nach oben

Universal Access in the Information Society

Erschienen in:

11.05.2021 | Short Paper

Effects of visual complexity on user search behavior and satisfaction: an eye-tracking study of mobile news apps

verfasst von: Fu Guo, Jiahao Chen, Mingming Li, Wei Lyu, Junjie Zhang

Erschienen in: Universal Access in the Information Society | Ausgabe 4/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The visual complexity of interface plays a crucial role in user experience. Previous studies have extensively investigated website complexity, while the visual complexity of mobile applications gets seldom attention. This study explored the effect of interface complexity of mobile news apps on user search behaviors and satisfaction by dividing visual complexity into quantity complexity and layout complexity. Thirty-four subjects were invited to take part in the task-oriented eye-tracking experiment. The results revealed that a high level of quantity complexity increased users’ revisit counts, fixation counts, and saccade counts. A high level of layout complexity increased users’ revisit counts and saccade counts while fixation counts decreased first and then increased. Additionally, user satisfaction was negatively correlated with quantity complexity levels, while there was an inverted-U shape between user satisfaction and layout complexity levels. Understanding the effect of visual complexity of mobile news apps on user search behaviors and satisfaction would contribute to providing better guidelines for designers to develop mobile news products with an appropriate complexity layout and improve user satisfaction.

Vorheriger Artikel Special section on new trends in HCI for improving communication, education and integration of people with disabilities

Nächster Artikel Using emotion recognition technologies to teach children with autism spectrum disorder how to identify and express emotions

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Bauerly, M., Liu, Y.: Effects of symmetry and number of compositional elements on interface and design aesthetics. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 24(3), 275–287 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310801920508CrossRef

Berggren, N., Eimer, M.: Electrophysiological correlates of active suppression and attentional selection in preview visual search. Neuropsychologia 120, 75–85 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA.2018.10.016CrossRef

Berggren, N., Eimer, M.: Visual working memory load disrupts template-guided attentional selection during visual search. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 30(12), 1902–1915 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1162/JOCN_A_01324CrossRef

Berlyne, D.E.: Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: steps toward an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation. In: Berlyne, D.E. (ed.) Hemisphere. Wiley, New York (1974)

BigData-Research: 2018 China Mobile Information Distribution Platform Market Research Report. http://www.bigdata-research.cn/content/201903/925.html (2019). Accessed 20 Mar 2019

Bölte, J., Hösker, T.M., Hirschfeld, G., Thielsch, M.T.: Electrophysiological correlates of aesthetic processing of webpages: a comparison of experts and laypersons. PeerJ 5, e3440 (2017). https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3440CrossRef

Chang, F.Y.: Usability evaluation of eye tracker-based smart phone APP GUI design. Appl. Mech. Mater. (2014). https://doi.org/10.4028/WWW.SCIENTIFIC.NET/AMM.644-650.1400CrossRef

Chevalier, A., Maury, A.-C., Fouquereau, N.: The influence of the search complexity and the familiarity with the website on the subjective appraisal of aesthetics, mental effort and usability. Behav. Inf. Technol. 33(2), 117–132 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2013.819936CrossRef

Chittaro, L.: Designing visual user interfaces for mobile applications. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems, pp. 331–332. ACM (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/1996461.1996550

10.

Cho, H., Powell, D., Pichon, A., Kuhns, L.M., Garofalo, R., Schnall, R.: Eye-tracking retrospective think-aloud as a novel approach for a usability evaluation. Int. J. Med. Inform. 129, 366–373 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJMEDINF.2019.07.010CrossRef

11.

Chukoskie, L., Guo, S., Ho, E., Zheng, Y., Chen, Q., Meng, V., Cao, J., Devgan, N., Wu, S., Cosman, P.C.: Quantifying gaze behavior during real-world interactions using automated object, face, and fixation detection. IEEE Trans. Cogn. Dev. Syst. 10(4), 1143–1152 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCDS.2018.2821566CrossRef

12.

Cisco Annual Internet Report. http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/service-provider/visual-networking-index-vni/mobile-white-paper-c11-520862.html (2018–2023). Accessed 9 Mar 2020

13.

Clark, R.C., Lyons, C.: Graphics for Learning: Proven Guidelines for Planning, Designing, and Evaluating Visuals in Training Materials. Wiley (2010)

14.

CNNIC: 34th Statistical Report on Internet Development in China. Report. China Internet Network Information Center, Beijing (2014)

15.

Cook, J.R.: Cognitive and social factors in the design of computerized jobs. Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University (1991)

16.

Cornish, L., Hill, A., Horswill, M.S., Becker, S.I., Watson, M.O.: Eye-tracking reveals how observation chart design features affect the detection of patient deterioration: an experimental study. Appl. Ergon. 75, 230–242 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APERGO.2018.10.005CrossRef

17.

Deng, L., Poole, M.S.: Affect in web interfaces: a study of the impacts of web page visual complexity and order. MIS Q. 34(4), 711–730 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2307/25750702CrossRef

18.

Djamasbi, S., Siegel, M., Tullis, T.: Visual hierarchy and viewing behavior: an eye tracking study. In: HCII’11 Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Human–Computer Interaction: Design and Development Approaches, pp. 331–340 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21602-2_36

19.

Doherty, S., O’Brien, S., Carl, M.: Eye tracking as an MT evaluation technique. Mach. Transl. 24(1), 1–13 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10590-010-9070-9CrossRef

20.

Donderi, D.C.: Visual complexity: a review. Psychol. Bull. 132(1), 73–97 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.73CrossRef

21.

Dutta, C.B., Das, D.K.: What drives consumers’ online information search behavior? Evidence from England. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 35, 36–45 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.10.015CrossRef

22.

Flavián-Blanco, C., Gurrea-Sarasa, R., Orús-Sanclemente, C.: Analyzing the emotional outcomes of the online search behavior with search engines. Comput. Hum. Behav. 27(1), 540–551 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.002CrossRef

23.

Flavián, C., Guinalíu, M., Gurrea, R.: The role played by perceived usability, satisfaction and consumer trust on website loyalty. Inf. Manag. 43(1), 1–14 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IM.2005.01.002CrossRef

24.

Geissler, G.L., Zinkhan, G.M., Watson, R.T.: The influence of home page complexity on consumer attention, attitudes, and purchase intent. J. Advert. 35(2), 69–80 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2006.10639232CrossRef

25.

Gorrell, M.: The 21st century searcher: how the growth of search engines affected the redesign of EBSCOhost. Against Grain 20(3), 22–24 (2008)

26.

Guo, F., Ding, Y., Liu, W., Liu, C., Zhang, X.: Can eye-tracking data be measured to assess product design?: visual attention mechanism should be considered. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 53, 229–235 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2015.12.001CrossRef

27.

Gustafsson, A., Johnson, M.D., Roos, I.: The effects of customer satisfaction, relationship commitment dimensions, and triggers on customer retention. J. Mark. 69(4), 210–218 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1509/JMKG.2005.69.4.210CrossRef

28.

Hacek, J.: The correlation of usability, familiarity, satisfaction and reputation with the loyalty of student users of news websites. Medijske Studije 8(15), 56–71 (2017). https://doi.org/10.20901/MS.8.15.5CrossRef

29.

Härtel, C.E.J.: Development and test of the two-stage model of performance appraisal. Asia Pac. J. Hum. Resour. 37(2), 76–91 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1177/103841119903700207CrossRef

30.

Henderson, J.M., Chanceaux, M., Smith, T.J.: The influence of clutter on real-world scene search: evidence from search efficiency and eye movements. J. Vis. 9(1), 32–32 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1167/9.1.32CrossRef

31.

Huang, M.H.: Designing website attributes to induce experiential encounters. Comput. Hum. Behav. 19(4), 425–442 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00080-8CrossRef

32.

Hussain, A., Mkpojiogu, E.O.C., Musa, J., et al.: A user experience evaluation of Amazon Kindle mobile application. AIP Conf. Proc. 1891(1), 20060 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5005393CrossRef

33.

Inal, T.C., Serteser, M., Coşkun, A., Özpinar, A., Ünsal, I.: Indirect reference intervals estimated from hospitalized population for thyrotropin and free thyroxine. Croat. Med. J. 51(2), 124–130 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2010.51.124CrossRef

34.

Janiszewski, C.: The influence of display characteristics on visual exploratory search behavior. J. Consum. Res. 25(3), 290–301 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1086/209540CrossRef

35.

Jiang, J.-Y., Guo, F., Chen, J.-H., Tian, X.-H., Lv, W.: Applying eye-tracking technology to measure interactive experience toward the navigation interface of mobile games considering different visual attention mechanisms. Appl. Sci. 9(16), 3242 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/APP9163242CrossRef

36.

Jones, T.: Incidental learning during information retrieval: a hypertext experiment. In: ICCAL’89 Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Assisted Learning, pp. 235–253 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-51142-3_63

37.

Khan, K., Locatis, C.: Searching through cyberspace: the effects of link display and link density on information retrieval from hypertext on the World Wide Web. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 49(2), 176–182 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1998)49:2%3c176::AID-ASI7%3e3.0.CO;2-WCrossRef

38.

King, A.J., Lazard, A.J., White, S.R.: The influence of visual complexity on initial user impressions: testing the persuasive model of web design. Behav. Inf. Technol. 39(5), 497–510 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1602167CrossRef

39.

Kuhlthau, C.C.: Inside the search process: information seeking from the user’s perspective. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 42(5), 361–371 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199106)42:5%3c361::AID-ASI6%3e3.0.CO;2-%23CrossRef

40.

Lazonder, A.W., Biemans, H.J.A., Wopereis, I.G.J.H.: Differences between novice and experienced users in searching information on the World Wide Web. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 51(6), 576–581 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:6%3c576::AID-ASI9%3e3.0.CO;2-7CrossRef

41.

Lazard, A.J., King, A.J.: Objective Design to subjective evaluations: connecting visual complexity to aesthetic and usability assessments of eHealth. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 36(1), 95–104 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1606976CrossRef

42.

Lim, J.H., Ryu, T., Kim, Y.: Effects of visual stimulus on response behavior of control-on-display interface. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 30(4), 291–302 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2013.858459CrossRef

43.

Lindgaard, G., Fernandes, G., Dudek, C., Brown, J.: Attention web designers: you have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impression! Behav. Inf. Technol. 25(2), 115–126 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290500330448CrossRef

44.

Lindgaard, G.: Aesthetics, visual appeal, usability and user satisfaction: what do the user’s eyes tell the user’s brain? Aust. J. Emerg. Technol. Soc. 5(1), 1–14 (2007)

45.

Lin, H., Hsieh, Y.-C., Wu, F.-G.: A study on the relationships between different presentation modes of graphical icons and users’ attention. Comput. Hum. Behav. 63, 218–228 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2016.05.008CrossRef

46.

Lin, S.-W., Lo, L. Y.-S., Huang, T.K.: Visual complexity and figure-background color contrast of e-commerce websites: effects on consumers’ emotional responses. In: 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 3594–3603 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2016.449

47.

Mayer, R.E.: Ten research-based principles of multimedia learning. Web-Based Learn. Theory Res. Pract. (2006). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203759820CrossRef

48.

Mestre, L.S.: Matching up learning styles with learning objects: What’s effective? J. Libr. Adm. 50(7–8), 808–829 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2010.488975CrossRef

49.

Michailidou, E., Harper, S., Bechhofer, S.: Visual complexity and aesthetic perception of web pages. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual ACM International Conference on Design of Communication, pp. 215–224. ACM (2008). https://doi.org/10.1145/1456536.1456581

50.

Muylle, S., Moenaert, R., Despontin, M.: The conceptualization and empirical validation of web site user satisfaction. Inf. Manag. 41(5), 543–560 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00089-2CrossRef

51.

Nadkarni, R.G.: A task-based model of perceived website complexity. MIS Q. 31(3), 501–524 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2307/25148805CrossRef

52.

Neider, M.B., Zelinsky, G.J.: Cutting through the clutter: searching for targets in evolving complex scenes. J. Vis. 11(14), 7–7 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1167/11.14.7CrossRef

53.

Olivia, A., Mack, M.L., Shrestha, M., et al.: Identifying the perceptual dimensions of visual complexity of scenes. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, vol. 26, no. 26 (2004)

54.

Orth, U.R., Wirtz, J.: Consumer processing of interior service environments: the interplay among visual complexity, processing fluency, and attractiveness. J. Serv. Res. 17(3), 296–309 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670514529606CrossRef

55.

Orth, U.R., Wirtz, J., McKinney, A.: Shopping experiences in visually complex environments: a self-regulation account. J. Serv. Manag. 27(2), 194–217 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-10-2014-0268CrossRef

56.

Palmer, J.W.: Web Site usability, design, and performance metrics. Inf. Syst. Res. 13(2), 151–167 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1287/ISRE.13.2.151.88CrossRef

57.

Pan, B., Hembrooke, H.A., Gay, G.K., Granka, L.A., Feusner, M.K., Newman, J. K.: The determinants of web page viewing behavior: an eye-tracking study. In: Proceedings of the Eye Tracking Research & Applications Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications, pp. 147–154. ACM (2004). https://doi.org/10.1145/968363.968391

58.

Pandir, M., Knight, J.: Homepage aesthetics: the search for preference factors and the challenges of subjectivity. Interact. Comput. 18(6), 1351–1370 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2006.03.007CrossRef

59.

Qu, Q.-X., Zhang, L., Chao, W.-Y., Duffy, V.: User experience design based on eye-tracking technology: a case study on smartphone APPs. AHFE 2016 Appl. Hum. Factors Ergon. Int. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41627-4_27CrossRef

60.

Vertegaal, R., Ding, Y.: Explaining effects of eye gaze on mediated group conversations: amount or synchronization? In: Proceedings of the 2002 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 41–48. ACM (2002). https://doi.org/10.1145/587078.587085

61.

Rosenholtz, R., Li, Y., Nakano, L.: Measuring visual clutter. J. Vis. 7(2), 17–17 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1167/7.2.17CrossRef

62.

Rotondi, A.J., Spring, M.R., Hanusa, B.H., Eack, S.M., Haas, G.L.: Designing eHealth applications to reduce cognitive effort for persons with severe mental illness: page complexity, navigation simplicity, and comprehensibility. JMIR Hum. Factors 4(1), e1 (2017). https://doi.org/10.2196/humanfactors.6221CrossRef

63.

Seckler, M., Opwis, K., Tuch, A.N.: Linking objective design factors with subjective aesthetics: an experimental study on how structure and color of websites affect the facets of users’ visual aesthetic perception. Comput. Hum. Behav. 49, 375–389 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.056CrossRef

64.

Shan, W., Wang, Y., Luan, J., Tang, P.: The influence of physician information on patients’ choice of physician in mHealth services using China’s Chunyu Doctor App: eye-tracking and questionnaire study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 7(10), e15544 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2196/15544CrossRef

65.

Shim, S., Eastlick, M.A., Lotz, S.L., et al.: An online prepurchase intentions model: the role of intention to search. J. Retail. 77(3), 397–416 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00051-3CrossRef

66.

Snodgrass, J.G., Vanderwart, M.: A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Learn. Mem. 6(2), 174–215 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.174CrossRef

67.

Solman, G.J., Cheyne, J.A., Smilek, D.: Memory load affects visual search processes without influencing search efficiency. Vis. Res. 51(10), 1185–1191 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2011.03.009CrossRef

68.

Song, Y., Ma, H., Wang, H., Wang, K.: Exploring and exploiting user search behavior on mobile and tablet devices to improve search relevance. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 1201–1212. ACM (2013). https://doi.org/10.1145/2488388.2488493

69.

Soussan Djamasbi, M.S., Tullis, T.: Visual hierarchy and viewing behavior: an eye tracking study. In: International Conference on Human–Computer Interaction, vol. 6761, pp. 331–340. Springer, Berlin (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21602-2_36

70.

Stevenson, J.S., Bruner, G.C., Kumar, A.: Webpage background and viewer attitudes. J. Advert. Res. 40(1–2), 29–34 (2000). https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-40-1-2-29-34CrossRef

71.

Su, X., Lin, W., Xu, A., Huang, L., Wu, J., Cai, S., Sun, L., Xu, W.: Customer experience and continual usage willingness of fresh products APPs: based on the framework of the cue utilization theory. In: International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/IESM45758.2019.8948142

72.

Sweller, J.: Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cogn. Sci. 12(2), 257–285 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7CrossRef

73.

Sweller, J.: Cognitive load theory. In: Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 55, pp. 37–76. Academic Press (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8

74.

Thuring, M., Hannemann, J., Haake, J.M.: Hypermedia and cognition: designing for comprehension. Commun. ACM 38(8), 57–66 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1145/208344.208348CrossRef

75.

To, P.L., Liao, C., Lin, T.H.: Shopping motivations on Internet: a study based on utilitarian and hedonic value. Technovation 27(12), 774–787 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.01.001CrossRef

76.

Treisman, A.M., Gelade, G.: A feature-integration theory of attention. Cogn. Psychol. 12(1), 97–136 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5CrossRef

77.

Tuch, A.N., Bargas-Avila, J.A., Opwis, K., Wilhelm, F.H.: Visual complexity of websites: effects on users’ experience, physiology, performance, and memory. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 67(9), 703–715 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.04.002CrossRef

78.

Tuch, A.N., Presslaber, E.E., StöCklin, M., Opwis, K., Bargas-Avila, J.A.: The role of visual complexity and prototypicality regarding first impression of websites: working towards understanding aesthetic judgments. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 70(11), 794–811 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.06.003CrossRef

79.

Tupikovskaja-Omovie, Z., et al.: Mobile app versus website: a comparative eye-tracking case study of topshop. Int. J. Soc. Behav. Educ. Econ. Bus. Ind. Eng. 9(10), 3524–3531 (2015)

80.

Vasilyev, A.Y.: Optimal control of eye-movements during visual search. IEEE Trans. Cogn. Dev. Syst. 11(4), 548–559 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCDS.2018.2877128CrossRef

81.

Wang, H.-F., Lin, C.-H.: An investigation into visual complexity and aesthetic preference to facilitate the creation of more appropriate learning analytics systems for children. Comput. Hum. Behav. 92, 706–715 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.032CrossRef

82.

Wang, H.-F., Wang, P.-Y., Liao, C.-C., Lin, Y.-Y.: The impact of perceived visual complexity, gender, and cognitive style on children’s aesthetic preferences for learning web, pp. 248–265 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6228-5.CH014

83.

Wang, Q., Yang, S., Liu, M., Cao, Z., Ma, Q.: An eye-tracking study of website complexity from cognitive load perspective. Decis. Support Syst. 62, 1–10 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2014.02.007CrossRef

84.

Wang, X., Liebscher, P., Marchionini, G.: Improving Information-Seeking Performance in Hypertext: Roles of Display Format and Search Strategy (Computer Science Tech. Rep. Series CS-TR-2006 CAR-TR-353). University of Maryland, College Park (1988)

85.

Williams, L.H., Drew, T.: Maintaining rejected distractors in working memory during visual search depends on search stimuli: evidence from contralateral delay activity. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. (2020). https://doi.org/10.3758/S13414-020-02127-7CrossRef

86.

Wolfe, J.M.: What can 1 million trials tell us about visual search? Psychol. Sci. 9(1), 33–39 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00006CrossRef

87.

Wu, L., Zhu, Z., Cao, H., Li, B.: Influence of information overload on operator’s user experience of human–machine interface in LED manufacturing systems. Cogn. Technol. Work 18(1), 161–173 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-015-0352-0CrossRef

88.

Yoon, S.H., Lim, J.H., Ji, Y.G.: Perceived visual complexity and visual search performance of automotive instrument cluster: a quantitative measurement study. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 31(12), 890–900 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2015.1069661CrossRef

89.

Yu, Y., Mann, G.K., Gosine, R.G.: A goal-directed visual perception system using object-based top–down attention. IEEE Trans. Auton. Ment. Dev. 4(1), 87–103 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/10.1109/TAMD.2011.2163513CrossRef

90.

Zhang, D., Adipat, B.: Challenges, methodologies, and issues in the usability testing of mobile applications. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 18(3), 293–308 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327590ijhc1803_3CrossRef

91.

Zheng, X.S., Chakraborty, I., Lin, J.J.W., Rauschenberger, R.: Correlating low-level image statistics with users-rapid aesthetic and affective judgments of web pages. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–10. ACM (2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518703

92.

Kusumasondjaja, S., Tjiptono, F.: Endorsement and visual complexity in food advertising on Instagram. Internet Research 29(4), 659–687 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-11-2017-0459CrossRef

93.

Choi, J.H., Lee, H.J.: Facets of simplicity for the smartphone interface: A structural model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 70(2), 129–142 (2012)CrossRef

Titel: Effects of visual complexity on user search behavior and satisfaction: an eye-tracking study of mobile news apps
verfasst von: Fu Guo
Jiahao Chen
Mingming Li
Wei Lyu
Junjie Zhang
Publikationsdatum: 11.05.2021
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Universal Access in the Information Society / Ausgabe 4/2022
Print ISSN: 1615-5289
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-5297
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-021-00815-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2022

Vocabulary recommendation approach for forced migrants using informal language learning tools

Usability evaluation of an electric-powered wheelchair driven by eye tracking

Where form meets function: the impact of social media platform characteristics on access to online social support

Putting situational impairments in context: developing guidance for situational impairments and severely constraining situational impairments by examining parallel domains

Design and evaluation of ECO: an augmentative and alternative communication tool

Supporting a crowd-powered accessible online art gallery for people with visual impairments: a feasibility study

Premium Partner