Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Social Choice and Welfare 3-4/2017

30.05.2017 | Original Paper

Equality of opportunity, moral hazard and the timing of luck

verfasst von: Arnaud Lefranc, Alain Trannoy

Erschienen in: Social Choice and Welfare | Ausgabe 3-4/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Equality of opportunity is usually defined as a situation where the effect of circumstances on outcome is nullified (compensation principle) and effort is rewarded (reward principle). We propose a new version of the reward principle based on the idea that effort deserves reward for it is costly. We show that luck can be introduced in two ways in the definition of these principles, depending on whether the correlation between luck and circumstances should be nullified and whether the correlation between luck and effort should be rewarded. In this regard, the timing of luck with respect to effort decisions is crucial, as is exemplified by moral hazard where effort choice influences the lottery of future uncertain events.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Frank (2016).
 
2
Of course, the principle is meaningless if society does not value the outcome realized with effort as input. Thus in the background, the outcome introduced in Sect. 2.2 below is assumed to be of value to all individuals and then to society.
 
3
If work duration is statutory and differs across firms, it can be said that it is a circumstance. It should be compensated and in fact the cost of working more should be more compensated than the cost of working less. The principle of compensation can be useful if there is full cardinality and comparability of the cost of effort.
 
4
See for instance Brown et al. (2011) and Wager et al. (2013).
 
5
See for instance Fleurbaey (2008), or Ramos and Van de gaer (2016) for a recent survey
 
6
We will later signal the rare instances where the assumption of a metric space is required.
 
7
In the rest, for notational simplicity, we omit this adjustment.
 
8
Some may contend that the pure pleasure of gambling remains intact even if outcomes are equalized ex post. However, casual empiricism suggests that the thrill of poker games is higher when monetary gains are at stake, compared to high-school games where the only stake is a handful of matchsticks.
 
9
Of course, one may contend that the tax treatment of gambling gains does not simply reflect collective preference for redistribution but also reflects the government’s objective to provide incentives to participate in revenue-generating gambling.
 
10
In fact, such positions might echo the previous discussion on the preference for skewness in gambling contexts: the asymmetric compensation for luck would lead to a skewed distribution of the consequences of genetic luck that would be welfare enhancing, from the ex-ante perspective where genetic endowments have not been drawn.
 
11
Strictly speaking, introducing distribution functions and cumulative distribution functions, as we do here, presupposes that the set \({\mathcal {L}}^r\) be a metric space. We make this assumption for ease of notations. However, the results derived below could generalize easily to the case where \({\mathcal {L}}^r\) is not a metric space by using Dirac mass distributions on the universe of luck.
 
12
Effort is cleaned from the impact of circumstances [see Roemer (1993) and Lefranc and Trannoy (2017)].
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson E (1999) What is the point of equality? Ethics 109(2):287–337CrossRef Anderson E (1999) What is the point of equality? Ethics 109(2):287–337CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Arneson R (1989) Equality and equal opportunity of welfare. Philos Stud 56:77–93CrossRef Arneson R (1989) Equality and equal opportunity of welfare. Philos Stud 56:77–93CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Arneson R (2004) Luck egalitarianism interpreted and defended. Philos Topics 32(2):1–20CrossRef Arneson R (2004) Luck egalitarianism interpreted and defended. Philos Topics 32(2):1–20CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brown JE, Chatterjee N, Younger J, Mackey S (2011) Towards a physiology-based measure of pain: patterns of human brain activity distinguish painful from non-painful thermal stimulation. PLOS One 6(9):1–8 Brown JE, Chatterjee N, Younger J, Mackey S (2011) Towards a physiology-based measure of pain: patterns of human brain activity distinguish painful from non-painful thermal stimulation. PLOS One 6(9):1–8
Zurück zum Zitat Cappelen AW, Tungodden B (2006) A liberal Egalitarian paradox. Econ Philos 22(03):393–408CrossRef Cappelen AW, Tungodden B (2006) A liberal Egalitarian paradox. Econ Philos 22(03):393–408CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chiu H (2010) Skewness preference, risk-taking and expected utility maximisation. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 2:108–129CrossRef Chiu H (2010) Skewness preference, risk-taking and expected utility maximisation. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 2:108–129CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen GA (1989) On the currency of egalitarian justice. Ethics 99:906–944CrossRef Cohen GA (1989) On the currency of egalitarian justice. Ethics 99:906–944CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cunha F, Heckman J (2007) The technology of skill formation. Am Econ Rev 97(2):31–47CrossRef Cunha F, Heckman J (2007) The technology of skill formation. Am Econ Rev 97(2):31–47CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dworkin R (1981a) What is equality. part 1: equality of welfare. Philos Public Affairs 10:185–246 Dworkin R (1981a) What is equality. part 1: equality of welfare. Philos Public Affairs 10:185–246
Zurück zum Zitat Dworkin R (1981b) What is equality. part 2: equality of ressources. Philos Public Affairs 10:283–345 Dworkin R (1981b) What is equality. part 2: equality of ressources. Philos Public Affairs 10:283–345
Zurück zum Zitat Dworkin R (2000) Sovereign virtue: the theory and practice of equality. Harvard University Press, USA Dworkin R (2000) Sovereign virtue: the theory and practice of equality. Harvard University Press, USA
Zurück zum Zitat Fleurbaey M (2008) Fairness, responsibility and welfare. Oxford University Press, Oxford Fleurbaey M (2008) Fairness, responsibility and welfare. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Zurück zum Zitat Fleurbaey M (2010) Assessing risky social situations. J Political Econ 118(4):649–680CrossRef Fleurbaey M (2010) Assessing risky social situations. J Political Econ 118(4):649–680CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fleurbaey M, Schokkaert E (2009) Unfair inequalities in health and health care. J Health Econ 28(1):73–90CrossRef Fleurbaey M, Schokkaert E (2009) Unfair inequalities in health and health care. J Health Econ 28(1):73–90CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Frank R (2016) Success and luck: good fortune and the myth of meritocracy. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRef Frank R (2016) Success and luck: good fortune and the myth of meritocracy. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Garcia-gomez P, Schokkaert E, Van Ourti T, Bago d’Uva T (2015) Inequity in the face of death. Health Econ 24(10):1348–1367CrossRef Garcia-gomez P, Schokkaert E, Van Ourti T, Bago d’Uva T (2015) Inequity in the face of death. Health Econ 24(10):1348–1367CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Golec J, Tamarkin M (1998) Gamblers favor skewness, not risk, at the horse track. J Political Econ 106:205–225CrossRef Golec J, Tamarkin M (1998) Gamblers favor skewness, not risk, at the horse track. J Political Econ 106:205–225CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hamermesh DS, Biddle JE (1994) Beauty and the labor market. Am Econ Rev 84(5):1174–1194 Hamermesh DS, Biddle JE (1994) Beauty and the labor market. Am Econ Rev 84(5):1174–1194
Zurück zum Zitat Hurley S (2003) Justice, luck and knowledge. Oxford University Press, Oxford Hurley S (2003) Justice, luck and knowledge. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Zurück zum Zitat Kahneman D, Wakker PP, Sarin R (1997) Back to Bentham? explorations of experienced utility. Q J Econ 112(2):375CrossRef Kahneman D, Wakker PP, Sarin R (1997) Back to Bentham? explorations of experienced utility. Q J Econ 112(2):375CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Le Grand J (1991) Equity and choice. Harper Collins, London Le Grand J (1991) Equity and choice. Harper Collins, London
Zurück zum Zitat Lefranc A, Pistolesi N, Trannoy A (2009) Equality of opportunity and luck: definitions and testable conditions, with an application to income in france (1979–2000). J Public Econ 93(11–12):1189–1207CrossRef Lefranc A, Pistolesi N, Trannoy A (2009) Equality of opportunity and luck: definitions and testable conditions, with an application to income in france (1979–2000). J Public Econ 93(11–12):1189–1207CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lefranc A, Trannoy A (2017) The correlation between effort and circumstances in an uncertain world, mimeo Lefranc A, Trannoy A (2017) The correlation between effort and circumstances in an uncertain world, mimeo
Zurück zum Zitat Ramos X, Van de gaer D (2016) Approaches to inequality of opportunity: principles, measures, and evidence. J Econ Surv 30(5):855–883CrossRef Ramos X, Van de gaer D (2016) Approaches to inequality of opportunity: principles, measures, and evidence. J Econ Surv 30(5):855–883CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Zurück zum Zitat Roemer J (1993) A pragmatic theory of responsibility for the egalitarian planner. Philos Public Affairs 22(2):146–166 Roemer J (1993) A pragmatic theory of responsibility for the egalitarian planner. Philos Public Affairs 22(2):146–166
Zurück zum Zitat Roemer J (1998) Equality of opportunity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Roemer J (1998) Equality of opportunity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Zurück zum Zitat Savage L (1954) The foundations of statistics. Wiley, New York Savage L (1954) The foundations of statistics. Wiley, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Scheffler S (2003) What is egalitrianism? Philos Public Affairs 31(1):5–39CrossRef Scheffler S (2003) What is egalitrianism? Philos Public Affairs 31(1):5–39CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vallentyne P (1997) Self-ownership and equality: brute luck, gifts, universal dominance, and leximin. Ethics 107(2):321–343CrossRef Vallentyne P (1997) Self-ownership and equality: brute luck, gifts, universal dominance, and leximin. Ethics 107(2):321–343CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wager TD, Atlas LY, Lindquist MA, Roy M, Woo C-W, Kross E (2013) An fmri-based neurologic signature of physical pain. N Engl J Med 368(15):1388–1397 (PMID: 23574118)CrossRef Wager TD, Atlas LY, Lindquist MA, Roy M, Woo C-W, Kross E (2013) An fmri-based neurologic signature of physical pain. N Engl J Med 368(15):1388–1397 (PMID: 23574118)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Equality of opportunity, moral hazard and the timing of luck
verfasst von
Arnaud Lefranc
Alain Trannoy
Publikationsdatum
30.05.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Social Choice and Welfare / Ausgabe 3-4/2017
Print ISSN: 0176-1714
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-217X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-017-1054-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3-4/2017

Social Choice and Welfare 3-4/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner