Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Wireless Networks
Erschienen in: Wireless Networks 5/2020

06.02.2020

Grey Wolf based compressive sensing scheme for data gathering in IoT based heterogeneous WSNs

verfasst von: Ahmed Aziz, Walid Osamy, Ahmed M. Khedr, Ahmed A. El-Sawy, Karan Singh

Erschienen in: Wireless Networks | Ausgabe 5/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Sensor node energy constraint is considered as an impediment in the further development of the Internet of Things (IoT) technology. One of the most efficient solution is to combine between compressive sensing (CS) and routing techniques. However, this combination faces many challenges that makes it an attractive point for research. This paper proposes an Efficient Multi-hop Cluster-based Aggregation scheme using Hybrid CS (EMCA-CS) for IoT based heterogeneous wireless sensor networks (WSNs). EMCA-CS efficiently combines between CS and routing protocols to extend the network lifetime and reduces the reconstruction error. EMCA-CS includes the following: a new algorithm to partition the field into various hexagonal cells (clusters) and based on multiple criteria, selects a node from each cluster as cluster head (CH). Each CH will then compress its cluster data using hybrid CS method. Also, a new Grey Wolf based algorithm to create optimal path for CHs to deliver the compressed data to base station (BS) and a CSMO-GWO algorithm to optimize the CS matrix construction process is introduced. Moreover, a new Grey Wolf and reversible Greedy based Reconstruction Algorithm is proposed to recover the actual data. The simulation results indicate that the performance of the proposed work exceeds the existing baseline techniques in terms of prolonging WSN lifetime, reducing the power consumption and reducing normalized mean square error.
Vorheriger Artikel An analytical framework for reliability evaluation of d-dimensional IEEE 802.11 broadcast wireless networks
Nächster Artikel Emperor based resource allocation for D2D communication and QoF based routing over cellular V2X in urban environment (ERA-D2Q)

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
2.
Cands, E. J. (2006). Compressive sampling. In Proceedings of the international congress of mathematicians (Vol. III, pp. 1433–1452). Madrid, Spain.
3.
Meenu, R., Sanjay, B., & Dhok, R. B. (2018). DeshmukhA systematic review of compressive sensing: Concepts, implementations and applications. IEEE Access, 6, 4875–4894.CrossRef
4.
Lv, C., Wang, Q., Yan, W., & Shen, Y. (2016). Energy-balanced compressive data gathering in wireless sensor networks. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 61, 102–114.CrossRef
5.
Khedr, A. M. (2015). Effective data acquisition protocol for multi-hop heterogeneous wireless sensor networks using compressive sensing. Algorithms, 8(4), 910–928.MATHCrossRef
6.
Omar, D. M., Khedr, A. M., & Agrawal, Dharma P. (2017). Optimized clustering protocol for balancing energy in wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Communication Networks and Information Security (IJCNIS), 9(3), 367–375.
7.
Khedr, A. M., & Omar, Dina M. (2015). SEP-CS: Effective routing protocol for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc and Sensor Wireless Networks, 26, 211–232.
8.
Omar, D. M., & Khedr, A. M. (2018). ERPLBC: Energy efficient routing protocol for load balanced clustering in wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc and Sensor Wireless Networks, 42, 145–169.
9.
10.
Aziz, A., & Singh, K. (2018). Lightweight security scheme for Internet of Things. Wireless Personal Communications, 104(2), 577–593.CrossRef
11.
Singh, K., Singh, K., Le, H. S., & Aziz, A. (2018). Congestion control in wireless sensor networks by hybrid multi-objective optimization algorithm. Computer Networks, 138, 90–107.CrossRef
12.
Osamy, W., Khder, A. M., Aziz, A., & Elsawy, A. (2018). Cluster-tree routing based entropy scheme for data gathering in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Access, 6, 77372–77387.CrossRef
13.
Aziz, A., Singh, K., Osamy, W., & Khedr, A. M. (2019). Effective algorithm for optimizing compressive sensing in IoT and periodic monitoring applications. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 126, 12–28.CrossRef
14.
Heinzelman, W., Chandrakasan, A., & Balakrishnan, H. (2000). Energy efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference (pp. 3005–3014).
15.
Luo, C., Wu, F., & Sun, J. (2013). An efficient compressive data gathering routing scheme for large-scale wireless sensor networks. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 39(6), 1935–1946.CrossRef
16.
Nguyen, M. T., Teague, K. A., & Rahnavard, N. (2016). CCS: Energy-efficient data collection in clustered wireless sensor networks utilizing block-wise compressive sensing. Computer Networks, 106, 171–185.CrossRef
17.
Chen, S., Zhao, C., Wu, M., Sun, Z., Zhang, H., & Leung, V. C. M. (2016). Compressive network coding for wireless sensor networks: Spatio-temporal coding and optimization design. Computer Networks, 108, 345–356.CrossRef
18.
Luo, J., Xiang, L., & Rosenberg, C. (2010). Does compressed sensing improve the throughput of wireless sensor networks? In IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) (pp. 1–6).
19.
Xiang, L., Luo, J., & Vasilakos, A. (2011). Compressed data aggregation for energy efficient wireless sensor networks. In 2011 8th annual IEEE communications society conference on sensor, mesh and ad hoc communications and networks (Vol. 11, pp. 46–54).
20.
Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., Nor, K., Khalifah, Z., Zakwan, N., & Valipour, A. (2015). Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications–a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 28(1), 516–571.CrossRef
21.
Heinzelman, W. B. (2000). Application-specific protocol architectures for wireless networks, Microsystems Technology Laboratories. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
22.
Jerbi, W., Guermazi, A., & Trabelsi, H. (2016). O-LEACH of routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. In 2016 13th International Conference on Computer Graphics, Imagin and Visualization (CGiV), Beni Mellal (pp. 399–404).
23.
Aderohunmu, F. A., Deng, J. D., & Purvis, M. K. (2011). A deterministic energy-efficient clustering protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of seventh IEEE international conference on intelligent sensors, sensor networks and information processing (pp. 341–346).
24.
Salim, A., Osamy, W., & Khedr, A. (2014). IBLEACH: Intra-balanced LEACH protocol for wireless sensor networks. Wireless Network, 20(6), 1515–1525.CrossRef
25.
Al-Zubaidi, A., Ariffin, A., & Al-Qadhi, A. (2018). Enhancing the stability of the improved-LEACH routing protocol for WSNs. Journal of ICT Research and Applications, 12(1), 1–13.CrossRef
26.
Smaragdakis, G., Matta, I., & Bestavros, A. (2004). SEP: A stable election protocol for clustered heterogeneous wireless sensor networks In Proceeding of the international workshop on SANPA.
27.
Mittal, N., Singh, U., & Singh Sohi, B. (2017). A stable energy efficient clustering protocol for wireless sensor networks. Wireless Networks, 23, 809–1821.CrossRef
28.
Kumar, S., Kant, S., & Kumar, A. (2015). Enhanced threshold sensitive stable election protocol for heterogeneous wireless sensor network. Wireless Personal Communications, 85, 2643–2656.CrossRef
29.
Aziz, A., Salim, A., & Osamy, W. (2013). Adaptive and efficient compressive sensing based technique for routing in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of INTHITEN (IoT and its Enablers) conference (pp. 3–4).
30.
Chong, L., Feng, W., Jun, S., & Chang, C. (2009). Compressive data gathering for large-scale wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 15th annual international conference on mobile computing and networking, MobiCom ’09 (pp. 145–156), New York, NY, USA.
31.
Xiang, L., Luo, J., & Vasilakos, A. (2011). Compressed data aggregation for energy efficient wireless sensor networks. In 2011 8th annual IEEE communications society conference on sensor, mesh and ad hoc communications and networks (pp. 46–54).
32.
Haupt, J., Bajwa, W., & Rabbat, M. (2012). Compressed sensing for networked data. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 25, 603–611.
33.
Duarte, M., Sarvotham, S., Wakin, M., Baron, D., & Baraniuk, R. (2005). Joint sparsity models for distributed compressed sensing. In Proceedings of the workshop on signal processing with adaptative sparse structured representations (SPARS).
34.
Jin, W., ShaoJie, T., Baocai, Y., & Yang, X. (2013). Data gathering in wireless sensor networks through intelligent compressive sensing. Digital Signal Processing, 23, 1539–1548.MathSciNetCrossRef
35.
Luo, C., Wu, F., & Sun, J. (2010). Efficient measurement generation and pervasive sparsity for compressive data gathering. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 9(12), 3728–3738.CrossRef
36.
Xie, R., & Jia, X. (2014). Transmission-efficient clustering method for wireless sensor networks using compressive sensing. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 25(3), 806–815.CrossRef
37.
Nguyen, M. T. (2013). Minimizing energy consumption in random walk routing for Wireless Sensor Networks utilizing compressed sensing. In Proceedings of the 2013 8th international conference on system of systems engineering, Maui, HI (Vol. 2–6, pp. 297–301). New York: IEEE.
38.
Salim, A., & Osamy, W. (2015). Distributed multi chain compressive sensing based routing algorithm for wireless sensor networks. Wireless Networks, 21, 1379–1390.CrossRef
39.
Ejaz, A., Yaqoob, I., Gani, A., Imran, M., Guizani, M., Rabbat, M., et al. (2016). CInternet-of-things-based smart environments: state of the art, taxonomy, and open research challenges. IEEE Wireless Communications, 23, 10–16.
40.
Mirjalili, S., Mirjalili, S., & Lewis, A. (2014). Grey Wolf optimizer. Advances in Engineering Software, 69, 46–61.CrossRef
41.
Liu, H., Hua, G., Yin, H., & Xu, Y. (2018). An intelligent grey Wolf optimizer algorithm for distributed compressed sensing. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 20(6), 1–10.
42.
Kumara, V., Kumara, V., Sandeep, D., Yadava, S., Barikb, R., Tripathic, R., et al. (2018). Multi-hop communication based optimal clustering in hexagon and voronoi cell structured WSNs. International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 93, 305–316.CrossRef
43.
Houy, N., & Tadenuma, K. (2009). Lexicographic compositions of multiple criteria for decision making. Journal of Economic Theory, 144, 1770–1782.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
44.
Needell, D., & Tropp, J. A. (2009). COSAMP: Iterative signal re-covery from incomplete and inaccurate samples. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 26(3), 301–321.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
45.
Wei, D., & Olgica, M. (2009). Subspace pursuit for compressive sensing signal reconstruction. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 55(5), 2230–2249.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
46.
Du, X., Cheng, L., & Chen, D. (2014). A simulated annealing algorithm for sparse recovery by \(l_0\) minimization. Neurocomputing, 131, 98–104.CrossRef
47.
Tropp, J., & Gilber, A. (2007). Signal recovery from random measurements via orthogonal matching pursuit. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 53(14), 4655–4666.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
48.
Burak, N., & Erdogan, H. (2013). Compressed sensing signal recovery via forward-backward pursuit. Digital Signal Processing, 23, 1539–1548.MathSciNetCrossRef
49.
Chartrand, R., & Yin, W. (2008). Iteratively reweighted algorithms for compressive sensing. In IEEE international conference on acoustics (pp. 3869–3872). Las Vegas, NV: Speech and Signal Processing.
50.
51.
52.
Duarte-Carvajalino, J. M., & Sapiro, G. (2009). Learning to sense sparse signals: Simultaneous sensing matrix and sparsifying dictionary optimization. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 18(7), 1395–1408.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
53.
Abolghasemi, V., Jarchi, D., & Sanei, S. (2010). A robust approach for optimization of the measurement matrix in compressed sensing. In 2010 2nd international workshop on cognitive information processing (pp. 388–392). Elba, Italy.
54.
Abolghasemi, V., Ferdowsi, S., Makkiabadi, B., & Sanei, S. (2010). On optimization of the measurement matrix for compressive sensing. In 18th European signal processing conference (pp. 427–431), Aalborg.
55.
Tropp, J., & Gilber, A. (2007). Signal recovery from random measurements via orthogonal matching pursuit. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 53(14), 4655–4666.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Grey Wolf based compressive sensing scheme for data gathering in IoT based heterogeneous WSNs
verfasst von
Ahmed Aziz
Walid Osamy
Ahmed M. Khedr
Ahmed A. El-Sawy
Karan Singh
Publikationsdatum
06.02.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Wireless Networks / Ausgabe 5/2020
Print ISSN: 1022-0038
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8196
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-020-02265-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2020

Wireless Networks 5/2020 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Simultaneous wireless information and power transfer in heterogeneous cellular networks with underlay D2D communication

OriginalPaper

Cryptanalysis and improvement of a group RFID authentication protocol

OriginalPaper

SMTS: a swarm intelligence-inspired sensor wake-up control method for multi-target sensing in wireless sensor networks

OriginalPaper

Self-heat controlling energy efficient OPOT routing protocol for WBAN

OriginalPaper

Exploitation of Information Centric Networking in federated satellite: 5G network

OriginalPaper

NSGA-II with ENLU inspired clustering for wireless sensor networks

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise