Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
International Journal of Social Robotics
Erschienen in: International Journal of Social Robotics 3/2019

06.12.2018

Leveraging Robotics Research for Children with Autism: A Review

verfasst von: Luthffi Idzhar Ismail, Thibault Verhoeven, Joni Dambre, Francis Wyffels

Erschienen in: International Journal of Social Robotics | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Robotics research in helping children with autism has gained increased attention in recent years. Children with autism often struggle with neurodevelopmental disorders that affect their lives particularly in communication skills, social interaction and their repetitive stereotyped behavior. In this article, we highlight previous findings on human–robot interaction for children with autism. To date, it has been claimed that child–robot interaction is a beneficial approach in helping children with autism to improve their quality of life. Based on an extensive search of the literature, we identified three major research gaps: (1) diversity in research focus, (2) bias contribution in robotics research towards specific behavior impairments in autism and, (3) effectiveness of human–robot interaction after robot-based intervention program. Therefore, this review paper shall identify and thoroughly discuss published works that address the research gaps found in this areas. This article is therefore seen as a crucial step in bridging the gap between robotics research and children with autism. The results presented could be beneficial for researchers in determining future directions for robotics research in helping children with autism.
Vorheriger Artikel A Study on Different User Interfaces for Teaching Virtual Borders to Mobile Robots
Nächster Artikel Influence of Embodiment and Substrate of Social Robots on Users’ Decision-Making and Attitude

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
American-Psychiatric-Association (1995) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders DSM-IV. American Psychiatric Association, Washington
2.
Amirabdollahian F, Robins B, Dautenhahn K, Ji Z (2011) Investigating tactile event recognition in child–robot interaction for use in autism therapy. In: 2011 annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, IEEE, pp 5347–5351
3.
Anzalone SM, Tilmont E, Boucenna S, Xavier J, Jouen AL, Bodeau N, Maharatna K, Chetouani M, Cohen D, Group MS (2014) How children with autism spectrum disorder behave and explore the 4-dimensional (spatial 3D+ time) environment during a joint attention induction task with a robot. Res Autism Spectr Disord 8(7):814–826CrossRef
4.
Aresti-Bartolome N, Garcia-Zapirain B (2014) Technologies as support tools for persons with autistic spectrum disorder: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 11(8):7767–7802CrossRef
5.
Aresti-Bartolome N, Garcia-Zapirain B (2015) Cognitive rehabilitation system for children with autism spectrum disorder using serious games: a pilot study. Bio-Med Mater Eng 26(s1):811–824CrossRef
6.
Baio J (2012) Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders: autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 14 sites, United States, 2008. Surveillance summaries: morbidity and mortality weekly report. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention vol 61(3)
7.
Barakova EI, Bajracharya P, Willemsen M, Lourens T, Huskens B (2015) Long-term lego therapy with humanoid robot for children with ASD. Expert Syst 32(6):698–709CrossRef
8.
Beer JM, Boren M, Liles KR (2016) Robot assisted music therapy a case study with children diagnosed with autism. In: 2016 11th ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction (HRI), IEEE, pp 419–420
9.
Begum M, Serna RW, Kontak D, Allspaw J, Kuczynski J, Yanco HA, Suarez J (2015) Measuring the efficacy of robots in autism therapy: how informative are standard HRI metrics. In: Proceedings of the tenth annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, ACM, pp 335–342
10.
Begum M, Serna RW, Yanco HA (2016) Are robots ready to deliver autism interventions? A comprehensive review. Int J Soc Robot 8(2):157–181CrossRef
11.
Bekele E, Crittendon JA, Swanson A, Sarkar N, Warren ZE (2014) Pilot clinical application of an adaptive robotic system for young children with autism. Autism 18(5):598–608CrossRef
12.
Bekele ET, Lahiri U, Swanson AR, Crittendon JA, Warren ZE, Sarkar N (2013) A step towards developing adaptive robot-mediated intervention architecture (ARIA) for children with autism. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 21(2):289–299CrossRef
13.
Bharatharaj J, Kumar SS (2013) Considerations in autism therapy using robotics. In: 2013 fourth international conference on computing, communications and networking technologies (ICCCNT), IEEE, pp 1–5
14.
Bharatharaj J, Huang L, Al-Jumaily A, Elara MR, Krägeloh C (2017) Investigating the effects of robot-assisted therapy among children with autism spectrum disorder using bio-markers. In: IOP conference series: materials science and engineering. IOP Publishing, vol 234, pp 012–017
15.
16.
Boccanfuso L, O’Kane JM (2011) Charlie: an adaptive robot design with hand and face tracking for use in autism therapy. Int J Soc Robot 3(4):337–347CrossRef
17.
Boucenna S, Narzisi A, Tilmont E, Muratori F, Pioggia G, Cohen D, Chetouani M (2014) Interactive technologies for autistic children: a review. Cogn Comput 6(4):722–740CrossRef
18.
Broadbent E (2017) Interactions with robots: the truths we reveal about ourselves. Ann Rev Psychol 68:627–652CrossRef
19.
Cao HL, Pop C, Simut R, Furnemónt R, De Beir A, Van de Perre G, Esteban PG, Lefeber D, Vanderborght B (2015) Probolino: a portable low-cost social device for home-based autism therapy. In: International conference on social robotics, Springer, New York, pp 93–102
20.
Chevalier P, Martin JC, Isableu B, Bazile C, Iacob DO, Tapus A (2016) Joint attention using human–robot interaction: impact of sensory preferences of children with autism. In: 2016 25th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN), IEEE, pp 849–854
21.
Chevalier P, Martin JC, Isableu B, Bazile C, Tapus A (2017) Impact of sensory preferences of individuals with autism on the recognition of emotions expressed by two robots, an avatar, and a human. Auton Robots 41(3):613–635CrossRef
22.
Chuah MC, Coombe D, Garman C, Guerrero C, Spletzer J (2014) Lehigh instrument for learning interaction (LILI): an interactive robot to aid development of social skills for autistic children. In: 2014 IEEE 11th international conference on mobile ad hoc and sensor systems, IEEE, pp 731–736
23.
Coeckelbergh M, Pop C, Simut R, Peca A, Pintea S, David D, Vanderborght B (2016) A survey of expectations about the role of robots in robot-assisted therapy for children with ASD: ethical acceptability, trust, sociability, appearance, and attachment. Sci Eng Ethics 22(1):47–65CrossRef
24.
Conti D, Cattani A, Di Nuovo S, Di Nuovo A (2015) A cross-cultural study of acceptance and use of robotics by future psychology practitioners. In: 2015 24th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN), IEEE, pp 555–560
25.
Conti D, Di Nuovo S, Buono S, Trubia G, Di Nuovo A (2015) Use of robotics to stimulate imitation in children with autism spectrum disorder: a pilot study in a clinical setting. In: 2015 24th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN), IEEE, pp 1–6
26.
Conti D, Di Nuovo S, Buono S, Di Nuovo A (2017) Robots in education and care of children with developmental disabilities: a study on acceptance by experienced and future professionals. Int J Soc Robot 9(1):51–62CrossRef
27.
Corsello CM (2005) Early intervention in autism. Infants Young Child 18(2):74–85CrossRef
28.
Costa S, Lehmann H, Dautenhahn K, Robins B, Soares F (2015) Using a humanoid robot to elicit body awareness and appropriate physical interaction in children with autism. Int J Soc Robot 7(2):265–278CrossRef
29.
Costescu CA, Vanderborght B, David DO (2015) Reversal learning task in children with autism spectrum disorder: a robot-based approach. J Autism Dev Disord 45(11):3715–3725CrossRef
30.
Dautenhahn K (2003) Roles and functions of robots in human society: implications from research in autism therapy. Robotica 21(04):443–452CrossRef
31.
Dautenhahn K (2007) Methodology & themes of human–robot interaction: a growing research field. Int J Adv Robot Syst 4(1):15CrossRef
32.
Dautenhahn K (2007) Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human–robot interaction. Philos Trans R Soc B: Biol Sci 362(1480):679–704CrossRef
33.
Dautenhahn K, Werry I (2000) Issues of robot–human interaction dynamics in the rehabilitation of children with autism. Proc Anim Animats 6:519–528
34.
de Haas M, Smeekens I, Njeri E, Haselager P, Buitelaar J, Lourens T, Staal W, Glennon J, Barakova E (2017) Personalizing educational game play with a robot partner. In: Robotics in education. Springer, New York pp 259–270
35.
Delaherche E, Boucenna S, Chetouani M, Cohen D (2013) How social signal processing (SSP) can help assessment of bonding phenomena in developmental psychology? In: Neural nets and surroundings, Springer, Berlin pp 345–356
36.
Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network Surveillance Year 2010 Principal Investigators (2014) Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years-autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 sites, United States, 2010. Morbidity and mortality weekly report: surveillance summaries, Washington, DC, vol 63(2)
37.
Dickstein-Fischer L, Alexander E, Yan X, Su H, Harrington K, Fischer GS (2011) An affordable compact humanoid robot for autism spectrum disorder interventions in children. In: 2011 Annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, IEEE, pp 5319–5322
38.
Diehl JJ, Schmitt LM, Villano M, Crowell CR (2012) The clinical use of robots for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: a critical review. Res Autism Spectr Disord 6(1):249–262CrossRef
39.
Diehl JJ, Crowell CR, Villano M, Wier K, Tang K, Riek LD (2014) Clinical applications of robots in autism spectrum disorder diagnosis and treatment. In: Comprehensive guide to autism. Springer, New York pp 411–422
40.
Dimitrova M, Vegt N, Barakova E (2012) Designing a system of interactive robots for training collaborative skills to autistic children. In: 2012 15th international conference on interactive collaborative learning (ICL), IEEE, pp 1–8
41.
Erden MS (2013) Emotional postures for the humanoid-robot NAO. Int J Soc Robot 5(4):441–456CrossRef
42.
Feil-Seifer D, Matarić MJ (2009) Toward socially assistive robotics for augmenting interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders. In: Experimental robotics. Springer, New York, pp 201–210
43.
Gillesen JC, Barakova E, Huskens BE, Feijs LM (2011) From training to robot behavior: towards custom scenarios for robotics in training programs for ASD. In: 2011 IEEE International conference on rehabilitation robotics, IEEE, pp 1–7
44.
Gilliam J (2014) GARS-3: Gilliam autism rating scale, 3rd edn. Pro-Ed Publishers, Austin
45.
Goodrich MA, Schultz AC (2008) Human–robot interaction: a survey. Found Trends Hum Comput Interact 1(3):203–275MATHCrossRef
46.
Goulart CM, Castillo J, Valadao CT, Caldeira E, Bastos-Filho TF (2014) Mobile robotics: a tool for interaction with children with autism. In: 2014 IEEE 23rd international symposium on industrial electronics (ISIE), IEEE, pp 1555–1559
47.
Greczek J, Kaszubski E, Atrash A, Matarić M (2014) Graded cueing feedback in robot-mediated imitation practice for children with autism spectrum disorders. In: The 23rd IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, IEEE, pp 561–566
48.
Guneysu A, Siyli RD, Salah AA (2014) Auto-evaluation of motion imitation in a child–robot imitation game for upper arm rehabilitation. In: The 23rd IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, IEEE, pp 199–204
49.
Hirokawa M, Funahashi A, Itoh Y, Suzuki K (2014) Design of affective robot-assisted activity for children with autism spectrum disorders. In: The 23rd IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, IEEE, pp 365–370
50.
Hirokawa M, Funahashi A, Pan Y, Itoh Y, Suzuki K (2016) Design of a robotic agent that measures smile and facing behavior of children with autism spectrum disorder. In: 2016 25th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN), IEEE, pp 843–848
51.
52.
Huijnen CA, Lexis MA, de Witte LP (2016) Matching robot Kaspar to autism spectrum disorder (ASD) therapy and educational goals. Int J Soc Robot 8(4):445–455CrossRef
53.
Huijnen CA, Lexis MA, Jansens R, de Witte LP (2017) How to implement robots in interventions for children with autism? A co-creation study involving people with autism, parents and professionals. J Autism Dev Disord 47(10):3079–3096CrossRef
54.
Huskens B, Palmen A, Van der Werff M, Lourens T, Barakova E (2015) Improving collaborative play between children with autism spectrum disorders and their siblings: the effectiveness of a robot-mediated intervention based on lego® therapy. J Autism Dev Disord 45(11):3746–3755CrossRef
55.
Ismail LI, Yussof H, Shamsuddin S, Hanapiah FA, Zahari NI (2013) Relationship of IQ levels toward initial response in robotic intervention for children with autism. In: Proceedings of the 7th international convention on rehabilitation engineering and assistive technology, Singapore therapeutic, assistive & rehabilitative technologies (START) Centre
56.
Kajopoulos J, Wong AHY, Yuen AWC, Dung TA, Kee TY, Wykowska A (2015) Robot-assisted training of joint attention skills in children diagnosed with autism. In: International conference on social robotics. Springer, New York, pp 296–305
57.
Kim ES, Berkovits LD, Bernier EP, Leyzberg D, Shic F, Paul R, Scassellati B (2013) Social robots as embedded reinforcers of social behavior in children with autism. J Autism Dev Disord 43(5):1038–1049CrossRef
58.
Kim ES, Daniell CM, Makar C, Elia J, Scassellati B, Shic F (2015) Potential clinical impact of positive affect in robot interactions for autism intervention. In: 2015 international conference on affective computing and intelligent interaction (ACII), IEEE, pp 8–13
59.
Kim M, Kwon T, Kim K (2018) Can human–robot interaction promote the same depth of social information processing as human–human interaction? Int J Soc Robot 10(1):33–42MathSciNetCrossRef
60.
Kim MG, Barakova E, Lourens T (2014) Rapid prototyping framework for robot-assisted training of autistic children. In: The 23rd IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, IEEE, pp 353–358
61.
Kim YD, Hong JW, Kang WS, Baek SS, Lee HS, An J (2010) Design of robot assisted observation system for therapy and education of children with autism. In: International conference on social robotics. Springer, New York pp 222–231
62.
Kim YS, Leventhal BL, Koh YJ, Fombonne E, Laska E, Lim EC, Cheon KA, Kim SJ, Kim YK, Lee H et al (2011) Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders in a total population sample. Am J Psychiatry 168:904–912CrossRef
63.
Kozima H, Nakagawa C (2006) Interactive robots as facilitators of children’s social development. In: Lazinica A (ed) Mobile robots towards new applications. Advanced Robotic Systems, Vienna, pp 271–286
64.
Kozima H, Nakagawa C, Yasuda Y (2005) Interactive robots for communication-care: a case-study in autism therapy. In: ROMAN 2005. IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, IEEE, pp 341–346
65.
Kozima H, Nakagawa C, Yasuda Y (2007) Children–robot interaction: a pilot study in autism therapy. Progr Brain Res 164:385–400CrossRef
66.
Kozima H, Yasuda Y, Nakagawa C (2007) Social interaction facilitated by a minimally-designed robot: findings from longitudinal therapeutic practices for autistic children. In: RO-MAN 2007—the 16th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, IEEE, pp 599–604
67.
Kozima H, Michalowski MP, Nakagawa C (2009) Keepon: a playful robot for research, therapy, and entertainment. Int J Soc Robot 1(1):3–18CrossRef
68.
Kumazaki H, Warren Z, Muramatsu T, Yoshikawa Y, Matsumoto Y, Miyao M, Nakano M, Mizushima S, Wakita Y, Ishiguro H et al (2017) A pilot study for robot appearance preferences among high-functioning individuals with autism spectrum disorder: implications for therapeutic use. PLoS ONE 12(10):e0186581CrossRef
69.
Lee J, Takehashi H, Nagai C, Obinata G, Stefanov D (2012) Which robot features can stimulate better responses from children with autism in robot-assisted therapy? Int J Adv Robot Syst 9(3):72CrossRef
70.
Lindgren S, Doobay A (2011) Evidence-based interventions for autism spectrum disorders. The University of Iowa, Iowa
71.
Liu X, Zhou X, Liu C, Wang J, Zhou X, Xu N, Jiang A (2016) An interactive training system of motor learning by imitation and speech instructions for children with autism. In: 2016 9th international conference on human system interactions (HSI), IEEE, pp 56–61
72.
Liu X, Wu Q, Zhao W, Luo X (2017) Technology-facilitated diagnosis and treatment of individuals with autism spectrum disorder: an engineering perspective. Appl Sci 7(10):1051CrossRef
73.
Manner MD (2015) Using small humanoid robots to detect autism in toddlers. In: Proceedings of the 24th international conference on artificial intelligence, AAAI Press, pp 4383–4384
74.
Ma’sum MA, Alvissalim MS, Sanjaya F, Jatmiko W et al (2012) Body gesture based control system for humanoid robot. In: 2012 international conference on advanced computer science and information systems (ICACSIS), IEEE, pp 275–280
75.
Mavadati SM, Feng H, Salvador M, Silver S, Gutierrez A, Mahoor MH (2016) Robot-based therapeutic protocol for training children with autism. In: 2016 25th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN), IEEE, pp 855–860
76.
McPartland JC, Reichow B, Volkmar FR (2012) Sensitivity and specificity of proposed DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for autism spectrum disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 51(4):368–383CrossRef
77.
Mengoni SE, Irvine K, Thakur D, Barton G, Dautenhahn K, Guldberg K, Robins B, Wellsted D, Sharma S (2017) Feasibility study of a randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of using a humanoid robot to improve the social skills of children with autism spectrum disorder (Kaspar RCT): a study protocol. BMJ open 7(6):e017376CrossRef
78.
Miskam MA, Shamsuddin S, Samat MRA, Yussof H, Ainudin HA, Omar AR (2014) Humanoid robot NAO as a teaching tool of emotion recognition for children with autism using the android app. In: 2014 International symposium on micro-nanomechatronics and human science (MHS), IEEE, pp 1–5
79.
Moorthy RS, Pugazhenthi S (2017) Teaching psychomotor skills to autistic children by employing a robotic training kit: a pilot study. Int J Soc Robot 9(1):97–108CrossRef
80.
Pan Y, Hirokawa M, Suzuki K (2015) Measuring k-degree facial interaction between robot and children with autism spectrum disorders. In: 2015 24th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN), IEEE, pp 48–53
81.
Peca A, Coeckelbergh M, Simut R, Costescu C, Pintea S, David D, Vanderborght B (2016) Robot enhanced therapy for children with autism disorders: measuring ethical acceptability. IEEE Technol Soc Mag 35(2):54–66CrossRef
82.
Pennisi P, Tonacci A, Tartarisco G, Billeci L, Ruta L, Gangemi S, Pioggia G (2015) Autism and social robotics: a systematic review. Autism Res 9:165–183CrossRef
83.
Petric F, Tolić D, Miklić D, Kovačić Z, Cepanec M, Šimleša S (2015) Towards a robot-assisted autism diagnostic protocol: modelling and assessment with POMDP. In: International conference on intelligent robotics and applications. Springer, New York pp 82–94
84.
Pioggia G, Igliozzi R, Ferro M, Ahluwalia A, Muratori F, De Rossi D (2005) An android for enhancing social skills and emotion recognition in people with autism. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 13(4):507–515CrossRef
85.
Pioggia G, Sica M, Ferro M, Igliozzi R, Muratori F, Ahluwalia A, De Rossi D (2007) Human–robot interaction in autism: face, an android-based social therapy. In: RO-MAN 2007—the 16th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, IEEE, pp 605–612
86.
Ponce P, Molina A, Grammatikou D (2016) Design based on fuzzy signal detection theory for a semi-autonomous assisting robot in children autism therapy. Comput Hum Behav 55:28–42CrossRef
87.
Pop CA, Simut R, Pintea S, Saldien J, Rusu A, David D, Vanderfaeillie J, Lefeber D, Vanderborght B (2013) Can the social robot Probo help children with autism to identify situation-based emotions? A series of single case experiments. Int J Hum Robot 10(03):1350025CrossRef
88.
Pour AG, Taheri A, Alemi M, Meghdari A (2018) Human–robot facial expression reciprocal interaction platform: case studies on children with autism. Int J Soc Robot 10(2):179–198CrossRef
89.
Ricks DJ, Colton MB (2010) Trends and considerations in robot-assisted autism therapy. In: 2010 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), IEEE, pp 4354–4359
90.
Robins B (2007) Mediators versus isolators—the effect of robots on children with autism and other user-groups. In: RO-MAN 2007—the 16th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, IEEE, pp 93–94
91.
Robins B, Dautenhahn K (2010) Developing play scenarios for tactile interaction with a humanoid robot: a case study exploration with children with autism. In: International conference on social robotics, Springer, New York pp 243–252
92.
Robins B, Dautenhahn K (2014) Tactile interactions with a humanoid robot: novel play scenario implementations with children with autism. Int J Soc Robot 6(3):397–415CrossRef
93.
Robins B, Dautenhahn K, Dubowski J (2006) Does appearance matter in the interaction of children with autism with a humanoid robot? Int Stud 7(3):509–542CrossRef
94.
Roelfsema MT, Hoekstra RA, Allison C, Wheelwright S, Brayne C, Matthews FE, Baron-Cohen S (2012) Are autism spectrum conditions more prevalent in an information-technology region? A school-based study of three regions in the Netherlands. J Autism Dev Disord 42(5):734–739CrossRef
95.
Rudovic O, Lee J, Mascarell-Maricic L, Schuller BW, Picard RW (2017) Measuring engagement in robot-assisted autism therapy: a cross-cultural study. Front Robot AI 4:36CrossRef
96.
Salter T, Davey N, Michaud F (2014) Designing & developing QueBall, a robotic device for autism therapy. In: The 23rd IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, IEEE, pp 574–579
97.
Salvador MJ, Silver S, Mahoor MH (2015) An emotion recognition comparative study of autistic and typically-developing children using the Zeno robot. In: 2015 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), IEEE, pp 6128–6133
98.
Samat MRA, Shamsuddin S, Miskam MA, Yussof H (2014) Development of face recognition algorithm for enhancement of social communication of robotic assistive autism therapy. In: 2014 international symposium on micro-nanomechatronics and human science (MHS), IEEE, pp 1–5
99.
Sartorato F, Przybylowski L, Sarko DK (2017) Improving therapeutic outcomes in autism spectrum disorders: enhancing social communication and sensory processing through the use of interactive robots. J Psychiatr Res 90:1–11CrossRef
100.
Scassellati B, Admoni H, Mataric M (2012) Robots for use in autism research. Ann Rev Biomed Eng 14:275–294CrossRef
101.
Shamsuddin S, Ismail LI, Yussof H, Zahari NI, Bahari S, Hashim H, Jaffar A (2011) Humanoid robot NAO: review of control and motion exploration. In: 2011 IEEE international conference on control system, computing and engineering (ICCSCE), IEEE, pp 511–516
102.
Shamsuddin S, Yussof H, Ismail L, Hanapiah FA, Mohamed S, Piah HA, Zahari NI (2012) Initial response of autistic children in human–robot interaction therapy with humanoid robot NAO. In: 2012 IEEE 8th international colloquium on signal processing and its applications (CSPA), IEEE, pp 188–193
103.
Shamsuddin S, Yussof H, Ismail LI, Mohamed S, Hanapiah FA, Zahari NI (2012) Initial response in HRI—a case study on evaluation of child with autism spectrum disorders interacting with a humanoid robot NAO. Procedia Eng 41:1448–1455CrossRef
104.
Shamsuddin S, Yussof H, Mohamed S, Hanapiah FA (2014) Design and ethical concerns in robotic adjunct therapy protocols for children with autism. Procedia Comput Sci 42:9–16CrossRef
105.
Shamsuddin S, Yussof H, Hanapiah F, Mohamed S (2015) A humanoid robot for autism rehabilitation: does iq influence response in child–robot interaction? In: Proceedings of mechanical engineering research day 2015: MERD’15 2015, pp 145–146
106.
Silva S, Soares F, Costa S, Pereira AP, Moreira F (2012) Development of skills in children with ASD using a robotic platform. In: 2012 IEEE 2nd Portuguese meeting in bioengineering (ENBENG), IEEE, pp 1–4
107.
Silva V, Soares F, Esteves JS (2017) Mirroring and recognizing emotions through facial expressions for a Robokind platform. In: 2017 IEEE 5th Portuguese meeting on bioengineering (ENBENG), IEEE, pp 1–4
108.
Simut R, Pop C, Vanderborght B, Saldien J, Rusu A, Pintea S, Vanderfaeillie J, Lefeber D, David D et al (2011) The huggable social robot probo for social story telling for robot assisted therapy with ASD children. In: 3rd International conference on social robotics (ICSR 2011), pp 97–100
109.
Steinfeld A, Fong T, Kaber D, Lewis M, Scholtz J, Schultz A, Goodrich M (2006) Common metrics for human–robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on human–robot interaction, ACM, pp 33–40
110.
Strickland D (1996) A virtual reality application with autistic children. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 5(3):319–329CrossRef
111.
Suzuki R, Lee J (2016) Robot-play therapy for improving prosocial behaviours in children with autism spectrum disorders. In: 2016 international symposium on micro-nanomechatronics and human science (MHS), IEEE, pp 1–5
112.
Tapus A, Peca A, Aly A, Pop C, Jisa L, Pintea S, Rusu AS, David DO (2012) Children with autism social engagement in interaction with NAO, an imitative robot—a series of single case experiments. Interact Stud 13(3):315–347CrossRef
113.
Vanderborght B, Simut R, Saldien J, Pop C, Rusu AS, Pintea S, Lefeber D, David DO (2012) Using the social robot Probo as a social story telling agent for children with ASD. Interact Stud 13(3):348–372CrossRef
114.
Vandevelde C, Saldien J (2016) Demonstration of OPSORO—an open platform for social robots. In: 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on human–robot interaction (HRI), pp 555–556
115.
Wainer J, Ferrari E, Dautenhahn K, Robins B (2010) The effectiveness of using a robotics class to foster collaboration among groups of children with autism in an exploratory study. Personal Ubiquitous Comput 14(5):445–455CrossRef
116.
Wainer J, Dautenhahn K, Robins B, Amirabdollahian F (2014) A pilot study with a novel setup for collaborative play of the humanoid robot Kaspar with children with autism. Int J Soc Robot 6(1):45–65CrossRef
117.
Wainer J, Robins B, Amirabdollahian F, Dautenhahn K (2014) Using the humanoid robot Kaspar to autonomously play triadic games and facilitate collaborative play among children with autism. IEEE Trans Auton Mental Dev 6(3):183–199CrossRef
118.
Warren ZE, Zheng Z, Swanson AR, Bekele E, Zhang L, Crittendon JA, Weitlauf AF, Sarkar N (2015) Can robotic interaction improve joint attention skills? J Autism Dev Disord 45(11):3726–3734CrossRef
119.
Weitlauf AS, Sathe N, McPheeters ML, Warren ZE (2017) Interventions targeting sensory challenges in autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review. Pediatrics 139(6):e20170347CrossRef
120.
Weitlauf AS, McPheeters ML, Peters B, Sathe N, Travis R, Aiello R, Williamson E, Veenstra-VanderWeele J, Krishnaswami S, Jerome R, Warren Z (2014) Therapies for children with autism spectrum disorder: behavioral interventions update. Comparative effectiveness review no. 137. (Prepared by the Vanderbilt Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2012-00009-I.) AHRQ Publication No. 14-EHC036-EF. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville
121.
Welch KC, Lahiri U, Warren Z, Sarkar N (2010) An approach to the design of socially acceptable robots for children with autism spectrum disorders. Int J Soc Robot 2(4):391–403CrossRef
122.
Werry I, Dautenhahn K, Harwin W (2001) Investigating a robot as a therapy partner for children with autism. In: Proceedings of the AAATE 2001
123.
Wijayasinghe IB, Ranatunga I, Balakrishnan N, Bugnariu N, Popa DO (2016) Human–robot gesture analysis for objective assessment of autism spectrum disorder. Int J Soc Robot 8(5):695–707CrossRef
124.
Yun SS, Park SK, Choi J (2014) A robotic treatment approach to promote social interaction skills for children with autism spectrum disorders. In: The 23rd IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, IEEE, pp 130–134
125.
Yun SS, Choi J, Park SK, Bong GY, Yoo H (2017) Social skills training for children with autism spectrum disorder using a robotic behavioral intervention system. Autism Res 10(7):1306–1323CrossRef
126.
Zheng Z, Young EM, Swanson A, Weitlauf A, Warren Z, Sarkar N (2015) Robot-mediated mixed gesture imitation skill training for young children with ASD. In: 2015 international conference on advanced robotics (ICAR), IEEE, pp 72–77
127.
Zheng Z, Fu Q, Zhao H, Swanson AR, Weitlauf AS, Warren ZE, Sarkar N (2017) Design of an autonomous social orienting training system (ASOTS) for young children with autism. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 25(6):668–678CrossRef
128.
Zubrycki I, Granosik G (2016) Understanding therapists’ needs and attitudes towards robotic support. The roboterapia project. Int J Soc Robot 8(4):553–563CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Leveraging Robotics Research for Children with Autism: A Review
verfasst von
Luthffi Idzhar Ismail
Thibault Verhoeven
Joni Dambre
Francis Wyffels
Publikationsdatum
06.12.2018
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
International Journal of Social Robotics / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1875-4791
Elektronische ISSN: 1875-4805
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-018-0508-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

International Journal of Social Robotics 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Perceived Human-Likeness of Social Robots: Testing the Rasch Model as a Method for Measuring Anthropomorphism

OriginalPaper

A Study on Different User Interfaces for Teaching Virtual Borders to Mobile Robots

Editorial

Editorial

OriginalPaper

Influence of Embodiment and Substrate of Social Robots on Users’ Decision-Making and Attitude

OriginalPaper

Modeling the Interactions of Context and Style on Affect in Motion Perception: Stylized Gaits Across Multiple Environmental Contexts

OriginalPaper

Understanding of Human Behavior with a Robotic Agent Through Daily Activity Analysis

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise