Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Continuous Research and Development Partnership in Engineering Education Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Faculty Perceptions on Publishing Research

verfasst von : Diane Rasmussen Pennington, Andree Swanson, Efiong Akwaowo, Paula Zobisch

Erschienen in: Interactive Collaborative Learning

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Today’s researchers have not only the traditional publications, but the open access publishing method whereby research papers can be published via the Internet as well as print publications. Researchers must carefully scrutinize the open access publishers in order to ensure the publication is a legitimate scholarly publication.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Developing Electrical Engineering Course in an Active Cooperative Learning (ACL) Platform
Nächstes Kapitel Criteria for Selection of a Web 2.0 Tool for Process Modeling Education
Literatur
1.
Alemu, D.S.: Expansion vs. quality: emerging issues of for-profit private higher education institutions in Ethiopia. Int. Rev. Educ. 56, 51–61 (2010)CrossRef
2.
Barandiaran, J.: Threats and opportunities of science at a for-profit university in Chile. High. Educ. 63, 205–218 (2012)CrossRef
3.
Bartholomew, R.E.: Science for sale: the rise of predatory journals. J. R. Soc. Med. 107(10), 384–385 (2014)CrossRef
4.
Beall, J.: Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature 489(7415), 179 (2012)CrossRef
5.
Beall, J.: Avoiding the peril of publishing qualitative scholarship in predatory journals. J. Ethnographic Qual. Res. 8(1), 1–12 (2013)
6.
7.
Beall, J.: The open-access movement is not really about open access. TripleC 11(2), 589–597 (2013). (Cognition, Communication, Co-Operation): Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society
8.
9.
10.
11.
Berry, J., Worthen, H.: Why we should support organizing in the for-profits. Radical Teach. 93(1), 35–37 (2012)CrossRef
12.
Bivens-Tatum, W.: Reactionary rhetoric against open access publishing. tripleC 12(2), 441–446 (2014)
13.
Bohannon, J.: Who’s afraid of peer review? Science 342(6154), 60–65 (2013)CrossRef
14.
15.
Boumil, M.M., Salem, D.N.: In… and out: open access publishing in scientific journals. Qual. Manag. Health Care 23(3), 133–137 (2014)CrossRef
16.
Butler, D.: Sham journals scam authors: con artists are stealing the identities of real journals to cheat scientists out of publishing fees. Nature 495, 421–422 (2013)CrossRef
17.
18.
19.
Coonin, B.: Open access publishing in business research: the authors’ perspective. J. Bus. Finance Librarianship 16(3), 193–212 (2011)CrossRef
20.
21.
Davis, J.Y., Adams, M., Hardesty, L.: Academic libraries in for-profit schools of higher education. Coll. Res. Librar. 72(6), 568–582 (2011)CrossRef
22.
Donovan, J.M., Watson, C.A.: Citation advantage of open access legal scholarship. Law Library J. 103(4), 553–573 (2011)
23.
Douglass, J.A.: The rise of the for-profit sector in US higher education and the Brazilian effect. Eur. J. Educ. 47(2), 242–258 (2012)CrossRefMathSciNet
24.
25.
26.
Floyd, C.E.: Know your competitor: impact of for-profit colleges on the higher education landscape. New Dir. High. Educ. 140, 121–129 (2007)CrossRef
27.
28.
29.
Grech, V.: Publish, but do not perish in the open access model. Malta Med. J. 1, September 2013
30.
Hassler, R.P.: The flogging of for-profit colleges. Acad. Questions 19(3), 63–74 (2006)CrossRef
31.
Husain, S., Nazim, M.: Analysis of open access scholarly journals in media & communication. DESIDOC J. Libr. Inf. Technol. 33(5), 405–411 (2013)CrossRef
32.
Jalalian, M., Mahboobi, H.: Hijacked journals and predatory publishers: is there a need to re-think how to assess the quality of academic research? Walailak J. Sci. Technol. 11(5–8), 389–394 (2014)
33.
Jamali, H.R., Nicholas, D., Watkinson, A., Herman, E., Tenopir, C., Levine, K., Nichols, F.: How scholars implement trust in their reading, citing, and publishing practices: geographical differences. Libr. Inf. Sci. Res. 36(3/4), 192–202 (2014)CrossRef
34.
Khalili, L.: Familiarity and experience with open access among Iranian medical researchers. Libri 61(4), 338–350 (2011)CrossRef
35.
Khalili, L., Singh, D.: Factors influencing acceptance of open access publishing among medical researchers in Iran. Libri: Int. J. Libr. Inf. Serv. 62(4), 336–354 (2012)CrossRef
36.
Kim, J.: Faculty self-archiving: motivations and barriers. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 61(9), 1909–1922 (2010)CrossRef
37.
Kingsley, D.A.: Paying for publication: issues and challenges for research support services. Aust. Acad. Res. Libr. 45(4), 262–281 (2014)CrossRef
38.
Kinser, K.: Principles of student affairs in for-profit higher education. NASPA J. 43(2), 264–279 (2006)CrossRef
39.
Kozak, M., Hartley, J.: Publication fees for open access journals: different disciplines – different methods. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 64(12), 2591–2594 (2013)CrossRef
40.
Laaksom, M., Bjourk, B.: Anatomy of open-access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure. BMC Med. 10, 124 (2012)CrossRef
41.
Lăzăroiu, G.: Challenges facing scholarly publishing. Linguist. Philos. Invest. 13, 158–163 (2014)
42.
Mischo, W.H., Schlembach, M.C.: Open access issues and engineering faculty attitudes and practices. J. Libr. Adm. 51(5/6), 432–454 (2011)
43.
O’Malley, S.: The leading edge of corporatization in higher ed: for-profit colleges. Radical Teach. 93, 22–28 (2006)
44.
45.
Perry, H.: Scholarly journals identifying potentially predatory publishers: the case of open access. Inf. Today 30(6), 13 (2014)
46.
Raghavan, R., Dahanukar, N., Knight, J.M., Bijukumar, A., Katwate, U., Krishnakumar, K., Philip, S.: Predatory journals and Indian ichthyology. Curr. Sci. (00113891) 107(5), 740–742 (2014)
47.
Ramírez, M.L., Dalton, J.T., McMillan, G., Read, M., Seamans, N.H.: Do open access electronic theses and dissertations diminish publishing opportunities in the social sciences and humanities? findings from a 2011 survey of academic publishers. Coll. Res. Libr. 74(4), 808–821 (2013)
48.
Ramírez, M.L., McMillan, G., Dalton, J.T., Hanlon, A., Smith, H.S., Kern, C.: Do open access electronic theses and dissertations diminish publishing opportunities in the sciences? Coll. Res. Libr. 75(6), 808–821 (2014)CrossRef
49.
Reinsfelder, T.L., Anderson, J.A.: Observations and perceptions of academic administrator influence on open access initiatives. J. Acad. Librarianship 39(6), 481–487 (2013)CrossRef
50.
Richardson, P., Parker, R.S.: Does research enhance or inhibit teaching? an exploratory study. J. Educ. Bus. 68(2), 79 (1992)CrossRef
51.
52.
Schwartz, M.: Academic: alleged defamation worth $1B. Libr. J. 138(11), 19 (2013)
53.
Swanson, A., Hutkin, R., Babb, D., Howell, S.: Establishing the best practices for social interaction and e-connectivity in online higher education classes. Doctoral dissertation, University of Phoenix, Arizona. Publication Number: 3525517, September 2010. http://​gradworks.​umi.​com/​3525517.​pdf
54.
55.
Metadaten
Titel
Faculty Perceptions on Publishing Research
verfasst von
Diane Rasmussen Pennington
Andree Swanson
Efiong Akwaowo
Paula Zobisch
Copyright-Jahr
2017
Buch
Interactive Collaborative Learning

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50336-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-50337-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2017

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50337-0_7

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise