Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics 1/2013

01.09.2013

Bringing Back the Essence of the “S” and “R” to CSR: Understanding the Limitations of the Merchant Trade and the White Man’s Burden

verfasst von: Caterina Francisco Lorenzo-Molo, Zenon Arthur Siloran Udani

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 1/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

One of the fundamental struggles in corporate social responsibility (CSR) is the uncertainty and inherent contradictions that stem from a company being an individual legal entity and a community of persons. The authors contend that CSR has departed from the essence of “social responsibility.” The paper is a commentary on CSR, presented as two frameworks rooted in individualism—The Merchant Trade (the strategic view of CSR) and The White Man’s Burden (self-righteous CSR heroism that assumes the shackles of responsibility normally offered by others). Both, however, contradict the essence of “social responsibility” pitting individual against community, business against society, and economic needs and realities versus ethical reflection. The authors present a model that advocates a more moderate and realistic approach to CSR that goes back to the essence of social responsibility.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Andelman, D. (2008). A shattered peace. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Andelman, D. (2008). A shattered peace. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Arjoon, S. (2000). Virtue theory as a dynamic theory of business. Journal of Business Ethics, 28(2), 159–178.CrossRef Arjoon, S. (2000). Virtue theory as a dynamic theory of business. Journal of Business Ethics, 28(2), 159–178.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Badaracco, J. (2006). Questions of character: Illuminating the heart of leadership. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Badaracco, J. (2006). Questions of character: Illuminating the heart of leadership. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Balch, D., & Armstrong, R. (2009). Ethical marginality: The Icarus syndrome and banality of wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(2), 291–303.CrossRef Balch, D., & Armstrong, R. (2009). Ethical marginality: The Icarus syndrome and banality of wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(2), 291–303.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bay, D., McKeage, K., & McKeage, J. (2008). An historical perspective on the interplay of Christian thought and business ethics. Business & Society, 49(4), 652–676.CrossRef Bay, D., McKeage, K., & McKeage, J. (2008). An historical perspective on the interplay of Christian thought and business ethics. Business & Society, 49(4), 652–676.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bolton, S., Chung-hee Kim, R., & O’Gorman, K. (2011). Review article: Corporate social responsibility as a dynamic internal organizational process: A case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 101, 61–74.CrossRef Bolton, S., Chung-hee Kim, R., & O’Gorman, K. (2011). Review article: Corporate social responsibility as a dynamic internal organizational process: A case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 101, 61–74.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bragues, G. (2006). Seek the good life, not money: The Aristotelian approach to business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 341–357.CrossRef Bragues, G. (2006). Seek the good life, not money: The Aristotelian approach to business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 341–357.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brantlinger, P. (2007). Kipling’s ‘The White Man’s Burden’ and its afterlives. English Literature in Transition, 1800–1920, 50(2), 172–191. Brantlinger, P. (2007). Kipling’s ‘The White Man’s Burden’ and its afterlives. English Literature in Transition, 1800–1920, 50(2), 172–191.
Zurück zum Zitat Broadhurst, A. (2000). Corporations and the ethics of social responsibility: An emerging regime of expansion and compliance. Business Ethics: A European Review, 9(2 April), 86–98.CrossRef Broadhurst, A. (2000). Corporations and the ethics of social responsibility: An emerging regime of expansion and compliance. Business Ethics: A European Review, 9(2 April), 86–98.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brown, R. (2008). Sea change: Santa Barbara and the eruption of corporate social responsibility. Public Relations Review, 34(1), 1–8.CrossRef Brown, R. (2008). Sea change: Santa Barbara and the eruption of corporate social responsibility. Public Relations Review, 34(1), 1–8.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell, J. (2006). Institutional analysis of the paradox of corporate social responsibility. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), 925–938.CrossRef Campbell, J. (2006). Institutional analysis of the paradox of corporate social responsibility. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), 925–938.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. In D. Mele (Ed.), Review article: The firm as a ‘community of persons’: A pillar of humanistic business ethos. Journal of Business Ethics, 106, 89–101. Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. In D. Mele (Ed.), Review article: The firm as a ‘community of persons’: A pillar of humanistic business ethos. Journal of Business Ethics, 106, 89–101.
Zurück zum Zitat Collier, J., & Esteban, R. (2007). Review article: Corporate social responsibility and employee commitment. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16, 19–33.CrossRef Collier, J., & Esteban, R. (2007). Review article: Corporate social responsibility and employee commitment. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16, 19–33.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cornelius, N., Todres, M., Janjuha-Jivraj, S., Woods, A., & Wallace, J. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and the social enterprise. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 355–370.CrossRef Cornelius, N., Todres, M., Janjuha-Jivraj, S., Woods, A., & Wallace, J. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and the social enterprise. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 355–370.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore social responsibility? California Management Review, 2(3), 70–76. Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore social responsibility? California Management Review, 2(3), 70–76.
Zurück zum Zitat Dolwick, J. (2009). ‘The social’ and beyond: Introducing actor-network theory. Journal of Maritime Archaeology, 4, 21–49.CrossRef Dolwick, J. (2009). ‘The social’ and beyond: Introducing actor-network theory. Journal of Maritime Archaeology, 4, 21–49.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Easterly, W. (2006). The White Man’s Burden: Why the west’s efforts to aid the rest have done so much ill and so little good. New York: Penguin Press. Easterly, W. (2006). The White Man’s Burden: Why the west’s efforts to aid the rest have done so much ill and so little good. New York: Penguin Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Fairbrass, J., & Zueva-Owens, A. (2012). Review article: Conceptualising corporate social responsibility: ‘Relational governance’ assessed, augmented, and adapted. Journal of Business Ethics, 105, 321–335.CrossRef Fairbrass, J., & Zueva-Owens, A. (2012). Review article: Conceptualising corporate social responsibility: ‘Relational governance’ assessed, augmented, and adapted. Journal of Business Ethics, 105, 321–335.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman, I., & Hasnaoui, A. (2011). Review article: The meaning of corporate social responsibility: The vision of four nations. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 419–443.CrossRef Freeman, I., & Hasnaoui, A. (2011). Review article: The meaning of corporate social responsibility: The vision of four nations. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 419–443.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gibson, K. (2011). Toward an intermediate position on corporate moral personhood. Journal of Business Ethics, 101, 71–81.CrossRef Gibson, K. (2011). Toward an intermediate position on corporate moral personhood. Journal of Business Ethics, 101, 71–81.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Godfrey, P. C. (2005). Review article: The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30, 777–798.CrossRef Godfrey, P. C. (2005). Review article: The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30, 777–798.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Graafland, J. (2009). Do markets crowd out virtues? Journal of Business Ethics, 91(1), 1–19.CrossRef Graafland, J. (2009). Do markets crowd out virtues? Journal of Business Ethics, 91(1), 1–19.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Greenleaf, R. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press. Greenleaf, R. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Gross, E. (1980). Organizational structure and organizational crime. In G. Geis & E. Stotland (Eds.), White-collar crime: Theory and research, London: Sage Publications. Gross, E. (1980). Organizational structure and organizational crime. In G. Geis & E. Stotland (Eds.), White-collar crime: Theory and research, London: Sage Publications.
Zurück zum Zitat Haake, S. (2002). National business systems and industry-specific competitiveness. Organization Studies, 23(5), 711–736. Haake, S. (2002). National business systems and industry-specific competitiveness. Organization Studies, 23(5), 711–736.
Zurück zum Zitat Hadreas, P. (2002). Aristotle on the vices and virtue of wealth. Journal of Business Ethics, 39, 361–376.CrossRef Hadreas, P. (2002). Aristotle on the vices and virtue of wealth. Journal of Business Ethics, 39, 361–376.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hartman, E. (2007). Socratic questions and Aristotelian answers: A virtue-based approach to business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 313–328.CrossRef Hartman, E. (2007). Socratic questions and Aristotelian answers: A virtue-based approach to business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 313–328.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kallio, T. (2007). Review article: Taboos in corporate social responsibility discourse. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 165–175.CrossRef Kallio, T. (2007). Review article: Taboos in corporate social responsibility discourse. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 165–175.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kelly, M., & White, A. (2009). From corporate responsibility to corporate design. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 33(Spring), 23–27. Kelly, M., & White, A. (2009). From corporate responsibility to corporate design. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 33(Spring), 23–27.
Zurück zum Zitat Klein, T., & Laczniak, G. (2009). Applying Catholic social teachings to ethical issues in marketing. Journal of Macromarketing, 29(3), 233–243.CrossRef Klein, T., & Laczniak, G. (2009). Applying Catholic social teachings to ethical issues in marketing. Journal of Macromarketing, 29(3), 233–243.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kodish, S. (2006). The paradoxes of leadership: The contribution of Aristotle. Leadership, 2(4), 451–468.CrossRef Kodish, S. (2006). The paradoxes of leadership: The contribution of Aristotle. Leadership, 2(4), 451–468.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Krumwiede, D., Hackert, A., Tokle, J., & Vokurka, R. (2012). Review article: The practice of corporate social responsibility in different countries: A study of firms in Canada, Hungary, Italy, Lebanon, Taiwan and the United States. International Journal of Management, 29, 389–402. Krumwiede, D., Hackert, A., Tokle, J., & Vokurka, R. (2012). Review article: The practice of corporate social responsibility in different countries: A study of firms in Canada, Hungary, Italy, Lebanon, Taiwan and the United States. International Journal of Management, 29, 389–402.
Zurück zum Zitat Laczniak, G., & Michie, D. (1979). The social disorder of the broadened concept of Marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 7(3), 214–232.CrossRef Laczniak, G., & Michie, D. (1979). The social disorder of the broadened concept of Marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 7(3), 214–232.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Maccoby, M. (2000). Narcissistic leaders: The incredible pros, the inevitable cons. In S. Kodish (Ed.), The Paradoxes of leadership: The contribution of Aristotle. Leadership, 2(4), 451–468. Maccoby, M. (2000). Narcissistic leaders: The incredible pros, the inevitable cons. In S. Kodish (Ed.), The Paradoxes of leadership: The contribution of Aristotle. Leadership, 2(4), 451–468.
Zurück zum Zitat MacIntyre, A. (1985). After virtue (2nd ed.). London: Duckworth. MacIntyre, A. (1985). After virtue (2nd ed.). London: Duckworth.
Zurück zum Zitat Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). Review article: ‘Implicit’ and ‘explicit’ CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33, 404–424.CrossRef Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). Review article: ‘Implicit’ and ‘explicit’ CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33, 404–424.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McWilliams, A., Siegel, D., & Wright, P. (2006). Review article: Guest editors’ introduction corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1–18.CrossRef McWilliams, A., Siegel, D., & Wright, P. (2006). Review article: Guest editors’ introduction corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1–18.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Melé, D. (2012). Review article: The firm as a ‘community of persons’: A pillar of humanistic business ethos. Journal of Business Ethics, 106, 89–101.CrossRef Melé, D. (2012). Review article: The firm as a ‘community of persons’: A pillar of humanistic business ethos. Journal of Business Ethics, 106, 89–101.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Midttun, A. (2005). Policy making and the role of government: Realigning business, government and civil society. Corporate Governance, 5(3), 159–174. Midttun, A. (2005). Policy making and the role of government: Realigning business, government and civil society. Corporate Governance, 5(3), 159–174.
Zurück zum Zitat Mitchell, H. (1999). Roots of wisdom. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company. Mitchell, H. (1999). Roots of wisdom. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore, G., & Beadle, R. (2006). In search of organizational virtue in business: Agents, goods, practices, institutions and environments. Organization Studies, 27, 369–389.CrossRef Moore, G., & Beadle, R. (2006). In search of organizational virtue in business: Agents, goods, practices, institutions and environments. Organization Studies, 27, 369–389.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Neron, P., & Norman, W. (2008). Citizenship Inc.: Do we really want business to be good corporate citizens. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(1), 1–26.CrossRef Neron, P., & Norman, W. (2008). Citizenship Inc.: Do we really want business to be good corporate citizens. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(1), 1–26.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Polonsky, M., & Wood, G. (2001). Can the overcommercialization of cause-related marketing harm society. Journal of Macromarketing, 21(8), 8–22.CrossRef Polonsky, M., & Wood, G. (2001). Can the overcommercialization of cause-related marketing harm society. Journal of Macromarketing, 21(8), 8–22.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Renouard, C. (2011). Review article: Corporate social responsibility, utilitarianism, and the capabilities approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 85–97.CrossRef Renouard, C. (2011). Review article: Corporate social responsibility, utilitarianism, and the capabilities approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 85–97.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Richter, U. (2010). Review article: Liberal thought in reasoning on CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 625–649.CrossRef Richter, U. (2010). Review article: Liberal thought in reasoning on CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 625–649.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ripken, S., & Fordham, K. (2009). Corporations are people too: A multi-dimensional approach to the corporate personhood problem. Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, 15(1), 97–177. Ripken, S., & Fordham, K. (2009). Corporations are people too: A multi-dimensional approach to the corporate personhood problem. Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, 15(1), 97–177.
Zurück zum Zitat Ron, S., & Surendra, A. (2010). Review article: Corporate social responsibility in Caribbean community: Lessons from Trinidad and Tobago. Advances in Management, 3, 18–23. Ron, S., & Surendra, A. (2010). Review article: Corporate social responsibility in Caribbean community: Lessons from Trinidad and Tobago. Advances in Management, 3, 18–23.
Zurück zum Zitat Sendjaya, S., & Sarros, J. (2002). Servant leadership: Its origin, development, and application in organizations. Journal of Leadership and Organization Studies, 9(2), 57–64.CrossRef Sendjaya, S., & Sarros, J. (2002). Servant leadership: Its origin, development, and application in organizations. Journal of Leadership and Organization Studies, 9(2), 57–64.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shaker, F. (1970). The multinational corporation: The new imperialism? Columbia Journal of World Business, 5(November–December), 80–84. Shaker, F. (1970). The multinational corporation: The new imperialism? Columbia Journal of World Business, 5(November–December), 80–84.
Zurück zum Zitat Solomon, R. (1994). The corporation as community. A reply to Ed Hartman. In D. Melé (Ed.), The firm as a ‘community of persons’: A pillar of humanistic business ethos. Journal of Business Ethics, 106, 89–101. Solomon, R. (1994). The corporation as community. A reply to Ed Hartman. In D. Melé (Ed.), The firm as a ‘community of persons’: A pillar of humanistic business ethos. Journal of Business Ethics, 106, 89–101.
Zurück zum Zitat Solomon, R. (2004). Aristotle, ethics, and business organizations. Organization Studies, 25(6), 1021–1043.CrossRef Solomon, R. (2004). Aristotle, ethics, and business organizations. Organization Studies, 25(6), 1021–1043.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tengblad, S., & Ohlsson, C. (2010). Review article: The framing of corporate social responsibility and the globalization of a national business systems: A longitudinal case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 653–669.CrossRef Tengblad, S., & Ohlsson, C. (2010). Review article: The framing of corporate social responsibility and the globalization of a national business systems: A longitudinal case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 653–669.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, L., & Juslin, H. (2009). Review article: The impact of Chinese culture on corporate social responsibility: The harmony approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 433–451.CrossRef Wang, L., & Juslin, H. (2009). Review article: The impact of Chinese culture on corporate social responsibility: The harmony approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 433–451.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Whitley, R. (2005). How national are business systems? In G. Morgan, R. Whitley & E. Moen (Eds.), Changing capitalisms? (pp. 190–225). Oxford University Press. Whitley, R. (2005). How national are business systems? In G. Morgan, R. Whitley & E. Moen (Eds.), Changing capitalisms? (pp. 190–225). Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Windsor, D. (2006). Review article: Corporate social responsibility: Three key approaches. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 93–114.CrossRef Windsor, D. (2006). Review article: Corporate social responsibility: Three key approaches. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 93–114.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wolff, R. (1970). Economics of imperialism, modern imperialism: The view from the metropolis. American Economic Review, 60(2), 225–230. Wolff, R. (1970). Economics of imperialism, modern imperialism: The view from the metropolis. American Economic Review, 60(2), 225–230.
Metadaten
Titel
Bringing Back the Essence of the “S” and “R” to CSR: Understanding the Limitations of the Merchant Trade and the White Man’s Burden
verfasst von
Caterina Francisco Lorenzo-Molo
Zenon Arthur Siloran Udani
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2013
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1513-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2013

Journal of Business Ethics 1/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner