ouyang, Ch., Dumas, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Ter Hofstede, A.H.M., and Mendling, J., From business process models to process-oriented software systems, ACM Trans. Software Eng. Methodology, 2009, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 2. https://doi.org/10.1145/1555392.1555395CrossRef

13.

Figl, K., Comprehension of procedural visual business process models: A literature review, Business Inf. Syst. Eng., 2017, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 41–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-016-0460-2CrossRef

14.

Evron, Yo., Soffer, P., and Zamansky, A., Model-based analysis of data inaccuracy awareness in business processes, Business Inf. Syst. Eng., 2022, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-021-00709-9CrossRef

15.

Del Río-Ortega, A., Resinas, M., Durán, A., Bernárdez, B., Ruiz-Cortés, A., and Toro, M., VISUAL PPINOT: a graphical notation for process performance indicators, Business Inf. Syst. Eng., 2019, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0483-3CrossRef

16.

Modern Business Process Automation: YAWL and Its Support Environment, Hofstede, A.H.M., Aalst, W.M.P., Adams, M., and Russell, N., Eds., Berlin: Springer, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03121-2CrossRef

17.

Archimate® 3.1 Specification, Berkshire, England: The Open Group, 2019.

18.

Koschmider, A. and Reijers, H.A., Improving the process of process modelling by the use of domain process patterns, Enterpr. Inf. Syst., 2015, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 29–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2013.857792CrossRef

19.

Wang, L., Du, Y., and Qi, L., Efficient deviation detection between a process model and event logs, IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sin., 2019, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 1352–1364. https://doi.org/10.1109/JAS.2019.1911750MathSciNetCrossRef

20.

Khlif, W. and Ben-Abdallah, H., Integrating semantics and structural information for BPMN model refactoring, IEEE/ACIS 14th Int. Conf. on Computer and Information Science (ICIS), Las Vegas, 2015, IEEE, 2015, pp. 656–660. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIS.2015.7166674

21.

Goel, K., Bandara, W., and Gable, G., A typology of business process standardization strategies, Business Inf. Syst. Eng., 2021, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 621–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-021-00693-0CrossRef

22.

Dori, D., Object-process analysis: Maintaining the balance between system structure and behaviour, J. Logic Comput., 1995, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 227–249. https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/5.2.227CrossRef

23.

Forrester, J.W., Industrial dynamics, J. Oper. Res. Soc., 1997, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 1037–1041. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600946CrossRef

24.

Day, T. and Tosey, P., Beyond smart? A new framework for goal setting, Curriculum J., 2011, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 515–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2011.627213CrossRef

25.

Myl’nikov, L.A., Upravlenie proektami i sistemami v usloviyakh tsifrovoi ekonomiki (Projects and Systems Management under Digital Economy Conditions), Perm: Perm. Nats. Issled. Politekhn. Univ., 2021.

26.

Shamir, R., The efficiency of the simplex method: a survey, Manage. Sci., 1987, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 301–334. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.33.3.301MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

27.

Holzschuher, F. and Peinl, R., Performance of graph query languages, Proc. Joint EDBT/ICDT 2013 Workshops, Genoa, 2013, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2013, pp. 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1145/2457317.2457351CrossRef

28.

Awodey, S., Category Theory, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198568612.001.0001CrossRefMATH

29.

Petrov, A.E. Tenzornyi metod dvoistvennykh setei (Tensor Method of Reciprocal Networks), Moskva: TsITiP, 2007.

30.

Mylnikov, L.A., Structural and functional modeling of processes with a dedicated control subject, Autom. Doc. Math. Linguist., 2022, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 42–54. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0005105522010083CrossRef

31.

Doyle, P.G., Grinstead and Snell’s Introduction to Probability, Providence, R.I.: American Mathematical Society, 2006.

32.

Mylnikov, L., Efficiency management of discrete production systems under the dynamics of project portfolio, Comput. Ind. Eng., 2022, vol. 163, p. 107807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107807CrossRef

33.

Amberg, M. and Mylnikov, L., Innovation project lifecycle prolongation method, Commun. IBIMA, 2009, vol. 10, pp. 11–15.

34.

Moghaddam, K.S., Supplier selection and order allocation in closed-loop supply chain systems using hybrid Monte Carlo simulation and goal programming, Int. J. Prod. Res., 2015, vol. 53, no. 20, pp. 6320–6338. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1054452CrossRef

35.

Chekal, E.G. and Chichev, A.A., Nadezhnost’ informatsionnykh sistem (Reliability of Information Systems), Ulyanovsk: Ulyanovsk. Gos. Univ., 2012.

36.

Wilden, R., Hohberger, J., Devinney, T.M., and Lumineau, F., 60 years of March and Simon’s organizations: An empirical examination of its impact and influence on subsequent research, J. Manage. Stud., 2019, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 1570–1604. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12531CrossRef

37.

Mylnikov, L.A., Information support of the process of portfolio management of projects of industrial systems based on statistical data, Inf. Resur. Ross., 2021, no. 6, pp. 33–39. https://doi.org/10.52815/0204-3653_2021_06184_33

Titel: Process Models in the Management of the Decision Support System Efficiency in Production Systems
verfasst von: L. A. Mylnikov
Publikationsdatum: 01.02.2023
Verlag: Pleiades Publishing
Erschienen in: Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics / Ausgabe 1/2023
Print ISSN: 0005-1055
Elektronische ISSN: 1934-8371
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0005105523010089

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2023

Markov Chains, Law of Total Probability, and Recurrence Relations

Architecture of an Information System for Metallographic Quality Control

Algorithm for Setting Fuzzy Logical Inclusion Systems Based on Statistical Data

Analysis of Developments in Arctic Studies Using Bibliographic and Grant Databases

About Representation and Evaluation of the Scientific Data, Numerical and Non-Numerical Nature in the Properties of Materials Research

Scientometric Analysis of the Use of the Term “Economic Landscape”