Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Elements for Tailoring a BPM Maturity Model to Simplify its Use Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Artifact-Driven Monitoring for Human-Centric Business Processes with Smart Devices: Assessment and Improvement

verfasst von : Giovanni Meroni, Pierluigi Plebani

Erschienen in: Business Process Management Forum

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Monitoring human-centric business processes requires human operators to manually notify to a BPMS when activities start or end. Even if nowadays smart devices, like smartphones and tablets, are adopted to make the transmission of these notifications easier, such devices usually hold a passive role, being a simple mediator between the BPMS and human operators.
In this paper, we adopt the Internet of Things (IoT) paradigm by envisioning an artifact-driven process monitoring where all the objects interacting with a business process instance can be coupled with a smart device to actively detect when process activities start or end. To support the artifact-driven monitoring, we propose an ontology-based approach to assess and improve the monitorability of a process model.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Events in Business Process Implementation: Early Subscription and Event Buffering
Nächstes Kapitel A Quantitative Study of the Link Between Business Process Management and Digital Innovation
Fußnoten
1
Considerations on how to practically deal with sensor event streams are outside the scope of this paper.
 
2
For the sake of clarity, we applied our architecture to a simple scenario. However, this architecture can also monitor complex multi-party business processes [15].
 
3
The proposed ontologies have been implemented with Protégé [18] and are available at http://​purl.​org/​polimi/​martifact/​sosdr.
 
5
Actually, the Physics Domain ontology uses the name hasUnit to indicate such a property. However, hasUnit has already been used in FIESTA-IoT to indicate the relation between Sensor and Unit. Hence, to avoid ambiguity, we changed the name.
 
Literatur
1.
Agarwal, R., Fernandez, D.G., Elsaleh, T., Gyrard, A., Lanza, J., Sánchez, L., Georgantas, N., Issarny, V.: Unified IoT ontology to enable interoperability and federation of testbeds. In: WF-IoT 2016, pp. 70–75. IEEE Computer Society (2016)
2.
Baresi, L., Meroni, G., Plebani, P.: On handling business process anomalies through artifact-based modeling. In: CAiSE 2016 Forum, pp. 9–16. CEUR-WS.org (2016)
3.
Baumgrass, A., Herzberg, N., Meyer, A., Weske, M.: BPMN extension for business process monitoring. In: EMISA 2014, pp. 85–98. GI (2014)
4.
vanden Broucke, S.K.L.M., Caron, F., Lismont, J., Vanthienen, J., Baesens, B.: On the gap between reality and registration: a business event analysis classification framework. Inf. Technol. Manag. 17(4), 393–410 (2016)CrossRef
5.
6.
Compton, M., et al.: The SSN ontology of the W3C semantic sensor network incubator group. J. Web Semant. 17, 25–32 (2012)CrossRef
7.
Eid-Sabbagh, R.-H., Hewelt, M., Meyer, A., Weske, M.: Deriving business process data architecturesfrom process model collections. In: Basu, S., Pautasso, C., Zhang, L., Fu, X. (eds.) ICSOC 2013. LNCS, vol. 8274, pp. 533–540. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.​1007/​978-3-642-45005-1_​43 CrossRef
8.
Eshuis, R., Gorp, P.: Synthesizing object life cycles from business process models. In: Atzeni, P., Cheung, D., Ram, S. (eds.) ER 2012. LNCS, vol. 7532, pp. 307–320. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.​1007/​978-3-642-34002-4_​24 CrossRef
9.
Gnimpieba, Z.D.R., Nait-Sidi-Moh, A., Durand, D., Fortin, J.: Using Internet of Things technologies for a collaborative supply chain: application to tracking of pallets and containers. Procedia Comput. Sci. 56, 550–557 (2015)CrossRef
10.
Guceglioglu, A.S., Demirors, O.: A process based model for measuring process quality attributes. In: Richardson, I., Abrahamsson, P., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2005. LNCS, vol. 3792, pp. 118–129. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). doi:10.​1007/​11586012_​12 CrossRef
11.
Gyrard, A., Datta, S.K., Bonnet, C., Boudaoud, K.: Cross-domain Internet of Things application development: M3 framework and evaluation. In: FiCloud 2015, pp. 9–16. IEEE Computer Society (2015)
12.
Hachem, S., Teixeira, T., Issarny, V.: Ontologies for the Internet of Things. In: MDS 2011, pp. 3:1–3:6. ACM (2011)
13.
Hull, R., et al.: Introducing the guard-stage-milestone approach for specifying business entity lifecycles. In: Bravetti, M., Bultan, T. (eds.) WS-FM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6551, pp. 1–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.​1007/​978-3-642-19589-1_​1 CrossRef
14.
Ly, L.T., Maggi, F.M., Montali, M., Rinderle-Ma, S., van der Aalst, W.M.: Compliance monitoring in business processes: functionalities, application, and tool-support. Inf. Syst. 54, 209–234 (2015)CrossRef
15.
Meroni, G., Di Ciccio, C., Mendling, J.: Artifact-driven process monitoring: dynamically binding real-world objects to running processes. In: Proceedings of the Forum and Doctoral Consortium Papers Presented at the 29th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, CAiSE 2017, Essen, Germany, June 12-16, pp. 105–112 (2017). http://​dblp2.​uni-trier.​de/​rec/​bibtex/​conf/​caise/​MeroniCM17
16.
Meyer, A., Pufahl, L., Fahland, D., Weske, M.: Modeling and enacting complex data dependencies in business processes. In: Daniel, F., Wang, J., Weber, B. (eds.) BPM 2013. LNCS, vol. 8094, pp. 171–186. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.​1007/​978-3-642-40176-3_​14 CrossRef
17.
Miorandi, D., Sicari, S., Pellegrini, F.D., Chlamtac, I.: Internet of Things: vision, applications and research challenges. Ad Hoc Netw. 10(7), 1497–1516 (2012)CrossRef
18.
Musen, M.A.: The protégé project: a look back and a look forward. AI Matters 1(4), 4–12 (2015)CrossRef
19.
Nambi, S., Sarkar, C., Prasad, R.V., Biswas, A.R.: A unified semantic knowledge base for IoT. In: WF-IoT 2014, pp. 575–580. IEEE Computer Society (2014)
20.
Uschold, M., Gruninger, M.: Ontologies: principles, methods and applications. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 11(2), 93–136 (1996)CrossRef
21.
Wang, W., De, S., Tönjes, R., Reetz, E.S., Moessner, K.: A comprehensive ontology for knowledge representation in the Internet of Things. In: TrustCom 2012, pp. 1793–1798. IEEE Computer Society (2012)
22.
23.
Xu, Y., Zhang, C., Ji, Y.: An upper-ontology-based approach for automatic construction of IOT ontology. IJDSN 10, 1–17 (2014)
Metadaten
Titel
Artifact-Driven Monitoring for Human-Centric Business Processes with Smart Devices: Assessment and Improvement
verfasst von
Giovanni Meroni
Pierluigi Plebani
Copyright-Jahr
2017
Buch
Business Process Management Forum

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65014-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-65015-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2017

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65015-9_10

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise