Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Empirical Economics 4/2018

01.09.2017

Consumer valuation of energy-saving features of residential air conditioners with hedonic and choice models

verfasst von: Shigeru Matsumoto

Erschienen in: Empirical Economics | Ausgabe 4/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The promotion of energy-efficient appliances is necessary to reduce the energetic and environmental burden of the household sector. However, many studies have reported that a typical consumer underestimates the benefits of energy-saving investment on the purchase of household electric appliances. To analyze this energy-efficiency-gap problem, many scholars have estimated implicit discount rates that consumers use for energy-consuming durables. Although both hedonic and choice models have been used in previous studies, a comparison between the two models has not yet been made. This study uses point-of-sale data about Japanese residential air conditioners and estimates implicit discount rates with both hedonic and choice models. Both models demonstrate that a typical consumer underinvests in energy efficiency. Although choice models generally estimate a lower implicit discount rate than hedonic models, the latter models estimate the values of other product characteristics more consistently than choice models.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
By contrast, some studies that analyzed the fuel economy of vehicles reported that consumers overinvested in energy saving (Greene 2010).
 
2
In addition, engineering and stated preference models are used for the estimation of implicit discount rates. In engineering models, the installation costs of energy-efficient technologies are compared and the value of the resulting energy-efficient investment is estimated. In stated preference models, surveys are conducted to elicit the willingness to pay (WTP) for energy-efficient investment.
 
3
Although perfect competition is assumed in Rosen’s (1974) article, Bajari and Benkard (2004, 2005) show that there always exists a function mapping the characteristics to prices, regardless of the form of competition and even if there are a small number of products.
 
4
For instance, the Energy Star label was introduced in the USA in 1992.
 
5
The “tatami mat” is used as a measurement unit for traditional Japanese rooms. The size of one tatami mat is 1.74 m by 0.87 m. Room sizes are standardized according to the number of tatami mats used.
 
6
Different consumers may rely on different pieces of energy information. Houde (2014) focuses on the refrigerator market and compares consumers’ responses to electricity costs with those to the Energy Star label. He finds that richer and smaller households respond to electricity costs but not so much to the label. He estimates that the value of energy information is around 12–17 US dollars per refrigerator sold.
 
7
The removal of observations with zero sales is likely to bias price coefficient estimates in a choice model analysis. However, AC models with zero sales are old models and their sales are recoded infrequently. For instance, we observe single-unit sales after observing zero sales for 3 months. It is difficult to handle observations with zero sales. The factions of AC models with zero sales are only about 12% in all AC classes, and AC models with even single-unit sales are included. We believe that the bias caused by their removal is not so serious. We thank the journal referee for pointing out this problem.
 
8
If the rebate was provided for the purchase of a specific AC model, we subtract it from the sales price and use the acquisition price that consumers actually paid in the following analysis.
 
9
We used the electricity price of Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings, Inc. (TEPCO), which uses block pricing. We used the second-stage rate, 21.04 yen/kW h, which is the most popular stage among general households.
 
10
Tasaki (2006) examines the usage period of ACs brought to electronics retail stores for recycling purposes and reported that more than 60% of the ACs were used for at least 8 years.
 
11
Households may not use an AC under this condition. We conduct sensitivity analysis to examine whether the relationship between two models is affected by the assumption of the intensity of AC use.
 
12
Only a few previous studies conducted model-level analyses. For instance, Tsvetanov and Segerson (2014) compare refrigerators with Energy Star labels and those without them. Hausman (1979) includes information on only the size (BTU) and energy efficiency ratio (EER).
 
13
See Cockburn and Anis (1998) for further discussion.
 
14
Cropper et al. (1988) recommend the use of simple functional models if the omitted variable problem exists. Conversely, Kuminoff et al. (2010) recommend the use of flexible functional models such as a Box-Cox model when special and/or time fixed effects are included. The application of flexible functional models, however, makes the model comparison difficult. Thus, we use a simple functional model in this study.
 
15
These authors argue that the attributes attached to expensive models with limited numbers of sales are undervalued when the number of sales is used as a weighting variable.
 
16
We estimated Eq. 6 by including the share variable as well and obtained very similar results, as shown in Table 3.
 
17
Monthly fixed effects are not included in the choice model analysis as we compare the product choice between sampling periods.
 
18
Following the suggestion of the journal referee, we conducted sensitivity analyses. Although the implicit discount rates change with the assumptions about the future electricity cost, efficiency loss from depreciation, or usage period, the relationship between hedonic and choice models remains the same; that is, choice models estimate a lower implicit discount rate than hedonic models.
 
19
If consumers drive less, they can sell their used vehicles at higher prices at used car markets. In contrast, consumers are less likely to resell used ACs. Thus, heterogeneity in AC usage will have a greater effect on the price differentials of AC models, as original consumers are unlikely to consider resale value. Following the referees’ suggestion, we added the sensitivity analysis.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Arthur D. Little, Inc. (1984) Measuring the impact of residential conservation programs: An econometric analysis of utility data, Volume III. Final Report for RP1587, Electric Power Research Institute, California Arthur D. Little, Inc. (1984) Measuring the impact of residential conservation programs: An econometric analysis of utility data, Volume III. Final Report for RP1587, Electric Power Research Institute, California
Zurück zum Zitat Bajari P, Benkard CL (2005) Demand estimation with heterogeneous consumers and unobserved product characteristics: a hedonic approach. J Polit Econ 113:1239–1276. doi:10.1086/498586 CrossRef Bajari P, Benkard CL (2005) Demand estimation with heterogeneous consumers and unobserved product characteristics: a hedonic approach. J Polit Econ 113:1239–1276. doi:10.​1086/​498586 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Berkovec J, Hausman J, Rust J (1983) Heating system and appliance choice. Report no. MIT-EL 83-004WP. MIT Energy Laboratory, Cambridge, MA Berkovec J, Hausman J, Rust J (1983) Heating system and appliance choice. Report no. MIT-EL 83-004WP. MIT Energy Laboratory, Cambridge, MA
Zurück zum Zitat Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Charles River Associates, Inc. (1988) Investments in conservation measures, vol 1, Implicit discount rates in residential customer choices, EPRI EM-5587. Electric Power Research Institute, California Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Charles River Associates, Inc. (1988) Investments in conservation measures, vol 1, Implicit discount rates in residential customer choices, EPRI EM-5587. Electric Power Research Institute, California
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen F, Glachant M, Söderberg M (2014) The impact of energy prices on energy efficiency: evidence from the UK refrigerator market. In: TIGER Forum 2014: ninth conference on energy industry at a crossroads: preparing the low carbon future, Toulouse, France, June 5–6 Cohen F, Glachant M, Söderberg M (2014) The impact of energy prices on energy efficiency: evidence from the UK refrigerator market. In: TIGER Forum 2014: ninth conference on energy industry at a crossroads: preparing the low carbon future, Toulouse, France, June 5–6
Zurück zum Zitat Cole H, Fuller R (1980) Residential energy decision-making: An overview with emphasis on individual discount rates and responsiveness to household income and prices. Report, Hittman Associates Inc, Columbia, MD Cole H, Fuller R (1980) Residential energy decision-making: An overview with emphasis on individual discount rates and responsiveness to household income and prices. Report, Hittman Associates Inc, Columbia, MD
Zurück zum Zitat Dubin JA (1985) Consumer durable choice and the demand for electricity. North-Holland Publishing Co., New York, Amsterdam Dubin JA (1985) Consumer durable choice and the demand for electricity. North-Holland Publishing Co., New York, Amsterdam
Zurück zum Zitat Dubin JA (1992) Market barriers to conservation: are implicit discount rates too high? Working paper, no. 802. California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences Dubin JA (1992) Market barriers to conservation: are implicit discount rates too high? Working paper, no. 802. California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences
Zurück zum Zitat Fan Q, Rubin J (2009) Two-stage hedonic price model for light-duty vehicles: consumers’ valuation of automotive fuel economy in maine. TRR J 2157:119–128. doi:10.3141/2157-15 CrossRef Fan Q, Rubin J (2009) Two-stage hedonic price model for light-duty vehicles: consumers’ valuation of automotive fuel economy in maine. TRR J 2157:119–128. doi:10.​3141/​2157-15 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fifer DPC, Bunn NP (2009) Assessing consumer valuation on fuel economy in auto markets. Honors thesis, Department of Economics, Due University, Durham, North Carolina Fifer DPC, Bunn NP (2009) Assessing consumer valuation on fuel economy in auto markets. Honors thesis, Department of Economics, Due University, Durham, North Carolina
Zurück zum Zitat Gately D (1980) Individual discount rates and the purchase and utilization of energy-using durables: comment. Bell J Econ 11:373–374. doi:10.2307/3003318 CrossRef Gately D (1980) Individual discount rates and the purchase and utilization of energy-using durables: comment. Bell J Econ 11:373–374. doi:10.​2307/​3003318 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Goett A (1978) Appliance fuel choice: an application of discrete multivariate analysis. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Economics, University of California at Davis Goett A (1978) Appliance fuel choice: an application of discrete multivariate analysis. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Economics, University of California at Davis
Zurück zum Zitat Goett A (1983) Household appliance choice: revision of REEP behavioral models. Final report for research project 1918-1. Electric Power Research Institute, California Goett A (1983) Household appliance choice: revision of REEP behavioral models. Final report for research project 1918-1. Electric Power Research Institute, California
Zurück zum Zitat Goett A, McFadden D (1982) Residential energy-use planning system (REEPS). Report EA-2512. Electric Power Research Institute, California Goett A, McFadden D (1982) Residential energy-use planning system (REEPS). Report EA-2512. Electric Power Research Institute, California
Zurück zum Zitat Greene DL (2010) How consumers value fuel economy: a literature review. EPA-420-R-10-008. United States Environmental Protection Agency Greene DL (2010) How consumers value fuel economy: a literature review. EPA-420-R-10-008. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Zurück zum Zitat Hausman JA (1997) Valuing the effect of regulation on new services in telecommunications. Brookings Pap Econ Act 28:1–54 Hausman JA (1997) Valuing the effect of regulation on new services in telecommunications. Brookings Pap Econ Act 28:1–54
Zurück zum Zitat Houde S (2014) How consumers respond to environmental certification and the value of energy information. NBER working paper no. 20019 Houde S (2014) How consumers respond to environmental certification and the value of energy information. NBER working paper no. 20019
Zurück zum Zitat Lin W, Hirst E, Cohn S (1976) Fuel choice in the household sector. Report no. ORNL/CON-2. Oak Ridge National Laboratory Lin W, Hirst E, Cohn S (1976) Fuel choice in the household sector. Report no. ORNL/CON-2. Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Zurück zum Zitat McManus W (2007) The link between gasoline prices and vehicle sales: economic theory trumps conventional Detroit wisdom. Bus Econ 42:54–60. doi:10.2145/20070106 CrossRef McManus W (2007) The link between gasoline prices and vehicle sales: economic theory trumps conventional Detroit wisdom. Bus Econ 42:54–60. doi:10.​2145/​20070106 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Morita M, Matsumoto S, Tasaki T (2014) Effect of an energy rebate program on implicit discount rate: a hedonic analysis of the Japanese Eco Point Program. Rev Environ Econ Policy Stud 7:24–36 (in Japanese) Morita M, Matsumoto S, Tasaki T (2014) Effect of an energy rebate program on implicit discount rate: a hedonic analysis of the Japanese Eco Point Program. Rev Environ Econ Policy Stud 7:24–36 (in Japanese)
Zurück zum Zitat Sanstad AH, Hanemann WM, Auffhammer M (2006) End-use energy efficiency in a ‘post-carbon’ California economy: policy issues and research frontiers. In: Hanemann MW, Farrell AE (eds) Managing greenhouse gas emissions in California. The California Climate Change Center, University of California, Berkeley Sanstad AH, Hanemann WM, Auffhammer M (2006) End-use energy efficiency in a ‘post-carbon’ California economy: policy issues and research frontiers. In: Hanemann MW, Farrell AE (eds) Managing greenhouse gas emissions in California. The California Climate Change Center, University of California, Berkeley
Zurück zum Zitat Silver M (2002) The use of weights in hedonic regressions: the measurement of quality adjusted price changes. Cardiff Business School, Cardiff University, Mimeograph Silver M (2002) The use of weights in hedonic regressions: the measurement of quality adjusted price changes. Cardiff Business School, Cardiff University, Mimeograph
Zurück zum Zitat Tsvetanov T, Segerson K (2014) The welfare effects of energy efficiency standards when choice sets matter. J Assoc Environ Resour Econ 1:233–271. doi:10.1086/676036 CrossRef Tsvetanov T, Segerson K (2014) The welfare effects of energy efficiency standards when choice sets matter. J Assoc Environ Resour Econ 1:233–271. doi:10.​1086/​676036 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Veblen T (1899) Theory of the leisure class. Oxford University Press, Oxford Veblen T (1899) Theory of the leisure class. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Metadaten
Titel
Consumer valuation of energy-saving features of residential air conditioners with hedonic and choice models
verfasst von
Shigeru Matsumoto
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Empirical Economics / Ausgabe 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0377-7332
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-8921
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-017-1327-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2018

Empirical Economics 4/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner