nach oben

Economic Change and Restructuring

Erschienen in:

01.04.2024

How does central enterprise reform promote total factor productivity of defense firms in China?

verfasst von: Huaijia Zhu, Bo Chen, Huaiqi Zhu

Erschienen in: Economic Change and Restructuring | Ausgabe 2/2024

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Since 2017, the reform of central state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in China has had a profound impact on the operations and development of military-industrial enterprises. To study the influence of SOE reform on the total factor productivity (TFP) of China's state-owned military-industrial listed enterprises, this study uses a difference-in-differences model to conduct empirical tests. Its sample consists of relevant data from 115 military-industrial listed enterprises from 2011 to 2021. The results show that SOE reform has effectively improved the TFP of state-owned military-industrial listed enterprises. Furthermore, through heterogeneity testing, it was found that government subsidies weakened the impact of SOE reform on the TFP of military-industrial enterprises. Stock incentives had a greater impact on TFP than mergers and acquisitions. In similar conditions, motivating employees was more conducive to improving operational efficiency. The mechanism by which SOE reform affects the TFP of military-industrial enterprises is reflected in decreased agency costs and improving governance efficiency. The empirical results confirm the positive role of SOE reform and have certain enlightening significance for how to implement a scientific and reasonable subsidy system as well as how to design more effective reform measures.

Vorheriger Artikel The role of green technology and green utility performance in advancing energy utilities' commitment to sustainability

Nächster Artikel Paths to sustainable development in China: why green finance and green technology matter?

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Amit BC, Arindam M (2017) Can commercialization through partial disinvestment improve the performance of state-owned enterprises? The case of Indian SOEs under reforms. J Gen Manag 43(1):5–14

Berkowitz D, Ma H, Nishioka S (2017) Recasting the iron rice bowl: the reform of China’s state-owned enterprises. Rev Econ Stat 99(4):735–747

Bernini C, Pellegrini G (2011) How are growth and productivity in private firms affected by public subsidy? Evidence from a regional policy. Reg Sci Urban Econ 3:253–265

Bozec R, Zéghal D, Boujenoui A (2004) The effect of the reform of Canadian state-owned enterprises on major corporate governance mechanisms. Aust J Public Adm 63(2):79–94

Cardinale R (2022) State-owned enterprises’ reforms and their implications for the resilience and vulnerability of the Chinese economy: evidence from the banking, energy and telecom sectors. Netw Spat Econ 22:489–514

Castillo D (2018) State, monopoly and bribery. Market reforms and corruption in a swedish state-owned entreprise. Econ Sociol 11(2):64–79

Chen L (2018) Natural monopoly and mixed ownership reform-based on natural experiment and cost function analysis method. China Econ 13(05):62–85

Chen R, Ghoul SE, Guedhami O, Wang H (2017) Do state and foreign ownership affect investment efficiency? Evidence from privatizations. J Corp Finan 42:408–421

Chen Y, Zhu R, Song Z, Yan D (2018) Research of the impact of financial reform on total factor productivity-based on the empirical data of 5 national financial reform test areas. Chin J Manag Sci 26(9):19–28

Clausen TH (2009) Do subsidies have positive impacts on R&D and innovation activities at the firm level. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 20(4):239–253

Gu EX (2001) Beyond the property rights approach: welfare policy and the reform of state-owned enterprises in China. Dev Chang 32(1):129–150

Huang X (2019) Reform of state-owned enterprises and productivity growth in China. Asian-Pacific Econ Lit 33(1):64–77

Huang Y, Kalirajan KP (1998) Enterprise reform and technical efficiency of China’s state-owned enterprises. Appl Econ 30(5):585–592

Jefferson G, Su J (2006) Privatization and restructuring in China: evidence from shareholding ownership: 1995–2001. J Comp Econ 34(2):146–166

Jiao C, Chen Y (2018) R&D subsidy, rent-seeking and up-grading of total factor productivity. Stat Res 35(12):80–91

Ju J (2019) The role of state-owned enterprises’ reform and development in the construction of modern economic system. China Econ Transit (CET) 2(2):40–51

Jurkonis L, Merkliopas S, Kyga K (2016) Impact of the corporate governance reform on the management effectiveness of state-owned enterprises in Lithuania in 2012–2014. Ekonomika (vilnius University) 95(2):158–178

Levinsohn J, Petrin A (2003) Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservable. Rev Econ Stud 70(2):317–341

Li S, Jin Z, Xie Y (2022) Research on the influence of ESOP on enterprise total factor productivity. Chin J Manag 19(05):758–767

Li Xu, Li X, Wang Z (2023) Can mixed-ownership reform of state-owned enterprises restrain excessive perquisite consumption by executives. Emerg Mark Financ Trade 59(3):641–655

Liao H, Wang D, Zhu L, Zhao J (2022) Equity reform and high-quality development of state-owned enterprises: evidence from China in the new era. Front Psychol 26(13):913672

Lin Y (2021) State-owned enterprise reform in China: the new structural economics perspective. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 58:106–111

Liu K (2021) China’s state-owned enterprise reform since 2013. Eur J East Asian Stud 20(2):367–395

Liu M, Gao Y (2015) The abnormal cash dividends, agency costs and company`s value: empirical evidence of chinese listed companies. Nankai Bus Rev 18(1):152–160

Liu H, Zhao W (2023) The influence of state-owned enterprise reform on enterprise innovation: new evidence from China. Appl Econ Lett 30(16):2174–2178

Lu X, Lian Y (2012) Estimation of total factor productivity of industrial enterprises in China: 1999–2007. China Economic Quarterly 11(2):541–558

Luo H, Wu X, Wu Y (2022) Mixed ownership reform of state-owned enterprises and R&D investment. Math Probl Eng 8:1–14

Ma R (2011) Research on the efficiency of state-owned enterprises in China. Shanghai Journal of Economics 2:20–28

Mallon RD (1994) State-owned enterprise reform through performance contracts: the Bolivian experiment. World Dev 22(6):925–934

Molnar M (2017) Revitalizing China’s economy by improved corporate governance and state-owned enterprise reforms. J Int Econ Commer Policy 8(3):1–23

Nellis J (2005) The Evolution of Enterprise Reform in Africa: From State-owned Enterprises to Private Participation in Infrastructure--and Back? Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Working Papers 117

Olley S, Pakes A (1996) The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunication equipment industry. Econometrica 64(6):1263–1297

Painter M (2003) The politics of economic restructuring in Vietnam: the case of state-owned enterprise “reform.” Contemp Southeast Asia A J Int Strat Aff 25(1):20–43

Shleifer A, Vishny RW (2012) A survey of corporate government. J Financ 52(2):737–784

Sun S, Chu X, Liu X (2022) Urban wage inequality: The reform of state-owned enterprises in China’s great transition. Econ Polit Stud 10(4):442–461

Tan C, Puchniak D, Varonil U (2015) State-owned enterprises in Singapore: historical insights into a potential model for reform. Columbia J Asian Law 28(2):61–97

Tian X, Gong J, Zhai Z (2022) The effect of job displacement on labor market outcomes: evidence from the Chinese state-owned enterprise reform. China Econ Rev 72:101743

Wang J, Song H (2019) Sino-US trade war, the principle of competitive neutrality and the reform of China’s state-owned enterprises. Transnat Corporat Rev 11(4):298–309

Wang H, Yue H, Zhang X (2019) Research on the relationship between corporate governance structure and corporate performance- a perspective based on corporate total factor productivity. Shanghai J Econ 4:17–27

Wang W, Wang H, Wu J (2021) Mixed ownership reform and corporate tax avoidance: evidence of Chinese listed firms. Pac Basin Financ J 69:101648

Yan Z, Yu J (2017) Government subsidy and firms’ total factor productivity: a comparative analysis of emerging industry and traditional manufacturing industry. Ind Econ Res 1:1–13

Yan L, Ling X, Wang Z, Xu Y (2023) Can Mixed-ownership reform boost the digital transformation of state-owned enterprises? Economic Analysis and Policy 79:647–663

Yang W, Xie H (2023) Do private strategic investors improve capital allocation efficiency of SOEs? Evidence from China. Emerg Mark Financ Trade 59(1):129–155

Youssef SM (1996) Structural reform programme of Egyptian state-owned enterprises. J Manag Dev 15(5):88–99

Zhang F, Wang F, Wang Q (2023a) Does the mixed-ownership reform improve the productivity of state-owned enterprises? Evidence from companies listed in Chinese stock. Ann Public Cooper Econ 94(4):1299–1321

Zhang S, Zhang W, Chen Fu, Guo B (2023b) Does the mixed-ownership reform of Chinese state-owned enterprises improves their total factor productivity? Pac Basin Financ J 82:102182

Zhuang Q, Lin R, Luo W (2023) Fault tolerance for corporate innovation: evidence from the reform of state-owned enterprises. Front Bus Res China 17(1):126–159

Titel: How does central enterprise reform promote total factor productivity of defense firms in China?
verfasst von: Huaijia Zhu
Bo Chen
Huaiqi Zhu
Publikationsdatum: 01.04.2024
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Economic Change and Restructuring / Ausgabe 2/2024
Print ISSN: 1573-9414
Elektronische ISSN: 1574-0277
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-024-09643-8

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2024

Greening the bottom line: navigating legal and financial dimensions of energy digital transition in the modern economy

Promoting sustainable growth through eco-innovation, energy transition, and human capital: a comparative analysis of G-7 economies

Does the Yangtze River Protection Strategy help heavily polluting corporates deleverage? Evidence from corporates in the Yangtze River Economic Belt

Dynamic connectedness of economic policy uncertainty in G7 countries and the influence of the USA and UK on non-G7 countries

Green finance, renewable energy, and inbound tourism: a case study of 30 provinces in China

Club convergence of sustainable development: fresh evidence from developing and developed countries

Premium Partner