nach oben

International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal

Erschienen in:

03.01.2019

Determinants of say on pay vote: a configurational analysis

verfasst von: Nicola Cucari

Erschienen in: International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This study is the first to employ a relatively new analytical method to investigate combinations of board structure and other corporate characteristics that lead firms to achieve high levels of say on pay voting, based on configurational analysis. In this pioneering manner, using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fs-QCA) and the data from 51 listed firms in three different countries (Italy, France and Spain), the results identify four different causal paths that lead to high voting dissent, and two configurational board governance are identified as prototypes of unsatisfactory governance. These configurations, jointly analysing the interactions, allow us to think more carefully about the structure of boards. In particular, the study contributes to theory by identifying how board structure can affect shareholder voting, and by demonstrating the advantages of the configurational approach. Finally, the analysis could assist shareholders in reflecting upon, and justifying their choice to have a specific board structure.

Vorheriger Artikel Cash, community and coordination: the triple-C categorisation of technology transfer office organisational philosophy

Nächster Artikel Leveraging sport mega events for international entrepreneurship

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

As shown by Schneider and Wagemann (2010), it is “tempting to run an analysis including every possible condition in order to have an allegedly exhaustive view of sufficient and necessary conditions”, however high numbers of conditions are dysfunctional for QCA because it raises the problem of “limited diversity”. Limited diversity is the phenomenon wherein not all logically possible combinations of conditions exist in a dataset, or even in reality. In this specific case, based on the review paper by Mello (2012), where they find, on average, six conditions, also in this empirical analysis only six conditions was chosen.

Morrow Sodali and Frontis Governance.

Aguilera, R. V., Filatotchev, I., Gospel, H., & Jackson, G. (2008). An organizational approach to comparative corporate governance: Costs, contingencies, and complementarities. Organization Science, 19(3), 475–492.CrossRef

Aguilera, R. V., Desdender, K., & Castro, L. R. K. (2011). A bundle perspective to comparative corporate governance. In T. Clarke & D. Branson (Eds.), SAGE handbook of corporate governance (pp. 379–405). New York: Sage Publications.

Aguilera, R. V., Desender, K., Bednar, M. K., & Lee, J. H. (2015). Connecting the dots: Bringing external corporate governance into the corporate governance puzzle. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 483–573.CrossRef

Alegre, I., Mas-Machuca, M., & Berbegal-Mirabent, J. (2016). Antecedents of employee job satisfaction: Do they matter? Journal of Business Research, 69(4), 1390–1395.CrossRef

Alissa, W. (2015). Boards’ response to shareholders’ dissatisfaction: The case of shareholders’ say on pay in the UK. European Accounting Review, 24(4), 727–752.CrossRef

Armstrong, C. S., Gow, I. D., & Larcker, D. F. (2013). The efficacy of shareholder voting: Evidence from equity compensation plans. Journal of Accounting Research, 51(5), 909–950.CrossRef

Balsam, S., Boone, J., Liu, H., & Yin, J. (2016). The impact of say-on-pay on executive compensation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 35(2), 162–191.CrossRef

Belcredi, M., Bozzi, S., Ciavarella, A. & Novembre, V. (2014). Say-on-pay in a context of concentrated ownership. Evidence from Italy. CONSOB Working Papers No. 76. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2403886

Belcredi, M., Bozzi, S., Ciavarella, A., & Novembre V. (2017). Institutional investors’ activism under concentrated ownership and the role of proxy advisors. Evidence from the Italian say-on-pay. Corporate Ownership and Control, 14(4), 41–57.

Bell, R. G., Filatotchev, I., & Aguilera, R. V. (2014). Corporate governance and investors' perceptions of foreign IPO value: An institutional perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 57(1), 301–320.CrossRef

Berbegal-Mirabent, J., & Llopis-Albert, C. (2016). Applications of fuzzy logic for determining the driving forces in collaborative research contracts. Journal of Business Research, 69(4), 1446–1451.CrossRef

Cai, J., & Walkling, R. A. (2011). Shareholders’ say on pay: Does it create value? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(2), 299–339.CrossRef

Conyon, M. J. (2016). Shareholder dissent on say-on-pay and CEO compensation. Available at https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2748645

Conyon, M. J., & Leech, D. (1994). Top pay, company performance and corporate governance. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 56(3), 229–247.CrossRef

Conyon, M., & Sadler, G. (2010). Shareholder voting and directors' remuneration report legislation: Say on pay in the UK. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(4), 296–312.CrossRef

Cotter, J., Palmitter, A., & Thomas, R. (2013). The first year of “say on pay” under Dodd–frank: An empirical analysis and look forward. George Washington University Law Rev., 81(3), 967–1011.

Crawford, S., Nelson, K. K., & Rountree, B. (2017). Mind the gap: CEO-employee pay ratios and shareholder say on pay votes. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3088052

Cullinan, C. P., Mahoney, L., & Roush, P. B. (2017). Are CSR activities associated with shareholder voting in director elections and say-on-pay votes? Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 13(3), 225–243.CrossRef

Cuñat, V., Gine, M., & Guadalupe, M. (2015). Say pays! Shareholder voice and firm performance. Review of Finance, 20(5), 1799–1834.CrossRef

Cziraki, P., Renneboog, L., & Szilagyi, P. G. (2010). Shareholder activism through proxy proposals: The European perspective. European Financial Management, 16(5), 738–777.CrossRef

Daily, C. M., & Johnson, J. L. (1997). Sources of CEO power and firm financial performance: A longitudinal assessment. Journal of Management, 23(2), 97–117.

Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E., & Johnson, J. L. (1998). Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 269–290.CrossRef

De Cleyn, S. H., & Braet, J. (2012). Do board composition and investor type influence innovativeness in SMEs? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 8(3), 285–308.CrossRef

Deane, S. (2007). Say on pay: Results from overseas. The Corporate Board, 28, 11–18.

Del Guercio, D., Seery, L., & Woidtke, T. (2008). Do boards pay attention when institutional investor activists “just vote no”? Journal of Financial Economics, 90(1), 84–103.CrossRef

Edelman, P. H., Thomas, R. S., & Thompson, R. B. (2014). Shareholder voting in an age of intermediary capitalism. Southern California Law Review, 87, 1359–1434.

Ertimur, Y., Ferri, F., & Oesch, D. (2013). Shareholder votes and proxy advisors: Evidence from say on pay. Journal of Accounting Research, 51(5), 951–996.CrossRef

Esposito De Falco, S., Cucari, N., & Sorrentino, E. (2016). Voting dissent and corporate governance structures: The role of say on pay in a comparative analysis. Corporate Ownership and Control, 13(4), 188–197.CrossRef

Esposito De Falco, S., Cucari, N., & Carbonara, S. (2018). Shareholder engagement and co-creation. An analysis of a sample of listed companies. Sinergie – Italian Journal of Management, 36(106), 41–59.

Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325.CrossRef

Felício, J. A., Rodrigues, R., & Samagaio, A. (2016). Corporate governance and the performance of commercial banks: A fuzzy-set QCA approach. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 26(1), 87.

Ferri, F., & Maber, D. A. (2013). Say on pay votes and CEO compensation: Evidence from the UK. Review of Finance, 17(2), 527–563.CrossRef

Ferri, F., & Oesch, D. (2016). Management influence on investors: Evidence from shareholder votes on the frequency of say on pay. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(4), 1337–1374.CrossRef

Filatotchev, I., & Wright, M. (2017). Methodological issues in governance research: An editor's perspective. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 25(6), 454–460.CrossRef

Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. Oxford University Press.

Fisch, J. E., Palia, D., & Davidoff Solomon, S. (2018). Is say on pay all about pay? The impact of firm performance. Harvard Business Law Review, 8, 101–129.

Fiss, P. C. (2007). A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1180–1198.CrossRef

Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420.CrossRef

Fiss, P. C., Marx, A., & Cambré, B. (2013). Configurational theory and methods in organizational research: Introduction. In In configurational theory and methods in organizational research (pp. 1–22). Emerald Group publishing limited.

García-Castro, R., Aguilera, R. V., & Ariño, M. A. (2013). Bundles of firm corporate governance practices: A fuzzy set analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(4), 390–407.CrossRef

Gerner-Beuerle, C., & Kirchmaier, T. (2016). Say on pay: Do shareholders care? FMG Discussion Paper DP751. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2720481.

Gillan, S., & Starks, L. (2000). Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: The role of institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics, 57, 275–305.CrossRef

Gillan, S. L., & Starks, L. T. (2007). The evolution of shareholder activism in the United States. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 19(1), 55–73.CrossRef

Goranova, M., & Ryan, L. V. (2014). Shareholder activism a multidisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1230–1268.CrossRef

Goranova, M., Abouk, R., Nystrom, P. C., & Soofi, E. S. (2016). Corporate governance antecedents to shareholder activism: A zero-inflated process. Strategic Management Journal, 38(2), 415–435.CrossRef

Greckhamer, T., Misangyi, V. F., & Fiss, P. C. (2013). The two QCAs: From a small-N to a large-N set theoretic approach. In P. C. Fiss, B. Cambré, & A. Marx (Eds.), Configurational Theory and Methods in Organizational Research. Research in the Sociology of the Organizations (pp. 49–75). UK: Emerald Group Publishing.CrossRef

Gregory-Smith, I., Thompson, S., & Wright, P. W. (2014). CEO pay and voting dissent before and after the crisis. The Economic Journal, 124(574), F22–F39.CrossRef

Grosse, M., Kean, S., & Scott, T. (2017). Shareholder say on pay and CEO compensation: Three strikes and the board is out. Accounting & Finance, 57(3), 701–725.CrossRef

Harms, R., Kraus, S., & Schwarz, E. (2009). The suitability of the configuration approach in entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 21(1), 25–49.CrossRef

Hendry, K., & Kiel, G. C. (2004). The role of the board in firm strategy: Integrating agency and organisational control perspectives. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(4), 500–520.CrossRef

Hillman, A. J., Shropshire, C., Certo, S. T., Dalton, D. R., & Dalton, C. M. (2011). What I like about you: A multilevel study of shareholder discontent with director monitoring. Organization Science, 22(3), 675–687.CrossRef

Hooghiemstra, R., Kuang, Y. F., & Qin, B. (2017). Does obfuscating excessive CEO pay work? The influence of remuneration report readability on say-on-pay votes. Accounting and Business Research, 47(6), 695–729.CrossRef

Iannotta, M., Gatti, M., & Huse, M. (2016). Institutional complementarities and gender diversity on boards: A configurational approach. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(4), 406–427.CrossRef

Iliev, P., Lins, K. V., Miller, D. P., & Roth, L. (2015). Shareholder voting and corporate governance around the world. Review of Financial Studies, 28(8), 2167–2202.CrossRef

Jain, T., & Jamali, D. (2016). Looking inside the black box: The effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(3), 253–273.CrossRef

Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance, 48, 831–880.CrossRef

Johnson, S. G., Schnatterly, K., & Hill, A. D. (2013). Board composition beyond independence: Social capital, human capital, and demographics. Journal of Management, 39(1), 232–262.CrossRef

Jones, C. P. (2007). Investments: Analysis and management (7th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Kan, A. K. S., Adegbite, E., El Omari, S., & Abdellatif, M. (2016). On the use of qualitative comparative analysis in management. Journal of Business Research, 69(4), 1458–1463.CrossRef

Kang, E., Ding, D. K., & Charoenwong, C. (2010). Investor reaction to women directors. Journal of Business Research, 63(8), 888–894.CrossRef

Kimbro, M. B., & Xu, D. (2016). Shareholders have a say in executive compensation: Evidence from say-on-pay in the United States. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 35(1), 19–42.CrossRef

Kraus, S., Mensching, H., Calabrò, A., Cheng, C. F., & Filser, M. (2016). Family firm internationalization: A configurational approach. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5473–5478.CrossRef

Kraus, S., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Schüssler, M. (2018). Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research - the rise of a method. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(1), 15–33.1.CrossRef

Krause, R., Whitler, K. A., & Semadeni, M. (2014). Power to the principals! An experimental look at shareholder say-on-pay voting. Academy of Management Journal, 57(1), 94–115.CrossRef

L’Huillier, B. M. (2014). What does “corporate governance” actually mean? Corporate Governance, 14(3), 300–319.CrossRef

Laksmana, I. (2008). Corporate board governance and voluntary disclosure of executive compensation practices. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(4), 1147–1182.CrossRef

Larcker, D. F., McCall, A. L., & Ormazabal, G. (2015). Outsourcing shareholder voting to proxy advisory firms. The Journal of Law and Economics, 58(1), 173–204.CrossRef

Lewellyn, K. B., & Fainshmidt, S. (2017). Effectiveness of CEO power bundles and discretion context: Unpacking the ‘fuzziness’ of the CEO duality puzzle. Organization Studies., 1–22.

Lewellyn, K. B., & Muller-Kahle, M. I. (2016). The configurational effects of board monitoring and the institutional environment on CEO compensation: A country-level fuzzy-set analysis. Journal of Management & Governance, 20(4), 729–757.CrossRef

Liang, Y., Moroney, R., & Rankin, M. (2018). Say-on-pay judgements: The two-strikes rule and the pay-performance link. Accounting & Finance. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12391.

Lien, Y. C., & Li, S. (2013). Does diversification add firm value in emerging economies? Effect of corporate governance. Journal of Business Research, 66(12), 2425–2430.CrossRef

Linck, J. S., Netter, J. M., & Yang, T. (2008). The determinants of board structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(2), 308–328.CrossRef

Madanoglu, M., Kizildag, M., & Ozdemir, O. (2018). Which bundles of corporate governance provisions lead to high firm performance among restaurant firms? International Journal of Hospitality Management, 72, 98–108.

Mallin, C., & Melis, A. (2012). Shareholder rights, shareholder voting, and corporate performance. Journal of Management & Governance, 16(2), 171–176.CrossRef

Mangen, C., & Magnan, M. (2012). “Say on pay”: A Wolf in Sheep's clothing? Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(2), 86–104.CrossRef

Mason, S. A., Medinets, A. F., & Dan, P. (2017). Say-on-Pay: Is Anybody Listening? Multinational Finance Journal, 20(4), 273–322.CrossRef

Mello, P. A. (2012). A critical review of applications in QCA and fuzzy-set analysis and a 'toolbox' of proven solutions to frequently encountered problems. APSA 2012 Annual meeting paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2105539

Meyer, A. D., Tsui, A. S., & Hinings, C. R. (1993). Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1175–1195.

Misangyi, V. F., & Acharya, A. G. (2014). Substitutes or complements? A configurational examination of corporate governance mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1681–1705.CrossRef

Misangyi, V. F., Greckhamer, T., Furnari, S., Fiss, P. C., Crilly, D., & Aguilera, R. (2017). Embracing causal complexity the emergence of a neo-configurational perspective. Journal of Management, 43(1), 255–282.CrossRef

Morgan, A., Poulsen, A., & Wolf, J. (2006). The evolution of shareholder voting for executive compensation schemes. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(4), 715–737.CrossRef

Obermann, J., & Velte, P. (2018). Determinants and consequences of executive compensation-related shareholder activism and say-on-pay votes: A literature review and research agenda. Journal of Accounting Literature, 40, 116–151.CrossRef

Paniagua, J., Rivelles, R., & Sapena, J. (2018). Corporate governance and financial performance: The role of ownership and board structure. Journal of Business Research, 89, 229–234.CrossRef

Pinto, I., & Picoto, W. N. (2016). Configurational analysis of firms' performance: Understanding the role of internet financial reporting. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5360–5365.CrossRef

Pirson, M., & Turnbull, S. (2018). Decentralized governance structures are able to handle CSR-induced complexity better. Business & Society, 57(5), 929–961.CrossRef

Prevost, A. K., & Rao, R. P. (2000). Of what value are shareholder proposals sponsored by public pension funds. The Journal of Business, 73(2), 177–204.CrossRef

Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy set social science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef

Ragin, C. C. (2009). Qualitative comparative analysis using fuzzy sets. In B. Rihoux & C. C. Ragin (Eds.), Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques (applied social research methods) (pp. 87–121). Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRef

Ragin, C. C. (2010). User’s guide to fuzzy-set/qualitative comparative analysis 2.0. Irvine.

Ragin, C. C., & Davey, S. (2014). Fuzzy-set/qualitative comparative analysis 2.5. Irvine: Department of Sociology, University of California.

Ragin, C. C., & Fiss, P. C. (2008). Net effects analysis versus configurational analysis: An empirical demonstration. In C. C. Ragin (Ed.), Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond (pp. 190–212). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef

Rao, K., & Tilt, C. (2016). Board composition and corporate social responsibility: The role of diversity, gender, strategy and decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(2), 327–347.CrossRef

Rediker, K. J., & Seth, A. (1995). Boards of directors and substitution effects of alternative governance mechanisms. Strategic Management Journal, 16(2), 85–99.CrossRef

Renneboog, L., & Szilagyi, P. G. (2011). The role of shareholder proposals in corporate governance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(1), 167–188.CrossRef

Roig-Tierno, N., Huarng, K. H., & Ribeiro-Soriano, D. (2016). Qualitative comparative analysis: Crisp and fuzzy sets in business and management. Journal of Business Research., 69(4), 1261–1264.CrossRef

Samara, G., & Berbegal-Mirabent, J. (2018). Independent directors and family firm performance: Does one size fit all? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(1), 149–172.CrossRef

Sanchez-Marin, G., Lozano-Reina, G., Baixauli-Soler, J. S., & Lucas-Perez, M. E. (2017). Say on pay effectiveness, corporate governance mechanisms, and CEO compensation alignment. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 20(4), 226–239.CrossRef

Sauerwald, S., Van Oosterhout, J. H., & Van Essen, M. (2016). Expressive shareholder democracy: A multilevel study of shareholder dissent in 15 Western European countries. Journal of Management Studies, 53(4), 520–551.CrossRef

Schiehll, E., Ahmadjian, C., & Filatotchev, I. (2014). National governance bundles perspective: Understanding the diversity of corporate governance practices at the firm and country levels. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(3), 179–184.CrossRef

Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2010). Standards of good practice in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets. Comparative Sociology, 9(3), 397–418.CrossRef

Souha, S. B., & Anis, J. (2016). Corporate governance and firm characteristics as explanatory factors of shareholder activism: Validation through the French context. Cogent Economics & Finance, 4(1), 1150407.CrossRef

Starbuck, W. H. (2014). Why corporate governance deserves serious and creative thought. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(1), 15–21.CrossRef

Stathopoulos, K., & Voulgaris, G. (2016). The importance of shareholder activism: The case of say-on-pay. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(3), 359–370.CrossRef

Vafeas, N. (1999). Board meeting frequency and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53(1), 113–142.CrossRef

Ward, A. J., Brown, J. A., & Rodriguez, D. (2009). Governance bundles, firm performance, and the substitutability and complementarity of governance mechanisms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(5), 646–660.CrossRef

Woodside, A. G. (2013). Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: Calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory. Journal of Business Research, 66(4), 463–472.CrossRef

Woodside, A. G., & Zhang, M. (2013). Cultural diversity and marketing transactions: Are market integration, large community size, and world religions necessary for fairness in ephemeral exchanges? Psychology & Marketing, 30(3), 263–276.CrossRef

Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of a company with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40, 185–211.CrossRef

Yermack, D. (2010). Shareholder voting and corporate governance. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 2(1), 103–125.CrossRef

Yoshikawa, T., Zhu, H., & Wang, P. (2014). National governance system, corporate ownership, and roles of outside directors: A corporate governance bundle perspective. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(3), 252–265.CrossRef

Titel: Determinants of say on pay vote: a configurational analysis
verfasst von: Nicola Cucari
Publikationsdatum: 03.01.2019
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1554-7191
Elektronische ISSN: 1555-1938
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-018-0556-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

“Think entrepreneur - think male”: a task and relationship scale to measure gender stereotypes in entrepreneurship

Explaining cross-country variations in the prevalence of informal sector competitors: lessons from the World Bank Enterprise Survey

Behavioral agency and corporate entrepreneurship: CEO equity incentives & competitive behavior

The relationship between Entrepreneurial Orientation, Market Orientation and Performance in University Spin-Offs

Exploring the role of original aspiration in effectuation tendency

Intentions resurrected: a systematic review of entrepreneurial intention research from 2014 to 2018 and future research agenda

Premium Partner