nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.08.2014

Environmental effects on WHODAS 2.0 among patients with stroke with a focus on ICF category e120

verfasst von: Kwang-Hwa Chang, Yen-Nung Lin, Hua-Fang Liao, Chia-Feng Yen, Reuben Escorpizo, Tze-Hsun Yen, Tsan-Hon Liou

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 6/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Purpose

To explore the environmental effects on the disabilities of people post stroke and to search for the best probabilistic cut-off value of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule second edition (WHODAS 2.0) scores to predict people post stroke experiencing an access barrier to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health category e120 products and technology for personal indoor and outdoor mobility and transportation (PMT).

Method

We analyzed data of 162 younger (aged 18–64 years) and 202 older (aged ≥65 years) people post stroke from the databank of persons with disability between June 1, 2011 and February 29, 2012. All participants rated each WHODAS 2.0 item with environmental intervention (performance score) and without any intervention (capacity score). We used the paired capacity–performance score difference to assess the whole environmental effects on the participants’ disability, evaluated each participant’s access barrier to PMT (negative PMT), and used a receiver-operating characteristic curve to predict patients having a negative PMT.

Results

The whole environment acted as a barrier on mobility and self-care in >10 % of older people post stroke. Older patients having a summary index performance score of ≥78.8 points and younger patients having an index of ≥56.0 points were likely to experience a negative PMT. Older patients who have an access to PMT were possible to improve their daily activities performance, and younger patients could report less disability.

Conclusions

An environmental support to improve the PMT accessibility is important for people post stroke to reduce their disability.

Vorheriger Artikel Understanding the relative importance of preserving functional abilities in Alzheimer’s disease in the United States and Germany

Nächster Artikel Factors associated with health-related quality of life in chronic leg ulceration

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

World Health Organization (WHO). World report on disability. Geneva: WHO; 2011. Available from: http://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/report/en/index.html. Accessed Aug. 22, 2013.

Virues-Ortega, J., de Pedro-Cuesta, J., del Barrio, J. L., et al. (2011). Medical, environmental and personal factors of disability in the elderly in Spain: A screening survey based on the international classification of functioning. Gaceta Sanitaria, 25(Suppl 2), 29–38.PubMedCrossRef

Tongsiri, S., & Riewpaiboon, W. (2013). Using the ICF to develop the capability-oriented database of persons with disabilities: A case study in Nakornpanom province, Thailand. Disability and Rehabilitation, 35(13), 1078–1086.PubMedCrossRef

Posl, M., Cieza, A., & Stucki, G. (2007). Psychometric properties of the WHODASII in rehabilitation patients. Quality of Life Research, 16(9), 1521–1531.PubMedCrossRef

Schlote, A., Richter, M., Wunderlich, M. T., et al. (2009). WHODAS II with people after stroke and their relatives. Disability and Rehabilitation, 31(11), 855–864.PubMedCrossRef

Kucukdeveci, A. A., Kutlay, S., Yildizlar, D., Oztuna, D., Elhan, A. H., & Tennant, A. (2013). The reliability and validity of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS-II) in stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation, 35(5), 214–220.PubMedCrossRef

Hacke, W., Kaste, M., Skyhoj Olsen, T., Orgogozo, J., & Bogousslavsky, J. (2000). European Stroke Initiative (EUSI) recommendations for stroke management. The European stroke initiative writing committee. European Journal of Neurology, 7(6), 607–623.PubMedCrossRef

Donnan, G. A., Fisher, M., Macleod, M., & Davis, S. M. (2008). Stroke. Lancet, 371(9624), 1612–1623.PubMedCrossRef

Roger, V. L., Go, A. S., Lloyd-Jones, D. M., et al. (2011). Heart disease and stroke statistics—2011 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 123(4), e18–e209.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Lin, H. C., Lin, Y. J., Liu, T. C., Chen, C. S., & Chiu, W. T. (2007). Urbanization and stroke prevalence in Taiwan: Analysis of a nationwide survey. Journal of Urban Health, 84(4), 604–614.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

11.

Grysiewicz, R. A., Thomas, K., & Pandey, D. K. (2008). Epidemiology of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke: Incidence, prevalence, mortality, and risk factors. Neurologic Clinics, 26(4), 871–895.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Gallagher, P., & Mulvany, F. (2004). Levels of ability and functioning: Using the WHODAS II in an Irish context. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26(9), 506–517.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Alguren, B., Lundgren-Nilsson, A., & Sunnerhagen, K. S. (2009). Facilitators and barriers of stroke survivors in the early post-stroke phase. Disability and Rehabilitation, 31(19), 1584–1591.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Gosman-Hedström, G., Claesson, L., & Blomstrand, C. (2002). Assistive devices in elderly people after stroke: A longitudinal, randomized study—the Göteborg 70+ Stroke Study. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 9, 109–118.CrossRef

15.

Geyh, S., Cieza, A., Schouten, J., et al. (2004). ICF core sets for stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 44(Suppl), 135–141.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Chang, K. H., Chen, H. C., Lin, Y., Chen, S. C., Chiou, H. Y., & Liou, T. H. (2012). Taiwan ICF Team. Developing an ICF core set for post-stroke disability assessment and verification in Taiwan: A preliminary study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 34, 1254–1261.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Alguren, B., Fridlund, B., Cieza, A., Sunnerhagen, K. S., & Christensson, L. (2012). Factors associated with health-related quality of life after stroke: A 1-year prospective cohort study. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 26(3), 266–274.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Geyh, S., Kurt, T., Brockow, T., Cieza, A., Ewert, T., Omar, Z., et al. (2004). Identifying the concepts contained in outcome measures of clinical trials on stroke using the international classification of functioning, disability and health as a reference. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 36(44 Suppl), 56–62.CrossRef

19.

Maierhofer, S., Almazan-Isla, J., Alcalde-Cabero, E., & de Pedro-Cuesta, J. (2011). Prevalence and features of ICF-disability in Spain as captured by the 2008 National Disability Survey. BMC Public Health, 11, 897.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

20.

Griffiths, D., & Sturm, J. (2011). Epidemiology and etiology of young stroke. Stroke Research and Treatment, 2011, 209370.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

21.

Low, J. T., Kersten, P., Ashburn, A., George, S., & McLellan, D. L. (2003). A study to evaluate the met and unmet needs of members belonging to Young Stroke groups affiliated with the Stroke Association. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25(18), 1052–1056.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Chiu, W. T., Yen, C. F., Teng, S. W., et al. (2013). Implementing disability evaluation and welfare services based on the framework of the international classification of functioning, disability and health: Experiences in Taiwan. BMC Health Services Research, 13(1), 416.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

23.

Liu, C. Y., Hung, Y. T., Chuang, Y. L., et al. (2006). Incorporating development stratification of Taiwan townships into sampling design of large scale health interview survey. Journal of Health Management, 4, 1–22. (Chinese).

24.

World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. Geneva: WHO; 2011. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/whodasii/en/index.html. Accessed Aug 26, 2013.

25.

Federici, S., Meloni, F., Mancini, A., Lauriola, M., & Olivetti Belardinelli, M. (2009). World Health Organisation disability assessment schedule II: Contribution to the Italian validation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 31(7), 553–564.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Cerniauskaite, M., Ajovalasit, D., Quintas, R., et al. (2012). Functioning and disability in persons with epilepsy. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91(13 Suppl 1), S22–S30.PubMedCrossRef

27.

World Health Organization (WHO). ICF browser. Geneva: WHO; 2013. Available from: http://apps.who.int/classifications/icfbrowser/. Accessed Nov 19, 2013.

28.

Von Korff, M., Katon, W., Lin, E. H., et al. (2005). Potentially modifiable factors associated with disability among people with diabetes. Psychosomatic Medicine, 67(2), 233–240.CrossRef

29.

Liao, C. K., Liou, T. H., Wu, C. H., & Chang, K. H. (2011). Comparison of clinical characteristics and medical resource use between young and elderly patients with ischemic stroke. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, 3, 171–175.CrossRef

30.

Mollaoglu, M., Tuncay, F. O., & Fertelli, T. K. (2010). Mobility disability and life satisfaction in elderly people. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 51(3), e115–e119.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Kilzieh, N., Rastam, S., Ward, K. D., & Maziak, W. (2010). Gender, depression and physical impairment: an epidemiologic perspective from Aleppo, Syria. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 45(6), 595–602.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

32.

Subramaniam, M., Abdin, E., Vaingankar, J. A., & Chong, S. A. (2012). Gender differences in disability in a multiethnic Asian population: The Singapore Mental Health Study. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 54(4), 381–387.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Luciano, J. V., Ayuso-Mateos, J. L., Fernandez, A., et al. (2010). Utility of the twelve-item World Health Organization Disability assessment schedule II (WHO-DAS II) for discriminating depression “caseness” and severity in Spanish primary care patients. Quality of Life Research, 19(1), 97–101.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Environmental effects on WHODAS 2.0 among patients with stroke with a focus on ICF category e120
verfasst von: Kwang-Hwa Chang
Yen-Nung Lin
Hua-Fang Liao
Chia-Feng Yen
Reuben Escorpizo
Tze-Hsun Yen
Tsan-Hon Liou
Publikationsdatum: 01.08.2014
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 6/2014
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0624-9

Springer Professional

Abstract

Purpose

Method

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2014

Use of cognitive interviews in the development of the PLUS-M item bank

An investigation into the construct validity of the Carer Experience Scale (CES)

The Italian version of the Pain Beliefs and Perceptions Inventory: cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability and validity

The impact of concurrent granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor on quality of life in head and neck cancer patients: results of the randomized, placebo-controlled Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9901 trial

Understanding the relative importance of preserving functional abilities in Alzheimer’s disease in the United States and Germany

Depressive symptoms, health-related quality of life, and cardiac event-free survival in patients with heart failure: a mediation analysis