nach oben

Universal Access in the Information Society

Erschienen in:

24.01.2022 | Long Paper

Effect of gestures and smartphone sizes on user experience of text input methods

verfasst von: Ying Li, Fangzhou You, Ming Ji, Rui Jie Zhang, Xuqun You

Erschienen in: Universal Access in the Information Society | Ausgabe 2/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of gestures (text entry with thumbs of both hands and one-thumb text entry) and smartphone sizes (4.7, 5, and 5.5 inches) on the user experience during text entry with QWERTY and T9 input methods. Messaging using smartphones has become an important communication tool. Users change their gestures depending on the smartphone use context. Many different smartphone sizes are available, but suggestions from an ergonomic perspective are missing. Twenty-four participants used either two-thumb text entry or one-thumb text entry, using both QWERTY and T9. A different group of 24 participants entered text using QWERTY and T9 on smartphones with different sizes. Their performance, subjective rating, and physiological reactions were analyzed. Two-thumb text entry was more effective than one-thumb text entry. Better user experiences were achieved by using QWERTY for two-thumb text entry, by using T9 for one-thumb text entry, and by using QWERTY with a 5-inch smartphone compared with using a 4.7-inch smartphone. Using QWERTY with a 5.5-inch smartphone achieved a higher speed than using a 4.7-inch smartphone. Users who used T9 with a 5-inch smartphone achieved a better user experience than if using a 5.5-inch smartphone. QWERTY is more suitable for two-thumb text entry, while T9 is more suitable for one-thumb text entry. Different smartphone sizes affect the use of input methods. This study provides a reference for smartphone text input interface designers.

Vorheriger Artikel Usability of a telehealth solution based on TV interaction for the elderly: the VITASENIOR-MT case study

Nächster Artikel Applying web-mediated co-curricular learning and phenomenon-based learning to improve students’ programming skills and self-efficacy in an online programming course

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Al-Showarah, S., Naseer, A.J., Sellahewa, H.: Effects of user age on smartphone and tablet use, measured with an eye-tracker via fixation duration, scan-path duration, and saccades proportion. In: UAHCI, pp. 3–14. Springer, Cham (2014)

Azenkot, S., Zhai, S.: Touch behavior with different postures on soft smartphone keyboards. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Human–Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, pp. 251–260. ACM (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2371574.2371612

Baumgartner, T., Esslen, M., Jäncke, L.: From emotion perception to emotion experience: emotions evoked by pictures and classical music. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 60(1), 34–43 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.04.007CrossRef

Block, J.: A study of affective responsiveness in a lie-detection situation. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 55(1), 11 (1957)CrossRef

Bouwman, H., De Reuver, M., Sell, A., Walden, P.: Introduction to the special issue on lifestyle and mobile communication. Telemat. Inform. 31(2), V–VI (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-5853(13)00077-4CrossRef

Brooke, J.: SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval. Ind. 189(194), 4–7 (1996)

Castellucci, S.J., MacKenzie, I.S.: Gathering text entry metrics on android devices. In: Proceedings of the CHI'11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1507–1512. ACM (2011)

Castellucci, S.J., MacKenzie, I.S.: Gathering text input metrics on Android devices. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia and Human–Computer Interaction (MHCI), pp. 120.1–120.8. International ASET Inc, Toronto (2013)

Cha, J.M., Choi, E., Lim, J.: Virtual Sliding QWERTY: a new text entry method for smartwatches using Tap-N-Drag. Appl. Ergon. 51, 263–272 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.05.008CrossRef

10.

Chen, K.B., Savage, A.B., Chourasia, A.O., Wiegmann, D.A., Sesto, M.E.: Touch screen performance by individuals with and without motor control disabilities. Appl. Ergon. 44(2), 297–302 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2012.08.004CrossRef

11.

Chongyong, S., Dianzhi, L.: A comparison of several subjective rating scales of cognitive load. Psychol. Sci. 36, 194–201 (2013). https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2013.01.014CrossRef

12.

Chourasia, A.O., Wiegmann, D.A., Chen, K.B., Irwin, C.B., Sesto, M.E.: Effect of sitting or standing on touch screen performance and touch characteristics. Hum. Factors 55(4), 789–802 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720812470843CrossRef

13.

Conway, R.T., Sangaline, E.W.: A Monte Carlo simulation approach for quantitatively evaluating keyboard layouts for gesture input. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 99, 37–47 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.10.001CrossRef

14.

Critchley, H.D.: Electrodermal responses: what happens in the brain. Neuroscientist 8(2), 132–142 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1177/107385840200800209CrossRef

15.

DeviceAtlas: Most popular viewport size statistics for 2016. https://deviceatlas.com/blog/viewport-size-statistics-2016. Accessed 30 Dec 2016

16.

Findlater, L., Wobbrock, J.O.: From plastic to pixels: in search of touch-typing touch-screen keyboards. ACM Interact. XIX 3, 44–49 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2168931.2168942CrossRef

17.

Ghouali, S., Ghouali, Y., Feham, M.: An investigation of analytic decision during driving test. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 8 (2), 156–165 (2017). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2017.080221CrossRef

18.

Gold, J.E., Driban, J.B., Thomas, N., Chakravarty, T., Channell, V., Komaroff, E.G.: Postures, typing strategies, and gender differences in mobile device usage: an observational study. Appl. Ergon. 43(2), 408–412 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2011.06.015CrossRef

19.

Grubert, J., Ofek, E., Pahud, M., Kristensson, P.O.: The office of the future: virtual, portable, and global. IEEE CG&A 38(6), 125–133 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2018.2875609CrossRef

20.

Gustafsson, E., Johnson, P.W., Lindegård, A., Hagberg, M.: Technique, muscle activity and kinematic differences in young adults texting on mobile phones. Ergonomics 54(5), 477–487 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2011.568634CrossRef

21.

Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): results of empirical and theoretical research. Adv. Psychol. 52, 139–183 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9CrossRef

22.

Hinkle, L.B.: Determination of emotional state through physiological measurement. Master of Science, Graduate Council of Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas, United States (2016)

23.

Huang, H., Huang, T.C.: Thumb touch control range and usability factors of virtual keys for smartphone games. J. Multimodal User Interfaces 9(8), 1–12 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12193-017-0248-9CrossRef

24.

Hwangbo, H., Yoon, S.H., Jin, B.S., Han, Y.S., Ji, Y.G.: A study of pointing performance of elderly users on smartphones. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 29(9), 604–618 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2012.729996CrossRef

25.

Jiang, X., Bian, G.B., Tian, Z.: Removal of artifacts from EEG signals: a review. Sensors 19(5), 987 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/s19050987CrossRef

26.

Jia, Z., Pei-Luen, P.R., Gavriel, S.: Older adults’ text entry on smartphones and tablets: investigating effects of display size and input method on acceptance and performance. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 30(9), 727–739 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2014.924348CrossRef

27.

Jonsson, P., Johnson, P.W., Hagberg, M., Forsman, M.: Thumb joint movement and muscular activity during mobile phone texting—a methodological study. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 21(2), 363–370 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.10.007CrossRef

28.

Jordan, J.: 53% of emails opened on mobile; outlook opens decrease 33% (2015). https://litmus.com/blog/53-of-emails-opened-on-mobile-outlook-opensdecrease-33

29.

Jung, K., Jang, J.: Development of a two-step touch method for website navigation on smartphones. Appl. Ergon. 48, 148–153 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2014.11.006CrossRef

30.

Jung, E.S., Im, Y.: Touchable area: an empirical study on design approach considering perception size and touch input behavior. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 49, 21–30 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2015.05.008CrossRef

31.

Kane, S.K., Wobbrock, J.O., Smith, I.E.: Getting off the treadmill: evaluating walking user interfaces for mobile devices in public spaces. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, pp. 109–118. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2008). https://doi.org/10.1145/1409240.1409253

32.

Kietrys, D.M., Gerg, M.J., Dropkin, J., Gold, J.E.: Mobile input device type, texting style and screen size influence upper extremity and trapezius muscle activity, and cervical posture while texting. Appl. Ergon. 50, 98–104 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.03.003CrossRef

33.

Kim, J.H., Aulck, L., Bartha, M.C., Harper, C.A., Johnson, P.W.: Differences in typing forces, muscle activity, comfort, and typing performance among virtual, notebook, and desktop keyboards. Appl. Ergon. 45(6), 1406–1413 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2014.04.001CrossRef

34.

Kristensson, P.O.: Five challenges for intelligent text entry methods. AI Mag. 30(4), 85–94 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712309339854CrossRef

35.

Kristensson, P.O., Zhai, S.: SHARK2: a large vocabulary shorthand writing system for pen-based computers. In: Proceedings of UIST 2004, pp. 43–52. ACM Press (2004)

36.

Kristensson, P.O., Zhai, S.: Relaxing stylus typing precision by geometric pattern matching. In: Proceedings of IUI 2005, pp. 151–158. ACM Press (2005)

37.

Kwon, S., Lee, D., Chung, M.K.: Effect of key size and activation area on the performance of a regional error correction method in a touch-screen QWERTY keyboard. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 39(5), 888–893 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2009.02.013CrossRef

38.

Lee, S.C., Cha, M.C., Hwangbo, H., Mo, S., Ji, Y.G.: Smartphone form factors: effects of width and bottom bezel on touch performance, workload, and physical demand. Appl. Ergon. 67, 142–150 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.10.002CrossRef

39.

Lee, S., Kyung, G., Kim, M., Choi, D., Choi, H., Hwang, K., Park, S., Kim, S.Y., Lee, S.: Shaping rollable display devices: effects of gripping condition, device thickness, and hand length on bimanual perceived grip comfort. Hum. Factors 62(5), 770–786 (2019)CrossRef

40.

Leversedge, F.J.: Anatomy and pathomechanics of the thumb. Hand Clin. 24(3), 219–229 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hcl.2008.03.010CrossRef

41.

Li, Y., You, F., Ji, M., You, X.: The influence of smartphone text input method, posture, and environment on user experience. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 36(12), 1110–1121 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1719465CrossRef

42.

Li, Y., You, F., You, X., Ji, M.: Smartphone text input: effects of experience and phrase complexity on user performance, physiological reaction, and perceived usability. Appl. Ergon. 80, 200–209 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.05.019CrossRef

43.

Lin, Y.C., Lin, M.H.: This study of hand anthropometry and touchscreen size of smartphones. In: International Conference on Human Interface and the Management of Information, pp. 617–626. Springer, Cham (2015)

44.

Ljubic, S., Glavinic, V., Kukec, M.: Effects of interaction style and screen size on touchscreen text entry performance: an empirical research. In: UAHCI, pp. 68–79. Springer, Cham (2014)

45.

MacKenzie, I.S., Soukoreff, R.W.: Text entry for mobile computing: models and methods, theory and practice. Hum. Comput. Interact. 17, 147–198 (2002)CrossRef

46.

MacKenzie, I.S., Zhang, S.X., Soukoreff, R.W.: Text entry using soft keyboards. Behav. Inform. Technol. 18(4), 235–244 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1080/014492999118995CrossRef

47.

MacKenzie, I.S., Soukoreff, R.W.: Phrase sets for evaluating text entry techniques. In: Proceedings of the CHI'03 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 754–755. ACM (2003)

48.

Market Intelligence & Consulting Institute (MIC): Worldwide Smartphone Market Forecast, 2018–2022 (2018). https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/4471265/worldwide-smartphone-market-forecast-2018-2022

49.

Martinez-Peñaranda, C., Bailer, W., Barreda-Ángeles, M., Weiss, W., Pereda-Baños, A.: A psychophysiological approach to the usability evaluation of a multi-view video browsing tool. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia Modeling, pp. 456–466. Springer, Berlin (2013)

50.

McCarthy, M.W., James, D.A., Rowlands, D.D.: Smartphones: feasibility for real-time sports monitoring. Procedia Eng. 60, 409–414 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.07.044CrossRef

51.

Meehan, M., Razzaque, S., Insko, B., Whitton, M., Brooks, F.P.: Review of four studies on the use of physiological reaction as a measure of presence in stressful virtual environments. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 30(3), 239–258 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-005-6381-3CrossRef

52.

Nam, Y., Koo, B., Cichocki, A., Choi, S.: GOM-Face: GKP, EOG, and EMG-based multimodal interface with application to humanoid robot control. IEEE Trans. Bio Med. Eng. 61(2), 453–462 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2013.2280900CrossRef

53.

Niu, J., Liu, Y., Lin, J., Zhu, L., Wang, K.: Stroke++: a new Chinese input method for touch screen mobile phones. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 72(4), 440–450 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.01.001CrossRef

54.

Othman, M.K., Petrie, H., Power, C.: Measuring the usability of a smartphone delivered museum guide. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 97, 629–637 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.282CrossRef

55.

Park, Y., Heo, H., Lee, K.: Enhanced auditory feedback for Korean touch screen keyboards. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 73, 1–11 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.08.002CrossRef

56.

Park, Y.S., Han, S.H.: Touch key design for one-handed thumb interaction with a mobile phone: effects of touch key size and touch key location. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 40(1), 68–76 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2009.08.002CrossRef

57.

Perotto, A.O.: Anatomical Guide for the Electromyographer: The Limbs and Trunk. Charles C Thomas Publisher, Springfield (2011)

58.

Pfister, H., Wollstädter, S., Peter, C.: Affective responses to system messages in human–computer-interaction: effects of modality and message type. Interact. Comput. 23(4), 372–383 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2011.05.006CrossRef

59.

Pritom, A.I., Mahmud, H., Ahmed, S., Hasan, M.K., Khan, M.M.: TYPEHEX keyboard: a virtual keyboard for faster typing in Smartphone. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT), pp. 522–526. IEEE (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCITechn.2015.7488126

60.

SAC.: Hand Sizing System-Adult (Vol. GB/T 16252-1996). Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China, SAC, Beijing (1996)

61.

Schildbach, B., Rukzio, E.: Investigating selection and reading performance on a mobile phone while walking. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, pp. 93–102. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1851600.1851619

62.

Seror, P., Maisonobe, T., Bouche, P.: A new electrode placement for recording the compound motor action potential of the first dorsal interosseous muscle. Neurophysiol. Clin. 41(4), 173–180 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucli.2011.06.003CrossRef

63.

Seven Nights Digital House: (2018). https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1590412081911332478&wfr=spider&for=pc

64.

Shin, G., Zhu, X.: Ergonomic issues associated with the use of touchscreen desktop PC. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 949–953. SAGE Publications, Los Angeles (2011)

65.

Sinex, J.E.: Pulse oximetry: principles and limitations. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 17(1), 59–66 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-6757(99)90019-0CrossRef

66.

Šolcová, I.P., Lačev, A.: Differences in male and female subjective experience and physiological reactions to emotional stimuli. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 117, 75–82 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2017.04.009CrossRef

67.

Soylu, A.R., Yavaş, G., Ergin, B., Keceli, S.: Effect of touch coordinate display as a form of augmented, concurrent visual feedback on the accuracy of single-handed typing via smartphone virtual keyboards. Turk. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 25(3), 1724–1732 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3906/elk-1504-11CrossRef

68.

Tsai, T.H., Tseng, K.C., Chang, Y.S.: Testing the usability of smartphone surface gestures on different sizes of smartphones by different age groups of users. Comput. Hum. Behav. 75, 103–116 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.013CrossRef

69.

Trudeau, M.B., Asakawa, D.S., Jindrich, D.L., Dennerlein, J.T.: Two-handed grip on a mobile phone affords greater thumb motor performance, decreased variability, and a more extended thumb posture than a one-handed grip. Appl. Ergon. 52, 24–28 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.06.025CrossRef

70.

Trudeau, M.B., Udtamadilok, T., Karlson, A.K., Dennerlein, J.T.: Thumb motor performance varies by movement orientation, direction, and device size during single-handed mobile phone use. Hum. Factors 54(1), 52–59 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811423660CrossRef

71.

Trudeau, M.B., Young, J.G., Jindrich, D.L., Dennerlein, J.T.: Thumb motor performance varies with thumb and wrist posture during single-handed mobile phone use. J. Biomech. 45(14), 2349–2354 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.07.012CrossRef

72.

Turner, C.J., Chaparro, B.S., He, J.: Text input on a smartwatch QWERTY keyboard: tap versus trace. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 33(2), 143–150 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2016.1223265CrossRef

73.

Vertanen, K., Kristensson, P.O.: Mining, analyzing, and modeling text written on mobile devices. Nat. Lang. Eng. 27(1), 1–33 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324919000548CrossRef

74.

Victor, H.: Did you know that smartphone screens nearly doubled in size since 2007. Phone Arena (2014). http://www.phonearena.com/news/Did-you-know-thatsmartphone-screens-nearly-doubled-in-size-since-2007_id52067

75.

Wang, Y., Ai, H., Liang, Q., Chang, W., He, J.: How to optimize the input efficiency of keyboard buttons in large smartphone? A comparison of curved keyboard and keyboard area size. In: HCI, pp. 85–92. Springer, Cham (2019)

76.

Werth, A., Babski-Reeves, K.: Effects of portable computing devices on posture, muscle activation levels and efficiency. Appl. Ergon. 45(6), 1603–1609 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2014.05.008CrossRef

77.

Wright, P., Bartram, C., Rogers, N., Emslie, H., Evans, J., Wilson, B., Belt, S.: Text entry on handheld computers by older users. Ergonomics 43(6), 702–716 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/001401300404689CrossRef

78.

Wu, C.F., Lai, C.C., Liu, Y.K.: Investigation of the performance of trackpoint and touchpads with varied right and left buttons function locations. Appl. Ergon. 44(2), 312–320 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2012.08.006CrossRef

79.

Xiong, J., Muraki, S.: Effects of age, thumb length and screen size on thumb movement coverage on smartphone touchscreens. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 53, 140–148 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2015.11.004CrossRef

80.

Yamada, H.: A historical study of typewriters and typing methods, from the position of planning Japanese parallels. J. Inf. Process. 2, 175–202 (1980)

81.

Yi, X., Yu, C., Shi, W., Shi, Y.: Is it too small: investigating the performances and preferences of users when typing on tiny QWERTY keyboards. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 106, 44–62 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.05.001CrossRef

82.

Yin, P.Y., Su, E.P.: Cyber Swarm optimization for general keyboard arrangement problem. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 41(1), 43–52 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2010.11.007CrossRef

83.

Yu, Y., Zhou, Z., Yin, E., Jiang, J., Liu, Y., Hu, D.: A P300-based brain–computer interface for Chinese character input. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 32(11), 878–884 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2016.1203529CrossRef

84.

Zhai, S., Hunter, M., Smith, B.A.: Performance optimization of virtual keyboards. Hum. Comput. Interact. 17(2–3), 229–269 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2002.9667315CrossRef

85.

Zhai, S., Kristensson, P.O.: Shorthand writing on stylus keyboard. In: Proceedings of CHI 2003, pp. 97–104. ACM Press (2003)

86.

Zhai, S., Kristensson, P.O.: The word-gesture keyboard: reimagining keyboard interaction. Commun. ACM 55(9), 91–101 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2330667.2330689CrossRef

87.

Zhou, J., Rau, P.L.P., Salvendy, G.: Older adults’ text entry on smartphones and tablets: investigating effects of display size and input method on acceptance and performance. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 30(9), 727–739 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2014.924348CrossRef

88.

Zhou, J., Sun, J., Chen, F., Wang, Y., Taib, R., Khawaji, A., Li, Z.: Measurable decision making with GSR and pupillary analysis for intelligent user interface. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. (TOCHI) 21(6), 33 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2687924CrossRef

89.

Zhu, Y., Machi, Y.: An evaluation about the characters of four inputting methods of mobile phone based on human body's physiological indices. In: Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Active Media Technology, pp. 364–368. IEEE (2005)

Titel: Effect of gestures and smartphone sizes on user experience of text input methods
verfasst von: Ying Li
Fangzhou You
Ming Ji
Rui Jie Zhang
Xuqun You
Publikationsdatum: 24.01.2022
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Universal Access in the Information Society / Ausgabe 2/2023
Print ISSN: 1615-5289
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-5297
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-021-00863-7

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2023

The use of accessibility metadata in e-learning environments: a systematic literature review

I see therefore i read: improving the reading capabilities of individuals with visual disabilities through immersive virtual reality

Mobile learning for hearing-impaired children: Review and analysis

Accessibility, usability, and security evaluation of universities’ prospective student web pages: a comparative study of Europe, North America, and Oceania

Constraining peripheral perception in instant messaging during software development by continuous work context extraction

Visualising user–website interaction: description and evaluation of a teaching method

Premium Partner