Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
The capability approach is gaining momentum as a theory of corporate responsibility and business ethics at a time when the UN Guiding Principles have become a most important framework. A novel approach is now emerging that seeks to understand and specify human rights obligations of businesses within the framework provided by the capability approach. This article partially examines the triad corporate responsibility–human rights–capability approach by exploring the relationship between human rights and capabilities. Thus, it offers conceptual and practical implications for a human rights perspective on corporate responsibility. The bulk of our thesis focuses on studying Nussbaum’s and Sen’s claim that human rights are entitlements to capabilities by means of a discussion of the notion of human dignity. In particular, we show the capability approach’s ability to dissipate theoretical and practical challenges posed by the notion of dignity. This article does not offer a detailed explanation of the implications of our investigation for human rights responsibilities of business. However, an outline of its potential contribution toward unfolding those obligations, conceptually and practically, is provided.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Alkire, S. (2010). Human development: Definitions, critiques, and related concepts. Human development research papers (2009 to present), HDRP- 2010- 01, (pp. 1–96).
Bendik-Keymer, J. (2014). From human to all of life: Nussbaum’s transformation of dignity. In F. Comim & M. C. Nussbaum (Eds.), Capabilities, gender, equality: Towards fundamental entitlements (pp. 175–214). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Bolton, S. C. (2005). Emotion management in the workplace. Gordonsville, VA: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bolton, S. C. (2007). Dignity in and at work: Why it matters. Dimensions of dignity at work (pp. 3–16). London: Routledge. CrossRef
Bonvin, J.-M., & Moachon, E. (2012). Assessing employee voice in restructuring processes against the capability approach. A case study in the swiss metal sector. Management Revue, 23(2), 158–172.
Buchanan, R. (2001). Human dignity and human rights: Thoughts on the principles of human-centered design. Design Issues, 17(3), 35–39. CrossRef
Burchardt, T., & Vizard, P. (2011). ‘Operationalizing’ the capability approach as a basis for equality and human rights monitoring in twenty-first-century Britain. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 12(1), 91–119. CrossRef
Carozza, P. G. (2003). Subsidiarity as a structural principle of international human rights law. American Journal of International Law, 97, 38–79. CrossRef
Carozza, P. G. (2008). Human dignity and judicial interpretation of human rights: A reply. European Journal of International Law, 19(5), 931–944. CrossRef
Carozza, P. G. (2011). Human dignity in constitutional adjudication. In T. Ginsburg & R. Dixon (Eds.), Research handbook in comparative constitutional law (pp. 459–472). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Cecchini, S., & Notti, F. (2011). Millennium development goals and human rights: Faraway, so close? Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 12(1), 121–133. CrossRef
Claassen, R. (2014). Human dignity in the capability approach. In M. Düwell, J. Braarvig, R. Brownsword, & D. Mieth (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of human dignity. Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 240–249). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Comim, F. (2001). Operationalizing Sen’s capability approach. Paper presented at the justice and poverty: Examining Sen’s capability approach, Cambridge, 5–7 June
Cornelius, N. (2002). Building workplace equality: Ethics, diversity and inclusion. London: Cengage Learning EMEA.
Cornelius, N., & Gagnon, S. (2004). Still bearing the mark of cain? Ethics, diversity and inequality measurement. Business Ethics: A European Review, 13(1), 27–40. CrossRef
Cornelius, N., & Skinner, D. (2005). An alternative view through the glass ceiling: Using capabilities theory to reflect the career journeys of senior women. Women in Management Review, 20(8), 595–602. CrossRef
Cornelius, N., & Skinner, D. (2008). The careers of senior men and women—A capabilities theory perspective. British Journal of Management, 19(1), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00579.x. CrossRef
de Melo-Martín, I., & Salles, A. (2011). On disgust and human dignity. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 45(2), 159–168. CrossRef
Dierksmeier, C. (2016). Reframing economic ethics. Springer.
Drydyk, J. (2011). Responsible pluralism, capabilities, and human rights. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 12(1), 39–61. CrossRef
ECtHR. (2007). Vereinigung Bildender Künstler v. Austria. In E. C. o. H. Rights (Ed.), (Vol. App. No. 68354/01).
Enderle, G. (2004). Global competition and corporate responsibilities of small and medium-sized enterprises. Business Ethics: A European Review, 13(1), 51–63. CrossRef
Formosa, P., & Mackenzie, C. (2014). Nussbaum, Kant, and the capabilities approach to dignity. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 17(5), 875–892. CrossRef
Gagnon, S., & Cornelius, N. (1999). From ethics ‘by proxy’ to ethics in action: New approaches to understanding HRM and ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review, 8(4), 225–235. CrossRef
Glendon, M. A. (1998). Knowing the universal declaration of human rights. Notre Dame Law Review, 73, 1153.
González-Cantón, C. (2012). Empowering people in the business frontline. The Ruggie’s framework and the capability approach. Management Revue. The International Review of Management Studies, 23(2), 191–216.
Hahn, F. (1982). On some difficulties of the utilitarianism economist. In A. Sen & B. Williams (Eds.), Utilitarianism and beyond (pp. 187–198). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press & Maison des Sciences de l’Homme. CrossRef
Hick, R., & Burckhardt, T. (2016). Capability deprivation. In D. Brady & L. M. Burton (Eds.), The oxford handbook of the social science of poverty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hicks, D. (2011). Dignity—Its essential role in resolving conflict. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Hodson, R. (2001). Dignity at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Kateb, G. (2011). Human dignity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Kittay, E. (2005). Equality, dignity and disability. In M. A. Waldron & F. Lyons (Eds.), Perspectives on equality: The second Seamus Heaney lectures (pp. 95–122). Dublin: Liffey.
Leßmann, O. (2012). Applying the capability approach empirically: An overview with special attention to labor. Management Revue, 23(2), 98–118.
Leßmann, O., & Bonvin, J.-M. (2011). Job-satisfaction in the broader framework of the capability approach. Management Revue, 22(1), 84–99.
Lodigiani, R. (2010). Recalibrating lifelong learning and active citizenship: implications drawn from the capability approach. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 3, 59–78.
Macklin, R. (2003). Dignity is a useless concept: It means no more than respect for persons or their autonomy. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 327(7429), 1419. CrossRef
Markova, A. (2014). The concept of dignity in the capability approach: A personalistic perspective. In M. Pop (Ed.), Values of the human person: Contemporary challenges (Vol. VIII, pp. 273–280, Vol. Romanian Philosophical Studies). Washington DC.: The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.
McCrudden, C. (2008). Human dignity and judicial interpretation of human rights. European Journal of International Law, 19(4), 655–724. CrossRef
McCrudden, C. (2013). In pursuit of human dignity: An introduction to current debates. Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series, 309, 1–55.
McCrudden, C. (2015). Labour law as human rights law: A critique of the use of ‘dignity’ by Freedland and Kountouris. In A. Bogg, C. Costello, A. C. L. Davies, & J. Prassl (Eds.), The autonomy of labour law (p. 304). London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Nussbaum, M. C. (1988). Nature, function and capability: Aristotle on political distribution. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Supplementary Volume I, 145–184.
Nussbaum, M. C. (1992). Human functioning and social justice: In defense of aristotelian essentialism. Political Theory, 20(2), 202–246. CrossRef
Nussbaum, M. C. (1995a). Emotions and women’s capabilities. In M. C. Nussbaum & J. Glover (Eds.), Women, culture and development. A study of human capabilities (pp. 360–401). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
Nussbaum, M. C. (1995b). Human capabilities, female human beings. In M. C. Nussbaum & J. Glover (Eds.), Women, culture and development. A study of human capabilities (pp. 61–116). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
Nussbaum, M. C. (1997). Capabilities and human rights. Fordham Law Review, 66, 273.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2000a). Women’s capabilities and social justice. Journal of Human Development, 1(2), 219–247. CrossRef
Nussbaum, M. C. (2000b). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Nussbaum, M. C. (2003). Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Feminist Economics, 9(2–3), 33–59. CrossRef
Nussbaum, M. C. (2007a). Constitutions and capabilities: Perception against lofty formalism. Harvard Law Review, 121, 4.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2007b). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2011a). Capabilities, entitlements, rights: Supplementation and critique. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 12(1), 23–37. CrossRef
Nussbaum, M. C. (2011b). Creating capabilities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. CrossRef
Nussbaum, M. C. (2013). The cosmopolitan tradition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Nussbaum, M. C., & Dixon, R. (2012). Abortion, dignity, and a capabilities approach. In B. Baines, D. Barak-Erez, & T. Kahana (Eds.), Feminist constitutionalism: Global perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Olson, K. (2002). Recognizing gender, redistributing labor. Social Politics, 9, 380–410. CrossRef
Osmani, S. R. (2005). Poverty and human rights: Building on the capability approach. Journal of Human Development, 6(2), 205–219. CrossRef
Parra, C. M. (2008). Quality of life markets: Capabilities and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 9(2), 207–227. CrossRef
Pirson, M. (2017). Humanistic management: Protecting dignity and promoting well-being. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Power, J. L., Brotheridge, C. M., Blenkinsopp, J., Bowes-Sperry, L., Bozionelos, N., Buzady, Z., et al. (2013). Acceptability of workplace bullying: A comparative study on six continents. Journal of Business Research, 66(3), 374–380. CrossRef
Renouard, C. (2011). Corporate social responsibility, utilitarianism, and the capabilities approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(1), 85–97. CrossRef
Robeyns, I. (2003). Sen’s capability approach and gender inequalities: Selecting relevant capabilities. Feminist Economics, 9(2–3), 61–92. CrossRef
Robeyns, I. (2005). The capability approach: A theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(93), 93–117. CrossRef
Sen, A. K. (1980). Equality of what? In S. McMurrin (Ed.), Tanner lectures on human values (Vol. 1, pp. 196–220). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, University of Utah Press.
Sen, A. K. (1982a). Choice, welfare and measurement. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Sen, A. K. (1982b). Rights and agency. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1(11), 3–39.
Sen, A. K. (1984a). Resources, Values and Development. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Sen, A. K. (1984b). Rights and capabilities. In A. K. Sen (Ed.), Resources, values and development. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sen, A. K. (1985a). Commodities and capabilities. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Pub. Co.
Sen, A. K. (1985b). Well-being, agency, and freedom. Journal of Philosophy, 82(4), 169–221.
Sen, A. K. (1985c). Women, technology and sexual divisions. Trade and Development, 6, 195–223.
Sen, A. K. (1987). On ethics and economics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Sen, A. K. (1997). Human rights and Asian values: What Lee Kuan Yew and Le Peng don’t understand about Asia. The New Republic, 217(2–3), 33–40.
Sen, A. K. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf Inc.
Sen, A. K. (2002). Rationality and freedom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sen, A. K. (2004). Elements of a theory of human rights. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 32(4), 315–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2004.00017.x. CrossRef
Sen, A. K. (2005b). Human rights and the limits of law. Cardozo Law Review, 27, 2913–2927.
Sen, A. K. (2009). The idea of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sen, A. K. (2012). The global reach of human rights. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 29(2), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2012.00555.x. CrossRef
Sharkey, A. (2014). Robots and human dignity: A consideration of the effects of robot care on the dignity of older people. Ethics and Information Technology, 16(1), 63–75. CrossRef
Stark, C. A. (2009). Respecting human dignity: Contract versus capabilities. Metaphilosophy, 40(3–4), 366–381. CrossRef
Tasioulas, J. (2013). Human dignity as a foundation for human rights. In C. McCrudden (Ed.), Understanding human dignity. Oxford: British Academy, Oxford University Press.
UN. (2011). Guiding principles on business and human rights: Implementing the United Nations “protect, respect and remedy” framework (J. G. Ruggie, Trans.). (pp. 1–42). New York, NY: United Nations Human Rights Council.
UN General Assembly. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 10 December 1948, 217 A (III).
UN General Assembly. (1996a). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 16 December 1966, United Nations, Treaty Series, 999, 171.
UN General Assembly. (1996b). International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 16 December 1966, United Nations, Treaty Series, 993, 3.
UNDP. (2000). Human rights and human development. Human development report 2000. (pp. 290). New York, NY: United Nations Development Programme.
Unni, J. (2009). Gender differentials in education: Exploring the capabilities approach. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(9), 111–117.
Vizard, P. (2006). Poverty and human rights. Sen’s ‘capability perspective’ explored. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
Vizard, P., Fukuda-Parr, S., & Elson, D. (2011). Introduction: The capability approach and human rights. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 12(1), 1–22. CrossRef
Waldron, J. (2010). Torture, terror, and trade-offs: Philosophy for the White House. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Walsh, J. P., Weber, K., & Margolis, J. D. (2003). Social issues and management: Our lost cause found. Journal of Management, 29(6), 859–881. CrossRef
Wanderley, L. O. (2001). Sen’s capabilities approach: A meaningful framework for corporate social responsibility? Paper presented at the justice and poverty: Examining Sen’s capability approach, Cambridge, June
- Exploring the Link Between Human Rights, the Capability Approach and Corporate Responsibility
- Springer Netherlands
Journal of Business Ethics
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, Voraussetzungen für wirtschaftliche additive Fertigung/© Marco2811 | Fotolia