Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Ask Dr. Discovery is an NSF-funded study addressing the need for ongoing, large-scale museum evaluation while investigating new ways to encourage museum visitors to engage deeply with museum content. To realize these aims, we are developing and implementing a mobile app with two parts: (1) a front-end virtual scientist called Dr. Discovery (Dr. D) for use by museum visitors that doubles as an unobtrusive data-gatherer and (2) a back-end analytics portal to be mined by museum staff, evaluators, and researchers. With the aid of our museum partners, we are developing this app to function as a platform for STEM informal education, research, and data-driven decision-making by museum staff. The Dr. D app has been designed to engage museum visitors, while connecting with an analytic system to make sense, in real time, of the large amounts of data produced by visitors’ use of the app. The analytic system helps museum staff access and interpret ongoing evaluation data, regardless of experience or museum resources, informing the practice of professionals at the front lines of informal STEM education in diverse communities. The design of the Dr. D app incorporates open-source analytic tools that make the gathering and interpretation of contextual information from visitors’ app use accessible to museum staff and educators, building their capacity for using data in their day-to-day work. The same tools are being used by our research team to probe questions about informal learning and motivation, effective application of large datasets for museum evaluation, and ways to encourage and understand use of mobile virtual experiences. In this paper, we describe our theory-based design of the Dr. D app and data analytics and describe findings from initial user testing with our museum partners.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Adams, M. (2012). Where have we been? What has changed? And where do we need to go next? Journal of Museum Education, 37(2), 25–36. CrossRef
Association of Science-Technology Centers [ASTC]. (2011). 2011 Science Center and Museum Statistics. http://www.astc.org/about/pdf/Backgrounders/2011%20Science %20Center%20Statistics.pdf.
Baylor, A. L., & Plant, E. A. (2005). Pedagogical agents as social models for engineering: The influence of appearance on female choice. In C. K. Looi, G. McCalla, B. Bredeweg, & J. Breuker (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education: Supporting learning through intelligent and socially informed technology, 125 (pp. 65–72). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Bengel, J., Gauch, S., Mittur, E. & Vijayaraghavan, R. (2004). ChatTrack: Chat room topic detection using classification. In 2nd Symposium on Intelligence and Security Informatics ( pp. 266–277).
Bickmore, T., Pfeifer, L., & Schulman, D. (2011). Relational agents improve engagement and learning in science museum visitors. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, IVA’11 (pp. 55–67). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Cockburn, A., & McKenzie, B. (2001). What do web users do? An empirical analysis of web use. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 54(6), 903–922. CrossRef
Deerwester, S., Dumais, S. T., Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., & Harshman, R. (1990). Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 391–407. CrossRef
Diamond, J., Luke, J. J., & Uttal, D. H. (2009). Practical evaluation guide: Tool for museums and other informal educational settings. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2008). Enhancing visitor interaction and learning with mobile technologies. In L. Tallon & K. Walker (Eds.), Digital technologies and the museum experience: Handheld guides and other media (pp. 19–34). Lanham: AltaMira Press.
Frechette, C., & Moreno, R. (2010). The roles of animated Pedagogical agent’s presence and nonverbal communication in multimedia learning environments. Journal of Media Psychology, 22, 61–72. CrossRef
Freeman, A., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., McKelroy, E., Giesinger, C., & Yuhnke, B. (2016). NMC horizon report: 2016: Museum edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
Ingram, A., & Northcote, M. (1999). Using web server logs in evaluating instructional web sites. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 28(2), 137–157. CrossRef
Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2015). NMC horizon report: 2015 Museum edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
Johnson, L., Adams, S., & Witchey, H. (2011). The NMC horizon report: 2011 Museum edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
Katz, J. E., LaBar, W., & Lynch, E. (2010). Creativity and technology: Social media, mobiles and museums. Edinburgh: MuseumsEtc.
Kolenda, T., Hansen, L. K., & Larsen, J. (2001). Signal detection using ICA: Application to chat room topic spotting. In Third International Conference on Independent Component Analysis and Blind Source Separation (pp. 540–545).
Lane, H. C., Cahill, C., Foutz, S., Auerbach, D., Noren, D., Lussenhop, C., et al. (2013). The effects of a pedagogical agent for informal science education on learner behaviors and self-efficacy. Artificial Intelligence in Education, 7926, 309–318. CrossRef
National Research Council. (2009). Committee on Learning Science in Informal Environments. In P. Bell, B. Lewenstein, A. W. Shouse, & M. A. Feder (Eds.), Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places, and Pursuits. Washington, DC: Board on Science Education, Center for Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, The National Academies Press.
Pew Research Center. (2013). Smartphone ownership– 2013 Update. Pew Research Center: Washington DC. http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/06/05/smartphone-ownership-2013/.
Pew Research Center. (2015), The Smartphone Difference. Pew Research Center: Washington, DC. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/01/us-smartphone-use-in-2015/.
Pew Research Center (2016). Smartphone ownership and Internet usage continues to climb in emerging economies. http://www.pewglobal.org/2016/02/22/smartphone-ownership-and-internet-usage-continues-to-climb-in-emerging-economies/.
Pew Research Center (2017). Mobile fact sheet. http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/mobile/.
Proctor, N. (2015). Mobile in museums: From interpretation to conversation. The International Handbooks of Museum Studies, 4(22), 499–525. CrossRef
Røtne, O., & Kaptelinin, V. (2013). Design choices and museum experience: A design-based study of a mobile museum app. In Human Computer Interaction (pp. 9–13). Springer International Publishing.
Smithsonian Institution. (2004). The evaluation of museum educational programs: a national perspective. Washington, DC: Office of Policy and Analysis, Smithsonian Institution.
Tallon, L. (2012). Museums & Mobile in 2012: An analysis of the Museums & Mobile Survey 2012 Responses. Pocket-Proof & Learning Times. http://www.slideshare.net/LoicT/museums-mobile-in-2012-survey-results.
Wang, N., Johnson, W. L., Mayer, R. E., Rizzo, P., Shaw, E., & Collins, H. (2007). The politeness effect: Pedagogical Agents and learning outcomes. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(2), 98–112. CrossRef
Yee, N., Bailenson, J. N., & Rickertsen, K. (2007). A meta-analysis of the impact of the inclusion and realism of human-like faces on user experiences in interfaces. In Conference on human factors in computing systems, proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (p. 110).
- Designing for Data with Ask Dr. Discovery: Design Approaches for Facilitating Museum Evaluation with Real-Time Data Mining
Brian C. Nelson
- Springer Netherlands
in-adhesives, MKVS, Zühlke/© Zühlke, Nordson/© Nordson, ViscoTec/© ViscoTec, Hellmich GmbH/© Hellmich GmbH