nach oben

International Journal of Technology and Design Education

Erschienen in:

27.04.2023

Exploring the precedents retrieval styles of industrial and mechanical design students during brainstorming

verfasst von: Ning Zou, Xiaohan Zhang, Jianan Lou, Jing Liao, Chunlei Chai

Erschienen in: International Journal of Technology and Design Education | Ausgabe 1/2024

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Design processes can be decomposed into several steps, including information acquisition and application. Retrieving prior knowledge and experience is an important method of acquiring design information, thus designers’ precedents retrieval styles reflect their design thinking. The obvious difference between industrial (ID) and mechanical design (MD) education is well known: ID education focuses on cultivating design thinking abilities, while MD education focuses on cultivating technical abilities. The background discipline influences design thinking methods. This study aims at exploring the similarities and differences between ID and MD students’ precedents retrieval styles in the design process. Forty-eight junior and senior undergraduate students participated in a brainstorming experiment using the think-aloud method. Participants’ prior knowledge and experience retrieved during brainstorming were coded and the frequency ratios were analyzed. We conclude that ID students are more inclined to extract and apply episodic precedents than MD students. Compared with semantic precedents, episodic precedents have a greater possibility for being applied to the final solution.

Vorheriger Artikel Body, dance and abstraction for spatial and structural comprehension in the first year of design education

Nächster Artikel Impacts of maker education-design thinking integration on knowledge, creative tendencies, and perceptions of the engineering profession

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357CrossRef

Bédard, J., Chi, M. T. H. (1992). Expertise—Jean , Michelene T.H. Chi, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep107697.

Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retentions in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040373CrossRefPubMed

Cantarello, S., Nosella, A., Petroni, G., & Venturini, K. (2011). External technology sourcing: Evidence from design-driven innovation. Management Decision, 49(6), 962–983. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111143630CrossRef

Cartier, P. (2011). Most valuable aspects of educational expectations of the students in design education. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2187–2191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.077CrossRef

Casakin, H., & Goldschmidt, G. (1999). Expertise and the use of visual analogy: Implications for design education. Design Studies, 20(2), 153–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00032-5CrossRef

Chan, J., Fu, K., Schunn, C., Cagan, J., Wood, K., & Kotovsky, K. (2011). On the benefits and pitfalls of analogies for innovative design: ideation performance based on analogical distance, commonness, and modality of examples. Journal of Mechanical Design. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4004396CrossRef

Chinien, C. A., & Boutin, F. (1993). Cognitive style FD/I: An important learner characteristic for educational technologists. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 21(4), 303–311. https://doi.org/10.2190/WVUW-Q5MU-YE9M-DFF4CrossRef

Christensen, J. F. (1995). Asset profiles for technological innovation. Research Policy, 24(5), 727–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)00794-8CrossRef

Christensen, B. T., & Schunn, C. D. (2007). The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and preinventive structure: The case of engineering design. Memory & Cognition, 35(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195939CrossRef

Chrysikou, E. G., & Weisberg, R. W. (2005). Following the wrong footsteps: Fixation effects of pictorial examples in a design problem-solving task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1134–1148. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.1134CrossRefPubMed

Cross, N. (1990). The nature and nurture of design ability. Design Studies, 11(3), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(90)90002-TCrossRef

Cross, N. (2021). Engineering design methods: Strategies for product design (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Dorst, K., & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem–solution. Design Studies, 22(5), 425–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00009-6CrossRef

Eder, W. E. (2013). Engineering design vs. artistic design: Some educational consequences. In Online Submission (Vol. 3, Issue 4, pp. 259–280). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED542977.

Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. The MIT Press.

Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. The MIT Press.

Fomunyam, K. G. (2019). Education and the fourth industrial revolution: Challenges and possibilities for engineering education. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 10(8), 271–284.

Fonteyn, M. E., Kuipers, B., & Grobe, S. J. (1993). A description of think aloud method and protocol analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 3(4), 430–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239300300403CrossRef

Goncher, A., Johri, A., & Sharma, A. (2010). Work in progress—Use-value and functionality versus aesthetics and experience: Inculcation of design ideologies in engineering and industrial design students. 2010 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), T4H-1-T4H-3. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2010.5673667.

Hou, G., & Lu, G. (2019). The influence of design proposal viewing strategy: Design aesthetics and professional background. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(3), 543–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9450-7CrossRef

Hubka, V., & Eder, W. E. (2012). Design science: Introduction to the needs, scope and organization of engineering design knowledge. Springer Science & Business Media.

Jansson, D., & Smith, S. (1991). Design fixation. Design Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(91)90003-FCrossRef

Jiang, H., & Yen, C. (2009). Protocol analysis in design research: A review. Journal Paper, 78(24), 16.

Jiang, H., Gero, J. S., & Yen, C.-C. (2014). Exploring designing styles using a problem-solution division. In J. S. Gero (Ed.), Design computing and cognition ’12 (pp. 79–94). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9112-0_5CrossRef

Jin, Y., & Benami, O. (2010). Creative patterns and stimulation in conceptual design. AI EDAM, 24(2), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060410000053CrossRef

Katz, R. (2015). Integrating analysis and design in mechanical engineering education. Procedia CIRP, 36, 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.01.042CrossRef

Kim, E., & Kim, K. (2013). Idea generation with precedents. In Conference: IASDR.

Kim, E., & Kim, K. (2015). Cognitive styles in design problem solving: Insights from network-based cognitive maps. Design Studies, 40, 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.05.002ADSCrossRef

Kirkpatrick, A. T., Danielson, S., & Perry, T. (2012). ASME vision 2030’s Recommendations for Mechanical Engineering Education. 25.209.1–25.209.9. https://peer.asee.org/asme-vision-2030-s-recommendations-for-mechanical-engineering-education.

Kuusela, H., & Paul, P. (2000). A comparison of concurrent and retrospective verbal protocol analysis. American Journal of Psychology, 113(3), 387–404.CrossRefPubMed

Lawson, B. (2004). Schemata, gambits and precedent: Some factors in design expertise. Design Studies, 25(5), 443–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.05.001CrossRef

Leclercq, P., & Heylighen, A. (2002). 5. 8 Analogies per hour. In J. S. Gero (Ed.), Artificial intelligence in design ’02 (pp. 285–303). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0795-4_14CrossRef

Lee, T. Y., & Radcliffe, D. F. (1990). Innate design abilities of first year engineering and industrial design students. Design Studies, 11(2), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(90)90024-7CrossRef

Levine, B. (2004). Autobiographical memory and the self in time: Brain lesion effects, functional neuroanatomy, and lifespan development. Brain and Cognition, 55(1), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00280-XCrossRefPubMed

Meneely, J., & Portillo, M. (2005). The Adaptable mind in design: Relating personality, cognitive style, and creative performance. Creativity Research Journal, 17(2–3), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2005.9651476CrossRef

Mubin, O., Novoa, M., & Al Mahmud, A. (2016). Towards the successful integration of design thinking in industrial design education. In International Association for Development of the Information Society.

Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (2006). How the group affects the mind: A cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 186–213. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_1CrossRefPubMed

Nijstad, B. A., Stroebe, W., & Lodewijkx, H. F. M. (2002). Cognitive stimulation and interference in groups: Exposure effects in an idea generation task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(6), 535–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00500-0CrossRef

Pahl, G., & Beitz, W. (1988). Engineering design: A systematic approach. NASA STI/Recon Technical Report A, 89, 47350.ADS

Pei, E. (2009). Building a common language of design representations for industrial designers & engineering designers [Ph.D., Loughborough University]. https://hdl.handle.net/2134/5432.

Persson, S., & Wickman, C. (2004). Effects of industrial design and engineering design interplay: An empirical study on tolerance management in the automotive industry. DS 32: Proceedings of DESIGN 2004, the 8th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 1151–1160.

Perttula, M., & Sipilä, P. (2007). The idea exposure paradigm in design idea generation. Journal of Engineering Design, 18(1), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820600679679CrossRef

Purcell, A. T., & Gero, J. S. (1996). Design and other types of fixation. Design Studies, 17(4), 363–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(96)00023-3CrossRef

Rindova, V. P., & Petkova, A. P. (2007). When is a new thing a good thing? Technological change, product form design, and perceptions of value for product innovations. Organization Science, 18(2), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0233CrossRef

Sio, U. N., Kotovsky, K., & Cagan, J. (2015). Fixation or inspiration? A meta-analytic review of the role of examples on design processes. Design Studies, 39, 70–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.04.004CrossRef

van Someren, M.W., Barnard, Y.F., Sandberg, J.A.C., & Onderzoeksinstituut Psychologie (FMG). (1994). The think aloud method: A practical approach to modelling cognitive processes. In Knowledge-based systems. Academic Press. https://dare.uva.nl/personal/pure/en/publications/the-think-aloud-method-a-practical-approach-to-modelling-cognitive-processes(7fef37d5-8ead-44c6-af62-0feeea18d445).html.

Terlutter, R., Diehl, S., Koinig, I., & Waiguny, M. (2013). Who gains, who loses? Recall and recognition of brand placements in 2D, 3D and 4D movies. https://openrepository.aut.ac.nz/handle/10292/6273.

Tulving, E. (2002). Episodic memory: From mind to brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135114ADSCrossRefPubMed

Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In Organization of memory (pp. xiii, 423–xiii, 423). Academic Press.

Tulving, E. (1991). Concepts of human memory. In Memory: Organization and locus of change (pp. 3–32). Oxford University Press.

Yang, M.-Y., You, M., & Chen, F.-C. (2005). Competencies and qualifications for industrial design jobs: Implications for design practice, education, and student career guidance. Design Studies, 26(2), 155–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.09.003CrossRef

Titel: Exploring the precedents retrieval styles of industrial and mechanical design students during brainstorming
verfasst von: Ning Zou
Xiaohan Zhang
Jianan Lou
Jing Liao
Chunlei Chai
Publikationsdatum: 27.04.2023
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: International Journal of Technology and Design Education / Ausgabe 1/2024
Print ISSN: 0957-7572
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1804
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-023-09825-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2024

Teacher practices of verbal support during a design project in the chemistry classroom

Impacts of maker education-design thinking integration on knowledge, creative tendencies, and perceptions of the engineering profession

Iterative transformations for deeper exploration during concept generation

Body, dance and abstraction for spatial and structural comprehension in the first year of design education

Industrial Design education in Australia: a competence analysis across primary, secondary and tertiary education levels

What can first-year undergraduate students “envision” from a pandemic?

Premium Partner