Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Business & Information Systems Engineering
Erschienen in: Business & Information Systems Engineering 1/2018

03.01.2018 | Research Notes

From Expert Discipline to Common Practice: A Vision and Research Agenda for Extending the Reach of Enterprise Modeling

verfasst von: Prof. Dr. Kurt Sandkuhl, Prof. Dr. Hans-Georg Fill, Prof. Dr. Stijn Hoppenbrouwers, Prof. Dr. John Krogstie, Prof. Dr. Florian Matthes, Prof. Dr. Andreas Opdahl, Prof. Dr. Gerhard Schwabe, Ömer Uludag, Prof. Dr. Robert Winter

Erschienen in: Business & Information Systems Engineering | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The benefits of enterprise modeling (EM) and its contribution to organizational tasks are largely undisputed in business and information systems engineering. EM as a discipline has been around for several decades but is typically performed by a limited number of people in organizations with an affinity to modeling. What is captured in models is only a fragment of what ought to be captured. Thus, this research note argues that EM is far from its maximum potential. Many people develop some kind of model in their local practice without thinking about it consciously. Exploiting the potential of this “grass roots modeling” could lead to groundbreaking innovations. The aim is to investigate integration of the established practices of modeling with local practices of creating and using model-like artifacts of relevance for the overall organization. The paper develops a vision for extending the reach of EM, identifies research areas contributing to the vision and proposes elements of a future research agenda.
Vorheriger Artikel Enabling Normalized Systems in Practice – Exploring a Modeling Approach
Nächster Artikel Robo-Advisory

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Literatur
Allemang D, Hendler J (2011) Semantic web for the working ontologist: effective modeling in RDFS and OWL. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Anaya V, Berio G, Harzallah M, Heymans P, Matulevičius R, Opdahl AL, Panetto H, Verdecho M J (2010) The unified enterprise modelling language—overview and further work. Comput Ind 61(2)
Benkenstein M, Fellmann M, Leyer M, Sandkuhl K (2016) The value of enterprise modelling: towards a service-centric perspective. In: Horkoff J, Jeusfeld MA, Persson A (eds) The practice of enterprise modeling. In: 9th IFIP WG 8.1. Working Conference, PoEM 2016, pp 299–306
Berners-Lee T, Hendler J et al (2001) The semantic web—a new form of web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities. Sci Am 284(5):34–43CrossRef
Berzisa S, Bravos G, González TC, Czubayko U, España S, Grabis J et al (2015) Capability driven development: an approach to designing digital enterprises. Bus Inf Syst Eng 57(1):15–25CrossRef
Bizer C, Heath T, Berners-Lee T (2009) Linked data-the story so far. Semantic services, interoperability and web applications: emerging concepts. Int J Semant Web Inf Syst 5(3):205–227CrossRef
Blohm I, Leimeister JM, Krcmar H (2013) Crowdsourcing: how to benefit from (too) many great ideas. MIS Q Exec 4(12):199–211
Bork D, Fill HG (2014) Formal aspects of enterprise modeling methods: a comparison framework. In: Proceedings of the 2014 47th International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE
Bork D, Fill HG, Karagiannis D, Miron ET, Tantouris N, Walch M (2015) Conceptual modelling for smart cities: a teaching case. Inter Design Arch J 27:10–27
Brenner W, Karagiannis D, Kolbe L, Krüger J, Leifer L, Lamberti H, Leimeister J, Österle H, Petrie C, Plattner H, Schwabe G, Uebernickel F, Winter R, Zarnekow R (2015) User, use & utility research—the digital user as new design perspective in business and information systems engineering. Bus Inf Syst Eng 6(1):55–61CrossRef
Corradi G, Gherardi S, Verzelloni L (2010) Through the practice lens: where is the bandwagon of practice-based studies heading? Manag Learn 41(3):265–283CrossRef
Dalkir K (2013) Knowledge management in theory and practice. Routledge, London
Delfmann P, Herwig S, Lis L, Stein A, Tent K, Becker J (2010) Pattern specification and matching in conceptual models—a generic approach based on set operations. Enterp Model Inf Syst Archit 5(3):24–43
Dietz JLG (2006) Enterprise ontology—theory and methodology. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRef
Dietz JLG (2008) Architecture. Building strategy into design. Academic Service, The Hague
Fellmann M, Zarvic N, Metzger D, Koschmider A (2015) Requirements catalog for business process modeling recommender systems WI 2015, Osnabrück, Germany, March 4–6. In: Thomas O, Teuteberg F (eds) Smart enterprise engineering: 12. Internationale Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik 2015, pp 393–407
Fill HG (2011) On the conceptualization of a modeling language for semantic model annotations. In: CAiSE 2011 Workshops, Springer. LNBIP vol. 83, pp 134–148
Fill HG (2016) SeMFIS: a flexible engineering platform for semantic annotations of conceptual models. Semant Web 8(5):747–763CrossRef
Fill HG, Johannsen F (2016) A knowledge perspective on big data by joining enterprise modeling and data analyses. In: Bui TX, Sprague RH (eds) 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE
Fill HG, Karagiannis D (2013) On the conceptualisation of modelling methods using the adoxx meta modelling platform. Enterp Model Inf Syst Archit 8(1):4–25CrossRef
Fill HG, Redmond T, Karagiannis D (2012) FDMM: A formalism for describing ADOxx meta models and models. In: Leszek M, Cuzzocrea A, Cordeiro J (eds) Proceedings of ICEIS 2012, vol. 3. SciTePress, Lisbon, pp 133–144
Fischbach M, Puschmann T, Alt R (2013) Service lifecycle management. Bus Inf Syst Eng 5(1):45–49CrossRef
Frank U (2014a) Multilevel modeling—toward a new paradigm of conceptual modeling and information systems design. Bus Inf Syst Eng 6(6):319–337CrossRef
Frank U (2014b) Multi-perspective enterprise modeling: foundational concepts, prospects and future research challenges. Softw Syst Model 13(3):941–962CrossRef
Frank U, Strecker S, Fettke P, vom Brocke J, Becker J, Sinz E (2014) The research field “modeling business information systems”—current challenges and elements of a future research agenda. Bus Inf Syst Eng 6(1)
Fraser MD, Kumar K et al (1994) Strategies for incorporating formal specifications in software development. Commun ACM 37(10):74–86CrossRef
Gardner D, Fehskens L, Naidu M, Rouse WB, Ross JW (2012) Point-counterpoint: enterprise architecture and enterprise transformation as related but distinct concepts. J Enter Transform 2(4):283–294CrossRef
Gruber T (2008) Collective knowledge systems: where the social web meets the semantic web. J Web Sem 6(1):4–13CrossRef
Gutschmidt A, Sandkuhl K, Borchardt U (2017) Multi-touch table or plastic wall? Design of a study for the comparison of media in modeling workshops, 2016. In: Abramowicz W, Alt R, Franczyk B (eds) Business information systems workshops 2016, LNBIP 263. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 123–135
Henderson-Sellers B, Ralyté J, Ågerfalk PJ, Rossi M (2014) Situational method engineering. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 1–274
Hermans FFJ (2012) Analyzing and visualizing spreadsheets. PhD thesis, Software Engineering Research Group, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
Hoppenbrouwers SJBA, Rouwette EAJA (2012) A dialogue game for analysing group model building: framing collaborative modelling and its facilitation. Int J Org Design Eng 2(1):19–40
Hoppenbrouwers SJBA, van Stokkum W (2013) From dialogue games to mthinklets: overview and synthesis of a collaborative modeling approach. Int J E-Collab 9(4):32–44
Iyer B, Basole R (2016) Visualization to understand ecosystems. Commun ACM 59(11):27–30CrossRef
Kolb J, Rudner B, Reichert M (2013) Gesture-based process modeling using multi-touch devices. IJISMD 4(4):48–69
Krogstie J (2016) Quality in business process modeling. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRef
Krogstie J, Dalberg V, Jensen SM (2006) Process modeling value framework. In: Manolopoulos Y, Filipe J, Constantopoulos P, Cordeiro J (eds) Selected papers from ICEIS 2006, LNBIP 3. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 309–321
Krogstie BR, Schmidt AP, Kunzmann C, Krogstie J, Mora S (2013) Linking reflective learning and knowledge maturing in organizations. In: ARTEL@ EC-TEL, pp 13–28
Kusel A, Schönböck J, Wimmer M, Kappel G, Retschitzegger W, Schwinger W (2015) Reuse in model-to-model transformation languages: are we there yet? Softw Syst Model 14(2):537–572CrossRef
Leimeister JM (2010) Collective intelligence. Bus Inf Syst Eng 4(2):245–248CrossRef
Lillehagen F, Krogstie J (2009) Active knowledge modelling of enterprises. Springer, Heidelberg
Luff P, Heath C (1998) Mobility in collaboration. In: ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, ACM
Luff P, Hindmarsh J, Heath C (2000) Workplace studies: recovering work practice and informing system design. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef
Maier S, Minas M (2015) Recording, processing, and visualizing changes in diagrams. In: IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing
Martens A, Fettke P, Loos P (2015) Inductive development of reference process models based on factor analysis WI 2015, Osnabrück, March 4–6. In: Thomas O, Teuteberg F (eds) Smart Enterprise Engineering: 12. Internationale Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik 2015, pp 438–452
Matthes F, Neubert C, Schneider AW (2013) Fostering collaborative and integrated enterprise architecture modeling. J Enterp Model Inf Syst Architectures 8(1)
Narayanan NH, Hübscher R (1998) Visual language theory: towards a human-computer interaction perspective. In: Marriott K (ed) Visual language theory. Springer, Heidelberg
Neumann G, Sobernig S, Aram M (2014) Evolutionary business information systems—perspectives and challenges of an emerging class of information systems. Bus Inf Syst Eng 6(1):33–38CrossRef
Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ Sci 5(1):14–37CrossRef
Obrst L (2003) Ontologies for semantically interoperable systems. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, New Orleans, ACM Press
Opdahl AL, Berio G, Harzallah M, Matulevičius R (2012) An ontology for enterprise and information systems modelling. Appl Ontol 7(1):49–92
Oppl S (2016) Towards scaffolding collaborative articulation and alignment of mental models. In: Proceedings of ICKM 2016. Elsevier Procedia Computer Science
Orlikowski W (1993) Learning from notes: organizational issues in groupware implementation. Inf Soc 9(3):237–250CrossRef
Probst G, Raub S, Romhardt K (2000) Managing knowledge—building blocks for success. Wiley, Chichester
Reschenhofer T, Bhat M, Hernandez-Mendez A, Matthes F (2016) Lessons learned in aligning data and model evolution in collaborative information systems. In: Proc. International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)
Ross JW, Quaadgras A (2012) Enterprise architecture is not just for architects. Center for Information Systems Research Sloan School of Management Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Roth S, Hauder M, Matthes F (2013) Collaborative evolution of enterprise architecture models. 8th International Workshop on Models at Runtime (Models@run.time 2013)
Sandkuhl K, Stirna J, Persson A, Wißotzki M (2014) Enterprise modeling: tackling business challenges with the 4EM method (The Enterprise Engineering Series). Springer, HeidelbergCrossRef
Schatzki TR (2001) Practice minded orders. In: Schatzki TR, Knorr Cetina K, Savigny E (eds) The practice turn in contemporary theory. Routledge, London
Star S, Griesemer J (1989) Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology 1907–39. Soc Stud Sci 19(3):387–420CrossRef
Stirna J, Persson A, Sandkuhl K (2007) Participative enterprise modeling: experiences and recommendations. International conference on advanced information systems engineering. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 546–560CrossRef
Studer R, Benjamins VR, Fensel D (1998) Knowledge engineering: principles and methods. Data Knowl Eng 25(1):161–197CrossRef
Theunissen T, van Heesch U (2016) The disappearance of technical specifications in web and mobile applications. In: Proceedings of ECSA
Thomas O, Fellmann M (2007) Semantic business process management: ontology-based process modeling using event-driven process chains. IBIS 2(1):29–44
Van Deursen A, Klint P, Visser J (2000) Domain-specific languages: an annotated bibliography. Sigplan Not 35(6):26–36CrossRef
Vernadat FB (1996) Enterprise modelling and Integration. Chapman & Hall
von Hippel (2005) Democratizing innovation: the evolving phenomenon of user innovation. J Betriebswirtschaft 55(1):63–78CrossRef
Weiss S, Aier S, Winter R (2013) Institutionalization and the effectiveness of enterprise architecture management. In: International Conference on Information Systems, AIS
Winter R (2004) Architektur braucht Management. Wirtschaftsinformatik 46(4):317–319
Winter R (2014) Architectural thinking. Bus Inf. Syst Eng 6(6):361–364
Yoon Y, Myers B (2015) Semantic zooming of code change history. In: IEEE symposium on visual languages and human-centric computing
Zdravkovic J, Stirna J, Kirikova M, Karagiannis, D, Winter R (2015) Advanced enterprise modeling. Bus Inf Syst Eng 57(1)
Metadaten
Titel
From Expert Discipline to Common Practice: A Vision and Research Agenda for Extending the Reach of Enterprise Modeling
verfasst von
Prof. Dr. Kurt Sandkuhl
Prof. Dr. Hans-Georg Fill
Prof. Dr. Stijn Hoppenbrouwers
Prof. Dr. John Krogstie
Prof. Dr. Florian Matthes
Prof. Dr. Andreas Opdahl
Prof. Dr. Gerhard Schwabe
Ömer Uludag
Prof. Dr. Robert Winter
Publikationsdatum
03.01.2018
Verlag
Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
Erschienen in
Business & Information Systems Engineering / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 2363-7005
Elektronische ISSN: 1867-0202
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0516-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Business & Information Systems Engineering 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Research Paper

Security Requirements Elicitation from Airline Turnaround Processes

Profile

Interview with Anne Persson on “The Practice of Enterprise Modeling”

Catchword

Robo-Advisory

Research Paper

Process Modeling Recommender Systems

Research Paper

Modeling Simultaneous Cooperation and Competition Among Enterprises

Editorial

Enterprise Modeling for Business Agility