nach oben

Education and Information Technologies

Erschienen in:

16.02.2021

Factors affecting ICT integration in TURKISH education: a systematic review

verfasst von: Yigit Emrah Turgut, Alper Aslan

Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies | Ausgabe 4/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This research aims to reveal factors affecting Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) integration in learning environments in Turkey. The meta-synthesis method is used to make in-depth analysis and to interpret qualitative research findings on this issue. Through inclusion and exclusion criteria, 60 studies among 907 candidate studies accessed from databases named Web of Science, Education Resource Information Center (ERIC) and the Turkish Academic Network and Information Center (ULAKBIM) are included in this research. As a result of analyses, it is revealed that ICT integration into learning environments in Turkey is affected by five factors; students, educational material, infrastructure, management, and teachers. Considering these factors, it has been found that certain factors become prominent namely: the ICT and pedagogy competence of teachers; students’ ICT competence; a lack of technical equipment and technical support; a lack of educational materials; the attitudes of school administrators; and the quality and lack of in-service training for ICT. It is concluded that the factors affecting the ICT integration in education are directly or indirectly related to each other, and that ICT integration should be addressed with all its stakeholders and phases as a whole.

Vorheriger Artikel Designing a gamified e-learning environment for teaching undergraduate ERP course based on big five personality traits

Nächster Artikel Reasons and mediators in the development and communication of personal digital stories

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Akcaoglu, M., Gumus, S., Bellibas, M. S., & Boyer, D. M. (2015). Policy, practice, and reality: Exploring a nation-wide technology implementation in Turkish schools. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(4), 477–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2014.899264.CrossRef

Akti Aslan, S., & Duruhan, K. (2018). Being counsellor of information technologies: Expectations and professional roles. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 33(4), 1049–1064. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2018038631.CrossRef

Akti Aslan, S., & Duruhan, K. (2020). Problem based virtual learning: A conceptual analysis. Turkish Studies - Applied Sciences, 15(2), 157–182. https://doi.org/10.29228/TurkishStudies.43251.CrossRef

Alvarado, L. E., Aragón, R. R., & Bretones, F. D. (2020). Teachers’ attitudes towards the introduction of ICT in Ecuadorian public schools. TechTrends, 64(3), 498–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00483-7.CrossRef

Aslan, A., & Zhu, C. (2018). Starting teachers’ integration of ICT into their teaching practices in the lower secondary schools in Turkey. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2018.1.0431.CrossRef

Aspfors, J., & Fransson, G. (2015). Research on mentor education for mentors of newly qualified teachers: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 48(May 2015), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.02.004.CrossRef

Au, W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258–267. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07306523.CrossRef

Belay, M. T., Khatete, D. W., & Mugo, B. C. (2020). Teachers' attitude towards integrating ICT in classroom instruction in teaching and learning biology in secondary schools in the southern region, Eritrea. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(1), 1–18.CrossRef

Chand, V. S., Deshmukh, K. S., & Shukla, A. (2020). Why does technology integration fail? Teacher beliefs and content developer assumptions in an Indian initiative. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 2753–2774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09760-x.CrossRef

Chauhan, S. (2017). A meta-analysis of the impact of technology on learning effectiveness of elementary students. Computers & Education, 105(February 2017), 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.005.CrossRef

Chun, S. (2017). Birth and major strategies of smart education initiative in South Korea and its challenges. In International Conference on Smart Education and Smart E-Learning (pp. 439-449). Springer, Cham.

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. California: Sage Publications.

Daghan, G., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2015). General trends of the studies about the sustainability of the technology usage in education: A thematic content analysis study. Education and Science, 40(178), 225–253. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2015.4175.CrossRef

Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Deryakulu, D., & Olkun, S. (2009). Technology leadership and supervision: An analysis based on Turkish computer teachers' professional memories. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 18(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390802704055.CrossRef

Dong, Y., Xu, C., Chai, C. S., & Zhai, X. (2019). Exploring the structural relationship among teachers’ technostress, technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK), computer self-efficacy and school support. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(2), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00461-5.CrossRef

Endres, M. L., & Chowdhury, S. (2019). Team and individual interactions with reciprocity in individual knowledge sharing. In effective knowledge management systems in modern society (pp. 123-145). IGI Global.

Eom, S. B., & Ashill, N. J. (2018). A system’s view of e-learning success model. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 16(1), 42–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12144.CrossRef

Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2000). How to design and evaluate research in education (4th ed.). United States of America: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc..

Fuchs, C. (2008). The implications of new information and communication technologies for sustainability. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 10(3), 291–309.CrossRef

Getenet, S. T., Beswick, K., & Callingham, R. (2016). Professionalizing in-service teachers’ focus on technological pedagogical and content knowledge. Education and Information Technologies, 21(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-013-9306-4.CrossRef

Gil-Flores, J., Rodríguez-Santero, J., & Torres-Gordillo, J. J. (2017). Factors that explain the use of ICT in secondary-education classrooms: The role of teacher characteristics and school infrastructure. Computers in Human Behavior, 68(March 2017), 441–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.057.CrossRef

Goktas, Y., Gedik, N., & Baydas, O. (2013). Enablers and barriers to the use of ICT in primary schools in Turkey: A comparative study of 2005–2011. Computers & Education, 68, 211–222.CrossRef

Gries, T., Grundmann, R., Palnau, I., & Redlin, M. (2017). Innovations, growth and participation in advanced economies-a review of major concepts and findings. International Economics and Economic Policy, 14(2), 293–351.CrossRef

Gurcan, F., & Ozyurt, O. (2020). Emerging trends and knowledge domains in E-learning researches: Topic modeling analysis with the articles published between 2008-2018. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 8(16), 738–756.

Haji, S. A., Moluayonge, G. E., & Park, I. (2017). Teachers’ use of information and communications technology in education: Cameroon secondary schools perspectives. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 16(3), 147–153.

Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223–252.CrossRef

Hu, X., Gong, Y., Lai, C., & Leung, F. K. (2018). The relationship between ICT and student literacy in mathematics, reading, and science across 44 countries: A multilevel analysis. Computers & Education, 125, 1–13.CrossRef

Intel (2020). Australia Experiences a Digital Education Revolution. Retrieved from https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/case-studies/Ed-Transformation-CS-Australia-HiRes.pdf

Isci, T. G., & Demir, S. B. (2015). The use of tablets distributed within the scope of FATIH project for education in Turkey (is FATIH project a fiasco or a technological revolution?). Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3(7), 442–450. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2015.030703.CrossRef

ISTE. (2016). ISTE standards for students. Retrieved from https://www.iste.org/standards/for-students

Izmirli, O. S., & Kirmaci, O. (2017). New barriers to technology integration. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 17(72), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2017.72.8.CrossRef

Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, N. H. (2016). The effects of secondary teachers’ technostress on the intention to use technology in South Korea. Computers & Education, 95(April 2016), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.004.CrossRef

Kaleli-Yilmaz, G. (2015). The views of mathematics teachers on the factors affecting the integration of technology in mathematics courses. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(8), 132–148. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n8.8.CrossRef

Karadeniz, S., & Hacifazlioglu, O. (2013). School Administrators Turning Dystopias into Utopias: Technology Stories From Low Socio-Economic Schools. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(28–1), 211–222.

Karalar, H., & Dogan, U. (2017). Teacher perception on educational informatics network: A qualitative study of a Turkish Anatolian high school. International Education Studies, 10(4), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n4p101.CrossRef

Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Hong, H. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2015). A survey to examine teachers’ perceptions of design dispositions, lesson design practices, and their relationships with technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43(5), 378–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2014.941280.CrossRef

Krefting, L. (1991). Rigor in qualitative research: The assessment of trustworthiness. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(3), 214–222.CrossRef

Kula, A., & Deryakulu, D. (2017). Different subject teachers’ views, applications and suggestions about ICT integration in education. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 7(2), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.267187.CrossRef

Kurt, S. (2014). Creating technology-enriched classrooms: Implementational challenges in Turkish education. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.776077.CrossRef

Kuru Gönen, S. I. (2019). A qualitative study on a situated experience of technology integration: Reflections from pre-service teachers and students. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(3), 163–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1552974.CrossRef

Lawrence, J., & Tar, U. (2013). The use of grounded theory technique as a practical tool for qualitative data collection and analysis. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 11(1), 29–40.

Lawrence, J. E., & Tar, U. A. (2018). Factors that influence teachers’ adoption and integration of ICT in teaching/learning process. Educational Media International, 55(1), 79–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2018.1439712.CrossRef

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. In Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage.CrossRef

Malak, M. Z., Khalifeh, A. H., & Shuhaiber, A. H. (2017). Prevalence of internet addiction and associated risk factors in Jordanian school students. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 556–563.CrossRef

Mascheroni, G., & Ólafsson, K. (2014). Net children go mobile: Risks and opportunities.

Mishra, P. C., Kishore, S., & Shivani, S. (2018). The role of information technology for knowledge management: An empirical study of the Indian coal mining industry. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 21(3), 208–225.CrossRef

Mulhim, E. (2013). The current use of ICT by novice female teachers in Saudi primary schools and their perceived training needs. In ASCILITE-Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference (pp. 597–601). Retrieved from https://www.ascilite.org/conferences/sydney13/about/proceedings.pdf

Munyengabe, S., Yiyi, Z., Haiyan, H., & Hitimana, S. (2017). Primary teachers’ perceptions on ICT integration for enhancing teaching and learning through the implementation of one laptop per child program in primary schools of Rwanda. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(11), 7193–7204. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/79044.CrossRef

Paryono, P., & Quito, B. G. (2010). Meta-analysis of ICT integration in vocational and technical education in Southeast Asia. Seavern Journals, 2(1) Retrieved from https://bit.ly/378wekk.

Perrotta, C. (2013). Do school-level factors influence the educational benefits of digital technology? A critical analysis of teachers' perceptions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 314–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01304.x.CrossRef

Rodríguez-Miranda, F. P., Pozuelos-Estrada, F. J., & León-Jariego, J. C. (2014). The role of ICT coordinator. Priority and time dedicated to professional functions. Computers & Education, 72(March 2014), 262–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.11.009.CrossRef

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.

Sanli, C., Sezer, A., & Pinar, A. (2016). Perceptions of geography teachers to integrating technology to teaching and their practices. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 6(3), 234–252.

Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128(January 2019), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009.CrossRef

Sezer, B. (2011). Bilisim teknolojilerinin egitime kaynastirilmasi: Onem, engeller ve ulkemizde gerceklestirilen projeler [Integration of information technologies into education: importance, barriers and projects carried out in Turkey]. In 16th Internet Conference of Turkey. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326225245_Bilisim_Teknolojilerinin_Egitime_Kaynastirilmasi_Onem_Engeller_ve_Ulkemizde_Gerceklestirilen_Projeler

Sharts-Hopko, N. C. (2002). Assessing rigor in qualitative research. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care, 13(4), 84–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1055-3290(06)60374-9.CrossRef

Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75.CrossRef

Skryabin, M., Zhang, J., Liu, L., & Zhang, D. (2015). How the ICT development level and usage influence student achievement in reading, mathematics, and science. Computers & Education, 85, 49–58.CrossRef

Spiteri, M., & Rundgren, S. N. C. (2020). Literature review on the factors affecting primary teachers’ use of digital technology. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25(1), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9376-x.CrossRef

Staneva, A., Bogossian, F., Pritchard, M., & Wittkowski, A. (2015). The effects of maternal depression, anxiety, and perceived stress during pregnancy on preterm birth: A systematic review. Women and Birth, 28(3), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2015.02.003.CrossRef

Tarman, B., Baytak, A., & Duman, H. (2015). Teachers' views on an ICT reform in education for social justice. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(4), 865–874. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1445a.CrossRef

Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 45, 1–45,10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45.CrossRef

Timur, B., Yilmaz, Ş, & Timur, S. (2016). Science and technology teachers’ views about FATIH Project. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 45(2), 287–300.

Tondeur, J., Forkosh-Baruch, A., Prestridge, S., Albion, P., & Edirisinghe, S. (2016). Responding to challenges in teacher professional development for ICT integration in education. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 110–120.

Torgerson, C. J., & Elbourne, D. (2002). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of information and communication technology (ICT) on the teaching of spelling. Journal of Research in Reading, 25(2), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.00164.CrossRef

Voet, M., & De Wever, B. (2017). Towards a differentiated and domain-specific view of educational technology: An exploratory study of history teachers’ technology use. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6), 1402–1413. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12493.CrossRef

Voogt, J., Knezek, G., Cox, M., Knezek, D., & ten Brummelhuis, A. (2013). Under which conditions does ICT have a positive effect on teaching and learning? A call to action. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00453.x.CrossRef

Walsh, D., & Downe, S. (2005). Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: A literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50(2), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03380.x.CrossRef

Wikan, G., & Molster, T. (2011). Norwegian secondary school teachers and ICT. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34(2), 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2010.543671.CrossRef

Wikibooks (2020). One-to-One Laptop Schools/Portugal. Retrieved from https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/One-to-One_Laptop_Schools/Portugal

Williams-Miller, G. (2020). The use of information and communication technology (ICT) by preschool and kindergarten educators. Retrieved from https://source.sheridancollege.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1005&context=fahcs_student_capstones_hbecl

Yesilyurt, E., Ulas, A. H., & Akan, D. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy, academic self-efficacy, and computer self-efficacy as predictors of attitude toward applying computer-supported education. Computers in Human Behavior, 64(November 2016), 591–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.038.CrossRef

Yıldırım, O., Kursun, E., & Goktas, Y. (2015). The factors affecting the quality of in-service training on information and communication technologies. Education and Science, 40(178), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2015.4137.CrossRef

Yukselir, C. (2017). A meta-synthesis of qualitative research about mobile assisted language learning (MALL) in foreign language teaching. Arab World English Journal, 8(3), 302–318. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3053570.CrossRef

Titel: Factors affecting ICT integration in TURKISH education: a systematic review
verfasst von: Yigit Emrah Turgut
Alper Aslan
Publikationsdatum: 16.02.2021
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies / Ausgabe 4/2021
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10441-2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2021

An evaluation of accessibility to preschool education institutions using geographic information systems

Preservice teachers’ attitudes toward Web 2.0 personal learning environments (PLEs): Considering the impact of self-regulation and digital literacy

Examining technology acceptance of pre-service mathematics teachers in Turkey: A structural equation modeling approach

Cooperative learning in computer programming: A quasi-experimental evaluation of Jigsaw teaching strategy with novice programmers

Highlighting and taking notes are equally ineffective when Reading paper or eText

Socio-interactive practices and personality within an EFL online learning environments

Premium Partner