nach oben

TechTrends

Erschienen in:

09.05.2023 | Guest Editorial

Introduction to Special Section on Race and Racism in Educational Technology

verfasst von: Michael Lachney, Aman Yadav

Erschienen in: TechTrends | Ausgabe 3/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Excerpt

It is now argued by critical scholars of technology across disciplines that technological devices and socio-technical systems reproduce white supremacy and racism (e.g., Benjamin, 2022; Eubanks, 2018; Noble, 2018). But what does this mean for educational technology? Simply put, educational technologies and systems are no different (e.g., Eglash et al., 2021; Yadav et al., 2022; Watters, 2021). Thus, technologists and researchers need to challenge their own assumptions that technological devices and socio-technical systems are value-free and neutral when it comes to their design and use. This is especially the case given that since at least the 1980s it has been argued that artifacts have politics, including those that are racialized (Strate, 2012; Winner, 1980). …

Vorheriger Artikel ChatGPT in Education: An Opportunity or a Challenge for the Future?

Nächster Artikel Expanding Theories of Sociopolitical Development: Centering the Intersectional Experiences of Girls of Color in an Informal STEM Program

Allen Kuyenga, M. C., Lachney, M., & Green, B. (2022). Race-positive career and technical education: Techno-social agency beyond the vocational-Liberal divide. TechTrends, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00806-w

Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new jim code. Polity.

Benjamin, R. (2022). Viral justice: How we grow the world we want. Princeton University Press.CrossRef

Crenshaw, K. W., Harris, L., HoSang, D. M., Lipsitz, G., & (Ed.). (2019). Seeing race again: Countering colorblindness across the disciplines. Univ of California Press.CrossRef

Eglash, R., & Bennett, A. (2022). Anti-racism for freethinkers: Cultivating a mindset for curiosity and scientific inquiry in the context of racial equity and social justice. TechTrends, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00815-9

Eglash, R., Bennett, A., Cooke, L., Babbitt, W., & Lachney, M. (2021). Counter-hegemonic computing: Toward computer science education for value generation and emancipation. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 21(4), 1–30.CrossRef

Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. Martin's Press.

Garcia, P., Cadenas, G. A., & Scott, K. A. (2022). Expanding theories of sociopolitical development: Centering the intersectional experiences of girls of color in an informal STEM program. TechTrends, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00812-y

Gaskins, N. R. (2021). Techno-vernacular creativity and innovation: Culturally relevant making inside and outside of the classroom. MIT Press.CrossRef

Gaskins, N. (2022). Interrogating algorithmic Bias: From speculative fiction to Liberatory design. TechTrends, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00783-0

Glasgow, J., Haslanger, S., Jeffers, C., & Spencer, Q. (2019). What is race?: Four philosophical views. Oxford University Press.CrossRef

López-Quiñones, A., Martinez-Lopez, M., Moreno Sandoval, C. D., Carroll-Miranda, J., Lindala, A. E., Chatman, M. C., ... & Flores-Reyes, E. (2023). Ancestral computing for sustainability: Centering indigenous epistemologies in researching computer science education. TechTrends, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00820-y

Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression. Algorithms of oppression.CrossRef

Peralta, L. M. M. (2023). Resisting techno-orientalism and mimicry stereotypes in and through data science education. TechTrends, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00842-0

Shah, N., & Yadav, A. (2023). Racial justice amidst the dangers of computing creep: A dialogue. TechTrends, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00835-z

Strate, L. (2012). If it's neutral, it's not technology. Educational Technology, 6–9.

Watters, A. (2021). Teaching machines: The history of personalized learning. MIT Press.CrossRef

Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121–136.

Yadav, A., Heath, M., & Hu, A. D. (2022). Toward justice in computer science through community, criticality, and citizenship. Communications of the ACM, 65(5), 42–44.CrossRef

Titel: Introduction to Special Section on Race and Racism in Educational Technology
verfasst von: Michael Lachney
Aman Yadav
Publikationsdatum: 09.05.2023
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: TechTrends / Ausgabe 3/2023
Print ISSN: 8756-3894
Elektronische ISSN: 1559-7075
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00853-x

Springer Professional

Introduction to Special Section on Race and Racism in Educational Technology

Excerpt

Premium Partner

Springer Professional

Excerpt

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2023

Youth Hackathons in Computing for the Community: A Design Case

Anti-racism for Freethinkers: Cultivating a Mindset for Curiosity and Scientific Inquiry in the Context of Racial Equity and Social Justice

Trends and Topics in Educational Technology, 2023 Edition

Interrogating Algorithmic Bias: From Speculative Fiction to Liberatory Design

Ancestral Computing for Sustainability: Centering Indigenous Epistemologies in Researching Computer Science Education

Effects of Two Modes of Digital Storytelling Instructional Strategy on Pupils' Achievement in Social Studies

Premium Partner