nach oben

TechTrends

Erschienen in:

19.02.2021 | Original Paper

Educators’ Interests, Prior Knowledge and Questions Regarding Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality and 3D Printing and Modeling

verfasst von: Torrey Trust, Nathaniel Woodruff, Matthew Checrallah, Jeromie Whalen

Erschienen in: TechTrends | Ausgabe 4/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Innovative new technologies, such as augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR) and 3D printers, provide new affordances for education. While each of these technologies has been shown to positively impact learning, they have not yet been widely adopted in schools. With the interest in these technologies growing among educators, this study explores why educators are motivated to learn about these tools, what they already know about these tools, and what they want to know. This paper presents data from 265 educators who completed a pre-course survey before engaging in an open online course to learn about these technologies. Findings from the data reveal significant variance in educators’ prior knowledge, interests, and motivations. This paper yields new insights that can support the design of professional learning experiences for educators and potentially increase mainstream adoption and use of these tools in education.

Vorheriger Artikel Cyber-Safety Policy Elements in the Era of Online Learning: A Content Analysis of Policies in the UAE

Nächster Artikel Visualizing Course Structure: Using Course Composition Diagrams to Reflect on Design

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Barnard, D. (2019). History of VR - Timeline of events and tech development. Virtual Speech. https://virtualspeech.com/blog/history-of-vr

Billinghurst, M., Kato, H., & Poupyrev, I. (2001). The magic book — Moving seamlessly between reality and virtuality. IEEE Computers, Graphics and Applications, 21(3), 2–4.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.CrossRef

Brown, M., McCormack, M., Reeves, J., Brooks, D., Grajek, S., Alexander, B., et al. (2020). 2020 EDUCAUSE Horizon Report: Teaching and Learning Edition (ISBN 978–1–933046-03-7). Louisville, CO: EDUCAUSE.

Carpenter, J. P. (2016). Unconference professional development: Edcamp participant perceptions and motivations for attendance. Professional Development in Education, 42(1), 78–99.CrossRef

Cheng, K., & Tsai, C. (2013). Affordances of augmented reality in science learning: Suggestions for future research. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(4), 449–462 Retrieved July 9, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/23442320.CrossRef

Choi, H., & Kim, J. M. (2018). Implications for activating 3D printer use for education in elementary and secondary schools. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 8(4–2), 1546–1551.CrossRef

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute

EDUCAUSE. (2020). 3D printing. https://library.educause.edu/topics/emerging-technologies/3d-printing.

Edwards-Stewart, A., Hoyt, T., & Reger, G. (2016). Classifying different types of augmented reality technology. Annual Review of Cybertherapy and Telemedicine, 14, 199–202.

Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02299597.CrossRef

Evans, J. (2019). Digital learning: Peril or promise for our K-12 students. Irvine, CA: Project Tomorrow Speak Up Research Initiative.

Ford, S., & Minshall, T. (2019). Invited review article: Where and how 3D printing is used in teaching and education. Additive Manufacturing, 25, 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.028.CrossRef

Hantono, B, S., Nugroho, L, E., & Santosa, P, I. (2018). Meta-review of augmented reality in education. In 2018 10th international conference on information technology and electrical engineering (ICITEE) (pp. 312-315). IEEE.https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITEED.2018.8534888.

Ibáñez, M. B., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2018). Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123, 109–123.CrossRef

Iqbal, M. (2020). Pokémon GO Revenue and Usage Statistics (2020). Retrieved July 09, 2020, from https://www.businessofapps.com/data/pokemon-go-statistics/

Jensen, L., & Konradsen, F. (2017). A review of the use of virtual reality head-mounted displays in education and training. Education and Information Technologies, 23(4), 1515–1529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9676-0.CrossRef

Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., & Ludgate, H. (2013). NMC horizon report: 2013 K-12 edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.

Kavanagh, S., Luxton-Reilly, A., Wuensche, B., & Plimmer, B. (2017). A systematic review of virtual reality in education. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 10(2), 85–119.

Keay, J. K., Carse, N., & Jess, M. (2019). Understanding teachers as complex professional learners. Professional Development in Education, 45(1), 125–137.CrossRef

Koehler, M. (2012). TPACK explained. TPACK.ORG. http://matt-koehler.com/tpack2/tpack-explained/

Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education., 9(1), 60–70.

Kyndt, E., Gijbels, D., Grosemans, I., & Donche, V. (2016). Teachers’ everyday professional development: Mapping informal learning activities, antecedents and learning outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1111–1150.CrossRef

Lee, K. (2012). The future of learning and training in augmented reality. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 7, 31–42.CrossRef

Leinonen, T., Virnes, M., Hietala, I., & Brinck, J. (2020). 3D printing in the wild: Adopting digital fabrication in elementary school education. International Journal of Art & Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12310.

Makki, T. W., O'Neal, L. J., Cotten, S. R., & Rikard, R. V. (2018). When first-order barriers are high: A comparison of second-and third-order barriers to classroom computing integration. Computers & Education, 120, 90–97.CrossRef

Maloy, R., Trust, T., Kommers, S., LaRoche, I., & Malinowski, A. (2017). 3D modeling and printing in history/social studies classrooms: Initial lessons and insights. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 17(2), 229–249.

Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Mora, C. E., Añorbe-Díaz, B., & González-Marrero, A. (2017). Virtual technologies trends in education. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(2), 469–486.CrossRef

Milman, N. B. (2018). Defining and conceptualizing mixed reality, augmented reality and virtual reality. Distance Learning, 15(2), 55–58.

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847.CrossRef

Oliver, K. (2016). Professional development considerations for makerspace leaders, part one: Addressing “what?” and “why?”. TechTrends, 60(2), 160–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0028-5.CrossRef

Patterson, T., & Han, I. (2019). Learning to teach with virtual reality: Lessons from one elementary teacher. TechTrends, 63(4), 463–469.CrossRef

Pomerantz, J. & Rode, R. (2020). Exploring the future of extended reality in higher education. EDUCAUSE. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/6/exploring-the-future-of-extended-reality-in-higher-education

Promethean. (2019). Promethean publishes the state of technology in education report 18/19. https://resourced.prometheanworld.com/state-of-technologyreport/.

Schoffer, F. (2016). How expiring patents are ushering in the next generation of 3D printing. TechCrunch. https://techcrunch.com/2016/05/15/how-expiring-patents-are-ushering-in-the-next-generation-of-3d-printing/

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.CrossRef

Snelson, C., & Hsu, Y. C. (2019). Educational 360-degree videos in virtual reality: A scoping review of the emerging research. TechTrends, 64, 404–412.CrossRef

Trust, T., & Maloy, R. (2017). Why 3D print? The 21st century skills students develop while engaging in 3D printing projects. Computers in the Schools, 34(4).

Twining, P., Heller, R. S., Nussbaum, M., & Tsai, C. C. (2017). Some guidance on conducting and reporting qualitative studies. Computers & Education, 106, A1–A9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.002.CrossRef

Vega, V., & Robb, M. B. (2019). The common sense census: Inside the 21st-century classroom. San Francisco, CA: Common Sense Media.

Wilson, K. (2018). How (and why!) to write a pre-course survey or questionnaire - SPS: Distance learning. Northwestern School of Professional Studies. https://dl.sps.northwestern.edu/blog/2018/04/write-pre-course-survey-questionnaire/.

Titel: Educators’ Interests, Prior Knowledge and Questions Regarding Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality and 3D Printing and Modeling
verfasst von: Torrey Trust
Nathaniel Woodruff
Matthew Checrallah
Jeromie Whalen
Publikationsdatum: 19.02.2021
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: TechTrends / Ausgabe 4/2021
Print ISSN: 8756-3894
Elektronische ISSN: 1559-7075
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00594-9

Springer Professional

Educators’ Interests, Prior Knowledge and Questions Regarding Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality and 3D Printing and Modeling

Abstract

Premium Partner

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2021

A Qualitative Exploration of College Students’ Perceptions of Cyberbullying

Technologies, Challenges and Needs of K-12 Teachers in the Transition to Distance Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Don’t Be Evil: Should We Use Google in Schools?

Open Education Resources: Supporting Diversity and Sharing in Education

The Role of Creative Risk Taking and Productive Failure in Education and Technology Futures

Introducing the July 2021 Issue

Premium Partner