Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Universal Access in the Information Society
Erschienen in: Universal Access in the Information Society 2/2018

10.07.2017 | Position Paper

Improving the information society skills: Is knowledge accessible for all?

verfasst von: David Fonseca, Miguel Ángel Conde, Francisco J. García-Peñalvo

Erschienen in: Universal Access in the Information Society | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The emergence and popularization of information and communications technologies (ICT) is changing modern society and its educational landscape. ICT facilitates individuals’ ability to learn anywhere and at any time. In fact, by using ICT, access to knowledge acquisition is not restricted to formal contexts, such as academic institutions. This position paper reviews the educational contexts in which new learning strategies using ICT have been adapted, by focusing on how users access information and improve their digital skills. Our initial hypothesis is that in technological environments, learners use very specific devices and applications to access information, because content accessibility depends on both the user’s profiles and ICT. We demonstrate this through a case study applied in several Spanish university institutions.
Vorheriger Artikel Information society skills: Is knowledge accessible for all? Part I
Nächster Artikel Accessibility and tangible interaction in distributed workspaces based on multi-touch surfaces

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
2.
Kreijns, K., Acker, F.V., Vermeulen, M., Buuren, H.V.: What stimulates teachers to integrate ICT in their pedagogical practices? The use of digital learning materials in education. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29, 217–225 (2013). doi:10.​1016/​j.​chb.​2012.​08.​008 CrossRef
3.
Shen, C.X., Liu, R.D., Wang, D.: Why are children attracted to the Internet? The role of need satisfaction perceived online and perceived in daily real life. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29, 185–192 (2013). doi:10.​1016/​j.​chb.​2012.​08.​004 CrossRef
4.
Fonseca, D., Martí, N., Redondo, E., Navarro, I., Sánchez, A.: Relationship between student profile, tool use, participation, and academic performance with the use of Augmented Reality technology for visualized architecture models. Comput. Hum. Behav. 31, 434–445 (2014). doi:10.​1016/​j.​chb.​2013.​03.​006 CrossRef
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Warschauer, M.: Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)
11.
Australian National Audit Office: Innovation in the public sector: enabling better performance, driving new directions. Australian, National Audit Office, Canberra, Commonwealth of Australia, Barton (2009)
12.
García-Peñalvo, F.J., Colomo-Palacios, R.: Innovative teaching methods in engineering. Eng. Educ. 31(3), 689–693 (2015)
13.
Vanderlinde, R., Van Braak, J.: The gap between educational research and practice: views of teachers, school leaders, intermediaries and researchers. Br. Educ. Res. J. 36(2), 299–316 (2010). doi:10.​1080/​0141192090291925​7 CrossRef
14.
Sein-Echaluce, M.L., Fidalgo, A., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: Buenas prácticas de Innovación Educativa: artículos seleccionados del II Congreso Internacional sobre Aprendizaje, Innovación y Competitividad, CINAIC 2013. RED. Revista de Educación a Distancia. 44, 1–5 (2013)
15.
16.
Giesbers, B., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., Gijselaers, W.: Investigating the relations between motivation, tool use, participation, and performance in an e-learning course using web-videoconferencing. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(1), 285–292 (2013). doi:10.​1016/​j.​chb.​2012.​09.​005 CrossRef
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
Tsekleves, E., Whitham, R., Kondo, K., Hill, A.: Investigating pay-as-you-go address issues of trust, privacy and security around media use at home. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 12(2), 217–231 (2013). doi:10.​1007/​s10209-012-0270-3 CrossRef
22.
Kavita, E.T.: Investigation of age-differentiated spatial semantic elaboration strategies for communicating route instructions. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 12(2), 175–190 (2013). doi:10.​1007/​s10209-012-0274-z CrossRef
23.
Fernandes, H., Conceição, N., Paredes, H., Pereira, A., Araújo, P., Barroso, J.: Providing accessibility to blind people using GIS. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 11(4), 399–407 (2012). doi:10.​1007/​s10209-011-0255-7 CrossRef
24.
Rogers, D.L.: A paradigm shift: technology integration for higher education in the new millennium. Educ. Technol. Rev. 1, 19–33 (2000)
25.
Redacción de Educaweb: El 52% de los docentes ha tenido problemas para utilizar las TIC en el aula debido a fallos técnicos. www.​Scolartic.​com. Retrieved 18 Mar 2013 (2013)
26.
27.
Hu, B.Y.: Book review: integrating technology into higher. Educ. Technol. Soc. 9(1), 359–360 (2006)MathSciNet
28.
29.
Fonseca, D., Canaleta, X., Climent, A.: Usability and satisfaction assessment of vocational training students in terms of their initial motivation. In: Mobile Comerce Course Using SCC Methodology. 12th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, Lisbon, Accepted for publication (2017)
30.
Área, M., San Nicolás, M.B., Fariña, E.: Buenas prácticas de aulas virtuales en la docencia universitaria semipresencial. Revista de Teoría de la Educación Sociedad de la Información (TESI) 11(3), 7–31 (2010)
31.
32.
Ruiz, M., Abella, V.: Creación de un blog educativo como herramienta TIC e instrumento TAC en el ámbito universitario. Revista de Teoría de la Educación Sociedad de la Información (TESI) 12(4), 53–70 (2011)
33.
Dale, E.: Audiovisual Methods in Teaching, p.719. Dryden Press, New York (1969)
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
Forés, A., Ligioiz, M.: Descubrir la neurodidáctica. Ediciones UOC, Barcelona (2008)
39.
40.
Fonseca, D., Climent, A., Vicent, L., Canaleta, X.: Learning4Work. Designing a new evaluation system based on scenario centered curriculum methodology: the pre-test. In: Learning and Collaboration Technologies (LCT 2016), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 9753. Springer, Berlin (2016). doi:10.​1007/​978-3-319-39483-1_​1
41.
Fonseca, D., Redondo, E., Villagrasa, S., Canaleta, X.: Assessment of augmented visualization methods in multimedia engineering education. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 31(3), 736–750 (2015)
42.
Fonseca, D., Redondo, E., Valls, F., Villagrasa, S.: Technological adaptation of the student to the educational density of the course. A case study: 3D architectural visualization. Comput. Hum. Behav. (2016). doi:10.​1016/​j.​chb.​2016.​05.​048
43.
L, Vicent, Villagrasa, S., Fonseca, D., Redondo, E.: Virtual learning scenarios for qualitative assessment in higher education 3D arts. J. Univ. Comput. Sci. 21(8), 1086–1105 (2015). doi:10.​3217/​jucs-021-08-1086
44.
45.
46.
47.
Conde, M.Á.: Personalización del aprendizaje: Framework de servicios para la integración de aplicaciones online en los sistemas de gestión del aprendizaje. Tesis Doctoral, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca (2012)
48.
Comisión de las Comunicades Europeas: Hacer realidad un espacio europeo del aprendizaje permanente. Comunicación de la Comisión. 678 final (2001)
49.
Livingstone, D.: Exploring the icebergs of adult learning: findings of the first Canadian survey of informal learning practices. Can. J. Study Adult Educ. 3(2), 49–72 (1999)
50.
51.
Attwell, G.: e-Portfolios—the DNA of the Personal Learning Environment? J. e-Learning Knowl. Soc. 3(2), 39–61 (2007)
52.
Barrett, H., Carney, J.: Conflicting paradigms and competing purposes in electronic portfolio development. TaskStream web site (2005)
53.
Cole, D., Ryan, C.W., Kick, F.: Portfolios Across the Curriculum and Beyond. Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks (1995)
54.
Weigel, V.B.: Deep Learning for a Digital Age: Technology’s Untapped Potential to Enrich Higher Education. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2001)
55.
Chen, T.: Recommendations for creating and maintaining effective networked learning communities: a review of the literature. Int. J. Instr. Media 30(1), 35–44 (2003)
56.
Avgeriou, P., Papasalouros, A., Retalis, S., Skordalakis, M.: Towards a pattern language for learning management systems. Educ. Technol. Soc. 6(2), 11–24 (2003)MATH
57.
Prendes, M.P.: Plataformas de campus virtuales de Software Libre: Análisis compartivo de la situación actual de las Universidades Españoles. Informe del proyecto EA-2008-0257 de la Secretaría de Estado de Universidades e Investigación (2009)
58.
Arroway, P., Davenport, E., Guangning, X., Updegrove, D.: Educause Core Data Service Fiscal Year 2009 summary report. EDUCAUSE White Paper. EDUCAUSE (2010)
59.
Browne, T., Hewitt, R., Jenkins, M., Voce, J., Walker, R., Yip, H.: Survey of Technology Enhanced Learning for Higher Education in the UK. UCISA—Universities and Colleges Information System Asociation, Oxford (2010)
60.
Wexler, S., Dublin, L., Grey, N., Jagannathan, S., Karrer, T., Martinez, M., Mosher, B., Oakes, K., Barneveld, A.: Learning management systems. The good, the bad, the ugly,… and the truth. Guild Research 360 Degree Report. The eLearning Guild, Santa Rosa, CA (2008)
61.
Brown, J.S., Adler, R.P.: Minds on fire: open education, the long tail, and learning 2.0. Educ. Q. 42(6), 16–32 (2008)
62.
Cuban, L.: Oversold and Underused: Computers in the Classroom. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2001)
63.
Attwell, G.: The personal learning environments—the future of eLearning? eLearn. Pap. 2(1), 1–8 (2007)
64.
Ajjan, H., Hartshorne, R.: Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: theory and Empirical Tests. Internet Higher Educ. 11(2), 71–80 (2008)CrossRef
65.
Casquero, O., Portillo, J., Ovelar, R., Benito, M., Romo, J.: iPLE Network: an integrated eLearning 2.0 architecture from University’s perspective. Interact. Learn. Environ. 18(3), 293–308 (2010)CrossRef
66.
Mott, J., Wiley, D.: Open for learning: the CMS and the open learning network. Educ. Explor. Connect. Educ. Landsc. 15(2), 3–22 (2009)
67.
European-Union: Towards the European higher education area. In: Conference of Ministers responsible for Higher Education in 29 European countries, Bologna, Italy (1999)
68.
Fielding, R.T.: Architectural Styles and the Design of Network-Based Software Architectures. University of California, Irvine (2000)
69.
Wilson, S., Liber, O., Johnson, M., Beauvoir, P., Sharples, P., Milligan, C.: Personal learning environments: challenging the dominant design of educational systems. J. e-Learning Knowl. Soc. 3(3), 27–38 (2007)
70.
Adell, J., Castañeda, L.: Los Entornos Personales de Aprendizaje (PLEs): una nueva manera de entender el aprendizaje. In: Roig Vila, R., Fiorucci, M. (eds.) Claves para la investigación en innovación y calidad educativas. La integración de las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación y la Interculturalidad en las aulas. Marfil – Roma TRE Universita degli studi, Alcoy (2010)
71.
Schaffert, R., Hilzensauer, W.: On the way towards personal learning environments: seven crucial aspects. e-Learning Pap. 2(9), 1–11 (2008)
72.
Sclater, N.: Web 2.0, personal learning environments, and the future of learning management systems. Res. Bull. 13, 1–13 (2008)
73.
Piscitelli, A., Adaime, I., Binder, I.: El proyecto facebook y la posuniversidad. Sistemas operativos sociales y entornos abiertos de aprendizaje. Fundación Telefónica. Editorial Ariel, S.A., Barcelona (2010)
74.
Conde, M.Á., García-Peñalvo, F.J., Rodríguez-Conde, M.J., Alier, M., García-Holgado, A.: Perceived openness of Learning Management Systems by students and teachers in education and technology courses. Comput. Hum. Behav. 31, 517–526 (2014). doi:10.​1016/​j.​chb.​2013.​05.​023 CrossRef
75.
76.
Palmér, M., Sire, S., Bogdanov, E., Gillet, D., Wild, F.: Mapping web personal learning environments. Paper presented at the Mash-Up Personal Learning Environments—2nd Workshop MUPPLE’09, Nize, France, 29 September (2009)
77.
García-Peñalvo, F.J., Conde, M.Á., Alier, M., Casany, M.J.: Opening learning management systems to personal learning environments. J. Univ. Comput. Sci. 17(9), 1222–1240 (2011). doi:10.​3217/​jucs-017-09-1222
78.
Casquero, O., Portillo, J., Ovelar, R., Romo, J., Benito, M.: iGoogle and gadgets as a platform for integrating institutional and external services. Paper presented at the Mash-Up Personal Learning Environments—1st Workshop MUPPLE’08, Maastricht, The Netherlands (2008)
79.
Torres, R., Edirisingha, P., Mobbs, R.: Building Web 2.0-based personal learning environments: a conceptual framework. Paper presented at the EDEN Research Workshop, Paris, France (2008)
80.
81.
Peret, Y., Leroy, S., Leprêtre, E.: First steps in the integration of institutional and personal learning environments. Paper presented at the Workshop Future Learning Landscape—EC-TEL 2010, Barcelona, Spain, 28 September (2010)
82.
83.
Wilson, S., Sharples, P., Griffiths, D., Popat, K.: Moodle wave: reinventing the VLE using Widget technologies. Paper presented at the Mash-Up Personal Learning Environments—2nd Workshop MUPPLE’09, Nize France (2009)
84.
De-la-Fuente-Valentín, L., Leony, D., Pardo, A., Kloos, C.D.: Mashups in learning design: pushing the flexibility envelope. Paper presented at the Mash-Up Personal Learning Environments—1st Workshop MUPPLE’08, Maastricht, The Netherlands, September 17 (2008)
85.
Verpoorten, D., Glahn, C., Kravcik, M., Ternier, S., Specht, M.: Personalisation of learning in virtual learning environments. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning: Learning in the Synergy of Multiple Disciplines, Nice, France (2009)
86.
Alario-Hoyos, C., Wilson, S.: Comparison of the main alternatives to the integration of external tools in different platforms. Paper presented at the International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, ICERI, Madrid, Spain, November (2010)
87.
Dale, M., Bell, J.: Informal Learning in the Workplace. Dept. for Education and Employment (1999)
88.
Halliday-Wynes, S., Beddie, F.: Informal Learning. At a Glance. National Centre for Vocational Education Research Ltd., Adelaide (2009)
89.
CEDEFOP: European Guidelines for Validating Non-formal and Informal Learning. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg (2009)
90.
Otero, M.S., McCoshan, A., Junge, K.: European inventory on validation of non-formal and informal learning. ECOTEC Research and Consulting Limited, Birmingham (2005)
91.
Werquin, P.: Recognition of Non-formal and Informal Learning: Country Practices. OECD—Organization for Economic Coperation and Development, Paris (2010)
92.
93.
94.
García-Peñalvo, F.J., González-González, J.C., Murray, M.: MyElvin: a web-based informal learning platform for languages practice. Int. J. Knowl. Soc. Res. 3(1), 26–39 (2012). doi:10.​4018/​jksr.​2012010103 CrossRef
95.
Berlanga, A.J., Sloep, P.B., Brouns, F., Bitter-Rijpkema, M.E., Koper, R.: Towards a TENCompetence ePortfolio. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 3, 24–28 (2008)
96.
Schoonenboom, J., Sligte, H., Moghnieh, A., Hernández-Leo, D., Stefanov, K., Glahn, C., Specht, M., Lemmers, R.: Supporting life-long competence development using the TENComptence infrastructure: a first experiment. Int. J. Emerg. Tech. Learn. 3(1), 53–59 (2008)
97.
98.
99.
100.
García-Peñalvo, F.J., Conde, M.Á., Zangrando, V., García-Holgado, A., Seoane, A.M., Forment, M.A., Galanis, N., Janssen, J., Brouns, F., Vogten, H., Griffiths, D., Mykowska, A., Alves, G.R., Minović, M.: TRAILER project (Tagging, recognition, acknowledgment of informal learning experiences). A Methodology to make visible learners’ informal learning activities to the institutions. J. Univ. Comput. Sci. 19(11), 1661–1683 (2013)
101.
102.
Adkins, B.A., Foth, M., Summerville, J.A., Higgs, P.L.: Ecologies of innovation: symbolic aspects of cross-organizational linkages in the design sector in an Australian inner-city area. Am. Behav. Sci. 50(7), 922–934 (2007). doi:10.​1177/​0002764206298317​ CrossRef
103.
Adomavicius, G., Bockstedt, J., Gupta, A., Kauffman, R.J.: Understanding patterns of technology evolution: an ecosystem perspective. In: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference System Sciences, 2006. HICSS ‘06. Hawaii, 04–07 Jan 2006, vol 8. IEEE, USA, p. 189a (2006). doi:10.​1109/​HICSS.​2006.​515
104.
105.
Crouzier, T.: Science Ecosystem 2.0: How Will Change Occur? Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2015). doi:10.​2777/​67279
106.
Dini, P., Darking, M., Rathbone, N., Vidal, M., Hernández, P., Ferronato, P., Briscoe, G., Hendryx, S.: The Digital Ecosystems Research Vision: 2010 and Beyond. European Commission, Luxembourg (2005)
107.
Nachira, F.: Towards a Network of Digital Business Ecosystems Fostering the Local Development. European Commission, Luxembourg (2002)
108.
García-Peñalvo, F.J., García-Holgado, A.: Open source solutions for knowledge management and technological ecosystems. In: García-Peñalvo, F.J., García-Holgado, A. (eds.) Advances in Knowledge Acquisition, Transfer, and Management (AKATM). IGI Global, Hershey (2017). doi:10.​4018/​978-1-5225-0905-9
109.
García-Peñalvo, F.J., Hernández-García, Á., Conde, M.Á., Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., Sein-Echaluce, M.L., Alier-Forment, M., Llorens-Largo, F., Iglesias-Pradas, S.: Enhancing education for the knowledge society era with learning ecosystems. In: García-Peñalvo, F.J., García-Holgado, A. (eds.) Open Source Solutions for Knowledge Management and Technological Ecosystems. Advances in Knowledge Acquisition, Transfer, and Management (AKATM), pp. 1–24. IGI Global, Hershey (2017). doi:10.​4018/​978-1-5225-0905-9.​ch001
110.
García-Peñalvo, F.J., Hernández-García, Á., Conde-González, M.Á., Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., Sein-Echaluce Lacleta, M.L., Alier-Forment, M., Llorens-Largo, F., Iglesias-Pradas, S.: Learning services-based technological ecosystems. In: Alves, G.R., Felgueiras, M.C. (eds.) Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM’15) (Porto, Portugal, October 7–9, 2015), pp. 467–472. ACM, New York (2015)CrossRef
111.
Moore, J.F.: Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard Bus. Rev. 71(3), 75–86 (1993)
112.
Iansiti, M., Levien, R.: Strategy as ecology. Harvard Bus. Rev. 82(3), 68–78 (2004)
113.
Yu, E., Deng, S.: Understanding software ecosystems: a strategic modeling approach. In: Jansen, S., Bosch, J., Campbell, P., Ahmed, F. (eds.) IWSECO-2011 Software Ecosystems 2011. Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Software Ecosystems. Brussels, Belgium, June 7th, 2011. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Aachen, Germany, pp. 65–76 (2011)
114.
115.
116.
García-Holgado, A., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: A metamodel proposal for developing learning ecosystems. In: HCI International 2017, Vancouver, Canada, 2017. Springer, Accepted for publication (2017)
117.
Pardo, A., Delgado-Kloos, C.: Stepping out of the box: Towards analytics outside the learning management system. In: LAK ‘11 Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 163–167. ACM, New York (2011). doi:10.​1145/​2090116.​2090142
118.
Bosch, J.: Architecture challenges for software ecosystems. In: ECSA’10 Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Software Architecture: Companion Volume, pp. 93–95. ACM, New York (2010). doi:10.​1145/​1842752.​1842776
119.
Domingo, M.G., Forner, J.A.M.: Expanding the learning environment: combining physicality and virtuality-the internet of things for eLearning. In: Proceedings of 2010 IEEE 10th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), Sousse, Tunisia, 5–7 July 2010, pp. 730–731. IEEE, Washington (2010). doi:10.​1109/​ICALT.​2010.​211
120.
121.
Yukselturk, E., Ozekes, S., Türel, Y.: Predicting dropout student: an application of data mining methods in an online education program. Eur. J. Open Distance E-Learning (2014). doi:10.​2478/​eurodl-2014-0008
122.
Cruz-Benito, J., Therón, R., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: Analytics of information flows and decision making in heterogeneous learning ecosystems. In: García-Peñalvo, F.J. (ed.) Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM’14), pp. 703–707. ACM, New York (2014). doi:10.​1145/​2669711.​2669977
123.
García-Holgado, A., Cruz-Benito, J., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: Analysis of knowledge management experiences in spanish public administration. In: Alves, G.R., Felgueiras, M.C. (eds.) Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM’15) (Porto, Portugal, October 7–9, 2015), pp. 189–193. ACM, New York (2015). doi:10.​1145/​2808580.​2808609 CrossRef
124.
125.
Fernandez, C., Esteban, G., Conde, M.Á., Rodríguez-Lera, F.J.: ICT for older people to learn about ICT: application and evaluation. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds.) Learning and Collaboration Technologies: Third International Conference, LCT 2016, Held as Part of HCI International 2016, Toronto, Canada, July 17–22, Proceedings, vol. 9753, pp. 292–302. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.​1007/​978-3-319-39483-1_​27
126.
García-Peñalvo, F.J., Conde, M.Á., Matellán-Olivera, V.: Mobile apps for older users—the development of a mobile apps repository for older people. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds.) Learning and Collaboration Technologies Technology-Rich Environments for Learning and Collaboration, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8524, pp. 117–126. Springer, Cham (2014). doi:10.​1007/​978-3-319-07485-6_​12
127.
128.
Fundación-Vodafone-España: TIC y Mayores. Conectados al futuro (2012)
129.
Fundación-Orange: eEspaña 2014. Informe Anual sobre el desarrollo de la sociedad de la información en España. Madrid (2015)
130.
Fundación-Vodafone-España, Red.es: Tecnologías orientadas a la movilidad: valoración y tendencias. Madrid (2014)
131.
132.
Ala-Mutka, K., Malanowski, N., Punie, Y., Cabrera, M.: Active ageing and the potential of ICT for learning. European Comission, Seville (2008)
133.
European-Comission: The 2015 Ageing Report—Economic and budgetary projections for the 28 EU Member States (2013–2060). European Economy 2015. Publications Office of the European Union, Louxembourg (2015)
134.
Sandhu, J., Damodaran, L., Ramondt, L.: ICT skills acquisition by older people: motivations for learning and barriers to progression. Int. J. Educ. Ageing 3(1), 25–42 (2013)
135.
Amaro, F., Gil, H.: ICT for elderly people : “Yes, They Can!”. In: e-CASE & e-Teach International Conference on e-Commerce, e-Administration, e-Society, e-Education, and e-Technology, Tokyo, 2011, pp. 3792–3803
136.
Prensky, M.: Digital natives, digital immigrants, part ii: do they really think differently? On the Horizon 9(6), 1–6 (2001)CrossRef
137.
138.
139.
140.
White, H., McConnell, E., Clipp, E., Bynum, L., Teague, C., Navas, L., Craven, S., Halbrecht, H.: Surfing the net in later life: a review of the literature and pilot study of computer use and quality of life. J. Appl. Gerontol. 18(3), 358–378 (1999)CrossRef
141.
142.
Czaja, S.J., Lee, C.C.: Designing computer systems for older adults. In: Julie, A.J., Andrew, S. (eds.) The Human–Computer Interaction Handbook, pp. 413–427. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Mahwah (2003)
143.
European-Commission: Active Ageing in the Information Society: e-Inclusion—Be Part of It! Brussels (2007)
144.
ITU: ICT Facts & Figures. Geneva, Switzerland (2015)
145.
COM: 678 Final. Making a European Area of Lifelong Learning a Reality. Communication from the commission (2001)
146.
Davie, R.: Older People in Europe—EU Policies and Programmes. European Parliamentary Research Service (2014)
147.
Balanskat, A., Blamire, R., Kefala, S.: The ICT impact report. European Schoolnet 1, 1–71 (2006)
148.
Collis, B., Wende, M.: Models of technology and change in higher education: an international comparative survey on the current and future use of ICT in higher education. http://​doc.​utwente.​nl/​44610/​. Accessed 20 Jan 2017 (2002)
149.
150.
Briz-Ponce, L., Pereira, A., Carvalho, L., Juanes-Méndez, J.A., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: Learning with mobile technologies: students’ behavior. Comput. Hum. Behav. (2017). doi:10.​1016/​j.​chb.​2016.​05.​027
151.
Sánchez Prieto, J.C., Olmos Migueláñez, S., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: Informal tools in formal contexts: development of a model to assess the acceptance of mobile technologies among teachers. Comput. Hum. Behav. 55A, 519–528 (2016). doi:10.​1016/​j.​chb.​2015.​07.​002 CrossRef
152.
Sánchez Prieto, J.C., Olmos Migueláñez, S., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: MLearning and pre-service teachers: an assessment of the behavioral intention using an expanded TAM model. Comput. Hum. Behav. (2017). doi:10.​1016/​j.​chb.​2016.​09.​061
Metadaten
Titel
Improving the information society skills: Is knowledge accessible for all?
verfasst von
David Fonseca
Miguel Ángel Conde
Francisco J. García-Peñalvo
Publikationsdatum
10.07.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Universal Access in the Information Society / Ausgabe 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1615-5289
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-5297
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0548-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

Universal Access in the Information Society 2/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Long Paper

Accessibility and tangible interaction in distributed workspaces based on multi-touch surfaces

Long Paper

Activity-tracking devices for older adults: comparison and preferences

Long Paper

Interactivity and multimodality in language learning: the untapped potential of audiobooks

Long Paper

Touching graphical applications: bimanual tactile interaction on the HyperBraille pin-matrix display

Long Paper

Measuring the difficulty of activities for adaptive learning

Long Paper

Performance-based testing for ICT skills assessing: a case study of students and teachers’ ICT skills in Finnish schools

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise