Embodiment und Sense of Agency

Aarts, H., Custers, R., & Wegner, D. M. (2005). On the inference of personal authorship: Enhancing experienced agency by priming effect information. Consciousness and Cognition, 14, 439–458.PubMedCrossRef

Abernethy, B., & Zawi, K. (2007). Pickup of essential kinematics underpins expert perception of movement patterns. Journal of Motor Behavior, 39(5), 353–367.PubMedCrossRef

Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E. P., & Teasdale, J. D. (1978). Learned Helplessness in Humans: Critique and Reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 49–74.PubMedCrossRef

Ach, N. (1905). Über die Willenstätigkeit und das Denken. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Rubprecht.

Ach, N. (1910). Über den Willensakt und das Temperament. Eine experimentelle Untersuchung. Leipzig: Verlag von Quelle und Meyer.

Aglioti, S. M., Cesari, P., Romani, M., & Urgesi, C. (2008). Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players. Nature Neuroscience, 11(9), 1109–1116.PubMedCrossRef

Allison, T., Puce, A., & McCarthy, G. (2000). Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(7), 267–278.PubMedCrossRef

Alloy, L. B., & Abramson, L. Y. (1979). Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: sadder but wiser? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 441–485.CrossRef

Annett, J. (1996). On knowing how to do things: a theory of motor imagery. Cognitive Brain Research, 3(2), 65–69.PubMedCrossRef

Arora, S., Aggarwal, R., Sirimanna, P., Moran, A., Grantcharov, T., Kneebone, R., Sevdalis, N., & Darzi, A. (2011). Mental practice enhances surgical technical skills: A randomized controlled study. Annals of Surgery, 253, 265–270.PubMedCrossRef

Astafiev, S. V., Stanley, C. M., Shulman, G. L., & Corbetta, M. (2004). Extrastriate body area in human occipital cortex responds to the performance of motor actions. Nature Neuroscience, 7(5), 542–548.PubMedCrossRef

Atkinson, A. P., Dittrich, W. H., Gemmell, A. J., & Young, A. W. (2004). Emotion perception from dynamic and static body expressions in point-light and full-light displays. Perception, 33(6), 717–746.PubMedCrossRef

Avenanti, A., Bueti, D., Galati, G., & Aglioti, S. M. (2005). Transcranial magnetic stimulation highlights the sensorimotor side of empathy for pain. Nature Neuroscience, 8(7), 955–960.PubMedCrossRef

Baaren, R. B. van, Holland, R. W., Kawakami, K., & Van Knippenberg, A. (2004). Mimicry and prosocial behavior. Psychological Science, 15(1), 71–74.PubMedCrossRef

Baldissera, F., Cavallari, P., Craighero, L., & Fadiga, L. (2001). Modulation of spinal excitability during observation of hand actions in humans. European Journal of Neuroscience, 13(1), 190–194.PubMedCrossRef

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.PubMedCrossRef

Barclay, C. D., Cutting, J. E., & Kozlowski, L. T. (1978). Temporal and spatial factors in gait perception that influence gender recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 23(2), 145–152.CrossRef

Barr, K., & Hall, C. (1992). The use of imagery by rowers. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 23, 243–261.

Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.PubMed

Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded Cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.PubMedCrossRef

Barsalou, L. W. (2009). Simulation, situated conceptualization, and prediction. Philospohical Transactions of the Royal Society, 364, 1281–1289.CrossRef

Barsalou, L. W., Niedenthal, P. M., Barbey, A. K., & Ruppert, J. A. (2003). Social embodiment. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 43, 43–92.CrossRef

Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Lemery, C. R., & Mullett, J. (1986). „I show how you feel“: Motor mimicry as a communicative act. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 322–329.CrossRef

Beilock, S. L. (2009). Grounding cognition in action: expertise, comprehension, and judgment. Progress in Brain Research, 174, 3–11.PubMedCrossRef

Beilock, S. L., & Carr, T. H. (2001). On the fragility of skilled performance: what governs choking under pressure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 701–725.CrossRef

Beilock, S. L., & Gonso, S. (2008). Putting in the mind versus putting on the green: expertise, performance time, and the linking of imagery and action. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(6), 920–932.PubMedCrossRef

Beilock, S. L., & Holt, L. E. (2007). Embodied preference judgements: can likeability be driven by the motor system? Psychological Science, 18(1), 51–57.PubMedCrossRef

Beilock, S. L., Lyons, I. M., Mattarella-Micke, A., Nusbaum, H. C., & Small, S. L. (2008). Sports experience changes the neural processing of action language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(36), 13269–13273.CrossRef

Binkofski, F., & Buccino, G. (2004). Motor functions of the broca’s region. Brain and Language, 89(2), 362–369.PubMedCrossRef

Bischoff, M., Zentgraf, K., Lorey, B., Pilgramm, S., Balser, N., Baumgartner, E., & Munzert, J. (2012). Motor familiarity: Brain activation when watching kinematic displays of one’s own movements. Neuropsychologia, 50(8), 2085–2092.PubMedCrossRef

Blake, R., & Shiffrar, M. (2007). Perception of human motion. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 47–73.PubMedCrossRef

Blakemore, S. J., & Decety, J. (2001). From the perception of action to the understanding of intention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(8), 561–567.PubMed

Blakemore, S. J., & Frith, C. (2005). The role of motor contagion in the prediction of action. Neuropsychologia, 43(2), 260–267.PubMedCrossRef

Blakemore, S.-J., Wolpert, D., & Frith, C. (1998). Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 635–640.PubMedCrossRef

Blandin, Y., Lhuisset, L., & Proteau, L. (1999). Cognitive processes underlying observational learning of motor skills. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 52(4), 957–979.CrossRef

Boroditsky, L., & Ramscar, M. (2002). The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science, 13(2), 158–189.CrossRef

Borreggine, K. L., & Kaschak, M. P. (2006). The action-sentence compatibility effect: It’s all in the timing. Cognitive Science, 30, 1097–1112.PubMedCrossRef

Boulenger, V., Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F. (2009). Grasping ideas with the motor system: semantic somatotopy in idiom comprehension. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 1905–1914.PubMedCrossRef

Boschker, M. S., Bakker, F. C., & Rietberg, B. (2000). Retroactive interference effects of mentally imagined movement speed. Journal of Sports Sciences, 18(8), 593–603.PubMedCrossRef

Botvinick, M. M. (2007). Conflict monitoring and decision making: Reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 356–366.CrossRef

Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Wohlschläger, A., & Prinz, W. (2000). Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues. Brain and Cognition, 44(2), 124–143.PubMedCrossRef

Brass, M., Bekkering, H., & Prinz, W. (2001a). Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. Acta Psychologica, 106(1), 3–22.PubMedCrossRef

Brass, M., Zysset, S., & Cramon, D. Y. von (2001b). The inhibition of imitative response tendencies. Neuroimage, 14(6), 1416–1423.PubMedCrossRef

Brass, M., Schmitt, R., Spengler, S., & Gergely, G. (2007). Investigating action understanding: inferential processes versus motor simulation. Current Biology, 17(24), 2117–2121.PubMedCrossRef

Brass, M., Ruby, P., & Spengler, S. (2009). Inhibition of imitative behaviour and social cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 2359–2367.CrossRef

Braun, S., Kleynen, M., Heel, T. van, Kruithof, N., Wade, D., & Beurskens, A. (2013). The effects of mental practice in neurological rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 390.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Buccino, G., Binkofski, F., Fink, G. R., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Freund, H. J. (2001). Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 13(2), 400–404.PubMed

Buccino, G., Binkofski, F., & Riggio, L. (2004). The mirror neuron system and action recognition. Brain and Language, 89(2), 370–376.PubMedCrossRef

Buccino, G., Riggio, L., Melli, G., Binkofski, F., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: a combined TMS and behavioral study. Cognitive Brain Research, 24(3), 355–363.PubMedCrossRef

Calmels, C., & Fournier, J. F. (2001). Duration of physical and mental execution of gymnastic routines. The Sport Psychologist, 15, 142–150.CrossRef

Calmels, C., Holmes, P., Lopez, E., & Naman, V. (2006). Chronometric comparison of actual and imaged complex movement patterns. Journal of Motor Behavior, 38, 339–348.PubMedCrossRef

Campos, J. L., Siegle, J. H., Mohler, B. J., Bülthoff, H. H., & Loomis, J. M. (2009). Imagined self-motion differs from perceived self-motion: Evidence from a novel continuous pointing method. PLoS One, 4(11), e7793.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D. E., Grezes, J., Passingham, R. E., & Haggard, P. (2005). Action observation and acquired motor skills: an FMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex, 15(8), 1243–1249.PubMedCrossRef

Calvo-Merino, B., Grèzes, J., Glaser, D. E., Passingham, R. E., & Haggard, P. (2006). Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation. Current Biology, 16(19), 1905–1910.PubMedCrossRef

Casile, A., & Giese, M. A. (2006). Nonvisual motor training influences biological motion perception. Current Biology, 16(1), 69–74.PubMedCrossRef

Caspar, E. A., Christensen, J. F., Cleeremans, A., & Haggard, P. (2016). Coercion changes the sense of agency in the human brain. Current Biology, 26, 585–592.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Caspers, S., Zilles, K., Laird, A. R., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2010). ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain. Neuroimage, 50(3), 1148–1167.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Cerritelli, B., Maruff, P., Wilson, P., & Currie, J. (2000). The effect of an external load on the force and timing components of mentally represented actions. Behavioural Brain Research, 108, 91–96.PubMedCrossRef

Chambon, V., Moore, J. W., & Haggard, P. (2015). TMS stimulation over the inferior parietal cortex disrupts prospective sense of agency. Brain Structure and Function, 220, 3627–3639.PubMedCrossRef

Chambon, V., Wenke, D., Fleming, S. M., Prinz, W., & Haggard, P. (2013). An online neural substrate for sense of agency. Cerebral Cortex, 23, 1031–1037.PubMedCrossRef

Chambon, V., Sidarus, N., & Haggard, P. (2014). From action intentions to action effects: how does the sense of agency come about? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 320. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00320.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Chaminade, T., & Decety, J. (2002). Leader or follower? Involvement of the inferior parietal lobule in agency. Neuroreport, 13, 1975–1978.PubMedCrossRef

Chao, L. L., & Martin, A. (2002). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. NeuroImage, 12, 478–484.CrossRef

Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 893–910.PubMedCrossRef

Clark, A. (1999). An embodied cognitive science? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(9), 345–351.PubMedCrossRef

Clark, T., & Williamon, A. (2012). Imagining the music: Methods for assessing musical imagery ability. Psychology of Music, 40(4), 471–493.CrossRef

Corballis, M. C. (2004). FOXP2 and the mirror system. Trends in cognitive sciences, 8(3), 95–96.PubMedCrossRef

Costantini, M., Galati, G., Ferretti, A., Caulo, M., Tartaro, A., Romani, G. L., & Aglioti, S. M. (2005). Neural systems underlying observation of humanly impossible movements: an fMRI study. Cerebral Cortex, 15(11), 1761–1767.PubMedCrossRef

Courtine, G., Papaxanthis, C., Gentili, R., & Pozzo, T. (2004). Gait-dependent motor memory facilitation in covert movement execution. Cognitive Brain Research, 22(1), 67–75.PubMedCrossRef

Cravo, A. M., Claessens, P. M., & Baldo, M. V. (2011). The relation between action, predictability and temporal contiguity in temporal binding. Acta Psychologica, 136, 157–166.PubMedCrossRef

Cross, E. S., Liepelt, R., Hamilton, A. F. C. de, Parkinson, J., Ramsey, R., Stadler, W., & Prinz, W. (2012). Robotic movement preferentially engages the action observation network. Human Brain Mapping, 33, 2238–2254.PubMedCrossRef

Cross, E. S., Stadler, W., Parkinson, J., Schütz-Bosbach, S., & Prinz, W. (2013). The influence of visual training on complex action prediction. Human Brain Mapping, 34(2), 467–486.PubMedCrossRef

Dahm, S. F., & Rieger, M. (2016). Cognitive constraints on motor imagery. Psychological Research, 80, 235–247.PubMedCrossRef

Dam, W. O. van, Rueschemeyer, S.-A., Lindemann, O., & Bekkering, H. (2010). Context effects in embodied lexical-semantic processing. Frontiers in psychology, 1, 150. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00150.PubMedPubMedCentral

Dam, W. O. van, Dijk, M. van, Bekkering, H., & Rueschemeyer, S.-A. (2012). Flexibility in embodied lexical-semantic representations. Human Brain Mapping, 10, 2322–2333.

Damen, T. G., Baaren, R. B. van, & Dijksterhuis, A. (2014). You should read this! Perceiving and acting upon action primes influences one’s sense of agency. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 21–26.CrossRef

David, N., Newen, A., & Vogeley, K. (2008). The „sense of agency“ and its underlying cognitive and neural mechanisms. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 523–534.PubMedCrossRef

Davidson, P. R., & Wolpert, D. M. (2005). Widespread access to predictive models in the motor system: a short review. Journal of Neural Engineering, 2(3), 313–319.CrossRef

Deacon, T. (2004). Monkey homologues of language areas: computing the ambiguities. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(7), 288–290.PubMedCrossRef

Debarnot, U., Sahraoui, D., Champely, S., Collet, C., & Guillot, A. (2012). Selective influence of circadian modulation and task characteristics on motor imagery time. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 83(3), 442–450.PubMedCrossRef

Decety, J. (1991). Motor information may be important for updating the cognitive processes involved in mental imagery of movement. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition, 11(4), 415–426.

Decety, J. (1996). Do imagined and executed actions share the same neural substrate? Cognitive Brain Research, 3(2), 87–93.PubMedCrossRef

Decety, J., & Boisson, D. (1990). Effect of brain and spinal cord injuries on motor imagery. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 240(1), 39–43.PubMedCrossRef

Decety, J., & Grèzes, J. (2006). The power of simulation: imagining one’s own and other’s behavior. Brain Research, 1079(1), 4–14.PubMedCrossRef

Decety, J., & Jeannerod, M. (1996). Mentally simulated movements in virtual reality: Does Fitts’s law hold in motor imagery? Behavioural Brain Research, 72, 127–134.CrossRef

Decety, J., & Michel, F. (1989). Comparative analysis of actual and mental movement times in two graphic tasks. Brain and Cognition, 11, 87–97.PubMedCrossRef

Decety, J., Jeannerod, M., & Prablanc, C. (1989). The timing of mentally represented actions. Behavioural Brain Research, 34, 35–42.PubMedCrossRef

Demanet, J., Muhle-Karbe, P. S., Lynn, M. T., Blotenberg, I., & Brass, M. (2013). Power to the will: how exerting physical effort boosts the sense of agency. Cognition, 129(3), 574–578.PubMedCrossRef

Desantis, A., Roussel, C., & Waszak, F. (2011). On the influence of causal beliefs on the feeling of agency. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 1211–1220.PubMedCrossRef

Desantis, A., Hughes, G., & Waszak, F. (2012a). Intentional binding is driven by the mere presence of an action and not by motor prediction. PLoS One, 7(1), e29557.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Desantis, A., Weiss, C., Schütz-Bosbach, S., & Waszak, F. (2012b). Believing and perceiving: authorship belief modulates sensory attenuation. PLoS One, 7(5), e37959.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Diefenbach, C., Rieger, M., Massen, C., & Prinz, W. (2013). Action-sentence compatibility: the role of action effects and timing. Frontiers in psychology, 4, 272. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00272.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Diersch, N., Cross, E. S., Stadler, W., Schütz-Bosbach, S., & Rieger, M. (2012). Representing others’ actions: the role of expertise in the aging mind. Psychological Research, 76(4), 525–541.PubMedCrossRef

Diersch, N., Mueller, K., Cross, E. S., Stadler, W., Rieger, M., & Schütz-Bosbach, S. (2013). Action prediction in younger versus older adults: Neural correlates of motor familiarity. PLoS ONE, 8(5), e64195.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Dietrich, A. (2008). Imaging the imagination: the trouble with motor imagery. Methods, 45(4), 319–324.PubMedCrossRef

Dijksterhuis, A., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). The perception-behavior expressway: Automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 1–40.CrossRef

Dimberg, U., Thunberg, M., & Elmehed, K. (2000). Unconscious facial reactions to emotional facial expressions. Psychological Science, 11(1), 86–89.PubMedCrossRef

Downing, P. E., Jiang, Y., Shuman, M., & Kanwisher, N. (2001). A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body. Science, 293(5539), 2470–2473.PubMedCrossRef

Dreisbach, G., & Fischer, R. (2012). Conflicts as aversive signals. Brain and Cognition, 78(2), 94–98.PubMedCrossRef

Ebert, J. P., & Wegner, D. M. (2010). Time warp: authorship shapes the perceived timing of actions and events. Consciousness and Cognition, 19(1), 481–489.PubMedCrossRef

Ehrsson, H. H., Geyer, S., & Naito, E. (2003). Imagery of voluntary movement of fingers, toes, and tongue activates corresponding body-partspecific motor representations. Journal of Neurophysiology, 90, 3304–3316.PubMedCrossRef

Engbert, K., Wohlschläger, A., Thomas, R., & Haggard, P. (2007). Agency, subjective time, and other minds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1261–1268.PubMed

Engbert, K., Wohlschlager, A., & Haggard, P. (2008). Who is causing what? The sense of agency is relational and efferent-triggered. Cognition, 107, 693–704.PubMedCrossRef

Facchini, S., Muellbacher, W., Battaglia, F., Boroojerdi, B., & Hallett, M. (2002). Focal enhancement of motor cortex excitability during motor imagery: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 105(3), 146–151.PubMedCrossRef

Fadiga, I., Fogassi, L., Pavesi, G., & Rizolatti, G. (1995). Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 73, 2608–2611.PubMed

Farrer, C., Franck, N., Georgieff, N., Frith, C. D., Decety, J., & Jeannerod, M. (2003). Modulating the experience of agency: a positron emission tomography study. Neuroimage, 18, 324–333.PubMedCrossRef

Farrer, C., Frey, S. H., Van Horn, J. D., Tunik, E., Turk, D., Inati, S., & Grafton, S. T. (2008). The angular gyrus computes action awareness representations. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 254–261.PubMedCrossRef

Finke, R. A., Pinker, S., & Farah, M. J. (1989). Reinterpreting visual patterns in mental imagery. Cognitive Science, 13(1), 51–78.CrossRef

Fodor, J. A. (1975). The Language of Thought. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.

Frank, C., Land, W. M., Popp, C., & Schack, T. (2014). Mental representation and mental practice: experimental investigation on the functional links between motor memory and motor imagery. PloS One, 9(4), e95175.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Friston, K. (2012). Prediction, perception and agency. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83, 248–252.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Friston, K., & Kiebel, S. (2009). Predictive coding under the free-energy principle. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 1211–1221.CrossRef

Friston, K., Daunizeau, J., Kilner, J., & Kiebel, S. J. (2010). Action and behavior: a free-energy formulation. Biological Cybernetics, 102, 227–260.PubMedCrossRef

Friston, K., Mattout, J., & Kilner, J. (2011). Action understanding and active inference. Biological Cybernetics, 104, 137–160.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Frith, C. D. (2005). The self in action: Lessons from delusions of control. Consciousness and Cognition, 14, 752–720.PubMedCrossRef

Frith, C. D. (2012). Explaining delusions of control: The comparator model 20 years on. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 52–54.PubMedCrossRef

Frith, C. D. (2013). The psychology of volition. Experimental Brain Research, 229(3), 289–299.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Frith, C. D., Blakemore, S., & Wolpert, D. M. (2000). Explaining the symptoms of schizophrenia: abnormalities in the awareness of action. Brain Research Reviews, 31, 357–363.PubMedCrossRef

Gallagher, S. (2000). Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 14–21.PubMedCrossRef

Gallese, V. (2008). Empathy, embodied simulation, and the brain: Commentary on Aragno and Zepf/Hartmann. Journal of the American Psychological Association, 56, 769–781.CrossRef

Gallese, V., Fogassi, L., Fadiga, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (2002). Action representation and the inferior parietal lobule. In W. Prinz, & B. Hommel (Hrsg.), Attention and Performance XIX (S. 247–266). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gallese, V., Keysers, C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2004). A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(9), 396–403.PubMedCrossRef

Gallotti, M., & Frith, C. D. (2013). Social cognition in the we-mode. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(4), 160–165. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.02.002.PubMedCrossRef

Gazzola, V., Rizzolatti, G., Wicker, B., & Keysers, C. (2007). The anthropomorphic brain: the mirror neuron system responds to human and robotic actions. Neuroimage, 35(4), 1674–1684.PubMedCrossRef

Gentsch, A., & Synofzik, M. (2014). Affective coding: the emotional dimension of agency. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 608. eCollection 2014 doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00608.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Gentsch, A., Schütz-Bosbach, S., Endrass, T., & Kathmann, N. (2012). Dysfunctional forward model mechanisms and aberrant sense of agency in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Biological Psychiatry, 71, 652–659.PubMedCrossRef

Gentsch, A., Weiss, C., Spengler, S., Synofzik, M., & Schütz-Bosbach, S. (2015). Doing good or bad: How interactions between action and emotion expectations shape the sense of agency. Social Neuroscience, 10, 418–430.PubMed

Gentsch, A., Weber, A., Synofzik, M., Vosgerau, G., & Schütz-Bosbach, S. (2016). Towards a common framework of grounded action cognition: Relating motor control, perception and cognition. Cognition, 146, 81–89.PubMedCrossRef

Gerardin, E., Sirigu, A., Lehericy, S., Poline, J. B., Gaymard, B., Marsault, C., & Le Bihan, D. (2000). Partially overlapping neural networks for real and imagined hand movements. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 1093–1104.PubMedCrossRef

Gibbs, R. W. Jr (2005). Embodiment and cognitive science. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Gibbs, R. W. Jr (2006). Metaphor Interpretation as embodied simulation. Mind & Language, 21(3), 434–458.CrossRef

Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 558–565.CrossRef

Glenberg, A. M., & Robertson, D. A. (1999). Indexical understanding of instructions. Discourse Processes, 28(1), 1–26.CrossRef

Glenberg, A. M., & Robertson, D. A. (2000). Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 43(3), 379–401.CrossRef

Glenberg, A. M., Gutierrez, T., Levin, J. R., Japuntich, S., & Kaschak, M. P. (2004). Activity and imagined activity can enhance young children’s reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 424–436.CrossRef

Glenberg, A. M., Brown, M., & Levin, J. R. (2007). Enhancing comprehension in small reading groups using a manipulation strategy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3), 389–399.CrossRef

Glenberg, A. M., Sato, M., Cattaneo, L., Riggio, L., Palumbo, D., & Buccino, G. (2008a). Processing abstract language modulates motor system activity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(6), 905–919.PubMedCrossRef

Glenberg, A. M., Sato, M., & Cattaneo, L. (2008b). Use-induced motor plasticity affects the processing of abstract and concrete language. Current Biology, 18(7), 290–291.CrossRef

Glenberg, A. M., Goldberg, A. B., & Zhu, X. (2011). Improving early reading comprehension using embodied CAI. Instruction Science, 39, 27–39.CrossRef

Glenberg, A., Willford, J., Gibson, B., Goldberg, A., & Zhu, X. (2012). Improving reading to improve math. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(4), 316–340.CrossRef

Glenberg, A. M., Witt, J. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2013). From the revolution to embodiment 25 years of cognitive psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(5), 573–585.PubMedCrossRef

Glover, S., Rosenbaum, D. A., Graham, J., & Dixon, P. (2004). Grasping the meaning of words. Experimental Brain Research, 154, 103–108.PubMedCrossRef

Graf, M., Reitzner, B., Corves, C., Casile, A., Giese, M., & Prinz, W. (2007). Predicting point-light actions in real-time. Neuroimage, 36, 22–32.CrossRef

Grafton, S. T. (2009). Embodied cognition and the simulation of action to understand others. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156(1), 97–117.PubMedCrossRef

Grealy, M. A., & Shearer, G. F. (2008). Timing processes in motor imagery. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20, 867–892.CrossRef

Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (1982). The self-serving bias: beyond self-presentation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18(1), 56–67.CrossRef

Grèzes, J., & Decety, J. (2001). Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: a meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 12(1), 1–19.PubMedCrossRef

Grèzes, J., Fonlupt, P., Bertenthal, B., Delon-Martin, C., Segebarth, C., & Decety, J. (2001). Does perception of biological motion rely on specific brain regions? Neuroimage, 13(5), 775–785.PubMedCrossRef

Grossman, E., Donnelly, M., Price, R., Pickens, D., Morgan, V., Neighbor, G., & Blake, R. (2000). Brain areas involved in perception of biological motion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(5), 711–720.PubMedCrossRef

Grush, R. (2004). The emulation theory of representation: motor control, imagery, and perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(3), 377–396.PubMed

Gueugneau, N., & Papaxanthis, C. (2010). Time-of-day effects on the internal simulation of motor actions: Psychophysical evidence from pointing movements with the dominant and non-dominant arm. Chronobiology International, 27, 620–639.PubMedCrossRef

Gueugneau, N., Mauvieux, B., & Papaxanthis, C. (2009). Circadian modulation of mentally simulated motor actions: Implications for the potential use of motor imagery in rehabilitation. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 23, 237–245.PubMedCrossRef

Guillot, A., & Collet, C. (2005). Duration of mentally simulated movement: a review. Journal of Motor Behavior, 37(1), 10–20.PubMedCrossRef

Guillot, A., & Collet, C. (2008). Construction of the motor imagery integrative model in sport: a review and theoretical investigation of motor imagery use. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1(1), 31–44.CrossRef

Guillot, A., Collet, C., & Dittmar, A. (2005). Influence of environmental context on motor imagery quality. Biology of Sport, 22, 215–226.

Guillot, A., Collet, C., Nguyen, V. A., Malouin, F., Richards, C., & Doyon, J. (2008). Functional neuroanatomical networks associated with expertise in motor imagery. Neuroimage, 41, 1471–1483.PubMedCrossRef

Guillot, A., Louis, M., & Collet, C. (2009). Neural mechanisms for expertise in mental imagery. Cognitive Sciences, 4, 31–48.

Guillot, A., Debarnot, U., Louis, M., Hoyek, N., & Collet, C. (2010). Motor imagery and motor performance: evidence from the sport science literature. In C. Guillot, & C. Collet (Hrsg.), The Neurophysiological Foundations of Mental and Motor Imagery (S. 215–226). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Guillot, A., Hoyek, N., Louis, M., & Collet, C. (2012a). Understanding the timing of motor imagery: recent findings and future directions. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 5(1), 3–22.CrossRef

Guillot, A., Di Rienzo, F., MacIntyre, T., Moran, A., & Collet, C. (2012b). Imagining is not doing but involves specific motor commands: a review of experimental data related to motor inhibition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 247.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Haering, C., & Kiesel, A. (2012). Mine is earlier than yours: causal beliefs influence the perceived time of action effects. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 393.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Haering, C., & Kiesel, A. (2014). Intentional binding is independent of the validity of the action effect’s identity. Acta Psychologica, 152, 109–119.PubMedCrossRef

Haggard, P. (2005). Conscious intention and motor cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 290–295.PubMedCrossRef

Haggard, P., & Tsakiris, M. (2009). The experience of agency: feelings, judgments, and responsibility. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 242–246.CrossRef

Haggard, P., Clark, S., & Kalogeras, J. (2002). Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 382–385.PubMedCrossRef

Halpern, A. R., Zatorre, R. J., Bouffard, M., & Johnson, J. A. (2004). Behavioral and neural correlates of perceived and imagined musical timbre. Neuropsychologia, 42(9), 1281–1292.PubMedCrossRef

Hamilton, A., Wolpert, D., & Frith, U. (2004). Your own action influences how you perceive another person’s action. Current Biology, 14(6), 493–498.PubMedCrossRef

Hamilton, A. F., Wolpert, D. M., Frith, U., & Grafton, S. T. (2006). Where does your own action influence your perception of another person’s action in the brain? NeuroImage, 29(2), 524–535.PubMedCrossRef

Hanakawa, T., Dimyan, M. A., & Hallett, M. (2008). Motor planning, imagery, and execution in the distributed motor network: a time-course study with functional MRI. Cerebral Cortex, 18(12), 2775–2788.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Hari, R., Forss, N., Avikainen, S., Kirveskari, E., Salenius, S., & Rizzolatti, G. (1998). Activation of human primary motor cortex during action observation: a neuromagnetic study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95(25), 15061–15065.CrossRef

Harvey, L. R., Krenz, E. W., McQueen, C., & Krenz, V. D. (1994). Optimal arousal, stress and imagery. In A. A. Sheikh, & E. R. Korn (Hrsg.), Imagery in sports and physical performance (S. 135–146). Amityville: Baywood Publishing.

Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41, 301–307.PubMedCrossRef

Hecht, H., Vogt, S., & Prinz, W. (2001). Motor learning enhances perceptual judgment: A case for action-perception transfer. Psychological Research, 65(1), 3–14.PubMedCrossRef

Herbert, B. M., & Pollatos, O. (2012). The body in the mind: on the relationship between interoception and embodiment. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(4), 692–704.PubMedCrossRef

Herbert, B. M., Pollatos, O., & Schandry, R. (2007). Interoceptive sensitivity and emotion processing: an EEG study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 65(3), 214–227.PubMedCrossRef

Heyes, C. (2013). Imitation: associative and context dependent. In W. Prinz, M. Beisert, & A. Herwig (Hrsg.), Action science: Foundations of an emerging discipline (S. 309–332). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Holt, L. E., & Beilock, S. L. (2006). Expertise and its embodiment: Examining the impact of sensorimotor skill expertise on therepresentation of action-related text. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(4), 694–701.CrossRef

Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878.PubMedCrossRef

Hughes, G., Desantis, A., & Waszak, F. (2013). Mechanisms of intentional binding and sensory attenuation: The role of temporal prediction, temporal control, identity prediction, and motor prediction. Psychological Bulletin,139, 133–151.PubMedCrossRef

Iachini, T. (2011). Mental imagery and embodied cognition: A multimodal approach. Journal of Mental Imagery, 35(3), 1–26.

Iacoboni, M. (2007). Face to face: The neural basis of social mirroring and empathy. Psychiatric Annals, 37(4), 236–241.

Iacoboni, M., & Mazziotta, J. C. (2007). Mirror neuron system: basic findings and clinical applications. Annals of Neurology, 62, 213–218.PubMedCrossRef

Jackson, P. L., Meltzoff, A. N., & Decety, J. (2005). How do we perceive the pain of others? A window into the neural processes involved in empathy. Neuroimage, 24(3), 771–779.PubMedCrossRef

Jacob, P., & Jeannerod, M. (2005). The motor theory of social cognition: a critique. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(1), 21–25.PubMedCrossRef

Jacobs, A., Pinto, J., & Shiffrar, M. (2004). Experience, context, and the visual perception of human movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(5), 822–835.PubMed

Jacobson, E. (1932). Electrophysiology of mental activities. The American Journal of Psychology, 44, 677–694.CrossRef

Janssen, J. J., & Sheikh, A. A. (1994). Enhancing athletic performance through imagery: An overview. In A. A. Sheikh, & E. R. Korn (Hrsg.), Imagery in sports and physical performance (S. 1–22). Amityville: Baywood Publishing.

Jeannerod, M. (1994). The representing brain: neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 187–202.CrossRef

Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage, 14(1), 103–109.CrossRef

Jeannerod, M. (2006). Motor cognition: What actions tell the self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Jeannerod, M., & Frak, V. (1999). Mental imaging of motor activity in humans. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 9, 735–739.PubMedCrossRef

Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 14(2), 201–211.CrossRef

Karsh, N., & Eitam, B. (2015). I control therefore I do: judgments of agency influence action selection. Cognition, 138, 122–131.PubMedCrossRef

Kasai, T., Kawai, S., Kawanishi, M., & Yahagi, S. (1997). Evidence for facilitation of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) induced by motor imagery. Brain Research, 744, 147–150.PubMedCrossRef

Kaschak, M. P., & Borreggine, K. L. (2008). Temporal dynamics of the action-sentence compatibility effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(6), 883–895.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Keysers, C., Wicker, B., Gazzola, V., Anton, J. L., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2004). A touching sight: SII/PV activation during the observation and experience of touch. Neuron, 42(2), 335–346.PubMedCrossRef

Kiefer, M., & Barsalou, L. W. (2013). In W. Prinz, M. Beisert, & A. Herwig (Hrsg.), Action science: Foundations of an emerging discipline (S. 381–407). Cambridge: The MIT Press.CrossRef

Kilner, J. M., Paulignan, Y., & Blakemore, S. J. (2003). An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Current Biology, 13(6), 522–525.PubMedCrossRef

Kilner, J. M., Vargas, C., Duval, S., Blakemore, S. J., & Sirigu, A. (2004). Motor activation prior to observation of a predicted movement. Nature Neuroscience, 7(12), 1299–1301.PubMedCrossRef

Kilner, J. M., Friston, K. J., & Frith, C. D. (2007). Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system. Cognitive Processing, 8(3), 159–166.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Knoblich, G., & Flach, R. (2001). Predicting the effects of actions: Interactions of perception and action. Psychological Science, 12(6), 467–472.PubMedCrossRef

Knoblich, G., & Jordan, J. S. (2003). Action coordination in groups and individuals: learning anticipatory control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(5), 1006–1016.PubMed

Knoblich, G., Seigerschmidt, E., Flach, R., & Prinz, W. (2002). Authorship effects in the prediction of handwriting strokes: Evidence for action simulation during action perception. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 55(3), 1027–1046.CrossRef

Kobayashi, M., Takeda, M., Hattori, N., Fukunaga, M., Sasabe, T., Inoue, N., & Watanabe, Y. (2004). Functional imaging of gustatory perception and imagery: „top-down“ processing of gustatory signals. Neuroimage, 23(4), 1271–1282.PubMedCrossRef

Kohler, E., Keysers, C., Umilta, M. A., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2002). Hearing sounds, understanding actions: action representation in mirror neurons. Science, 297(5582), 846–848.PubMedCrossRef

Kontra, C., Goldin-Meadow, S., & Beilock, S. L. (2012). Embodied learning across the life span. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(4), 731–739.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Koriat, A., Ma’ayan, H., & Nussinson, R. (2006). The intricate relationships between monitoring and control in metacognition: lessons for the cause-and-effect relation between subjective experience and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 36–69.CrossRef

Kosslyn, S. M. (1981). The medium and the message in mental imagery: A theory. Psychological Review, 88(1), 46–66.CrossRef

Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.

Kosslyn, S. M. (2005). Mental images and the brain. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 333–347.PubMedCrossRef

Kosslyn, S. M., & Thompson, W. L. (2003). When is early visual cortex activated during visual mental imagery? Psychological Bulletin, 129, 723–746.PubMedCrossRef

Kosslyn, S. M., Ball, T. M., & Reiser, B. J. (1978). Visual images preserve metric spatial information: evidence from studies of image scanning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4(1), 47–60.PubMed

Kosslyn, S. M., Thompson, W. L., & Alpert, N. M. (1997). Neural systems shared by visual imagery and visual perception: A positron emission tomography study. Neuroimage, 6(4), 320–334.PubMedCrossRef

Kübler, A., Kotchoubey, B., Wolpaw, J. R., & Birbaumer, N. (2001). Brain-computer communication: Unlocking the locked in. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 358–375.PubMedCrossRef

Kunz, R. R., Creem-Regehr, S. H., & Thompson, W. B. (2009). Evidence for motor simulation in imagined locomotion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(5), 1458–1471.PubMed

Lakin, J. L., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport. Psychological Science, 14(4), 334–339.PubMedCrossRef

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980a). The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive Science, 4, 195–208.CrossRef

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980b). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic books.

Landauer, T. K. (1962). Rate of implicit speech. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 15, 646.PubMedCrossRef

Lange, F. P. de, Helmich, R. C., & Toni, I. (2006). Posture influences motor imagery: An fMRI study. Neuroimage, 33, 609–617.PubMedCrossRef

Lange, F. P. de, Spronk, M., Willems, R. M., Toni, I., & Bekkering, H. (2008). Complementary systems for understanding action intentions. Current Biology, 18(6), 454–457.PubMedCrossRef

Leary, M. R. (2007). Motivational and emotional aspects of the self. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 317–344.PubMedCrossRef

Leighton, J., & Heyes, C. (2010). Hand to mouth: automatic imitation across effector systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(5), 1174–1183.PubMed

Leube, D. T., Knoblich, G., Erb, M., Grodd, W., Bartels, M., & Kircher, T. T. (2003). The neural correlates of perceiving one’s own movements. Neuroimage, 20, 2084–2090.PubMedCrossRef

Lhermitte, F. (1983). Utilization behavior and its relation to lesions of the frontral lobes. Brain, 106, 237–255.PubMedCrossRef

Libet, B., Gleason, C. A., Wright, E. W., & Pearl, D. K. (1983). Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential) – The unconsious initiation of a freely voluntary act. Brain, 106, 623–642.PubMedCrossRef

Liepelt, R., & Brass, M. (2010). Top-down modulation of motor priming by belief about animacy. Experimental Psychology, 57(3), 221–227.PubMedCrossRef

Linser, K., & Goschke, T. (2007). Unconscious modulation of the conscious experience of control. Cognition, 104, 459–475.PubMedCrossRef

Longo, M. R., Kosobud, A., & Bertenthal, B. I. (2008). Automatic imitation of biomechanically possible and impossible actions: effects of priming movements versus goals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(2), 489–501.PubMed

Lorey, B., Bischoff, M., Pilgramm, S., Stark, R., Munzert, J., & Zentgraf, K. (2009). The embodied nature of motor imagery: the influence of posture and perspective. Experimental Brain Research, 194, 233–243.PubMedCrossRef

Lotze, M., Montoya, P., Erb, M., Hülsmann, E., Flor, H., Klose, U., & Grodd, W. (1999). Activation of cortical and cerebellar motor areas during executed and imagined hand movements: an fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(5), 491–501.PubMedCrossRef

Louis, M., Guillot, A., Maton, S., Doyon, J., & Collet, C. (2008). Effect of imagined movement speed on subsequent motor performance. Journal of Motor Behavior, 40, 117–132.PubMedCrossRef

Louis, M., Collet, C., & Guillot, A. (2011). Differences in motor imagery times during aroused and relaxed conditions. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23(3), 374–382.CrossRef

Loula, F., Prasad, S., Harber, K., & Shiffrar, M. (2005). Recognizing people from their movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(1), 210–220.PubMed

Macuga, K. L., & Frey, S. H. (2012). Neural representations involved in observed, imagined, and imitated actions are dissociable and hierarchically organized. Neuroimage, 59, 2798–2807.PubMedCrossRef

Macuga, K. L., Papailiou, A. P., & Frey, S. H. (2012). Motor imagery of tool use: relationship to actual use and adherence to Fitts’ law across tasks. Experimental Brain Research, 218(2), 169–179.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2008). A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology – Paris, 102(1–3), 59–70.CrossRef

Maidhof, C., Rieger, M., Prinz, W., & Koelsch, S. (2009). Nobody is perfect: ERP effects prior to performance errors in musicians indicate fast monitoring processes. PLoS One, 4(4), e5032.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Markman, A. B., & Brendl, C. M. (2005). Constraining theories of embodied cognition. Psychological Science, 16(1), 6–10.PubMedCrossRef

Marley, S. C., Levin, J. R., & Glenberg, A. M. (2010). What cognitive benefits does an activity-based reading strategy afford young native american readers? The Journal of Experimental Education, 78(3), 395–417.CrossRef

Maruff, P., Wilson, P. H., De Fazio, J., Cerritelli, B., Hedt, A., & Currie, J. (1999). Asymmetries between dominant and non-dominant hands in real and imagined motor task performance. Neuropsychologia, 37, 379–384.PubMedCrossRef

Mayer, J., & Hermann, H. D. (2009). Mentales Training. Heidelberg: Springer.

McAvinue, L. P., & Robertson, I. H. (2008). Measuring motor imagery ability: a review. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20, 232–251.CrossRef

Meier, B. P., Schnall, S., Schwarz, N., & Bargh, J. A. (2012). Embodiment in social psychology. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(4), 705–716.PubMedCrossRef

Meister, I. G., Krings, T., Foltys, H., Boroojerdi, B., Müller, M., Töpper, R., & Thron, A. (2004). Playing piano in the mind – an fMRI study on music imagery and performance in pianists. Cognitive Brain Research, 19(3), 219–228.PubMedCrossRef

Metcalfe, J., & Greene, M. J. (2007). Metacognition of agency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(2), 184–199.CrossRef

Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371–378.CrossRef

Milgram, S. (1965). Some conditions of obedience and disobedience to authority. Human Relations, 18(1), 57–76.CrossRef

Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: Harper & Row.

Miller, D. T., & Ross, M. (1975). Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: fact of fiction? Psychological Bulletin, 82, 213–225.CrossRef

Molenberghs, P., Cunnington, R., & Mattingley, J. B. (2012). Brain regions with mirror properties: a meta-analysis of 125 human fMRI studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(1), 341–349.CrossRef

Moore, J. W., & Fletcher, P. C. (2012). Sense of agency in health and disease: a review of cue integration approaches. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 59–68.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Moore, J. W., & Haggard, P. (2008). Awareness of action: Inference and prediction. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 136–144.PubMedCrossRef

Moore, J. W., & Obhi, S. S. (2012). Intentional binding and the sense of agency: a review. Consciousness & Cognition, 21, 546–561.CrossRef

Moore, J. W., Lagnado, D., Deal, D. C., & Haggard, P. (2009a). Feelings of control: contingency determines experience of action. Cognition, 110(2), 279–283.PubMedCrossRef

Moore, J. W., Wegner, D. M., & Haggard, P. (2009b). Modulating the sense of agency with external cues. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 1056–1064.PubMedCrossRef

Morsella, E., Wilson, L. E., Berger, C. C., Honhongva, M., Gazzaley, A., & Bargh, J. A. (2009). Subjective aspects of cognitive control at different stages of processing: Conscious conflict and double blindness. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 71, 1807–1824.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Mukamel, R., Ekstrom, A. D., Kaplan, J., Iacoboni, M., & Fried, I. (2010). Single-neuron responses in humans during execution and observation of actions. Current Biology, 20(8), 750–756.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Munroe, K. J., Giacobbi, P. R., Hall, C., & Weinberg, R. (2000). The four Ws of imagery use: Where, when, why and what. The Sport Psychologist, 14, 119–137.CrossRef

Munzert, J. (2002). Temporal accuracy of mentally simulated transport movements. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 94, 307–318.PubMedCrossRef

Munzert, J. (2008). Does level of expertise influence imagery durations in open skills? Played versus imagined durations of badminton sequences. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 6, 24–38.CrossRef

Munzert, J., Lorey, B., & Zentgraf, K. (2009). Cognitive motor processes: the role of motor imagery in the study of motor representations. Brain Research Review, 60, 306–326.CrossRef

Naish, K. R., Houston-Price, C., Bremner, A. J., & Holmes, N. P. (2014). Effects of action observation on corticospinal excitability: muscle specificity, direction, and timing of the mirror response. Neuropsychologia, 64, 331–348.PubMedCrossRef

Naito, E. (1994). Controllability of motor imagery and transformation of visual imagery. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78(2), 479–487.PubMedCrossRef

Neumann, R., & Strack, F. (2000). „Mood contagion“: the automatic transfer of mood between persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(2), 211–223.PubMedCrossRef

Newman-Norlund, R. D., Schie, H. T. van, Zuijlen, A. M. van, & Bekkering, H. (2007). The mirror neuron system is more active during complementary compared with imitative action. Nature Neuroscience, 10(7), 817–818.PubMedCrossRef

Niedenthal, P. M. (2007). Embodying Emotion. Science, 316, 1002–1005.PubMedCrossRef

Nolden, S., Haering, C., & Kiesel, A. (2012). Assessing intentional binding with the method of constant stimuli. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(3), 1176–1185.PubMedCrossRef

O, J., & Hall, C. (2009). A quantitative analysis of athletes’ voluntary use of slow motion, real time, and fast motion images. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 21(1), 15–30.CrossRef

Obhi, S. S., & Hall, P. (2011). Sense of agency and intentional binding in joint action. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 655–662.PubMedCrossRef

Paccalin, C., & Jeannerod, M. (2000). Changes in breathing during observation of effortful actions. Brain Research, 862(1), 194–200.PubMedCrossRef

Page, S. J. (2010). An overview of the effectiveness of motor imagery after stroke: a neuroimaging approach. In A. Guillot, & C. Collet (Hrsg.), The neurophysiological foundations of mental and motor imagery (S. 145–160). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Page, S. J., Levine, P., & Leonard, A. (2007). Mental practice in chronic stroke results of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Stroke, 38(4), 1293–1297.PubMedCrossRef

Papaxanthis, C., Schieppati, M., Gentili, R., & Pozzo, T. (2002). Imagined and actual arm movements have similar durations when performed under different conditions of direction and mass. Experimental Brain Research, 143(4), 447–452.PubMedCrossRef

Papaxanthis, C., Pozzo, T., Kasprinski, R., & Berthoz, A. (2003). Comparison of actual and imagined execution of whole-body movements after a long exposure to microgravity. Neuroscience letters, 339(1), 41–44.PubMedCrossRef

Papeo, L., Vallesi, A., Isaja, A., & Rumiati, R. I. (2009). Effects of TMS on different stages of motor and non-motor verb processing in the primary motor cortex. PLOS One, 4(2), e4508. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004508.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Parsons, L. M. (1994). Temporal and kinematic properties of motor behavior reflected in mentally simulated action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 709–730.PubMed

Perry, H. M. (1939). The relative efficiency of actual and imaginary practice in 5 selected tasks. Archives of Psychology, 4, 5–75.

Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press.CrossRef

Piaget, J. (1967). Biology and knowledge. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Porro, C. A., Cettolo, V., Francescato, M. P., & Baraldi, P. (2000). Ipsilateral involvement of primary motor cortex during motor imagery. European Journal of Neuroscience, 12, 3059–3063.PubMedCrossRef

Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129–154.CrossRef

Prinz, W. (2005). An ideomotor approach to imitation. In S. Hurley, & N. Chater (Hrsg.), Perspectives on imitation: From neuroscience to social science (S. 141–156). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Prinz, W., & Rapinett, G. (2008). Filling the gap: Dynamic representation of occluded action. In F. Morganti, A. Carassa, & G. Riva (Hrsg.), Enacting intersubjectivity: A cognitive and social perspective on the study of interactions (S. 223–236). Amsterdam: IOS Press.

Proffitt, D. R. (2006). Embodied perception and the economy of action. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 110–122.PubMedCrossRef

Pulvermüller, F., Hauk, O., Nikulin, V. V., & Ilmoniemi, R. J. (2005). Functional links between motor and language systems. European Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 793–797.PubMedCrossRef

Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1981). The imagery debate: Analogue media versus tacit knowledge. Psychological Review, 88(1), 16–45.CrossRef

Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2002). Mental imagery: In search of a theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(2), 157–182.PubMed

Ramnani, N., & Miall, R. C. (2004). A system in the human brain for predicting the actions of others. Nature Neuroscience, 7(1), 85–90.PubMedCrossRef

Raposo, A., Moss, H. E., Stamatakis, E. A., & Tyler, L. K. (2009). Modulation of motor and premotor cortices by actions, action words and action sentences. Neuropsychologia, 47(2), 388–396.PubMedCrossRef

Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 364–382.PubMedCrossRef

Reed, C. L. (2002). Chronometric comparisons of imagery to action: Visualizing versus physically performing springboard dives. Memory and Cognition, 30, 1169–1178.PubMedCrossRef

Repp, B. H., & Knoblich, G. (2004). Perceiving action identity how pianists recognize their own performances. Psychological Science, 15(9), 604–609.PubMedCrossRef

Reuven-Magril, O., Dar, R., & Liberman, N. (2008). Illusion of control and behavioral control attempts in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117(2), 334–341.PubMedCrossRef

Rieger, M. (2012). Motor imagery in typing: effects of typing style and action familiarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 101–107.CrossRef

Rieger, M., Dahm, S.F., & Koch, I.(2016). Inhibition in motor imagery: a novel action mode switching paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, Advance online publication. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1095-5.

Rieger, M., & Massen, C. (2014). Tool characteristics in imagery of tool actions. Psychological Research, 78(1), 10–17.PubMedCrossRef

Rieger, M., Martinez, F., & Wenke, D. (2011). Imagery of errors in typing. Cognition, 121(2), 163–175.PubMedCrossRef

Rizzolatti, G., & Arbib, M. A. (1998). Language within our grasp. Trends in Neurosciences, 21(5), 188–194.PubMedCrossRef

Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192.PubMedCrossRef

Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(9), 661–670.PubMedCrossRef

Roberts, R., Callow, N., Hardy, L., Markland, D., & Bringer, J. (2008). Movement imagery ability: Development and assessment of a revised version of the vividness of movement imagery questionnaire. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30, 200–221.CrossRef

Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80(1), 1–28.PubMedCrossRef

Rueschemeyer, S.-A., Rooij, D. van, Lindemann, O., Willems, R. M., & Bekkering, H. (2010). The function of words: distinct neural correlates for words denoting differently manipulable objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(8), 1844–1851.PubMedCrossRef

Saccuman, M. S., Cappa, S. F., Bates, E. A., Arevalo, A., Rosa, P. D., Danna, M., & Perani, D. (2006). The impact of semantic reference on word class: An fMRI study of action and object naming. NeuroImage, 32, 1865–1878.PubMedCrossRef

Sato, A. (2009). Both motor prediction and conceptual congruency between preview and action-effect contribute to explicit judgment of agency. Cognition, 110, 74–83.PubMedCrossRef

Sato, A., & Yasuda, A. (2005). Illusion of sense of self-agency: Discrepancy between the predicted and actual consequences of actions modulates the sense of self-agency, but not the sense of self-ownership. Cognition, 94, 241–255.PubMedCrossRef

Sato, M., Mengarelli, M., Riggio, L., Gallese, V., & Buccino, G. (2008). Task related modulation of the motor system during language processing. Brain and Language, 105(2), 83–90.PubMedCrossRef

Schiffer, A. M., & Schubotz, R. I. (2011). Caudate nucleus signals for breaches of expectation in a movement observation paradigm. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 38.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2009). Prediction in joint action: what, when, and where. Topics in cognitive science, 1, 253–237.CrossRef

Sebanz, N., & Lackner, U. (2007). Who’s calling the shots? Intentional content and feelings of control. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 859–876.PubMedCrossRef

Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2003). Representing others’ actions: just like one’s own? Cognition, 88(3), 11–21.CrossRef

Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 70–76.PubMedCrossRef

Seth, A. K. (2013). Interoceptive inference, emotion, and the embodied self. Trends in Cognitive Science, 17, 565–573.CrossRef

Shepard, R. N., & Cooper, L. A. (1986). Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Shiffrar, M., & Freyd, J. J. (1990). Apparent motion of the human body. Psychological Science, 1(4), 257–264.CrossRef

Shiffrar, M., & Freyd, J. J. (1993). Timing and apparent motion path choice with human body photographs. Psychological Science, 4(6), 379–384.CrossRef

Sidarus, N., Chambon, V., & Haggard, P. (2013). Priming of actions increases sense of control over unexpected outcomes. Consciousness and Cognition, 22, 1403–1411.PubMedCrossRef

Sirigu, A., & Duhamel, J. R. (2001). Motor and visual imagery as two complementary but neurally dissociable mental processes. Journal of Cognitive Neurosciences, 13, 910–919.CrossRef

Sirigu, A., Duhamel, J. R., Cohen, L., Pillon, B., Dubois, B., & Agid, Y. (1996). The mental representation of hand movements after parietal cortex damage. Science, 273, 1564–1568.PubMedCrossRef

Smith, L. B., & Sheya, A. (2010). Is cognition enough to explain cognitive development? Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 725–735.PubMedCrossRef

Sparenberg, P., Springer, A., & Prinz, W. (2012). Predicting others’ actions: evidence for a constant time delay in action simulation. Psychological Research, 76(1), 41–49.PubMedCrossRef

Spengler, S., Von Cramon, D. Y., & Brass, M. (2009). Was it me or was it you? How the sense of agency originates from ideomotor learning revealed by fMRI. Neuroimage, 46, 290–298.PubMedCrossRef

Sperduti, M., Delaveau, P., Fossati, P., & Nadel, J. (2011). Different brain structures related to self- and external-agency attribution: a brief review and meta-analysis. Brain Structure and Function, 216, 151–157.PubMedCrossRef

Springer, A., Parkinson, J., & Prinz, W. (2013). Action simulation: time course and representational mechanisms. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 387.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Stanfield, R. A., & Zwaan, R. A. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science, 12(2), 153–156.PubMedCrossRef

Stenner, M.-P., Bauer, M., Sidarus, N., Heinze, H.-J., Haggard, P., & Dolan, R. J. (2014). Subliminal action priming modulates the perceived intensity of sensory action consequences. Cognition, 130, 227–235.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Stevens, J. A., Fonlupt, P., Shiffrar, M., & Decety, J. (2000). New aspects of motion perception: selective neural encoding of apparent human movements. Neuroreport, 11(1), 109–115.PubMedCrossRef

Strack, F., Martin, L., & Stepper, S. (1988). Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: a nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 768–777.PubMedCrossRef

Stürmer, B., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2000). Correspondence effects with manual gestures and postures: a study of imitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(6), 1746–1759.PubMed

Synofzik, M., Thier, P., & Lindner, A. (2006). Internalizing agency of self-action: perception of one’s own hand-movements depends on an adaptable prediction about the sensory action outcome. Journal of Neurophysiology, 96, 1592–1601.PubMedCrossRef

Synofzik, M., Vosgerau, G., & Lindner, A. (2009). Me or not me – an optimal integration of agency cues? Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 1056–1064.CrossRef

Synofzik, M., Thier, P., Leube, D. T., Schlotterbeck, P., & Lindner, A. (2010). Misattributions of agency in schizophrenia are based on imprecise predictions about the sensory consequences of one’s actions. Brain, 133(1), 262–271.PubMedCrossRef

Tai, Y., Scherfler, C., Brooks, D., Sawamoto, N., & Castiello, U. (2004). The human premotor cortex is „mirror“ only for biological actions. Current Biology, 14, 117–120.PubMedCrossRef

Takahata, K., Takahashi, H., Maeda, T., Umeda, S., Suhara, T., Mimura, M., & Kato, M. (2012). It’s not my fault: postdictive modulation of intentional binding by monetary gains and losses. PLoS One, 7(12), e53421. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053421.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Tettamanti, M., Buccino, G., Saccuman, M. C., Gallese, V., Danna, M., Scifo, P., Fazio, F., Rizzolatti, G., Cappa, S. F., & Perani, D. (2005). Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(2), 273–281.PubMedCrossRef

Toni, I., Lange, F. P. de, Noordzij, M. L., & Hagoort, P. (2008). Language beyond action. Journal of Physiology – Paris, 102(1–3), 71–79.CrossRef

Umilta, M. A., Kohler, E., Gallese, V., Fogassi, L., Fadiga, L., Keysers, C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2001). I know what you are doing. A neurophysiological study. Neuron, 31, 155–165.PubMedCrossRef

Urgesi, C., Maieron, M., Avenanti, A., Tidoni, E., Fabbro, F., & Aglioti, S. M. (2010). Simulating the future of actions in the human corticospinal system. Cerebral Cortex, 20(11), 2511–2521.PubMedCrossRef

Urgesi, C., Savonitto, M. M., Fabbro, F., & Aglioti, S. M. (2012). Long-and short-term plastic modeling of action prediction abilities in volleyball. Psychological research, 76(4), 542–560.PubMedCrossRef

Vargas, C. D., Olivier, E., Craighero, L., Fadiga, L., Duhamel, J. R., & Sirigu, A. (2004). The influence of hand posture on corticospinal excitability during motor imagery: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 1200–1206.PubMedCrossRef

Vega, M. de (2008). Levels of embodied meaning: From pointing to counterfactuals. In M. de Vega, A. M. Glenberg, & A. C. Graesser (Hrsg.), Symbols and embodiment. Debates on meaning and cognition (S. 285–308). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Voss, M., Moore, J. W., Hauser, M., Gallinat, J., Heinz, A., & Haggard, P. (2010). Altered awareness of action in schizophrenia: a specific deficit in predicting action consequences. Brain, 133, 3104–3112.PubMedCrossRef

Wassermann, E. A., Elek, S. M., Chatlosh, D. L., & Baker, A. G. (1993). Rating causal relations: Role of probability in judgments of response-outcome contingency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(1), 174–188.

Wegner, D. M., Sparrow, B., & Winerman, L. (2004). Vicarious agency: Experiencing control over the movements of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 838–848.PubMedCrossRef

Wegner, D. M., & Wheatley, T. P. (1999). Apparent mental causation: Sources of the experience of will. American Psychologist, 54, 480–492.PubMedCrossRef

Weiss, C., Herwig, A., & Schütz-Bosbach, S. (2011). The self in social interactions: sensory attenuation of auditory action effects is stronger in interactions with others. PLoS One, 6(7), e22723. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022723.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Wenke, D., & Haggard, P. (2009). How voluntary actions modulate time perception. Experimental Brain Research, 196(3), 311–318.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Wenke, D., Fleming, S. M., & Haggard, P. (2010). Subliminal priming of actions influences sense of control over effects of action. Cognition, 115(1), 26–38.PubMedCrossRef

Werner, N. S., Jung, K., Duschek, S., & Schandry, R. (2009). Enhanced cardiac perception is associated with benefits in decision-making. Psychophysiology, 46(6), 1123–1129.PubMedCrossRef

Wertheimer, M. (1912). Experimentelle Studien über das Sehen von Bewegung. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 61, 161–265.

Wicker, B., Keysers, C., Plailly, J., Royet, J. P., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2003). Both of us disgusted in my insula: the common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust. Neuron, 40(3), 655–664.PubMedCrossRef

Willems, R. M., & Francken, J. C. (2012). Embodied cognition: taking the next step. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 582.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Williams, S. E., Cumming, J., Ntoumanis, N., Nordin-Bates, S. M., Ramsey, R., & Hall, C. (2012). Further validation and development of the movement imagery questionnaire. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 34, 621–646.CrossRef

Williams, S. E., Guillot, A., Di Rienzo, F., & Cumming, J. (2015). Comparing self-report and mental chronometry measures of motor imagery ability. European Journal of Sport Science, 27, 1–9.

Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625–636.CrossRef

Wilson, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin, 131(3), 460–473.PubMedCrossRef

Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., & Jordan, M. I. (1995). An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science, 269(5232), 1880–1882.PubMedCrossRef

Wolpert, D. M., & Miall, R. C. (1996). Foward models for physiological motor control. Neural Networks, 9, 1265–1279.PubMedCrossRef

Wright, M. J., Bishop, D. T., Jackson, R. C., & Abernethy, B. (2011). Cortical fMRI activation to opponents’ body kinematics in sport-related anticipation: expert-novice differences with normal and point-light video. Neuroscience Letters, 500(3), 216–221.PubMedCrossRef

Yoshie, M., & Haggard, P. (2013). Negative emotional outcomes attenuate sense of agency over voluntary actions. Current Biology, 23, 2028–2032.PubMedCrossRef

Zajonc, R. B., Adelmann, P. K., Murphy, S. T., & Niedenthal, P. M. (1987). Convergence in the physical appearance of spouses. Motivation and Emotion, 11(4), 335–346.CrossRef

Zwaan, R. A., & Taylor, L. J. (2006). Seeing, acting, understanding: Motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(1), 1–11.CrossRef

Zwaan, R. A., Stoep, N. van der, Guadalupe, T., & Bouwmeester, S. (2012). Language comprehension in the balance: the robustness of the action-compatibility effect (ACE). PLOS One, 7(2), e31204. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0031204.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Springer Professional

21. Embodiment und Sense of Agency

Zusammenfassung

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner