Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Journal of Business Ethics
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics 3/2019

04.01.2018 | Original Paper

Dynamics of Institutional Logics in a Cross-Sector Social Partnership: The Case of Refugee Integration in Germany

verfasst von: Andreas Hesse, Karin Kreutzer, Marjo-Riitta Diehl

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This study examines how institutional logics interplay in a cross-sector social partnership that manages refugee integration in a rural district in Germany. In an inductive 15-month case study that drew on interviews and observations, we observe the dynamic materialization of institutional logics in day-to-day practices and an increasing contradiction and even rivalry between community- and market-based institutional logics over time. As a result, we delineate a model explaining the interplay of institutional logics along two dimensions: the dominance of one salient logic and whether conflicts arise among logics. Our analysis also addresses the unifying properties of community as an institutional logic, especially in the context of urgency conditions. In addition, we show the influence of exogenous events and their media coverage on the interplay and conflicts of institutional logics. By unfolding the complexity of refugee integration—one of the global grand challenges of the present—we deepen the current understanding of the specific challenges addressed by cross-sector social partnerships.
Vorheriger Artikel Transforming Good Intentions into Social Impact: A Case on the Creation and Evolution of a Social Enterprise
Nächster Artikel The Effects and the Mechanisms of Board Gender Diversity: Evidence from Financial Manipulation

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
Germany faced an increase in registered refugees in 2015, compared to the 2014 numbers more than doubled (Die Zeit 2016).
 
Literatur
Almandoz, J. (2012). Arriving at the starting line: The impact of community and financial logics on new banking ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1381–1406.CrossRef
Batson, C. D., & Shaw, L. L. (1991). Evidence for altruism: Toward a pluralism of prosocial motives. Psychological Inquiry, 2(2), 107–122.CrossRef
Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419–1440.CrossRef
Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organizing—Insights from the study of social enterprises. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397–441.CrossRef
Battilana, J., Sengul, M., Pache, A. C., & Model, J. (2015). Harnessing productive tensions in hybrid organizations: The case of work integration social enterprises. Academy of Management Journal, 58(6), 1658–1685.CrossRef
Besharov, M. L., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Multiple logics in organizations: Explaining their varied nature and implications. Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 364–381.CrossRef
Binder, A. (2007). For love and money: Organizations creative responses to multiple environmental logics. Theory and Society, 36(6), 547–571.CrossRef
Branzei, O., & Le Ber, M. J. (2014). Theory-method interfaces in cross-sector partnership research. In M. M. Seitanidi & A. Crane (Eds.), Social partnerships and responsible business (pp. 247–267). London, New York: Routledge.
Colquitt, J. A., & George, G. (2011). Publishing in AMJ: Topic choice. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 432–435.CrossRef
Crosby, B. C., & Bryson, J. M. (2010). Integrative leadership and the creation and maintenance of cross-sector collaboration. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(2), 211–230.CrossRef
Crosby, B. C., & Bryson, J. M. (2014). Public integrative leadership. In D. V. Day (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of leadership and organization (pp. 57–72). London: Oxford University Press.
Currie, G., & Spyridonidis, D. (2016). Interpretation of multiple institutional logics on the ground: Actors’ position, their agency and situational constraints in professionalized contexts. Organization Studies, 37(1), 77–97.CrossRef
Dentoni, D., Bitzer, V., & Pascucci, S. (2016). Cross-sector partnerships and the co-creation of dynamic capabilities for stakeholder orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(1), 35–53.CrossRef
Die Zeit. (2016). “So war’s”—Grafik Jahresstatistik [Yearly statistical graphics]. DIE ZEIT: 42.
Dunn, M. B., & Jones, C. (2010). Institutional logics and institutional pluralism: The contestation of care and science logics in medical education, 1967–2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1), 114–149.CrossRef
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.CrossRef
Esping-Andersen, G. (2013). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bring society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–263). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine Publishing.
Glynn, M. A. (2000). When cymbals become symbols: Conflict over organizational identity within a symphony orchestra. Organization Science, 11(3), 285–298.
Googins, B. K., & Rochlin, S. A. (2000). Creating the partnership society: Understanding the rhetoric and reality of cross-sectoral partnerships. Business and Society Review, 105(1), 127–144.CrossRef
Google. (2017). Google trends search term “Deutschland Flüchtlinge” [Germany Refugees]. Retrieved August 18, 2017.
Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317–371.CrossRef
Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., & Bell, M. P. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 96–107.
Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2000). Leadership in the shaping and implementation of collaboration agendas: How things happen in a (not quite) joined-up world. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1159–1175.
Jay, J. (2013). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 137–159.CrossRef
Kolk, A., van Dolen, W., & Vock, M. (2010). Trickle effects of cross-sector social partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(1), 123–137.CrossRef
Kraatz, M. S., & Block, E. S. (2008). Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 243–275). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRef
Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710.CrossRef
Lawrence, T., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2011). Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(1), 52–58.CrossRef
Le Ber, M. J., & Branzei, O. (2010). Value frame fusion in cross sector interactions. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(1), 163–195.CrossRef
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.CrossRef
Marquis, C., Glynn, M. A., & Davis, G. F. (2007). Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 925–945.CrossRef
McPherson, C. M., & Sauder, M. (2013). Logics in action: Managing institutional complexity in a drug court. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(2), 165–196.CrossRef
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.CrossRef
Mintzberg, H., & McHugh, A. (1985). Strategy formation in an adhocracy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(2), 160–197.CrossRef
Montgomery, A. W., Dacin, P. M., & Dacin, M. T. (2012). Collective social entrepreneurship: Collaboratively shaping social good. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 375–388.CrossRef
Moss, T. W., Short, J. C., Payne, G. T., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2011). Dual identities in social ventures: An exploratory study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(4), 805–830.CrossRef
Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 455–476.
Pettigrew, A. M. (1990). Longitudinal filed research on change: Theory and practice. Organization Science, 1(3), 267–292.CrossRef
Pless, N. M., & Appel, J. (2012). In pursuit of dignity and social justice: Changing lives through 100% inclusion—how Gram Vikas fosters sustainable rural development. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 389–411.CrossRef
Pollock, T. G., & Rindova, V. P. (2003). Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 631–642.
Powell, W. W., & Colyvas, J. A. (2008). Microfoundations of institutional theory. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 276–298). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRef
Quarantelli, E. L. (1988). Disaster crisis management: A summary of research findings. Journal of Management Studies, 25(4), 373–385.CrossRef
Quattrone, P. (2015). Governing social orders, unfolding rationality, and Jesuit accounting practices: A procedural approach to institutional logics. Administration Science Quarterly, 60(3), 411–445.CrossRef
Ramus, T., Vaccaro, A., & Brusoni, S. (2017). Institutional complexity in turbulent times: Formalization, collaboration, and the emergence of blended logics. Academy of Management Journal, 60(4), 1253–1284.CrossRef
Reast, J., Lindgreen, A., Vanhamme, J., & Maon, F. (2010). The Manchester Super Casino: Experience and learning in a cross-sector social partnership. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(1), 197–218.CrossRef
Rein, M., & Stott, L. (2009). Working together: Critical perspectives on six cross-sector partnerships in Southern Africa. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(1), 79–89.CrossRef
Rueede, D., & Kreutzer, K. (2015). Legitimation work within a cross-sector social partnership. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(1), 39–58.CrossRef
Rufín, C., & Rivera-Santos, M. (2014). From institutions to partnerships, and back to institutions. In M. M. Seitanidi & A. Crane (Eds.), Social partnerships and responsible business (pp. 125–142). London, New York: Routledge.
Sakarya, S., Bodur, M., Yildirim-Öktem, Ö., & Selekler-Göksen, N. (2012). Social alliances: Business and social enterprise collaboration for social transformation. Journal of Business Research, 65(12), 1710–1720.CrossRef
Scott, R. W. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Seitanidi, M. M., & Lindgreen, A. (2010). Editorial: Cross-sector social interactions. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(1), 1–7.CrossRef
Selsky, J. W., & Parker, B. (2005). Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. Journal of Management, 31(6), 849–873.CrossRef
Selsky, J. W., & Parker, B. (2010). Platforms for cross-sector social partnerships: Prospective sensemaking devices for social benefit. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(1), 21–37.CrossRef
Slovic, P., Västfjäll, D., Erlandsson, A., & Gregory, R. (2017). Iconic photographs and the ebb and flow of empathic response to humanitarian disasters. Proceedings of the National Academy of the United States of America, 114(4), 640–644.CrossRef
Smith, A. (1937). The wealth of nations [1776]. New York: Modern Library.
Smith, D. H. (2000). Grassroots associations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research (Vol. 5). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousands Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Thornton, P. H. (2004). Markets from culture: Institutional logics and organizational decisions in higher education publishing. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. In P. H. Thornton & W. Ocasio (Eds.), The sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 99–129). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRef
Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Toubiana, M., & Zietsma, C. (2017). The message is on the wall? Emotions, social media and the dynamics of institutional complexity. Academy of Management Journal, 60(3), 922–953.CrossRef
Voltan, A., & De Fuentes, C. (2016). Managing multiple logics in partnerships for scaling social innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 19(4), 446–467.CrossRef
Vurro, C., & Dacin, M. T. (2014). An institutional perspective on cross-sector partnership. In M. M. Seitanidi & A. Crane (Eds.), Social partnerships and responsible business (pp. 306–319). London, New York: Routledge.
Vurro, C., Dacin, M. T., & Perrini, F. (2010). Institutional antecedents of partnering for social change: how institutional logics shape cross-sector social partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(1), 39–53.CrossRef
Waddock, S. A. (1989). Understanding social partnerships: An evolutionary model of partnership organizations. Administration and Society, 21(1), 78–100.CrossRef
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Westley, F., & Vredenburg, H. (1997). Interorganizational collaboration and the preservation of global biodiversity. Organization Science, 8(4), 381–403.CrossRef
Wiesenfeld, B. M., Wurthmann, K. A., & Hambrick, D. C. (2008). The stigmatization and devaluation of elites associated with corporate failures: A process model. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 231–251.CrossRef
Zilber, T. B. (2002). Institutionalization as an interplay between actions, meanings, and actors: the Case of a rape crisis center in Israel. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 234–254.
Metadaten
Titel
Dynamics of Institutional Logics in a Cross-Sector Social Partnership: The Case of Refugee Integration in Germany
verfasst von
Andreas Hesse
Karin Kreutzer
Marjo-Riitta Diehl
Publikationsdatum
04.01.2018
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3775-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Journal of Business Ethics 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Original Paper

Towards an Appreciation of Ethics in Social Enterprise Business Models

Original Paper

Bribery in MNEs: The Dynamics of Corruption Culture Distance and Organizational Distance to Core Values

Original Paper

Consumer Rights Paradigm: Development of the Construct in the Jordanian Context

Original Paper

Responding to Value Pluralism in Hybrid Organizations

Original Paper

Transforming Good Intentions into Social Impact: A Case on the Creation and Evolution of a Social Enterprise

Original Paper

The Link Between Benevolence and Well-Being in the Context of Human-Resource Marketing

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise