nach oben

Progress in Additive Manufacturing

Erschienen in:

16.01.2022 | Full Research Article

Effect of printing parameters on the tensile strength of FDM 3D samples: a meta-analysis focusing on layer thickness and sample orientation

verfasst von: Sajjad Farashi, Fariborz Vafaee

Erschienen in: Progress in Additive Manufacturing | Ausgabe 4/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

3D printing is an interesting and growing field in many areas. Despite advantages, several issues regarding the quality and strength of products have remained unresolved. Among these issues are the effects of printing process parameters on the mechanical properties of a printed object. In this study, the effects of the layer thickness and print orientation on the tensile strength of FDM-printed samples were considered. According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, eligible studies in major databases were found. The pooled effect size, heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed using statistical analysis. Results showed that increasing layer thickness might reduce the tensile strength of FDM-printed samples up to 20%, while increasing the printing angle of the sample on the build platform decreased the tensile strength to about 12%. Furthermore, adjusting extruder temperature to higher values and printing speeds to lower values might reduce the heterogeneity of results between studies. In conclusion, when enhanced tensile strength is required, it is recommended to focus mainly on the layer thickness than printing orientation, adjust lower layer thickness and orient the model parallel to the build platform.

Vorheriger Artikel An integrated process and data framework for the purpose of knowledge management and closed-loop quality feedback in additive manufacturing

Nächster Artikel Selective laser melting of Al and AlSi10Mg: parameter study and creep experiments

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Sathish T, Vijayakumar MD, Krishnan AA (2018) Design and fabrication of industrial components using 3D printing. Mater Today Proc 5:14489–14498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.03.036CrossRef

Dawood A, Marti MB, Sauret-Jackson V, Darwood A (2015) 3D printing in dentistry. Br Dent J 219:521–529. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.914CrossRef

Khalid M, Peng Q (2020) Investigation of printing parameters of additive manufacturing process for sustainability using design of experiments. In: Proceedings of the ASME design engineering technical conference. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2020-22771

Sandler N, Salmela I, Fallarero A, Rosling A, Khajeheian M, Kolakovic R, Genina N, Nyman J, Vuorela P (2014) Towards fabrication of 3D printed medical devices to prevent biofilm formation. Int J Pharm 459:62–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.11.001CrossRef

Buonamici F, Carfagni M, Furferi R, Governi L, Saccardi M, Volpe Y (2018) Optimizing fabrication outcome in low-cost FDM machines. Part-1 Metrics. Manuf Technol 18:372–378. https://doi.org/10.21062/ujep/108.2018/a/1213-2489/MT/18/3/372CrossRef

Ahmed SW, Hussain G, Altaf K, Ali S, Alkahtani M, Abidi MH, Alzabidi A (2020) On the effects of process parameters and optimization of interlaminate bond strength in 3D printed ABS/CF-PLA composite. Polymers. https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM12092155CrossRef

Amini M, Reisinger A, Pahr DH (2020) Influence of processing parameters on mechanical properties of a 3D-printed trabecular bone microstructure. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 108:38–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34363CrossRef

Asadi-Eydivand M, Solati-Hashjin M, Farzad A, Abu Osman NA (2016) Effect of technical parameters on porous structure and strength of 3D printed calcium sulfate prototypes. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 37:57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2015.06.005CrossRef

Kovan V, Tezel T, Topal E, Camurlu H (2018) Printing parameters effect on surface characteristics of 3D printed PLA materials. Mach Technol Mater 12:266–269

10.

Dey A, Yodo N (2019) A systematic survey of FDM process parameter optimization and their influence on part characteristics. J Manuf Mater Process 3:64. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp3030064CrossRef

11.

Markiz N, Horváth E, Ficzere P (2020) Influence of printing direction on 3D printed ABS specimens. Prod Eng Arch 26:127–130. https://doi.org/10.30657/pea.2020.26.24CrossRef

12.

Cantrell JT, Rohde S, Damiani D, Gurnani R, DiSandro L, Anton J, Young A, Jerez A, Steinbach D, Kroese C (2017) Experimental characterization of the mechanical properties of 3D-printed ABS and polycarbonate parts. Rapid Prototyp J. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41600-7_11CrossRef

13.

Alafaghani AA, Qattawi A, Alrawi B, Guzman A (2017) Experimental optimization of fused deposition modelling processing parameters: a design-for-manufacturing approach. Proc Manuf 10:791–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.079CrossRef

14.

Bellini A, Güçeri S (2003) Mechanical characterization of parts fabricated using fused deposition modeling. Rapid Prototyp J. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540310489631CrossRef

15.

Griffiths CA, Howarth J, De Almeida-Rowbotham G, Rees A (2016) A design of experiments approach to optimise tensile and notched bending properties of fused deposition modelling parts. In: Proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, pp 1502–1512. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405416640182

16.

Lin K-W, Hu C-J, Yang W-W, Chou L-W, Wei S-H, Chen C-S, Sun P-C (2019) Biomechanical evaluation and strength test of 3D-printed foot orthoses. Appl Bionics Biomech. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4989534CrossRef

17.

Ouhsti M, El Haddadi B, Belhouideg S (2018) Effect of printing parameters on the mechanical properties of parts fabricated with open-source 3D printers in PLA by fused deposition modeling. Mech Mech Eng 22:895–908. https://doi.org/10.2478/mme-2018-0070CrossRef

18.

Raut S, Jatti VS, Khedkar NK, Singh TP (2014) Investigation of the effect of built orientation on mechanical properties and total cost of FDM parts. Proc Mater Sci 6:1625–1630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.146CrossRef

19.

Rayegani F, Onwubolu GC (2014) Fused deposition modelling (FDM) process parameter prediction and optimization using group method for data handling (GMDH) and differential evolution (DE). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73:509–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5835-2CrossRef

20.

Sood AK, Ohdar RK, Mahapatra SS (2010) Parametric appraisal of fused deposition modeling process using the grey Taguchi method. Proc IMechE 224:135–145. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544054JEM1565CrossRef

21.

Wang S, Ma Y, Deng Z, Zhang S, Cai J (2020) Effects of fused deposition modeling process parameters on tensile, dynamic mechanical properties of 3D printed polylactic acid materials. PolymTest 86:106483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106483CrossRef

22.

Zhao Y, Chen Y, Zhou Y (2019) Novel mechanical models of tensile strength and elastic property of FDM AM PLA materials: experimental and theoretical analyses. Mater Des 181:108089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108089CrossRef

23.

Christiyan KGJ, Chandrasekhar U, Venkateswarlu K (2016) A study on the influence of process parameters on the Mechanical Properties of 3D printed ABS composite. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 114:012109. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/114/1/012109CrossRef

24.

Altan M, Eryildiz M, Gumus B, Kahraman Y (2018) Effects of process parameters on the quality of PLA products fabricated by fused deposition modeling (FDM): Surface roughness and tensile strength. Mater Test 60:471–477. https://doi.org/10.3139/120.111178CrossRef

25.

Wang P, Zou B, Xiao H, Ding S, Huang C (2019) Effects of printing parameters of fused deposition modeling on mechanical properties, surface quality, and microstructure of PEEK. J Mater Process Technol 271:62–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.03.016CrossRef

26.

Wang P, Zou B, Ding S, Li L, Huang C (2020) Effects of FDM-3D printing parameters on mechanical properties and microstructure of CF/PEEK and GF/PEEK. Chin J Aeronaut. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2020.05.040CrossRef

27.

Samykano M, Selvamani S, Kadirgama K, Ngui W, Kanagaraj G, Sudhakar K (2019) Mechanical property of FDM printed ABS: influence of printing parameters. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 102:2779–2796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03313-0CrossRef

28.

Hassanifard S, Hashemi SM (2020) On the strain-life fatigue parameters of additive manufactured plastic materials through fused filament fabrication process. Addit Manuf 32:100973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.100973CrossRef

29.

Chaudhry MS, Czekanski A (2020) Evaluating FDM process parameter sensitive mechanical performance of elastomers at various strain rates of loading. Materials 13:3202. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13143202CrossRef

30.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151:264–269. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135CrossRef

31.

Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson JVW, Losos M, Tugwell P (2009) The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ontario. Accessed 25 Mar 2014. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp

32.

Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327:557–560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557CrossRef

33.

van Enst WA, Ochodo E, Scholten RJPM, Hooft L, Leeflang MM (2014) Investigation of publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a meta-epidemiological study. BMC Med Res Methodol 14:70. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-70CrossRef

34.

Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Routledge

35.

Hasselblad V, Hedges LV (1995) Meta-analysis of screening and diagnostic tests. Psychol Bull 117:167–178. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.167CrossRef

36.

Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR (2009) Converting among effect sizes. In: Introduction to meta‐analysis, pp 45–49

37.

Ning F, Cong W, Hu Y, Wang H (2017) Additive manufacturing of carbon fiber-reinforced plastic composites using fused deposition modeling: effects of process parameters on tensile properties. J Compos Mater 51:451–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998316646169CrossRef

38.

Rankouhi B, Javadpour S, Delfanian F, Letcher T (2016) Failure analysis and mechanical characterization of 3D printed ABS with respect to layer thickness and orientation. J Fail Anal Prev 16:467–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-016-0113-2CrossRef

39.

Dou H, Cheng Y, Ye W, Zhang D, Li J, Miao Z, Rudykh S (2020) Effect of process parameters on tensile mechanical properties of 3D printing continuous carbon fiber-reinforced PLA composites. Materials. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13173850CrossRef

40.

Camposeco-Negrete C (2020) Optimization of printing parameters in fused deposition modeling for improving part quality and process sustainability. Int J Adv Manuf Syst 108:2131–2147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05555-9CrossRef

41.

Padhi SK, Sahu RK, Mahapatra SS, Das HC, Sood AK, Patro B, Mondal AK (2017) Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters using a fuzzy inference system coupled with Taguchi philosophy. Adv Manuf 5:231–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-017-0187-4CrossRef

42.

Keleş Ö, Blevins CW, Bowman KJ (2017) Effect of build orientation on the mechanical reliability of 3D printed ABS. Rapid Prototyp J 23:320–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-09-2015-0122CrossRef

43.

Tanoto YY, Anggono J, Siahaan IH, Budiman W (2017) The effect of orientation difference in fused deposition modeling of ABS polymer on the processing time, dimension accuracy, and strength. In: AIP conference proceedings. AIP Publishing LLC, pp 030051. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4968304

44.

Es-Said OS, Foyos J, Noorani R, Mendelson M, Marloth R, Pregger BA (2000) Effect of layer orientation on mechanical properties of rapid prototyped samples. Mater Manuf Process 15:107–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426910008912976CrossRef

45.

Sterne JA, Gavaghan D, Egger M (2000) Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature. J Clin Epidemiol 53:1119–1129. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00242-0CrossRef

46.

Song D, Chung Baek AM, Koo J, Busogi M, Kim N (2020) Forecasting warping deformation using multivariate thermal time series and K-nearest neighbors in fused deposition modeling. Appl Sci 10:8951. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10248951CrossRef

47.

Yu Y, Liu H, Qian K, Yang H, McGehee M, Gu J, Luo D, Yao L, Zhang YJ (2020) Material characterization and precise finite element analysis of fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites for 4D printing. Comput Aided Des 122:102817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2020.102817MathSciNetCrossRef

48.

Vanaei HR, Raissi K, Deligant M, Shirinbayan M, Fitoussi J, Khelladi S, Tcharkhtchi A (2020) Toward the understanding of temperature effect on bonding strength, dimensions and geometry of 3D-printed parts. J Mater Sci 55:14677–14689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-05057-9CrossRef

49.

Sun Q, Rizvi G, Bellehumeur C, Gu P (2008) Effect of processing conditions on the bonding quality of FDM polymer filaments. Rapid Prototyp J 14:72–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540810862028CrossRef

50.

Wang YT, Yeh YT (2017) Effect of print angle on mechanical properties of FDM 3D structures printed with POM material. In: Bajpai R, Chandrasekhar U (eds) Innovative design and development practices in aerospace and automotive engineering. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1771-1_20CrossRef

51.

Ahn SH, Montero M, Odell D, Roundy S, Wright PK (2002) Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS. Rapid Prototyp J. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540210441166CrossRef

52.

Hernandez-Contreras A, Ruiz-Huerta L, Caballero-Ruiz A, Moock V, Siller HR (2020) Extended CT void analysis in FDM additive manufacturing components. Materials 13:3831. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13173831CrossRef

53.

Wickramasinghe S, Do T, Tran P (2020) FDM-based 3D printing of polymer and associated composite: a review on mechanical properties, defects and treatments. Polymers 12:1529. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12071529CrossRef

54.

Chockalingam K, Jawahar N, Praveen J (2016) Enhancement of anisotropic strength of fused deposited ABS parts by genetic algorithm. Mater Manuf Process 31:2001–2010. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2015.1127949CrossRef

55.

Eiliat H, Urbanic RJ (2019) Determining the relationships between the build orientation, process parameters and voids in additive manufacturing material extrusion processes. Int J Adv Manuf Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2540-6CrossRef

56.

Papon EA, Haque A (2018) Tensile properties, void contents, dispersion and fracture behaviour of 3D printed carbon nanofiber reinforced composites. J Reinf Plast Compos 37:381–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684417750477CrossRef

57.

Dey A, Roan Eagle IN, Yodo N (2021) A review on filament materials for fused filament fabrication. J Manuf Mater Process 5:69

58.

Lay M, Thajudin NLN, Hamid ZAA, Rusli A, Abdullah MK, Shuib RK (2019) Comparison of physical and mechanical properties of PLA, ABS and nylon 6 fabricated using fused deposition modeling and injection molding. Compos B Eng 176:107341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107341CrossRef

59.

Muhammad Syamsuzzaman S (2013) Investigation of the effect of layer thickness and infill material percentage on the performance of low-cost and commercial fused deposition modelling, in: University of Malaya, University of Malaya. http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/8214/5/5_COMPLETE.pdf

60.

Tymrak BM, Kreiger M, Pearce JM (2014) Mechanical properties of components fabricated with open-source 3-D printers under realistic environmental conditions. Mater Des 58:242–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.038CrossRef

61.

Wang X, Zhao L, Fuh JYH, Lee HP (2019) Effect of porosity on mechanical properties of 3D printed polymers: experiments and micromechanical modeling based on X-ray computed tomography analysis. Polymers 11:1154. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11071154CrossRef

62.

Mohamed OA, Masood SH, Bhowmik JL (2016) Mathematical modeling and FDM process parameters optimization using response surface methodology based on Q-optimal design. Appl Math Model 40:10052–10073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2016.06.055CrossRefMATH

63.

Deswal S, Narang R, Chhabra D (2019) Modeling and parametric optimization of FDM 3D printing process using hybrid techniques for enhancing dimensional preciseness. Int J Interact Des Manuf IJIDeM 13:1197–1214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-019-00536-zCrossRef

Titel: Effect of printing parameters on the tensile strength of FDM 3D samples: a meta-analysis focusing on layer thickness and sample orientation
verfasst von: Sajjad Farashi
Fariborz Vafaee
Publikationsdatum: 16.01.2022
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Progress in Additive Manufacturing / Ausgabe 4/2022
Print ISSN: 2363-9512
Elektronische ISSN: 2363-9520
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-021-00247-6

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2022

Pin-bearing mechanical behaviour of continuous reinforced Kevlar fibre composite fabricated via fused filament fabrication

The influence of the energy density on dimensional, geometric, mechanical and morphological properties of SLS parts produced with single and multiple exposure types

Bio-composites for fused filament fabrication: effects of maleic anhydride grafting on poly(lactic acid) and microcellulose

Review of binder jetting 3D printing in the construction industry

Influence of the particle size distribution of monomodal 316L powder on its flowability and processability in powder bed fusion

Forward and backward modeling of direct metal deposition using metaheuristic algorithms tuned artificial neural network and extreme gradient boost

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten