nach oben

The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology

Erschienen in:

26.02.2022 | Critical Review

Fused deposition modeling: process, materials, parameters, properties, and applications

verfasst von: Kumaresan Rajan, Mahendran Samykano, Kumaran Kadirgama, Wan Sharuzi Wan Harun, Md. Mustafizur Rahman

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology | Ausgabe 3-4/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In recent years, 3D printing technology has played an essential role in fabricating customized products at a low cost and faster in numerous industrial sectors. Fused deposition modeling (FDM) is one of the most efficient and economical 3D printing techniques. Various materials have been developed and studied, and their properties, such as mechanical, thermal, and electrical, have been reported. Numerous attempts to improve FDM products’ properties for applications in various sectors have also been reported. Still, their applications are limited due to the materials’ availability and properties compared to traditional fabrication methods. In 3D printing, the process parameters are crucial factors for improving the product's properties and reducing the machining time and cost. Researchers have recently investigated many approaches for expanding the range of materials and optimizing the FDM process parameters to extend the FDM process’s possibility into various industrial sectors. This paper reviews and explains various techniques used in 3D printing and the various polymers and polymer composites used in the FDM process. The list of mechanical investigations carried out for different materials, process parameters, properties, and the FDM process's potential application was discussed. This review is expected to indicate the materials and their optimized parameters to achieve enhanced properties and applications. Also, the article is highly anticipated to provide the research gaps to sustenance future research in the area of FDM technologies.

Graphical abstract

Vorheriger Artikel A comprehensive review on metallic implant biomaterials and their subtractive manufacturing

Nächster Artikel Research progress on transition behavior control of welding droplets

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

ASTM (2009) ASTM International Committee F42 on Additive Manufacturing Technologies, ASTM F2792–10. Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing Technologies

Medellin-Castillo HI, Zaragoza-Siqueiros J (2019) Design and manufacturing strategies for fused deposition modelling in additive manufacturing: a review. Chinese J Mech Eng 32(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s10033-019-0368-0

Subramaniam SR et al (2019) 3D printing: overview of PLA progress. AIP Conference Proceedings 2059. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5085958

Wang X, Jiang M, Zhou Z, Gou J, Hui D (2017) 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: a review and prospective. Compos Part B Eng 110:442–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034CrossRef

Bai X, Wu J, Liu Y, Xu Y, Yang D (2020) Exploring the characteristics of 3D printing global industry chain and value chain innovation network. Inf Dev 36(4):559–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666919884348CrossRef

Vialva T (2020) 3D hubs 3D Printing trends report forecasts 24% growth in 3D printing industry over 5 years - 3D printing industry.https://3dprintingindustry.com/news/3d-hubs-3d-printing-trends-report-forecasts-24-growth-in-3d-printing-industry-over-5-years-167998/ (Accessed 23 Jan 2021)

Wohlers Report 2021 (2021) Weakened growth for additive manufacturing - 3Dnatives.https://www.3dnatives.com/en/wohlers-report-2021-180320214/#! (Accessed 28 Mar 2021)

Masood SH, Song WQ (2004) Development of new metal/polymer materials for rapid tooling using fused deposition modelling. Mater Des 25(7):587–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2004.02.009CrossRef

Marwah OM, Shukri MS, Mohamad EJ, Johar MA, Haq RH, Khirotdin RK (2017) Direct investment casting for pattern developed by desktop 3D printer. Matec Web of Conferences 135. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201713500036

10.

Vyavahare S, Teraiya S, Panghal D, Kumar S (2020) Fused deposition modelling: a review. Rapid Prototyp J 26(1):176–201. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-04-2019-0106CrossRef

11.

Kumar P, Ahuja IPS, Singh R (2012) Application of fusion deposition modelling for rapid investment casting - a review. Int J Mater Eng Innov 3(3–4):204–227. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMATEI.2012.049254CrossRef

12.

Bakar NSA, Alkahari MR, Boejang H (2010) Analysis on fused deposition modelling performance. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 11(12):972–977. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1001365CrossRef

13.

Mohd Pu’ad NAS, Abdul Haq RH, Mohd Noh H, Abdullah HZ, Idris MI, Lee TC (2018) Review on the fabrication of fused deposition modelling (FDM) composite filament for biomedical applications. Materials Today: Proceedings 29(2018):228–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.535

14.

Sathies T, Senthil P, Anoop MS (2020) A review on advancements in applications of fused deposition modelling process. Rapid Prototyp J 26(4):669–687. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-08-2018-0199CrossRef

15.

Jin YA, Li H, He Y, Fu JZ (2015) Quantitative analysis of surface profile in fused deposition modelling. Addit Manuf 8:142–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2015.10.001CrossRef

16.

Rajpurohit SR, Dave HK (2018) Effect of process parameters on tensile strength of FDM printed PLA part. Rapid Prototyp J 24(8):1317–1324. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-06-2017-0134CrossRef

17.

Lanzotti A, Grasso M, Staiano G, Martorelli M (2015) The impact of process parameters on mechanical properties of parts fabricated in PLA with an open-source 3-D printer. Rapid Prototyp J 21(5):604–617. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-09-2014-0135CrossRef

18.

Ziemian S, Okwara M, Ziemian CW (2015) Tensile and fatigue behavior of layered acrylonitrile butadiene styrene. Rapid Prototyp J 21(3):270–278. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-09-2013-0086CrossRef

19.

Chacón JM, Caminero MA, García-Plaza E, Núñez PJ (2017) Additive manufacturing of PLA structures using fused deposition modelling: effect of process parameters on mechanical properties and their optimal selection. Mater Des 124:143–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.065CrossRef

20.

Taufik M, Jain PK (2020) Part surface quality improvement studies in fused deposition modelling process: a review. Aust J Mech Eng 4846. https://doi.org/10.1080/14484846.2020.1723342

21.

Shofner ML, Lozano K, Rodríguez-Macías FJ, Barrera EV (2003) Nanofiber-reinforced polymers prepared by fused deposition modeling. J Appl Polym Sci 89(11):3081–3090. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.12496CrossRef

22.

Lee JY, An J, Chua CK (2017) Fundamentals and applications of 3D printing for novel materials. Appl Mater Today 7:120–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2017.02.004CrossRef

23.

Mitchell A, Lafont U, Hołyńska M, Semprimoschnig CJ (2018) Additive manufacturing - a review of 4D printing and future applications. Addit Manuf 24(2017)606–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.038

24.

Zhang Y et al (2018) Additive manufacturing of metallic materials: a review. J Mater Eng Perform 27(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-017-2747-yCrossRef

25.

Shahrubudin N, Lee TC, Ramlan R (2019) An overview on 3D printing technology: technological, materials, and applications. Procedia Manuf 35:1286–1296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.089CrossRef

26.

Coogan TJ, Kazmer DO (2020) Prediction of interlayer strength in material extrusion additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101368

27.

Daminabo SC, Goel S, Grammatikos SA, Nezhad HY, Thakur VK (2020) Fused deposition modeling-based additive manufacturing (3D printing): techniques for polymer material systems. Materials Today Chemistry 16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2020.100248

28.

Braconnier DJ, Jensen RE, Peterson AM (2020) Processing parameter correlations in material extrusion additive manufacturing. Additive Manufacturing 31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.100924

29.

Singh R et al (2020) Powder bed fusion process in additive manufacturing: an overview. Mater Today Proc 26:3058–3070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.635CrossRef

30.

DebRoy T et al (2018) Additive manufacturing of metallic components – process, structure and properties. Prog Mater Sci 92:112–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001CrossRef

31.

Ribeiro KSB, Mariani FE, Coelho RT (2020) A study of different deposition strategies in direct energy deposition (DED) processes. Procedia Manufacturing 48:663–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.05.158CrossRef

32.

Yao XX et al (2020) Controlling the solidification process parameters of direct energy deposition additive manufacturing considering laser and powder properties. Comput Mater Sci 182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109788

33.

Meteyer S, Xu X, Perry N, Zhao YF (2014) Energy and material flow analysis of binder-jetting additive manufacturing processes. Procedia CIRP 15:19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.06.030CrossRef

34.

Ziaee M, Crane NB (2019) Binder jetting: a review of process, materials, and methods. Addit Manuf 28(May):781–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.05.031CrossRef

35.

Dini F, Ghaffari SA, Jafar J, Hamidreza R, Marjan S (2020) A review of binder jet process parameters; powder, binder, printing and sintering condition. Met Powder Rep 75(2):95–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mprp.2019.05.001CrossRef

36.

Yap YL, Wang C, Sing SL, Dikshit V, Yeong WY, Wei J (2017) Material jetting additive manufacturing: an experimental study using designed metrological benchmarks. Precis Eng 50:275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2017.05.015CrossRef

37.

Dilag J, Chen T, Li S, Bateman SA (2019) Design and direct additive manufacturing of three-dimensional surface micro-structures using material jetting technologies. Addit Manuf 27(January):167–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.01.009CrossRef

38.

Palanikumar K, Mudhukrishnan M (2020) Technologies in additive manufacturing for fiber reinforced composite materials: a review. Curr Opin Chem Eng 28:51–59, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2020.01.001

39.

Westbeek S, Remmers JJ, Van Dommelen JA, Geers MG (2020) Multi-scale process simulation for additive manufacturing through particle filled vat photopolymerization. Comput Mater Sci 180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109647

40.

Stansbury JW, Idacavage MJ (2016) 3D printing with polymers: Challenges among expanding options and opportunities. Dent Mater 32(1):54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.018CrossRef

41.

Manapat JZ, Chen Q, Ye P, Advincula RC (2017) 3D printing of polymer nanocomposites via stereolithography. Macromol Mater Eng 302(9):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201600553CrossRef

42.

Calignano F et al (2017) Overview on additive manufacturing technologies. Proc IEEE 105(4):593–612. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2016.2625098CrossRef

43.

Melchels FPW, Feijen J, Grijpma DW (2010) A review on stereolithography and its applications in biomedical engineering. Biomaterials 31(24):6121–6130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.050CrossRef

44.

Zakeri S, Vippola M, Levänen E (2020) A comprehensive review of the photopolymerization of ceramic resins used in stereolithography. Add Manuf 35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101177

45.

Tiwari SK, Pande S, Agrawal S, Bobade SM (2015) Selection of selective laser sintering materials for different applications. Rapid Prototyp J 21(6):630–648. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-03-2013-0027CrossRef

46.

Geng LC, Ruan XL, Wu WW, Xia R, Fang DN (2019) Mechanical properties of selective laser sintering (SLS) additive manufactured chiral auxetic cylindrical stent. Exp Mech 59(6):913–925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-019-00489-0CrossRef

47.

Niu X et al (2019) Review of materials used in laser-aided additive manufacturing processes to produce metallic products. Front Mech Eng 14(3):282–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-019-0526-1CrossRef

48.

Akilesh M, Elango PR, Devanand AA, Soundararajan R, Varthanan PA (2018) Optimization of selective laser sintering process parameters on surface quality 3D Print. Addit Manuf Technol pp. 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0305-0_13

49.

De Leon AC, Chen Q, Palaganas NB, Palaganas JO, Manapat J, Advincula RC (2016) High performance polymer nanocomposites for additive manufacturing applications. React Funct Polym 103:141–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2016.04.010CrossRef

50.

Azizi Machekposhti S, Mohaved S, Narayan RJ (2019) Inkjet dispensing technologies: recent advances for novel drug discovery. Expert Opin Drug Discov 14(2):01–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/17460441.2019.1567489

51.

Guo Y, Patanwala HS, Bognet B, Ma AWK (2017) Inkjet and inkjet-based 3D printing: connecting fluid properties and printing performance. Rapid Prototyp J 23(3):562–576. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-05-2016-0076CrossRef

52.

Li J, Rossignol F, Macdonald J (2015) Inkjet printing for biosensor fabrication: combining chemistry and technology for advanced manufacturing. Lab Chip 15(12):2538–2558. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5lc00235dCrossRef

53.

Nayak L, Mohanty S, Nayak SK, Ramadoss A (2019) A review on inkjet printing of nanoparticle inks for flexible electronics. J Mater Chem C 7(29):8771–8795. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9tc01630aCrossRef

54.

Dermeik B, Travitzky N (2020) Laminated object manufacturing of ceramic-based materials. Adv Eng Mater2000256. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202000256

55.

Bhatt PM et al (2019) A robotic cell for multi-resolution additive manufacturing. In 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2019(2018):2800–2807. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2019.8793730

56.

Weisensel L, Travitzky N, Sieber H, Greil P (2004) Laminated object manufacturing (LOM) of SiSiC composites. Adv Eng Mater 6(11):899–903. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.200400112CrossRef

57.

Mansfield B, Torres S, Yu T, Wu D (2019) A review on additive manufacturing of ceramics. ASME 2019 14th International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference (MSEC2019) 1:36–53. https://doi.org/10.1115/MSEC2019-2886

58.

Windsheimer H, Travitzky N, Hofenauer A, Greil P (2007) Laminated object manufacturing of preceramic-paper-derived Si-SiC composites. Adv Mater 19(24):4515–4519. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200700789CrossRef

59.

Zindani D, Kumar K (2019) An insight into additive manufacturing of fiber reinforced polymer composite. International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture 2(4):267–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlmm.2019.08.004CrossRef

60.

Dizon JR, Espera Jr AH, Chen Q, Advincula RC (2018) Mechanical characterization of 3D-printed polymers 20:44–67

61.

Dul S, Fambri L, Pegoretti A (2016) Composites : Part A Fused deposition modelling with ABS – graphene nanocomposites 85:181–191

62.

Dizon JRC, Espera AH, Chen Q, Advincula RC (2018) Mechanical characterization of 3D-printed polymers. Addit Manuf 20:44–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.12.002CrossRef

63.

Popescu D, Zapciu A, Amza C, Baciu F, Marinescu R (2018) FDM process parameters influence over the mechanical properties of polymer specimens: a review. Polym Test 69(May):157–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.020CrossRef

64.

Jiang J, Lou J, Hu G (2019) Effect of support on printed properties in fused deposition modelling processes. Virtual Phys Prototyp 14(4):308–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2019.1568835CrossRef

65.

Rochus P, Plesseria JY, Van Elsen M, Kruth JP, Carrus R, Dormal T (2007) New applications of rapid prototyping and rapid manufacturing (RP/RM) technologies for space instrumentation. Acta Astronaut 61(1–6):352–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2007.01.004CrossRef

66.

Gkartzou E, Koumoulos EP, Charitidis CA (2017) Production and 3D printing processing of bio-based thermoplastic filament. Manuf Rev 4. https://doi.org/10.1051/mfreview/2016020

67.

Blok LG, Longana ML, Yu H, Woods BKS (2018) An investigation into 3D printing of fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites. Addit Manuf 22:176–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.039CrossRef

68.

Lalehpour A, Barari A (2016) Post processing for fused deposition modeling parts with acetone vapour bath. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49(31):42–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.12.159CrossRef

69.

Chen YF, Wang YH, Tsai JC (2017) Enhancement of surface reflectivity of fused deposition modeling parts by post-processing. Opt Commun 430:479–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2018.07.011

70.

Kumbhar NN, Mulay AV (2018) Post processing methods used to improve surface finish of products which are manufactured by additive manufacturing technologies: a review. J Inst Eng Ser C 99(4):481–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-016-0340-zCrossRef

71.

Boparai KS, Singh R, Singh H (2016) Development of rapid tooling using fused deposition modeling: a review. Rapid Prototyp J 22(2):281–299. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-04-2014-0048CrossRef

72.

McCullough EJ, Yadavalli VK (2013) Surface modification of fused deposition modeling ABS to enable rapid prototyping of biomedical microdevices. J Mater Process Technol 213(6):947–954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.12.015CrossRef

73.

Singh J, Singh R, Singh H (2017) Investigations for improving the surface finish of FDM based ABS replicas by chemical vapor smoothing process: a case study. Assem Autom 37(1):13–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/AA-12-2015-127CrossRef

74.

Kulkarni P, Dutta D (2000) On the integration of layered manufacturing and material removal processes. J Manuf Sci Eng Trans ASME 122(1):100–108. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.538891CrossRef

75.

Boschetto A, Bottini L, Veniali F (2016) Finishing of fused deposition modeling parts by CNC machining. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 41:92–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2016.03.004CrossRef

76.

Bryll K, Piesowicz E, Szymański P, Ślączka W, Pijanowski M (2018) Polymer composite manufacturing by FDM 3D printing technology. In MATEC Web of Conferences 237(6). https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201823702006

77.

Salem Bala A, bin Wahab S (2016) Elements and materials improve the FDM products: a review. Adv Eng Forum 16:33–51. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/aef.16.33

78.

Valino AD, Dizon JR, Espera Jr AH, Chen Q, Messman J, Advincula RC (2019) Advances in 3D printing of thermoplastic polymer composites and nanocomposites. Prog Polym Sci 98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101162

79.

Mazzanti V, Malagutti L, Mollica F (2019) FDM 3D printing of polymers containing natural fillers: a review of their mechanical properties. Polymers 11(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11071094

80.

Singh R, Garg HK (2016) Fused deposition modeling – a state of art review and future applications. Ref Modul Mater Sci Mater Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-803581-8.04037-6CrossRef

81.

Novakova-Marcincinova L, Novak-Marcincin J, Barna J, Torok J (2012) Special materials used in FDM rapid prototyping technology application. In 2012 IEEE 16th International Conference on Intelligent Engineering Systems (INES) pp. 73–76. https://doi.org/10.1109/INES.2012.6249805

82.

Coltelli MB et al (2019) Chitin nanofibrils in poly (lactic acid) (PLA) nanocomposites: Dispersion and thermo-mechanical properties. Int J Mol Sci 20(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20030504.

83.

Benwood C, Anstey A, Andrzejewski J, Misra M, Mohanty AK (2018) Improving the impact strength and heat resistance of 3D Printed models: structure, property, and processing correlationships during fused deposition modeling (FDM) of poly(lactic acid). ACS Omega 3(4):4400–4411. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b00129CrossRef

84.

Nofar M, Sacligil D, Carreau PJ, Kamal MR, Heuzey M (2019) International Journal of Biological Macromolecules Poly ( lactic acid ) blends : processing, properties and applications. Int J Biol Macromol 125:307–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.002CrossRef

85.

Yu DM, Zhu CJ, Su J, Wang D (2011) Process analysis and application for rapid prototyping based on fused deposition modeling. Adv Mater Res 179–180:875–880. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.179-180.875CrossRef

86.

Nguyen NA, Bowland CC, Naskar AK (2018) A general method to improve 3D-printability and inter-layer adhesion in lignin-based composites. Appl Mater Today 12:138–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2018.03.009CrossRef

87.

Zhou YG, Zou JR, Wu HH, Xu BP (2020) Balance between bonding and deposition during fused deposition modeling of polycarbonate and acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene composites. Polym Compos 41(1):60–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.25345CrossRef

88.

Shubham P, Sikidar A, Chand T (2016) The influence of layer thickness on mechanical properties of the 3D printed ABS polymer by fused deposition modeling. Key Eng Mater 706:63–67. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.706.63CrossRef

89.

Gao X, Zhang D, Wen X, Qi S, Su Y, Dong X (2019) Fused deposition modeling with polyamide 1012. Rapid Prototyp J 25(7):1145–1154. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-09-2018-0258CrossRef

90.

Lay M, Thajudin NL, Hamid ZA, Rusli A, Abdullah MK, Shuib RK (2019) Comparison of physical and mechanical properties of PLA, ABS and nylon 6 fabricated using fused deposition modeling and injection molding. Compos Part B Eng 176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107341

91.

Rahim TNAT, Abdullah AM, Akil HM, Mohamad D, Rajion ZA (2017) The improvement of mechanical and thermal properties of polyamide 12 3D printed parts by fused deposition modelling. Express Polym Lett 11(12):963–982. https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2017.92CrossRef

92.

Zhang X, Fan W, Liu T (2020) Fused deposition modeling 3D printing of polyamide-based composites and its applications. Compos Commun 21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2020.100413

93.

Wang P, Zou B, Xiao H, Ding S, Huang C (2019) Effects of printing parameters of fused deposition modeling on mechanical properties, surface quality, and microstructure of PEEK. J Mater Process Technol 271(March):62–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.03.016CrossRef

94.

Deng X, Zeng Z, Peng B, Yan S, Ke W (2018) Mechanical properties optimization of poly-ether-ether-ketone via fused deposition modeling. Materials 11(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11020216

95.

Xiaoyong S, Liangcheng C, Honglin M, Peng G, Zhanwei B, Cheng L (2017) Experimental analysis of high temperature PEEK materials on 3D printing test. In 2017 9th International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation (ICMTMA) pp. 13–16. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMTMA.2017.0012

96.

Wu W, Geng P, Li G, Zhao D, Zhang H, Zhao J (2015) Influence of layer thickness and raster angle on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed PEEK and a comparative mechanical study between PEEK and ABS. Materials (Basel) 8(9):5834–5846. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma8095271CrossRef

97.

Arif MF, Kumar S, Varadarajan KM, Cantwell WJ (2018) Performance of biocompatible PEEK processed by fused deposition additive manufacturing. Mater Des 146:249–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.03.015CrossRef

98.

Pakkanen J, Manfredi D, Minetola P, Iuliano L (2017) About the use of recycled or biodegradable filaments for sustainability of 3D printing. In International Conference on Sustainable Design and Manufacturing 68(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57078-5

99.

Haq RHA et al (2018) Mechanical properties of PCL/PLA/PEG composite blended with different molecular weight (M W ) of PEG for Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) filament wire. Int J Integr Eng 10(5):187–192. https://doi.org/10.30880/ijie.2018.10.05.028MathSciNetCrossRef

100.

Menčík P et al (2018) Effect of selected commercial plasticizers on mechanical, thermal, and morphological properties of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate)/poly (lactic acid)/plasticizer biodegradable blends for three-dimensional (3d) print. Materials (Basel) 11(10):1893CrossRef

101.

Ou-Yang Q, Guo B, Xu J (2018) Preparation and characterization of poly (butylene succinate)/ polylactide blends for fused deposition modeling 3D printing. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b02549

102.

Kim J et al (2012) Rapid-prototyped PLGA/β-TCP/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite scaffolds in a rabbit femoral defect model. Biofabrication 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/4/2/025003

103.

Lei Y, Rai B, Ho KH, Teoh SH (2007) In vitro degradation of novel bioactive polycaprolactone-20% tricalcium phosphate composite scaffolds for bone engineering. Mater Sci Eng C 27(2):293–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2006.05.006CrossRef

104.

Alizadeh-Osgouei M, Li Y, Wen C (2019) A comprehensive review of biodegradable synthetic polymer-ceramic composites and their manufacture for biomedical applications. Bioact Mater 4(1):22–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2018.11.003CrossRef

105.

Liu Z, Lei Q, Xing S (2019) Mechanical characteristics of wood, ceramic, metal and carbon fiber-based PLA composites fabricated by FDM. J Mater Res Technol 8(5):3743–3753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.06.034CrossRef

106.

Abdullah AM, Rahim TN, Mohamad D, Akil HM, Rajion ZA (2017) Mechanical and physical properties of highly ZrO2 /β-TCP filled polyamide 12 prepared via fused deposition modelling (FDM) 3D printer for potential craniofacial reconstruction application. Mater Lett 189:307–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2016.11.052

107.

Chen G, Chen N, Wang Q (2019) Fabrication and properties of poly(vinyl alcohol)/β-tricalcium phosphate composite scaffolds via fused deposition modeling for bone tissue engineering. Compos Sci Technol 172(January):17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.01.004CrossRef

108.

Korpela J, Kokkari A, Korhonen H, Malin M, Närhi T, Seppälä J (2013) Biodegradable and bioactive porous scaffold structures prepared using fused deposition modeling. J Biomed Mater Res: Part B Appl Biomater 101(4):610–619. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.32863

109.

