Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery
Erschienen in: Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 6/2021

07.05.2020 | Original Article

Dependence of pyrolysis temperature and lignocellulosic physical-chemical properties of biochar on its wettability

verfasst von: Luiza Usevičiūtė, Edita Baltrėnaitė-Gedienė

Erschienen in: Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery | Ausgabe 6/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Nowadays, high attention is paid to the knowledge on wettability of biochar, which is still very complicated, since it is acknowledged that it can depend either on primary feedstock, pyrolysis conditions or on environmental factors. Until now, it is known that the main factor responsible for the production of hydrophobic biochar is aliphatic functional groups forming tar compounds which vapour only at a high temperature. High-temperature (> 500 °C) biochar types are considered as hydrophilic due to the effect of the release of pores from the tars. However, it is still not known what the relation between wettability of biochar and other physical-chemical properties of it is and, if it is possible, is there a need to predict wettability of biochar based on other available properties. The article focuses main attention on the determination of physical-chemical properties of biochar made of five different lignocellulosic feedstocks depending on the pyrolysis temperature (300–700 °C) and their relation with the water holding capacity and wettability of biochar using the multiple regression analysis. The results showed that 54% of variation of biochar wettability could be predicted by its average pore size and 77% of variation of biochar water holding capacity could be predicted according to its ash content. Relation of wettability of biochar with its average pore size can be explained by the physical capacity of biochar to adsorb water on its surface and internal pores as well as retention of water among its particles due to capillary forces.
Vorheriger Artikel Optimization of protein extraction from bamboo shoots and processing wastes using deep eutectic solvents in a biorefinery approach
Nächster Artikel Response surface optimization of biodiesel synthesis over a novel biochar-based heterogeneous catalyst from cultivated (Musa sapientum) banana peels

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Ahmed MB, Zhou JL, Ngo HH, Guo W, Johir MAH, Sornalingam K, Rahman MS (2017) Chloramphenicol interaction with functionalized biochar in water: sorptive mechanism, molecular imprinting effect and repeatable application. Sci Total Environ 609:885–895
2.
Ahmed MB, Zhou JL, Ngo HH, Guo W, Chen M (2016) Progress in the preparation and application of modified biochar for improved contaminant removal from water and wastewater. Bioresour Technol 214:836–851
3.
Angin D, Senzor S (2014) Effect of pyrolysis temperature on chemical and surface properties of biochar of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Int J Phytoremediation 16(7–8):684–693
4.
ASTM (2005) D2216–98. Standart test method for laboratory determination of water content of soil and rock by mass. ASTM, West Conshohocken
5.
Baltrėnaitė E, Baltrėnas P, Bhatnagar A, Vilppo T, Selenius M, Koistinen A, Dahl M, Penttinen O-P (2017) A multicomponent approach to using waste-derived biochar in biofiltration: a case study based on dissimilar types of waste. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 119:565–576
6.
Batista EMCC, Shultz J, Matos TTS, Fornari MR, Ferreira TM, Szpoganicz B, de Freitas RA, Mangrich AS (2018) Effect of surface and porosity of biochar on water holding capacity aiming indirectly at preservation of the Amazon biome. Sci Rep 8(1):10677
7.
Bauters TWJ, Steenhuis TSS, DiCarlo DA, Nieber JL, Dekker LW, Ritsema CJ, Parlange J-Y, Haverkamp R (2000) Physics of water reppelent soils. J Hydrol 231–232:233–243
8.
Brewer CE (2012) Biochar characterization and engineering. In: Doctoral dissertation. Iowa State University, pp 55–57
9.
Bubici S, Korb J-P, Kucerik J, Conte P (2016) Evaluation of the surface affinity of water in three biochars using fast field cycling NMR relaxometry. Magn Reson Chem 54:365–370
10.
Cheng C-H, Lehmann J, Thies JE, Burton SD, Engelhard MH (2006) Oxidation of the black carbon by biotic and abiotic processes. Org Geochem 37(11):1477–1488
11.
Chia CH, Gong B, Joseph SD, Marjo C, Munroe P, Rich AM (2012) Imaging of mineral-enriched biochar by FTIR, Raman and SEM-EDX. Vib Spectrosc 62:248–257
12.
Chun Y, Sheng G, Chiou T, Xing B (2004) Compositions and sorptive properties of crop residue-derived chars. Environ Sci Technol 38:4649–4655
13.
Conz RF, Abbruzzini TF, de Andrade CA, Milori DMBP, Cerri CEP (2017) Effect of pyrolysis temperature and feedstock type on agricultural properties and stability of biochars. Agric Sci 8:914–933
14.
Das O, Sarmah AK (2015) The love-hate relationship of pyrolysis biochar and water: a perspective. Sci Total Environ 512–513:682–685
15.
16.
de Figueredo NA, de Costa LM, Melo LCA, Siebeneichlerd EA, Tronto J (2017) Characterization of biochars from different sources and evaluation of release of nutrients and contaminants. Rev Ciênc Agron 48(3):395–403
17.
Denyes MJ, Parisien MA, Rutter A, Zeeb BA (2014) Physical, chemical and biological characterization of six biochars produced for the remediation of contaminated sites. J Vis Exp 93:52183
18.
19.
Duwiejuah AB, Cobbina SJ, Bakobie N (2017) Review of eco-friendly biochar used in the removal of trace metals on aqueous phases. Int J Environ Bioremed Biodegr 5(2):27–40
20.
21.
Elnour AY, Alghyamah AA, Shaikh HM, Poulose AM, Al-Zahrani SM, Anis A, Al-Wablel MI (2019) Effect of pyrolysis temperature on biochar microstructural evolution, physicochemical characteristics, and its influence on biochar/polypropylene composites. Appl Sci 9(6):1149
22.
Fuschs M, Garcia-Perez M, Sjoding D (2012) Biochar: background and early steps to market development. Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia, p 9
23.
24.
Gray M, Johnson MG, Dragila MI, Kleber M (2014) Water uptake in biochars: the roles of porosity and hydrophobicity. Biomass Bioenergy 61:196–205
25.
Hallin IL, Douglas P, Doerr SH, Bryant R (2015) The effect of addition of a wettable biochar on soil water repellency. Eur J Soil Sci 66:1063–1073
26.
Inyang M, Dickenson E (2015) The potential role of biochar in the removal of organic and microbial contaminants from potable and reuse water: a review. Chemosphere 134:232–240
27.
Jeffery S, Meinders MBJ, Stoof CR, Bezemer TM, van de Voorde TFJ, Mommer L, van Groenigen JW (2015) Biochar application does not improve the soil hydrological function of a sandy soil. Geoderma 251–252:47–54
28.
Jindo K, Mizumoto H, Sawada Y, Sanchez-Monedero MA, Sonoki T (2014) Physical and chemical characterization of biochars derived from different agricultural residues. Biogeosciences 11:6613–6621
29.
Keiluweit M, Kleber M, Sparrow MA, Simoneit BRT, Prahl FG (2012) Solvent-extractable polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in biochar: influence of pyrolysis temperature and feedstock. Environ Sci Technol 46(17):9333–9341
30.
Keiluweit M, Nico PS, Johnson MG, Kleber M (2010) Dynamic molecular structure of plant biomass-derived black carbon (biochar). Environ Sci Technol 44:1247–1253
31.
Khanmohammadi Z, Afyuni M, Mosaddeghi MR (2015) Effect of pyrolysis temperature on chemical and physical properties of sewage sludge biochar. Waste Manag Res 33(3):275–83
32.
Kinney TJ, Masiello CA, Dugan B, Hockaday WC, Dean MR, Zygourakis K, Barnes RT (2012) Hydrologic properties of biochars produced at different temperatures. Biomass Bioenergy 41:34–43
33.
Li N, Ma X, Zha Q, Kim K, Chen Y (2011) Maximizing the number of oxygen-containing functional groups on activated carbon by using ammonium persulfate and improving the temperature-programmed desorption characterization of carboj surface chemistry. Carbon 49(15):5002–5013
34.
35.
Ma W, Li H, Yao X, Li L, Shih K (2015) Preparation of hydrophilic avtivated carbon through alkaline hydrolysis of ester for effective water-vapor adsorption. Sep Sci Technol 51(2):193–201
36.
37.
Mary GS, Sugumaran P, Niveditha S, Ramalakshmi B, Ravichandran P, Seshadri S (2016) Porduction, characterization and evaluation of biochar from pod (Pisum sativum), leaf (Brassica oleracea) and peel (Citrus sinensis) wastes. Int J Recycl Org Waste 5:43–53
38.
Mollinedo J, Schumacher TE, Chintala R (2015) Influence of feedstocks and pyrolysis on biochar‘s capacity to modify soil water retention characteristics. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 114:100–108
39.
Moreno JJM, Pol AP, Abad AS, Blasco BC (2013) Using the R-MAPE index as a resistant measure of forecast accuracy. Psicothema 25(4):500–506
40.
Naeem MA, Khalid M, Arshad M, Ahmad R (2014) Yield and nutrient composition of biochar produced from different feedstocks at varying pyrolytic temperatures. Pak J Agric Sci 51(1):75–82
41.
Narzari R, Bordoloi N, Sarma B (2017) Fabrication of biochars obtained from valorization of biowaste and evaluation of its physichochemical properties. Bioresour Technol 242:324–328
42.
Nwajiaku IM, Olanrewaju JS, Sato K, Tokunari T, Kitano S, Masunaga T (2018) Changein nutrient composition of biochar from rice husk and sugarcane bagasse at varying pyrolytic temperatures. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agric 7(4):269–276
43.
Oliveira FR, Patel AK, Jaisi DP, Adhikari S, Lu H, Khanal SK (2017) Environmental application of biochar: current status and perspectives. Bioresour Technol 246:110–122
44.
Patle GT, Sikar TT, Rawat KS, Singh SK (2017) Estimation of infiltration rate from soil properties using regression model for cultivated land. Geol Ecol Landscapes 3(1):1–13
45.
Pimchuai A, Dutta A, Basu P (2010) Torrefaction of agriculture residue to enhance combustible properties. Energy Fuels 24:4638–4645
46.
Pituello C, Francioso O, Simonetti G, Pisi A (2014) Characterization of chemical-physical, structural and morphological properties of biochars from biowastes produced at different temperatures. J Soils Sediments 15(4):792–804
47.
48.
49.
Rasa K, Heikkinen J, Hannula M, Arstila K, Kulju S, Hyvaluoma J (2018) How and why does willow biochar increase a clay soil water retention capacity? Biomass Bioenergy 119:346–353
50.
Ronewicz K, Kluskas J, Heda L, Kardas D (2016) Chemical and physical properties of pine wood during pyrolysis. Drv Ind 68(1):29–36
51.
52.
Shelukindo HB, Semu E, Msanya BM, Singh BR, Munishi PKT (2014) Predictor variables for soil organic carbon contents in the Miombo woodlands ecosystem of Kitonga forest reserve, Tanzania. Int J Agric Sci 4(7):222–231
53.
Sigmund G, Huffer T, Hofmann T, Kah M (2017) Biochar total surface area and total pore volume determined by N2 and CO2 physisorption are strongly influenced by degassing temperature. Sci Total Environ 580:770–775
54.
Smetanova A, Dotterweich D, Ulrich U, Fohrer N (2013) Influence of biochar and terra preta substrates on wettability and erodibility of soild. Z Geomorphologie 57:111–134
55.
Spokas KA, Novak JM, Masiello CA, Johnson MG, Colosky EC, Ippolito JA, Trigo C (2014) Physical disintegration of biochar: an overlooked process. Environ Sci Technol Lett 1(8):326–332
56.
Spokas KA, Novak JM, Stewart CE, Cantrell KB, Uchimiya M, DuSaire MG, Ro KS (2011) Qualitative analysis of volatile organic compounds on biochar. Chemosphere 85(5):869–882
57.
Suarez-Hernandez L, Ardila- A, Alba N, Barrera R (2017) Morphological and physicochemical characterization of biochar produced by gasification of selected forestry species. Rev Fac Ingenieria 26(46):123–130
58.
Subedi R, Bertora C, Zavattaro L, Grignani C (2017) Crop response to soils amended with biochar: expected benefits and unintended risks. Ital J Agron 12:794
59.
Suliman WSO (2015) Toward an understanding of the role of biochar as an agro-environmental tool: potential for control water release, bacterial retention, and greenhouse gas emissions, dissertation of philosophy. Washington State university, pp 49–53
60.
Suliman W, Harsh JB, Abu-Lail NI, Fortuna A-M, Dallmeyer I, Garcia-Perez M (2017) The role of biochar porosity and surface functionality in augmenting hydrologic properties of a sandy soil. Sci Total Environ 574:139–147
61.
Suliman W, Harsh JB, Abu-Lail NI, Fortuna A-M, Dallmeyer I, Garcia-Perez M (2016) Modification of biochar surface by air oxidation: role of pyrolysis temperature. Biomass Bioenergy 85:1–11
62.
Sun X, Shan R, Li X, Pan J, Liu X, Deng R, Song J (2017) Characterization of 60 types of Chinese biomass waste and resultant biochars in terms of their candidacy for soil spplication. GCB Bioenergy 9:1423–1435
63.
Usman ARA, Ahmad M, El-Mahrouky M, Al-Omran A, Sik Ok Y, Sallam AS, El-Naggar AH, Al-Wabel M (2015) Chemically modified biochar produced from conocarpus waste increases NO3 removal from aqueous solutions. Environ Geochem Health 38(2):511–521
64.
Valipour NM, Birjandi FC, Sargolzaei J (2014) Super-non-wettable surfaces: a review. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 448:93–106
65.
Vikrant K, Kim K-H, Ok YS, Tsang DCW, Tsang YF, Giri BS, Singh RS (2018) Engineered/designer biochar for the removal of phosphate in water and wastewater. Sci Total Environ 616–617:1242–1260
66.
Viswanathan B, Neel IN, Varadarajan TK (2009) Methods of activation and specific applications of carbon materials, p 160
67.
Weber K, Quicker P (2018) Properties of biochar. Fuel 217:240–261
68.
Wiedner K, Rumpel C, Steiner C, Pozzi A, Maas R, Glaser B (2013) Chemical evaluation of chars produced by thermochemical conversion (gasification, pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization) of agro-industrial biomass on a commercial scale. Biomass Bioenergy 59:264–278
69.
Woschnagg E, Cipan J (2004) Evaluating forecast accuracy, 406347 Okonometrische Prognose. University of Vienna, Austria, Department of Economics, pp 13–14
70.
Xiao F, Pignatello JJ (2016) Effects of post-pyrolysis air oxidation of biomass chars on adsorption of neutral and ionizable compounds. Environ Sci Technol 50(12):6276–6283
71.
Xiao Q, Zhu L-X, Shen Y-F, Li S-Q (2016) Sensitivity of soil water retention and availability to biochar addition in rainfed semi-arid farmland during a three-year field experiment. Field Crop Res 196:284–293
72.
Yakout SM (2015) Monitoring the changes of chemical properties of rice straw-derived biochars modified by different oxidizing agents and their adsorptive performance for organics. Bioremed J 19(2):171–182MathSciNet
73.
Yang H, Sheng K (2012) Characterization of biochar properties affected by different pyrolysis temperature using visible-near-infrared spectroscopy. Int Scholar Res Network Spectrosc 2012:7
74.
Yi, S. C. 2018. The impact of biochar surface properties on sand and on sandy loam regarding water repellency, water retention, and gas transmissivity, dissertation of philosophy in civil engineering
75.
Yu O-Y, Harper M, Hoepfl M, Domermuth D (2017) Characterization of biochar and its effects on the water holding capacity of loamy sand soil: comparison of hemlock biochar and switchblade grass biochar characteristics. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 36(5). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​ep.​12592
76.
Yu O-Y, Raichle B, Sink S (2013) Impact of biochar on the water holding capacity of loamy sand soil. Int J Energy Environ Eng 4:44
77.
Yuan JH, Xu RK, Zhang H (2011) The forms of alkalis in the biochar produced from crop residues at different temperatures. Bioresour Technol 102(3):3488–3497
78.
Zhang J, You C (2013) Water holding capacity and absorption properties of wood shars. Energy Fuel 27(5):2643–2648
79.
Zhang Z, Zhu Z, Shen B, Liu L (2019) Insights into biochar and hydrochar production and applications: a review. Energy 171:581–598
80.
Zhao S-X, Ta N, Wang X-D (2017) Effect of temperature on the structural and physicochemical properties of biochar with apple tree branches as feedstock material. Energies 10(9):1293
81.
Zornoza R, Moreno-Barriga JA, Acosta MA, Munoz AF (2016) Stability, nutrient availability and hydrophobicity of biochars derived from manure, crop residues, and municipal solid waste for their use as soil amendments. Chemosphere 144:122–130
Metadaten
Titel
Dependence of pyrolysis temperature and lignocellulosic physical-chemical properties of biochar on its wettability
verfasst von
Luiza Usevičiūtė
Edita Baltrėnaitė-Gedienė
Publikationsdatum
07.05.2020
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery / Ausgabe 6/2021
Print ISSN: 2190-6815
Elektronische ISSN: 2190-6823
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00711-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2021

Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 6/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Original Article

Enzymatic conversion of treated oil palm empty fruit bunches fiber into fermentable sugars: optimization of solid and protein loadings and surfactant effects

Review Article

Valorization of post-extraction biomass residues as carriers of bioavailable micronutrients for plants and livestock

Original Article

Mining the prospective of Candida tropicalis YES3 in Napier biomass saccharification

Original Article

Fischer-Tropsch products from biomass-derived syngas and renewable hydrogen

Original Article

Platform and fine chemicals from woody biomass: demonstration and assessment of a novel biorefinery

Original Article

Adsorptive behavior of free and immobilized Chlorella pyrenoidosa for decolorization