nach oben

Economic Change and Restructuring

Erschienen in:

01.04.2024

Does the Yangtze River Protection Strategy help heavily polluting corporates deleverage? Evidence from corporates in the Yangtze River Economic Belt

verfasst von: Min Liu, Yamei Li, Jiangfeng Hu

Erschienen in: Economic Change and Restructuring | Ausgabe 2/2024

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This paper investigates the effect of the Yangtze river protection strategy (YRPS) on the leverage of heavily polluting corporates in the Yangtze river economic belt (YREB) through a quasi-natural experiment. The findings are as follows: Firstly, the YRPS helps to deleverage heavily polluting corporates, and this deleveraging effect will increase over time. Secondly, when the corporates belong to the middle and lower reaches of the YREB and the financial supervision degree of the areas are higher, the YRPS will have a stronger inhibitory impression on the leverage of heavily polluting corporates. Thirdly, when the corporates are state-owned, technology-intensive, and capital-intensive, the YRPS will have a better deleveraging effect on heavily polluting corporates. Fourthly, the YRPS mainly works on the leverage of heavily polluting corporates by reducing the financing capacity of corporates, reducing the capital investment of corporates, and weakening the operating risks of corporates. The findings of this paper supply important policy insights for advancing the implementation of YRPS, pushing the green transformation and upgrading of heavily polluting corporates, and promoting the high-quality economic development of the YREB.

Vorheriger Artikel The role of solar energy in achieving net-zero emission and green growth: a global analysis

Nächster Artikel Industrial productive efficiency nexus with energy poverty and energy transition in digital economy: findings of Chinese transport and energy development industries

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Data source: National Bureau of Statistics (https://www.stats.gov.cn/).

Alter A, Elekdag S (2020) Emerging market corporate leverage and global financial conditions. J Corp Finan 62:101590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101590CrossRef

Ambec S, Cohen MA, Elgie S, Lanoie P (2013) The Porter hypothesis at 20: Can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Rev Environ Econ Pol 7(1):2–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/res016CrossRef

Atanassov J (2016) Arm’s length financing and innovation: evidence from publicly traded firms. Manage Sci 62(1):128–155. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2097CrossRef

Bai J, Guo K, Liu M, Jiang T (2023) Spatial variability, evolution, and agglomeration of eco-environmental risks in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China. Ecol Indic 152:110375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110375CrossRef

Basha SA, Bennasr H, Goaied M (2023) Financial literacy, financial development, and leverage of small firms. Int Rev Financ Anal 86:102510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102510CrossRef

Brunnermeier SB, Cohen MA (2003) Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries. J Environ Econ Manag 45(2):278–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-0696(02)00058-XCrossRef

Chen J, Zhang Y, Zheng S (2019) Ecoefficiency, environmental regulation opportunity costs, and interregional industrial transfers: evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China. J Clean Prod 233:611–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.117CrossRef

Chiarella C, Di Guilmi C (2011) The financial instability hypothesis: a stochastic microfoundation framework. J Econ Dyn Control 35(8):1151–1171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2011.02.005CrossRef

Çolak G, Gungoraydinoglu A, Öztekin Ö (2018) Global leverage adjustments, uncertainty, and country institutional strength. J Finan Intermed 35:41–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2018.01.010CrossRef

Cui X, Wang P, Sensoy A, Nguyen DK, Pan Y (2022) Green credit policy and corporate productivity: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 177:121516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121516CrossRef

Fard A, Javadi S, Kim I (2020) Environmental regulation and the cost of bank loans: international evidence. J Financ Stab 51:100797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2020.100797CrossRef

Firth M, Lin C, Wong SML (2008) Leverage and investment under a state-owned bank lending environment: evidence from China. J Corp Finan 14(5):642–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.08.002CrossRef

Flannery MJ, Rangan KP (2006) Partial adjustment toward target capital structures. J Financ Econ 79(3):469–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.03.004CrossRef

Geng Y, Liu W, Li K, Chen H (2021) Environmental regulation and corporate tax avoidance: a quasi-natural experiment based on the Eleventh Five-Year Plan in China. Energy Econ 99:105312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105312CrossRef

Graham JR (2005) A review of taxes and corporate finance. Rev Finan Stud 4(16):1075–1129. https://doi.org/10.1561/0500000010CrossRef

Greenwood R, Hanson SG (2013) Issuer quality and corporate bond returns. Rev Finan Stud 26(6):1483–1525. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hht016CrossRef

Hu G, Wang X, Wang Y (2021) Can the green credit policy stimulate green innovation in heavily polluting enterprises? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Energy Econ 98:105134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105134CrossRef

Huang Q, Liu M (2022) Trade openness and green total factor productivity: testing the role of environment regulation based on dynamic panel threshold model. Environ Dev Sustain 24(7):9304–9329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01825-yCrossRef

Huang J, Zhao J, Cao J (2021) Environmental regulation and corporate R&D investment—evidence from a quasi-natural experiment. Int Rev Econ Financ 72:154–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2020.11.018CrossRef

Issa S, Gevorkyan AV (2022) Optimal corporate leverage and speculative cycles: an empirical estimation. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 62:478–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2022.06.002CrossRef

Kneller R, Manderson E (2012) Environmental regulations and innovation activity in UK manufacturing industries. Resour Energy Econ 34(2):211–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2011.12.001CrossRef

Li T, Liao G (2020) The heterogeneous impact of financial development on green total factor productivity. Front Energy Res. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2020.00029CrossRef

Liu X, Liu F (2022) Environmental regulation and corporate financial asset allocation: a natural experiment from the new environmental protection law in China. Financ Res Lett 47:102974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102974CrossRef

Liu Q, Wu J (2023) Strong financial regulation and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from a natural experiment in China. Financ Res Lett 54:103747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.103747CrossRef

Liu X, Wang E, Cai D (2019) Green credit policy, property rights and debt financing: Quasi-natural experimental evidence from China. Financ Res Lett 29:129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.03.014CrossRef

Liu Y, Zhu J, Li EY, Meng Z, Song Y (2020) Environmental regulation, green technological innovation, and eco-efficiency: the case of Yangtze River economic belt in China. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 155:119993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119993CrossRef

Luo J (2017) How does smog affect firms’ investment behavior? A natural experiment based on a sudden surge in the PM25 index. China J Account Res 10(4):359–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2017.09.001CrossRef

Luo K, Liu Y, Chen P, Zeng M (2022) Assessing the impact of digital economy on green development efficiency in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Energy Econ 112:106127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106127CrossRef

Luo P, Tan Y, Yang J, Yao Y (2023) Underinvestment and optimal capital structure under environmental constraints. J Econ Dyn Control 157:104761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2023.104761CrossRef

Margaritis D, Psillaki M (2010) Capital structure, equity ownership and firm performance. J Bank Finance 34(3):621–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.08.023CrossRef

Minh TN, Ngoc AM, Tuan AN, Dao TN (2022) Corporate social responsibility, market rivalry and firm leverage: New evidence from a fixed-effect quantile regression approach. Financ Res Lett 47:102794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102794CrossRef

Nguyen JH, Phan HV (2020) Carbon risk and corporate capital structure. J Corp Finan 64:101713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101713CrossRef

Öztekin Ö, Flannery MJ (2012) Institutional determinants of capital structure adjustment speeds. J Financ Econ 103(1):88–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.08.014CrossRef

Phan DHB, Tran VT, Ming TC, Le A (2022) Carbon risk and corporate investment: a cross-country evidence. Financ Res Lett 46:102376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102376CrossRef

Sheikh S (2019) Corporate social responsibility and firm leverage: the impact of market competition. Res Int Bus Financ 48:496–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2018.11.002CrossRef

Sheng J, Rui D, Han X (2022) Governmentality and sociotechnical imaginary within the conservation-development nexus: China’s Great Yangtze River Protection Programme. Environ Sci Pol 136:56–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.05.018CrossRef

Shi X, Xu Z (2018) Environmental regulation and firm exports: evidence from the eleventh five-year plan in China. J Environ Econ Manag 89:187–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2018.03.003CrossRef

Wang C, Wu J, Zhang B (2018) Environmental regulation, emissions and productivity: evidence from Chinese COD-emitting manufacturers. J Environ Econ Manag 92:54–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2018.08.004CrossRef

Wu H, Guo H, Zhang B, Bu M (2017) Westward movement of new polluting firms in China: pollution reduction mandates and location choice. J Comp Econ 45(1):119–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2016.01.001CrossRef

Xiao H (2022) Environmental regulation and firm capital structure dynamics. Econ Anal Pol 76:770–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2022.09.020CrossRef

Yang J, Shi D, Yang W (2022) Stringent environmental regulation and capital structure: the effect of NEPL on deleveraging the high polluting firms. Int Rev Econ Financ 79:643–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2022.02.020CrossRef

Yao W, Zhang Y, Ma J, Cui G (2023) Does environmental regulation affect capital-labor ratio of manufacturing enterprises: evidence from China. Int Rev Financ Anal 86:102485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102485CrossRef

Zhang D, Du P, Chen Y (2019a) Can designed financial systems drive out highly polluting firms? An evaluation of an experimental economic policy. Financ Res Lett 31:218–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.08.032CrossRef

Zhang D, Du W, Zhuge L, Tong Z, Freeman RB (2019b) Do financial constraints curb firms’ efforts to control pollution? Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms. J Clean Prod 215:1052–1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.112CrossRef

Zhang X, Tan J, Chan KC (2021) Environmental law enforcement as external monitoring: evidence from the impact of an environmental inspection program on firm-level stock price crash risk. Int Rev Econ Financ 71:21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2020.08.020CrossRef

Zhao J, Zhao Y (2023) Synergy/trade-offs and differential optimization of production, living, and ecological functions in the Yangtze River economic Belt. China Ecol Indic 147:109925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.109925CrossRef

Zhao X, Zhao Y, Zeng S, Zhang S (2015) Corporate behavior and competitiveness: impact of environmental regulation on Chinese firms. J Clean Prod 86:311–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.074CrossRef

Zheng H, Wu S, Zhang Y, He Y (2023) Environmental regulation effect on green total factor productivity in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. J Environ Manage 325:116465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116465CrossRef

Zhou M, Li K, Chen Z (2021) Corporate governance quality and financial leverage: evidence from China. Int Rev Financ Anal 73:101652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101652CrossRef

Titel: Does the Yangtze River Protection Strategy help heavily polluting corporates deleverage? Evidence from corporates in the Yangtze River Economic Belt
verfasst von: Min Liu
Yamei Li
Jiangfeng Hu
Publikationsdatum: 01.04.2024
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Economic Change and Restructuring / Ausgabe 2/2024
Print ISSN: 1573-9414
Elektronische ISSN: 1574-0277
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-024-09640-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2024

Strategic enterprise management in the age of energy transition: a roadmap for sustainable business practices

Global directed technical change model with fiscal and monetary policies, and public debt

Sustainable energy utility investment role in energy transformation progress: case of Mongolia

How do institutional factors affect sustainable development? A comparative analysis

Spatial differences and dynamic evolution of economic resilience: from the perspective of China’s eight comprehensive economic zones

How does central enterprise reform promote total factor productivity of defense firms in China?

Premium Partner