Wu D, Spanou A, Diez-Escudero A, Persson C (2019) 3D-printed PLA/HA composite structures as synthetic trabecular bone: a feasibility study using fused deposition modeling. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 103:103608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103608

110.

Ayrilmis N, Kariz M, Kwon JH, Kitek Kuzman M (2019) Effect of printing layer thickness on water absorption and mechanical properties of 3D-printed wood/PLA composite materials. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 102(5–8):2195–2200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03299-9

111.

Liu H, He H, Peng X, Huang B, Li J (2019) Three-dimensional printing of poly(lactic acid) bio-based composites with sugarcane bagasse fiber: effect of printing orientation on tensile performance. Polym Adv Technol 30(4):910–922. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.4524CrossRef

112.

Zhao D, Cai X, Shou G, Gu Y, Wang P (2016) Study on the preparation of bamboo plastic composite intend for additive manufacturing. Key Eng Mater 667:250–258. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.667.250CrossRef

113.

Daver F, Lee KPM, Brandt M, Shanks R (2018) Cork–PLA composite filaments for fused deposition modelling. Compos Sci Technol 168(October):230–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.10.008CrossRef

114.

Tao Y, Wang H, Li Z, Li P, Shi SQ (2017) Development and application ofwood flour-filled polylactic acid composite filament for 3d printing. Materials (Basel) 10(4):1–6. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10040339CrossRef

115.

Vaidya AA, Collet C, Gaugler M, Lloyd-Jones G (2019) Integrating softwood biorefinery lignin into polyhydroxybutyrate composites and application in 3D printing. Mater Today Commun 19(February):286–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.02.008CrossRef

116.

Tran TN et al (2017) Cocoa shell waste biofilaments for 3D printing applications. Macromol Mater Eng 302(11):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201700219CrossRef

117.

Frone AN et al (2020) Morpho-structural, thermal and mechanical properties of PLA/PHB/cellulose biodegradable nanocomposites obtained by compression molding, extrusion, and 3d printing. Nanomaterials 10(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10010051

118.

Petroudy SD (2017) Physical and mechanical properties of natural fibers. Adv High Strength Nat Fibre Compos Constr pp. 59–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100411-1.00003-0

119.

Hu R, Lim JK (2007) Fabrication and mechanical properties of completely biodegradable hemp fiber reinforced polylactic acid composites. J Compos Mater 41(13):1655–1669. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998306069878CrossRef

120.

Le Duigou A, Barbé A, Guillou E, Castro M (2019) 3D printing of continuous flax fibre reinforced biocomposites for structural applications. Mater Des 180:4–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107884CrossRef

121.

Hinchcliffe SA, Hess KM, Srubar WV (2016) Experimental and theoretical investigation of prestressed natural fiber-reinforced polylactic acid (PLA) composite materials. Compos Part B Eng 95:346–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.03.089CrossRef

122.

Depuydt D et al (2019) Production and characterization of bamboo and flax fiber reinforced polylactic acid filaments for fused deposition modeling (FDM). Polym Compos 40(5):1951–1963. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.24971CrossRef

123.

Le Duigou A, Castro M, Bevan R, Martin N (2016) 3D printing of wood fibre biocomposites: from mechanical to actuation functionality. Mater Des 96:106–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.018CrossRef

124.

Milosevic M, Stoof D, Pickering KL (2017) Characterizing the mechanical properties of fused deposition modelling natural fiber recycled polypropylene composites. J Compos Sci 1(1):7. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs1010007

125.

Tarrés Q, Melbø JK, Delgado-Aguilar M, Espinach FX, Mutjé P, Chinga-Carrasco G (2018) Bio-polyethylene reinforced with thermomechanical pulp fibers: mechanical and micromechanical characterization and its application in 3D-printing by fused deposition modelling. Compos Part B Eng 153(April):70–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.07.009CrossRef

126.

Thibaut C, Denneulin A, Rolland du Roscoat S, Beneventi D, Orgéas L, Chaussy D (2019) A fibrous cellulose paste formulation to manufacture structural parts using 3D printing by extrusion. Carbohydr Polym 212(January):119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.01.076CrossRef

127.

Andreeßen C, Steinbüchel A (2019) Recent developments in non-biodegradable biopolymers: precursors, production processes, and future perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 103(1):143–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-9483-6CrossRef

128.

Peng X (2019) Shape memory effect of three-dimensional printed products based on polypropylene / nylon 6 alloy. J Mater Sci 54(12):9235–9246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03366-2CrossRef

129.

Chen S, Lu J, Feng J (2018) 3D-printable ABS blends with improved scratch resistance and balanced mechanical performance. Ind Eng Chem Res 57(11):3923–3931. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b05074CrossRef

130.

Singh S, Singh R (2020) Mechanical characterization and comparison of additive manufactured ABS, Polyflex™ and ABS/Polyflex™ blended functional prototypes. Rapid Prototyp J 26(2):225–237. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-11-2017-0234CrossRef

131.

Ahmed O, Hasan S, Lal J (2017) Experimental investigation of time-dependent mechanical properties of PC-ABS prototypes processed by FDM additive manufacturing process. Mater Lett 193:58–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2017.01.104CrossRef

132.

Postiglione G, Natale G, Griffini G, Levi M, Turri S (2015) Composites : Part A Conductive 3D microstructures by direct 3D printing of polymer / carbon nanotube nanocomposites via liquid deposition modeling. Compos PART A 76:110–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.05.014CrossRef

133.

Fafenrot S, Grimmelsmann N, Wortmann M, Ehrmann A (2017) Three-dimensional (3D) printing of polymer-metal hybrid materials by fused deposition modeling. Materials 10(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10101199

134.

Sa’ude N, Masood SH, Nikzad M, Ibrahim M, Ibrahim MHI (2013) Dynamic mechanical properties of copper-ABS composites for FDM feedstock. Int J Eng Res Appl 3(3):1257–1263

135.

Nikzad M, Masood SH, Sbarski I, Groth A (2009) A study of melt flow analysis of an ABS-iron composite in fused deposition modelling process. Tsinghua Sci Technol 14(June):29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1007-0214(09)70063-XCrossRef

136.

Zhong W, Li F, Zhang Z, Song L, Li Z (2001) Short fiber reinforced composites for fused deposition modeling. Mater Sci Eng A 301(2):125–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01810-4CrossRef

137.

Thomason JL (2002) The influence of fibre length and concentration on the properties of glass fibre reinforced polypropylene: 5. Injection moulded long and short fibre PP. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 33(12):1641–1652. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00179-3CrossRef

138.

Ferreira I, Machado M, Alves F, Marques AT (2019) A review on fibre reinforced composite printing via FFF. Rapid Prototyp J 25(6):972–988. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-01-2019-0004

139.

Yao S, Jin F, Rhee KY, Hui D, Park S (2018) Recent advances in carbon-fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites: a review. Compos Part B. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.007CrossRef

140.

Li Q, Zhao W, Li Y, Yang W, Wang G (2019) Flexural properties and fracture behavior of CF/PEEK in orthogonal building orientation by FDM: microstructure and mechanism. Polymers 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11040656

141.

Tekinalp HL et al (2014) Highly oriented carbon fiber-polymer composites via additive manufacturing. Compos Sci Technol 105:144–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.009CrossRef

142.

Spoerk M et al (2018) Anisotropic properties of oriented short carbon fibre filled polypropylene parts fabricated by extrusion-based additive manufacturing. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 113:95–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.06.018CrossRef

143.

Matsuzaki R et al (2016) Three-dimensional printing of continuous-fiber composites by in-nozzle impregnation. Sci Rep 6(February):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23058CrossRef

144.

Justo J, Távara L, García-Guzmán L, París F (2018) Characterization of 3D printed long fibre reinforced composites. Compos Struct 185(2017):537–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.052

145.

Dickson AN, Barry JN, McDonnell KA, Dowling DP (2017) Fabrication of continuous carbon, glass and Kevlar fibre reinforced polymer composites using additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 16:146–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.06.004CrossRef

146.

Li N, Li Y, Liu S (2016) Rapid prototyping of continuous carbon fiber reinforced polylactic acid composites by 3D printing. J Mater Process Technol 238:218–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.07.025CrossRef

147.

Dong G, Tang Y, Li D, Zhao YF (2018) Mechanical properties of continuous kevlar fiber reinforced composites fabricated by fused deposition modeling process. Procedia Manuf 26:774–781CrossRef

148.

Farahani RD, Dubé M, Therriault D (2016) Three-dimensional printing of multifunctional nanocomposites: manufacturing techniques and applications. Adv Mater 28(28):5794–5821. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201506215CrossRef

149.

Ivanov E et al (2019) PLA/Graphene/MWCNT composites with improved electrical and thermal properties suitable for FDM 3D printing applications. Appl Sci 9(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/app9061209

150.

Sezer HK, Eren O (2019) FDM 3D printing of MWCNT re-inforced ABS nano-composite parts with enhanced mechanical and electrical properties. J Manuf Process 37(2018):339–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.12.004

151.

Weng Z, Wang J, Senthil T, Wu L (2016) Mechanical and thermal properties of ABS/montmorillonite nanocomposites for fused deposition modeling 3D printing. Mater Des 102:276–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.04.045CrossRef

152.

Coppola B, Cappetti N, Di Maio L, Scarfato P, Incarnato L (2018) 3D printing of PLA/clay nanocomposites: Influence of printing temperature on printed samples properties. Materials (Basel) 11(10):1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11101947CrossRef

153.

Kim H, Fernando T, Li M, Lin Y, Tseng TLB (2018) Fabrication and characterization of 3D printed BaTiO3/PVDF nanocomposites. J Compos Mater 52(2):197–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998317704709CrossRef

154.

Torrado Perez AR, Roberson DA, Wicker RB (2014) Fracture surface analysis of 3D-printed tensile specimens of novel ABS-based materials. J Fail Anal Prev 14(3):343–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-014-9803-9

155.

Tambrallimath V, Keshavamurthy R, Saravanabavan D, Koppad PG, Kumar GP (2019) Thermal behavior of PC-ABS based graphene filled polymer nanocomposite synthesized by FDM process. Compos Commun 15:129–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2019.07.009

156.

Masood SH, Mau K, Song WQ (2010) Tensile properties of processed FDM polycarbonate material. Mater Sci Forum 654–656:2556–2559. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.654-656.2556CrossRef

157.

Yeo A, Wong WJ, Teoh SH (2010) Surface modification of PCL-TCP scaffolds in rabbit calvaria defects: evaluation of scaffold degradation profile, biomechanical properties and bone healing patterns. J Biomed Mater Res - Part A 93(4):1358–1367. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32633CrossRef

158.

Galantucci LM, Lavecchia F, Percoco G (2008) Study of compression properties of topologically optimized FDM made structured parts. CIRP Ann - Manuf Technol 57(1):243–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2008.03.009CrossRef

159.

Lin W, Shen H, Xu G, Zhang L, Fu J, Deng X (2018) Single-layer temperature-adjusting transition method to improve the bond strength of 3D-printed PCL/PLA parts. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 115(September):22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.09.008CrossRef

160.

Peng X et al (2019) Shape memory effect of three-dimensional printed products based on polypropylene/nylon 6 alloy. J Mater Sci 54(12):9235–9246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03366-2CrossRef

161.

Szykiedans K, Credo W, Osiński D (2017) Selected mechanical properties of PETG 3-D prints. Procedia Eng 177:455–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.245CrossRef

162.

Luo J, Wang H, Zuo D, Ji A, Liu Y (2018) Research on the application of MWCNTs/PLA composite material in the manufacturing of conductive composite products in 3D printing. Micromachines 9(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/mi9120635

163.

Wang C et al (2019) Reinforcement of polylactic acid for fused deposition modeling process with nano particles treated bamboo powder. Polymers 11(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11071146

164.

Barkoula NM, Alcock B, Cabrera NO, Peijs T (2008) Flame-retardancy properties of intumescent ammonium poly (phosphate) and mineral filler magnesium hydroxide in combination with graphene. Polym Polym Compos 16(2):101–113

165.

Wang P, Zou B, Ding S, Huang C, Shi Z, Ma Y, Yao P (2020) Preparation of short CF/GF reinforced PEEK composite filaments and their comprehensive properties evaluation for FDM-3D printing. Compos B Eng 198:108175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108175

166.

Ou-Yang Q, Guo B, Xu J (2018) Preparation and characterization of poly(butylene succinate)/polylactide blends for fused deposition modeling 3D printing. ACS Omega 3(10):14309–14317. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b02549CrossRef

167.

Sa’ude N, Masood SH, Nikzad M, Ibrahim M, Ibrahim MHI (2013) Dynamic mechanical properties of copper-ABS composites for FDM feedstock. Int J Eng Res Appl 3(3):1257–1263

168.

Haq RH, Rahman MN, Ariffin AM, Hassan MF, Yunos MZ, Adzila S (2017) Characterization and mechanical analysis of PCL/PLA composites for FDM feedstock filament. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 226(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/226/1/012038

169.

Espalin D, Ramirez JA, Medina F, Wicker R (2014) Multi-material, multi-technology FDM: exploring build process variations. Rapid Prototyp J 20(3):236–244. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-12-2012-0112CrossRef

170.

Prashantha K, Roger F (2017) Multifunctional properties of 3D printed poly(lactic acid)/graphene nanocomposites by fused deposition modeling. J Macromol Sci Part A Pure Appl Chem 54(1):24–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/10601325.2017.1250311

171.

Samykano M, Selvamani SK, Kadirgama K, Ngui WK, Kanagaraj G, Sudhakar K (2019) Mechanical property of FDM printed ABS: influence of printing parameters. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 102(9–12):2779–2796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03313-0CrossRef

172.

Domingo-Espin M, Puigoriol-Forcada JM, Garcia-Granada AA, Llumà J, Borros S, Reyes G (2015) Mechanical property characterization and simulation of fused deposition modeling polycarbonate parts. Mater Des 83:670–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.074CrossRef

173.

Camargo JC, Machado ÁR, Almeida EC, Silva EFMS (2019) Mechanical properties of PLA-graphene filament for FDM 3D printing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 103(5–8):2423–2443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03532-5CrossRef

174.

Senatov FS, Niaza KV, Zadorozhnyy MY, Maksimkin AV, Kaloshkin SD, Estrin YZ (2016) Mechanical properties and shape memory effect of 3D-printed PLA-based porous scaffolds. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 57:139–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.11.036CrossRef

175.

Dawoud M, Taha I, Ebeid SJ (2016) Mechanical behaviour of ABS: An experimental study using FDM and injection moulding techniques. J Manuf Process 21:39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2015.11.002CrossRef

176.

Nabipour M, Akhoundi B, Bagheri Saed A (2019) Manufacturing of polymer/metal composites by fused deposition modeling process with polyethylene. J Appl Polym Sci 48717:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.48717

177.

Wang S et al (2019) Improving mechanical properties for extrusion-based additive manufacturing of poly(lactic acid) by annealing and blending with poly(3-hydroxybutyrate). Polymers (Basel) 11(9):1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11091529CrossRef

178.

Stoof D, Pickering K, Zhang Y (2017) Fused deposition modelling of natural fibre/polylactic acid composites. J Compos Sci 1(1):8. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs1010008

179.

Berretta S, Davies R, Shyng YT, Wang Y, Ghita O (2017) Fused deposition modelling of high temperature polymers: Exploring CNT PEEK composites. Polym Test 63:251–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.08.024CrossRef

180.

Carneiro OS, Silva AF, Gomes R (2015) Fused deposition modeling with polypropylene. Mater Des 83:768–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.053CrossRef

181.

Dul S, Fambri L, Pegoretti A (2016) Fused deposition modelling with ABS–graphene nanocomposites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 85:181–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.03.013CrossRef

182.

Dul S, Fambri L, Pegoretti A (2018) Filaments production and fused deposition modelling of ABS/carbon nanotubes composites. Nanomaterials 8(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8010049

183.

Chen G, Chen N, Wang Q (2019) Fabrication and properties of poly(vinyl alcohol)/β-tricalcium phosphate composite scaffolds via fused deposition modeling for bone tissue engineering. Compos Sci Technol 172:17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.01.004CrossRef

184.

Durgashyam K, Reddy MI, Balakrishna A, Satyanarayana K (2019) Experimental investigation on mechanical properties of PETG material processed by fused deposition modeling method. Mater Today: Proceedings 18:2052–2059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.082

185.

Mercado-Colmenero JM, Dolores La Rubia M, Mata-Garcia E, Rodriguez-Santiago M, Martin-Doñate C (2020) Experimental and numerical analysis for the mechanical characterization of petg polymers manufactured with fdm technology under pure uniaxial compression stress states for architectural applications. Polymers (Basel) 12(10):1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12102202CrossRef

186.

Wach RA, Wolszczak P, Adamus‐Wlodarczyk A (2018) Enhancement of mechanical properties of FDM-PLA parts via thermal annealing. Macromol Mater Eng 303(9). https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201800169

187.

Kang Y et al (2011) Enhanced mechanical performance and biological evaluation of a PLGA coated β-TCP composite scaffold for load-bearing applications. Eur Polym J 47(8):1569–1577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2011.05.004CrossRef

188.

Afrose MF, Masood SH, Iovenitti P, Nikzad M, Sbarski I (2016) Effects of part build orientations on fatigue behaviour of FDM-processed PLA material. Prog Addit Manuf 1(1–2):21–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-015-0002-3CrossRef

189.

Ding S, Zou B, Wang P, Ding H (2019) Effects of nozzle temperature and building orientation on mechanical properties and microstructure of PEEK and PEI printed by 3D-FDM. Polym Test 78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.105948

190.

Yang L et al (2019) Effects of carbon nanotube on the thermal, mechanical, and electrical properties of PLA/CNT printed parts in the FDM process. Synth Met 253(2018):122–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synthmet.2019.05.008

191.

Afrose MF, Masood SH, Nikzad M, Iovenitti P (2014) Effects of build orientations on tensile properties of PLA material processed by FDM. Adv Mater Res 1044–1045:31–34. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1044-1045.31CrossRef

192.

Yu N, Sun X, Wang Z, Zhang D, Li J (2020) Effects of auxiliary heat on warpage and mechanical properties in carbon fiber/ABS composite manufactured by fused deposition modeling. Mater Des 195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108978

193.

Kariz M, Sernek M, Obućina M, Kuzman MK (2018) Effect of wood content in FDM filament on properties of 3D printed parts. Mater Today Commun 14:135–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2017.12.016CrossRef

194.

Menčík P et al (2018) Effect of selected commercial plasticizers on mechanical, thermal, and morphological properties of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)/Poly(lactic acid)/plasticizer biodegradable blends for three-dimensional (3D) print. Materials 11(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11101893

195.

Abbas T, Othman FM, Ali HB (2017) Effect of infill parameter on compression property in FDM process. Int J Eng Res Appl 7:16–19. https://www.ijera.comhttps://doi.org/10.9790/9622-0710021619

196.

Wang L, Gardner DJ (2017) Effect of fused layer modeling (FLM) processing parameters on impact strength of cellular polypropylene. Polymer (Guildf) 113:74–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2017.02.055CrossRef

197.

Hill N, Haghi M (2014) Deposition direction-dependent failure criteria for fused deposition modeling polycarbonate. Rapid Prototyp J 20(3):221–227. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-04-2013-0039CrossRef

198.

Kesavarma S, Kong CK, Samykano M, Kadirgama K, Pandey AK (2020) Bending properties of 3D printed coconut wood-PLA composite. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 736(5). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/736/5/052031

199.

Aydogdu MO et al (2018) Comparative characterization of the hydrogel added PLA/β-TCP scaffolds produced by 3D bioprinting. Bioprinting 13(December):2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2019.e00046CrossRef

200.

Garg A, Bhattacharya A, Batish A (2017) Chemical vapor treatment of ABS parts built by FDM: analysis of surface finish and mechanical strength. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89(5–8):2175–2191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9257-1CrossRef

201.

Wang Q, Ji C, Sun L, Sun J, Liu J (2020) Cellulose nanofibrils filled poly (lactic acid) biocomposite filament for FDM 3D printing. Molecules 25(10):2319. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25102319CrossRef

202.

Nadooshan AA, Daneshmand S, Aghanajafi C (2007) Application of RP technology with polycarbonate material for wind tunnel model fabrication. Int J Aerosp Mech Eng 1(8):371–376

203.

Hanon MM, Marczis R, Zsidai L (2019) Anisotropy evaluation of different raster directions, spatial orientations, and fill percentage of 3D printed PETG tensile test specimens. In Key engineering materials, vol 821. Trans Tech Publications Ltd, pp 167–173

204.

Spoerk M et al (2018) Anisotropic properties of oriented short carbon fibre filled polypropylene parts fabricated by extrusion-based additive manufacturing. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 113:95–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.06.018CrossRef

205.

Ahn SH, Montero M, Odell D, Roundy S, Wright PK (2002) Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS 8(4)

206.

Editor S, Davim JP, Shunmugam MS (2018) Lecture notes on multidisciplinary industrial engineering advances in unconventional machining and composites

207.

Anna V (2014) Ac Sc Ac Sc. Int J Refrig 43:36–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.029.ThisCrossRef

208.

Mostafa N, Syed HM, Igor S, Andrew G (2009) A study of melt flow analysis of an ABS-iron composite in fused deposition modelling process. Tsinghua Sci Technol 14(SUPPL. 1):29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1007-0214(09)70063-XCrossRef

209.

Mercado-Colmenero JM, Rubio-Paramio MA, Dolores La Rubia M, Lozano-Arjona D, Martin-Doñate C (2019) A numerical and experimental study of the compression uniaxial properties of PLA manufactured with FDM technology based on product specifications. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 103(5–8):1893–1909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03626-0CrossRef

210.

Francis V, Jain PK (2018) A filament modification approach for in situ ABS/OMMT nanocomposite development in extrusion-based 3D printing. J Brazilian Soc Mech Sci Eng 40(7). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1282-6.

211.

Thibaut C, Denneulin A, Du Roscoat SR, Beneventi D, Orgéas L, Chaussy D (2019) A fibrous cellulose paste formulation to manufacture structural parts using 3D printing by extrusion. Carbohydr Polym 212(2018):119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.01.076

212.

Yu J, Xu Y, Li S, Seifert GV, Becker ML (2017) Three-dimensional printing of nano hydroxyapatite/poly(ester urea) composite scaffolds with enhanced bioactivity. Biomacromol 18(12):4171–4183. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.7b01222CrossRef

213.

Schirmeister CG, Hees T, Licht EH, Mülhaupt R (2019) 3D printing of high density polyethylene by fused filament fabrication. Addit Manuf 28(May):152–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.05.003CrossRef

214.

Jiao Z, Luo B, Xiang S, Ma H, Yu Y, Yang W (2019) 3D printing of HA / PCL composite tissue engineering scaffolds. Adv Ind Eng Polym Res 2(4):196–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiepr.2019.09.003CrossRef

215.

Guerra AJ, Cano P, Rabionet M, Puig T, Ciurana J (2018) 3D-printed PCL/PLA composite stents: towards a new solution to cardiovascular problems. Materials (Basel) 11(9):1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11091679CrossRef

216.

Nikzad M, Masood SH, Sbarski I (2011) Thermo-mechanical properties of a highly filled polymeric composites for Fused deposition modeling. Mater Des 32(6):3448–3456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.01.056CrossRef

217.

Groza JR, Shackelford JF (eds) (2007) Materials processing handbook. CRC press

218.

Mohamed OA, Masood SH, Bhowmik JL (2015) Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters: a review of current research and future prospects. Adv Manuf 3(1):42–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-014-0097-7CrossRef

219.

Es-Said OS, Foyos J, Noorani R, Mendelson M, Marloth R, Pregger BA (2000) Effect of layer orientation on mechanical properties of rapid prototyped samples. Mater Manuf Process 15(1):107–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426910008912976CrossRef

220.

Chouksey A (2012) Study of parametric optimization of fused deposition modelling process using response surface methodology. Doctoral dissertation

221.

Chaturvedi V (2009) Parametric optimization of fused deposition modeling using response surface methodology. Doctoral dissertation

222.

Nancharaiah T, Raju DR, Raju VR (2010) An experimental investigation on surface quality and dimensional accuracy of FDM components. Int J Emerg Technol 1(2):106–111

223.

Sood AK, Ohdar RK, Mahapatra SS (2010) Parametric appraisal of fused deposition modelling process using the grey Taguchi method. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B 224(1):135–145. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544054JEM1565

224.

Arumaikkannu SGG, Uma Maheshwaraa N (2001) A genetic algorithm with design of experiments approach to predict the optimal process parameters for FDM p. 43

225.

Srinivasan R, Kumar KN, Ibrahim AJ, Anandu KV, Gurudhevan R (2020) Impact of fused deposition process parameter (infill pattern) on the strength of PETG part. Materials Today: Proceedings 27:1801–1805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.777

226.

Lužanin O, Movrin D, Plančak M (2014) Effect of layer thickness, deposition angle, and infill on maximum flexural force in FDM-built specimens. J Technol Plast 39(1):49–58

227.

Vinitha M, Rao AN, Mallik MK (2012) Optimization of speed parameters in burnishing of samples fabricated by fused deposition modeling. Int J Mech Ind Eng 2(2):10–12

228.

van Manen T, Janbaz S, Zadpoor AA (2018) Programming the shape-shifting of flat soft matter 21(2)

229.

Rayegani F, Onwubolu GC (2014) Fused deposition modelling (fdm) process parameter prediction and optimization using group method for data handling (gmdh) and differential evolution (de). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73(1–4):509–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5835-2CrossRef

230.

Vasudevarao B, Natarajan DP, Henderson M, Razdan A (2000) Sensitivity of RP surface finish to process parameter variation 251. In: 2000 International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium

231.

Mohamed OA, Masood SH, Bhowmik JL (2017) Experimental investigation of creep deformation of part processed by fused deposition modeling using definitive screening design. Addit Manuf 18:164–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.10.013CrossRef

232.

Peng A, Xiao X, Yue R (2014) Process parameter optimization for fused deposition modeling using response surface methodology combined with fuzzy inference system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73(1–4):87–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5796-5CrossRef

233.

Sood AK, Ohdar RK, Mahapatra SS (2009) Improving dimensional accuracy of fused deposition modelling processed part using grey Taguchi method. Mater Des 30(10):4243–4252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.04.030CrossRef

234.

Montero M, Roundy S, Odell D, Ahn S-H, Wright PK (2001) Material characterization of fused deposition modeling (FDM) ABS by designed experiments. Soc Manuf Eng 10(13552540210441166):1–21

235.

Durgun I, Ertan R (2014) Experimental investigation of FDM process for improvement of mechanical properties and production cost. Rapid Prototyp J 20(3):228–235. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-10-2012-0091CrossRef

236.

Gurrala PK, Regalla SP (2012) Optimization of support material and build time in fused deposition modeling (FDM). Appl Mech Mater 110–116:2245–2251. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.110-116.2245

237.

Alafaghani A, Qattawi A (2018) Investigating the effect of fused deposition modeling processing parameters using Taguchi design of experiment method. J Manuf Process 36(June):164–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.09.025CrossRef

238.

Peace GS (1993) Taguchi methods: a hands-on approach. Addison Wesley Publishing Company

239.

Roy RK (2010) A primer on the Taguchi method. Society of Manufacturing Engineers

240.

Mohamed OA, Masood SH, Bhowmik JL (2017) Process parameter optimization of viscoelastic properties of FDM manufactured parts using response surface methodology. Mater Today Proc 4(8):8250–8259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.07.167CrossRef

241.

Zhang J, Peng A (2012) Process-parameter optimization for fused deposition modeling based on Taguchi method. Adv Mater Res 538–541:444–447. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.538-541.444CrossRef

242.

Nancharaiah T (2011) Optimization of process parameters in fdm process using design of experiments. Int J Emerg Technol 2(1):100–102

243.

Mohamed OA, Masood SH, Bhowmik JL (2016) Mathematical modeling and FDM process parameters optimization using response surface methodology based on Q-optimal design. Appl Math Model 40(23–24):10052–10073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2016.06.055CrossRefMATH

244.

Nagendra J, Prasad MSG (2020) FDM process parameter optimization by Taguchi technique for augmenting the mechanical properties of nylon–aramid composite used as filament material. J Inst Eng Ser C 101(2):313–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-019-00538-6CrossRef

245.

Wankhede V, Jagetiya D, Joshi A, Chaudhari R (2019) Experimental investigation of FDM process parameters using Taguchi analysis. Mater Today Proc 27:2117–2120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.09.078CrossRef

246.

Dong G, Wijaya G, Tang Y, Zhao YF (2018) Optimizing process parameters of fused deposition modeling by Taguchi method for the fabrication of lattice structures. Addit Manuf 19:62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.11.004CrossRef

247.

Sood AK, Ohdar RK, Mahapatra SS (2010) Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts. Mater Des 31(1):287–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.016CrossRef

248.

Sood AK, Ohdar RK, Mahapatra SS (2012) Experimental investigation and empirical modelling of FDM process for compressive strength improvement. J Adv Res 3(1):81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2011.05.001CrossRef

249.

Letcher T, Waytashek M (2016) Material property testing of 3D-printed specimen in PLA on an entry-level 3D printer. InASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition pp. 1–8

250.

Türk DA, Brenni F, Zogg M, Meboldt M (2017) Mechanical characterization of 3D printed polymers for fiber reinforced polymers processing. Mater Des 118:256–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.01.050CrossRef

251.

Letcher T (2017) Imece2015–52634 experimental study of mechanical properties of additively. ASME 2015 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (IMECE2015), Houston 2015:1–8

252.

Reese R (2015) Imece2015–52209 mechanical properties of additively manufactured peek components using fused. ASME 2015 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition 2015:1–11

253.

Fatimatuzahraa AW, Farahaina B, Yusoff WA (2011) The effect of employing different raster orientations on the mechanical properties and microstructure of Fused Deposition Modeling parts. 2011 IEEE Symposium on Business, Engineering and Industrial Applications (ISBEIA 2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBEIA.2011.6088811

254.

Shojib Hossain M, Espalin D, Ramos J, Perez M, Wicker R (2014) Improved mechanical properties of fused deposition modeling-manufactured parts through build parameter modifications. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. Trans. ASME 136(6). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4028538

255.

Ognjan L, Vera G, Ivan R, Simon M (2017) Investigating impact of five build parameters on the maximum flexural force in FDM specimens – a definitive screening design approach. Rapid Prototyp J 23(6):1088–1098. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-09-2015-0116CrossRef

256.

Caminero MA, Chacón JM, García-Moreno I, Rodríguez GP (2018) Impact damage resistance of 3D printed continuous fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modelling Compos B Eng 148(93):103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.054

257.

Liu Z, Lei Q, Xing S (2019) Mechanical characteristics of wood, ceramic, metal and carbon fiber-based PLA composites fabricated by FDM. J Market Res 8(5):3743–3753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.06.034CrossRef

258.

Corcione CE et al (2019) Highly loaded hydroxyapatite microsphere/ PLA porous scaffolds obtained by fused deposition modelling. Ceram Int 45(2):2803–2810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.07.297

259.

Ning F, Cong W, Qiu J, Wei J, Wang S (2015) Additive manufacturing of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modeling. Compos Part B Eng 80:369–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.013CrossRef

260.

Caminero MA, Chacón JM, García-Moreno I, Rodríguez GP (2018) Impact damage resistance of 3D printed continuous fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modelling. Compos Part B Eng 148(March):93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.054CrossRef

261.

Tekinalp HL et al (2018) High modulus biocomposites via additive manufacturing: cellulose nanofibril networks as ‘microsponges.’ Compos Part B Eng 173(May):2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.028CrossRef

262.

Stoof D, Pickering K, Zhang Y (2017) Fused deposition modelling of natural fibre/polylactic acid composites. J Compos Sci 1(2):8. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs1010008

263.

Yang L et al (2019) Effects of carbon nanotube on the thermal, mechanical, and electrical properties of PLA/CNT printed parts in the FDM process. Synth Met 253(May):122–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synthmet.2019.05.008CrossRef

264.

265.

Xu N et al (2014) 3D artificial bones for bone repair prepared by computed tomography-guided fused deposition modeling for bone repair. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6(17):14952–14963. https://doi.org/10.1021/am502716tCrossRef

266.

Nyberg E, Rindone A, Dorafshar A, Grayson WL (2017) Comparison of 3D-printed poly-ϵ-caprolactone scaffolds functionalized with tricalcium phosphate, hydroxyapatite, Bio-Oss, or decellularized bone matrix. Tissue Eng - Part A 23(11–12):503–514. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2016.0418CrossRef

267.

Van Hemelrijck D, Strantza M, Angelis D, De Baere D, Guillaume P (2016) Additive manufacturing: the next industrial revolution? In: 23rd International Acoustic Emission Symposium, the Inauguration Conference of International Institute of Innovative Acoustic Emission & the 8th International Conference on Acoustic Emission. pp 275–280. Accessed 13 Nov 2020

268.

Vashishtha VK (2011) Advancement of rapid prototyping in aerospace industry -a review. Sci Technol 3(3):2486–2493

269.

Ridha Ben Mansour ZA, Mohamed O (2014) Ac Sc Ac Sc. Int J Refrig 43:36–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.003.This

270.

Turco E, Golaszewski M, Giorgio I, Annibale FD (2017) AC. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.02.039.This

271.

Chua CK, Leong KF, Lim CS (2010) Rapid prototyping: principles and applications (with companion CD-ROM). World Scientific Publishing Company

272.

Hiemenz J (2013) Additive Manufacturing trends in aerospace. Addit Manuf p. 6. [Online]. Available: https://www.stratasys.com

273.

Najmon JC, Raeisi S, Tovar A (2019) Review of additive manufacturing technologies and applications in the aerospace industry. Elsevier Inc.

274.

MacDonald E et al (2014) 3D printing for the rapid prototyping of structural electronics. IEEE Access 2:234–242. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2014.2311810CrossRef

275.

Leigh SJ, Bradley RJ, Purssell CP, Billson DR, Hutchins DA (2012) A simple, low-cost conductive composite material for 3D printing of electronic sensors. PLoS One 7(11):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049365CrossRef

276.

Manzanares Palenzuela CL, Novotný F, Krupička P, Sofer Z, Pumera M (2018) 3D-printed graphene/polylactic acid electrodes promise high sensitivity in electroanalysis. Anal Chem 90(9):5753–5757. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00083

277.

dos Santos PL et al (2019) Enhanced performance of 3D printed graphene electrodes after electrochemical pre-treatment: Role of exposed graphene sheets. Sensors Actuators B Chem 281(2018):837–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2018.11.013

278.

Junpha J, Wisitsoraat A, Prathumwan R, Chaengsawang W, Khomungkhun K, Subannajui K (2020) Electronic tongue and cyclic voltammetric sensors based on carbon nanotube/polylactic composites fabricated by fused deposition modelling 3D printing. Mater Sci Eng C 117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.111319

279.

Dawoud M, Taha I, Ebeid SJ (2017) Strain sensing behaviour of 3D printed carbon black filled ABS. J Manuf Process 35(2017):337–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.08.012

280.

Meaney JF, Goyen M (2007) Recent advances in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. Eur Radiol 17

281.

Murphy SV, Atala A (2014) 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol 32(8):773–785. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958CrossRef

282.

Lam CXF, Hutmacher DW, Schantz JT, Woodruff MA, Teoh SH (2009) Evaluation of polycaprolactone scaffold degradation for 6 months in vitro and in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res A 90(3):906–919. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32052CrossRef

283.

Teixeira BN, Aprile P, Mendonca RH, Kelly DJ, Thiré RM (2019) Evaluation of bone marrow stem cell response to PLA scaffolds manufactured by 3D printing and coated with polydopamine and type I collagen. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 107(1):37–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34093

284.

Rasoulianboroujeni M et al (2019) Development of 3D-printed PLGA/TiO 2 nanocomposite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications. Mater Sci Eng C 96(2018):105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.10.077

285.

Scoutaris N, Ross SA, Douroumis D (2018) 3D printed ‘Starmix’ drug loaded dosage forms for paediatric applications. Pharm Res 35(2):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-017-2284-2CrossRef

286.

Chai X et al (2017) Fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printed tablets for intragastric floating delivery of domperidone. Sci Rep 7(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03097-xCrossRef

287.

Khoshnevis B (2004) Automated construction by contour crafting - Related robotics and information technologies. Autom Constr 13(1):5–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2003.08.012CrossRef

288.

Alexandrea P (2017) 3D Printed Architecture: Top 12 Most Stunning Buildings - 3Dnatives. https://www.3dnatives.com/en/3d-printed-architecture030520174/ (Accessed data 23 Nov 2020)

289.

3D printed house: could it be a sustainable solution for future construction in Asia? Asia Green Buildings. http://www.asiagreenbuildings.com/8270/3d-printed-house-sustainable-solution-future-construction-asia/. Accessed 24 Nov 2020

290.

3D printers for aerospace industry. Purple Platypus. https://purpleplatypus.com/resources/industries/aerospace/. Accessed 26 Nov 2020

291.

Podsiadły B, Skalski A, Słoma M (2020) Conductive ABS/Ni composite filaments for fused deposition modeling of structural electronics. Adv Intell Syst Comput 1044:62–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29993-4_8CrossRef

292.

Creating realistic imaging simulations with 3D printed phantoms. Stratasys. https://www.stratasys.com/explore/case-study/3d-printed-phantoms?returnUrl=%2Fexplore%3FPage%3D1%26Phrase%3D%26Industries%3D%257BA56B5FEB-FAFE-4ABD-B3F3-850E854DC96C%257D. Accessed 26 Nov 2020

293.

Hager I, Golonka A, Putanowicz R (2016) 3D printing of buildings and building components as the future of sustainable construction? Procedia Engineering 151:292–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.357CrossRef

294.

Stipek R (2016) FDM additive manufacturing and its impact on the automotive industry. Fisher Unitech. https://www.cati.com/blog/2016/08/fdm-additive-manufacturing-impact-automotive-industry/ (Accessed date 25 Jan 2021)

295.

Mohan N, Senthil P, Vinodh S, Jayanth N (2017) A review on composite materials and process parameters optimisation for the fused deposition modelling process. Virtual Phys Prototyp 12(1):47–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2016.1274490CrossRef

Titel: Fused deposition modeling: process, materials, parameters, properties, and applications
verfasst von: Kumaresan Rajan
Mahendran Samykano
Kumaran Kadirgama
Wan Sharuzi Wan Harun
Md. Mustafizur Rahman
Publikationsdatum: 26.02.2022
Verlag: Springer London
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology / Ausgabe 3-4/2022
Print ISSN: 0268-3768
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-08860-7

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Graphical abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3-4/2022

3D hardness profile mapping and geometrical defect prediction of laser-welded galvanized steel blanks using wobbling technology: an experimental investigation

Multi-track, multi-layer dendrite growth and solid phase transformation analysis during additive manufacturing of H13 tool steel using a combined hybrid cellular automata/phase field, solid-state phase prediction models

A feedback-based print quality improving strategy for FDM 3D printing: an optimal design approach

Surface topography by water jet-guided laser texturing on wettability of monocrystalline silicon

Flow field simulation and experimental investigation on macro electrolyte jet electrochemical turning of TB6 titanium alloy

The influence of process parameters on the preparation of closed-cell aluminum foam by friction stir processing

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten